↓
 
Home→New Essays→CHILD SEXUALITY

CHILD SEXUALITY

56thst.com Posted on by
Wikipedia
The Free Encyclopedia

Search

Contents

hide

Child sexuality

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

  • SmallStandardLarge

Width

  • StandardWide

Color (beta)

  • AutomaticLightDark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sexual behaviors in children are common, and may range from normal and developmentally appropriate to abusive.[1] These behaviors may include self-stimulation, interest in sex, curiosity about their own or other genders, exhibitionism (the display of one’s body to another child or an adult), voyeurism (attempts at seeing the body of another child or an adult), gender role behaviors,[2] and engagement in interpersonal sexual acts.

More than 50% of children will engage in a form of sexual behavior before the age of 13 (around puberty), including sexual experiences with other children.[1] These experiences can include fondling, interpersonal genital exploration and masturbation; while intrusive contact (digital penetration, oral or genito-genital contact, etc) is more rare.[3]

Sexual behaviors

Curiosity

Although there are variations between individual children, children are generally curious about their bodies and those of others and explore their bodies through explorative sex play.[4][5] “Playing doctor” is one example of such childhood exploration; such games are generally considered to be normal in young children. Child sexuality is considered fundamentally different from adult sexual behavior, which is more goal-driven. Among children, genital penetration and oral-genital contact are very uncommon,[6] and may be perceived as imitations of adult behaviors.[7] Such behaviors are more common among children who have been sexually abused.[8]

According to the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, children have a natural curiosity about their own bodies and the bodies of others that ought to be addressed in an age-appropriate manner. According to the report:[9]

  • Children less than four years old will sometimes touch their own private parts or look at the private parts of others.
  • From the ages of three to seven, children are typically curious about where babies come from. They may explore other children’s and adults’ bodies out of curiosity and also begin to have a sense of learned modesty and of the differences between private and public behaviors. For some children, genital touching increases, especially when they are tired or upset.[10] They may attempt to see others dressing or undressing or will perhaps “play doctor”.
  • Between ages six and twelve, children may start to expand their curiosity to images of undressed people available in the media. They may develop a need for privacy regarding their own bodies and begin to be sexually attracted to peers.

Masturbation

Some children partake in genital stimulation at an early age.[11] By the age of 8 or 9, some children become aware that sexual arousal is a specific type of erotic sensation and will seek these pleasurable experiences through various sights, self-touches, and fantasy.[12]

Interpersonal sexual experiences

Many children take part in some sex play, typically with siblings or friends. Sex play with others usually decreases as children go through their elementary school years, yet they still may possess romantic interest in their peers. Curiosity levels remain high during these years, escalating in puberty (roughly the teenage years) when the main surge in sexual interest occurs.[13]

Mutual masturbation or other sexual experimentation between adolescents of similar ages may also occur, though cultural or religious coercion may inhibit or encourage concealment of such activity if there is negative peer pressure or if authority figures are likely to disapprove.[11]

A 1997 study based on limited variables found no correlation between early childhood (age 6 and under) peer sexual play and later adjustment. The study notes that its results do not demonstrate conclusively that no such correlation exists. The study also does not address the question of consequences of intense sexual experiences or aggressive or unwanted experiences.[14]

A Finnish study found that 2.4% of its respondents had sexual experiences with someone at least five years older during childhood. The disclosure of such experiences to adults or peers was conditioned largely by whether violence was employed during the act and the quality of the experience (participants who did not label the experience as abuse, which represented 51% of the sample, were less likely to report it to adults, but not peers).[15]

Discovery of sex differences

“Why do you not want to be a girl? Because I do not want to pee with nothing.” Illustration by Martin van Maële in La Grande Danse macabre des vifs, 1905.

With the passage of time, children become more aware of sex differences, and tend to choose same-sex friends and playmates, sometimes disparaging the opposite sex.[16] Children may drop their close attachment to their opposite-sex parent and become more attached to their same-sex parent.[10]

During this time, children, especially girls, show increased awareness of social norms regarding sex, nudity, and privacy.[17] Children may use sexual terms to test adult reaction.[10] “Bathroom humor” (jokes and conversation relating to excretory functions), present in earlier stages, continues.[18]

As this stage progresses, the choices of children picking same-sex friends becomes more marked and extends to disparagement of the opposite sex.[19]

Sexual development

Childcare

In childcare settings outside the home there is difficulty in determining what behavior is normal and what may be indicative of child sexual abuse (CSA). In 2018 an extensive study of Danish childcare institutions (which had, in the prior century, been tolerant of child nudity and playing doctor) found that contemporary policy had become restrictive as the result of childcare workers being charged with CSA. However, while CSA does occur, the response may be due to “moral panic” that is out of proportion with its actual frequency and over-reaction may have unintended consequences. Strict policies are being implemented not to protect children from a rare threat, but to protect workers from the accusation of CSA. The policies have created a split between childcare workers who continue to believe that behaviors involving nudity are a normal part of child development and those that advocate that children be closely supervised to prohibit such behavior.[20]

Puberty

Main article: Puberty

Research

Studies on children’s sexual behaviors are scarce.[21] Empirical knowledge about child sexual behavior is not usually gathered by direct interviews of children, partly due to ethical consideration.[8] Information about child sexual behavior is gathered by observing children being treated for problematic behavior, such as use of force in sex play,[22] often using anatomically correct dolls;[23] Recollections by adults[24] and observation by caregivers.[25]

Most published sexual research material emanates from the Western world.[26]

Early 20th century

Until Sigmund Freud published his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality in 1905, children were often regarded as asexual, having no sexuality until later development. Freud was one of the first researchers to seriously study child sexuality, and his acknowledgment of its existence was a significant change.[13]

Aside from Freud, the modern shift from childhood sexuality being understood as a pathological concept to a normal part of child behavior was also influenced by Albert Moll, Carl Jung, William Stern and Charlotte Bühler. Although Freud is usually regarded as the central figure in the “discovery of childhood sexuality”, his work was influenced by an already existing discussion around this topic that started in the second half of the 19th century.[27]

Kinsey

Alfred Kinsey in the Kinsey Reports (1948 and 1953) included research on the physical sexual response of children, including pre-pubescent children (though the main focus of the reports was adults). While there were initially concerns that some of the data in his reports could not have been obtained without observation of or participation in child sexual abuse,[28] the data was revealed much later in the 1990s to have been gathered from the diary of a single pedophile who had been molesting children since 1917.[29][30] This effectively rendered the data-set nearly worthless, not only because it relied entirely on a single source, but the data was hearsay reported by a highly unreliable observer. In 2000, Swedish researcher Ing-Beth Larsson noted, “It is quite common for references still to cite Alfred Kinsey”, due to the scarcity of subsequent large-scale studies of child sexual behavior.[8]

Contemporary issues

In the latter part of the 20th century, sexual liberation probably arose in the context of a massive cultural explosion in the United States of America following the upheaval of the Second World War, and the vast quantity of audiovisual media distributed worldwide by the new electronic and information technology. Children are apt to gain access and be influenced by material, despite censorship and content-control software.[31]

Sex education

Main article: Sex education

The extent of sex education in public schools varies widely around the world, and within countries such as the United States where course content is determined by individual school districts.

A series of sex education videos from Norway, intended for 8–12 year olds, includes explicit information and images of reproduction, anatomy, and the changes that are normal with the approach of puberty. Rather than diagrams or photos, the videos are shot in a locker room with live nude people of all ages. The presenter, a physician, is relaxed about close examination and touching of relevant body parts, including genitals. While the videos note that the age of consent in Norway is 16, abstinence is not emphasized. As of 2015, however, 37 U.S. states required that sex education curricula include lessons on abstinence and 25 required that a “just say no” approach be stressed. Studies show that early and complete sex education does not increase the likelihood of becoming sexually active, but leads to better health outcomes overall.[32]

Social media’s role on child sexuality

The impact of social media on adolescent sexuality is a multifaceted concern requiring ongoing research for a comprehensive understanding. Research suggests that exposure to sexual content on social media can influence adolescents’ sexual attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, given their vulnerable state during this developmental period when gender roles, sexual attitudes, and behaviors are actively being shaped.[33][34] Studies have identified a positive association between high-frequency social media use and increased sexual risk behaviors among adolescents.[34]

Exposure to sexual displays on social media sites has been linked to problematic beliefs and behaviors among both content creators and viewers, particularly affecting adolescents who are more susceptible to these effects and may encourage risky sexual behavior, associated with an increase in sexually transmitted infection rates and unintended pregnancies.[35][36] Social media can have both positive and negative effects on the sexual orientation of children and adolescents. For instance, it may provide a safe space for sexual identity exploration and expression for LGBTQ+ youth, fostering connectivity, social support, and positive impacts on well-being.[35][37] While early adopters of the LGBTQ+ identity within the youth use social media to understand their sexuality and connect with like-minded individuals, contributing to improved emotional support and development,[33] it’s important to note that social media can also expose children to inaccurate and potentially harmful information about sexuality, perpetuate risky sexual behaviors, and provide anonymity to potential dangers,[38] further covered in the proceeding sections.

Sexualization of children

“Nude boy and dog in garden” by Wilhelm von Gloeden (c. 1900)
Luchino Visconti, Sergio Garfagnoli and Björn Andrésen during the filming of Death in Venice in 1970

Over recent decades, children have been subject to a premature sexualization, as indicated by a level of sexual knowledge or sexual behavior not previously normal for their age group.[39] The causes of this premature sexualization that have been cited include portrayals in the media of sex and related issues, especially in media aimed at children; the marketing of products with sexual connotations to children, including clothing; the lack of parental oversight and discipline; access to adult culture via the internet; and the lack of comprehensive school sex education programs.[40][41] For girls and young women in particular, studies have found that sexualization has a negative impact on their “self-image and healthy development”.[42]

The cinema industry has frequently received accusations of sexualizing minors, objectifying the bodies of young girls, and reinforcing sexist attitudes among children.[43] Advertisers often portray young girls as older than their actual age and engaging in behaviors associated with adult women.[44] Child actors occasionally disagree with the use of their likeness by media executives; Brooke Shields unsuccessfully tried to stop nude photographs of her from publication and Björn Andrésen felt that director Luchino Visconti sexualized his appearance following the release of Death in Venice.[45] In 2017, Finn Wolfhard received numerous sexualized comments from media executives and asked interviewers to stop making these statements in public.[46]

Social media has been associated with an increase in child sexual exploitation and abuse. Reports indicate that social media platforms have become a pipeline for the rapid spread of child sexual abuse material (CSAM), leading to an alarming increase in the dissemination of such content.[47][48][49] Further, child predators use social media to identify and groom potential victims, and the closed or private social media groups enable them to connect with like-minded peers and trade tips on how to secretly record and share CSAM.[48]

Child sexual abuse

Main article: Child sexual abuse

Child sexual abuse is defined as an adult or older adolescent having a sexual relationship with a child.[50][51] Effects of child sexual abuse include clinical depression,[52] post-traumatic stress disorder,[53] anxiety,[54] propensity to further victimization in adulthood,[55] and physical injury to the child, among other problems.[56]

Child sexual abuse by a family member is a form of incest, and can result in more serious and long-term psychological trauma, especially in the case of parental incest.[40][57]

Children who have been the victim of child sexual abuse sometimes display overly sexualized behavior,[58][59] which may be defined as expressed behavior that is non-normative for the culture. Typical symptomatic behaviors may include excessive or public masturbation and coercing, manipulating or tricking other children into non-consensual or unwanted sexual activities, also referred to as “child-on-child sexual abuse“. Sexualized behavior is thought to constitute the best indication that a child has been sexually abused.[58]

Children who exhibit sexualized behavior may also have other behavioral problems.[59] Other symptoms of child sexual abuse may include manifestations of post-traumatic stress in younger children; fear, aggression, and nightmares in young school-age children; and depression in older children.[58]

Among siblings

Further information: Sibling sexual abuse

In 1980, a survey of 796 undergraduates, 15 percent of females and 10 percent of males reported some form of sexual experience involving a sibling; most of these fell short of actual intercourse. Approximately one quarter of these experiences were described as abusive or exploitative.[60] A 1989 paper reported the results of a questionnaire with responses from 526 undergraduate college students in which 17 percent of the respondents stated that they had preadolescent sexual experiences with a sibling.[61]

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Child sexuality.

References

  1.  Kellogg, Nancy D.; Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect (2009-09-01). “Clinical Report—The Evaluation of Sexual Behaviors in Children”. Pediatrics. 124 (3): 992–998. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1692. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 19720674. S2CID 6269473.
  2.  Friedrich, William N.; Fisher, Jennifer; Broughton, Daniel; Houston, Margaret; Shafran, Constance R. (1998-04-01). “Normative Sexual Behavior in Children: A Contemporary Sample”. Pediatrics. 101 (4): e9. doi:10.1542/peds.101.4.e9. ISSN 1098-4275. PMID 9521975. S2CID 5436544.
  3.  Ryan, Gail (2000). “Childhood sexuality: a decade of study. Part I—research and curriculum development”. Child Abuse & Neglect. 24 (1): 33–48. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00118-0. PMID 10660008.
  4.  SEX PLAY: parenting strategies by Dr. Marilyn Heins Archived 2006-09-07 at the Wayback Machine
  5.  PPP: Health and Safety || When Children’s Play Involves Sexuality || Sex play is normal Archived 2006-09-05 at the Wayback Machine
  6.  Friedrich, William N.; Fisher, Jennifer; Broughton, Daniel; Houston, Margaret; Shafran, Constance R. (1998). “Normative sexual behavior in children: a contemporary sample”. Pediatrics. 101 (4): E9. doi:10.1542/peds.101.4.e9. PMID 9521975. S2CID 5436544.
  7.  Larsson & Svedin, 1999, op. cit.; Larsson & Svedin, publication data unavailable; cited in Larsson, 2000, op. cit.
  8.  Larsson, IngBeth. Child sexuality and sexual behaviorArchived 2012-11-19 at the Wayback Machine (2000), Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (report), Article number 2000-36-001. English translation (Lambert & Tudball) Article number 2001-123-20.
  9.  Sexual Development and Behavior in Children: Information for Parents and Caregivers (Report). American Psychological Association. 2009. doi:10.1037/e736972011-001.
  10.  GH6002 Sexuality and Your Child: For Children Ages 3 to 7, MU Extension
  11.  Kelly, Garry (2003). Sexuality Today: The Human Perspective Edn 7. McGraw-Hill Tx USA. ISBN 978-0072558357.
  12.  Reinisch, June (1991). The Kinsey Institute new report on sex: what you must know to be sexually literate. New York: St. Martin’s Press. ISBN 9780312063863.
  13.  Santrock, J.W. (2008). A Topical Approach to Life-Span Development (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14.  Okami, Paul; Olmstead, Richard; Abramson, Paul R. (1997). “Sexual experiences in early childhood: 18-year longitudinal data from the UCLA family lifestyles project – University of California, Los Angeles”. Journal of Sex Research. 34 (4): 339–347. doi:10.1080/00224499709551902.
  15.  Lahtinen, Hanna-Mari; Laitila, Aarno; Korkman, Julia; Ellonen, Noora (2018). “Children’s disclosures of sexual abuse in a population-based sample”. Child Abuse & Neglect. 76: 84–94. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.011. hdl:10138/300574. PMID 29096161.
  16.  Sex education: Talking to toddlers and preschoolers about sex – MayoClinic.com
  17.  Richardson, Justin, M.D., and Schuster, Mark, M.D., Ph.D. Everything You Never Wanted Your Kids to Know About Sex (But Were Afraid They’d Ask) Archived 2006-10-13 at the Wayback Machine, 2003, Three Rivers Press
  18.  Planned Parenthood – Sexuality Development Archived 2006-12-02 at the Wayback Machine
  19.  “Child & adolescent sexuality”. South Easter CASA Centre Against Sexual Assault. 9 March 2012. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
  20.  Leander, Else-Marie Buch; Larsen, Per Lindsø; Munk, Karen Pallesgaard (2018). “Children’s Doctor Games and Nudity at Danish Childcare Institutions”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 47 (4): 863–875. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1144-9. ISSN 1573-2800. PMID 29450663. S2CID 46838503. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  21.  Kaeser, Frederick; DiSalvo, Claudia; Moglia, Ron (2000). “Sexual Behaviors of Young Children That Occur in Schools”. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy. 25 (4): 277–285. doi:10.1080/01614576.2000.11074361. ISSN 0161-4576. S2CID 142993207.
  22.  Gil & Cavanagh Johnson, 1993, op. cit.; Cavanagh Johnson, T., Feldmeth, J. R. (1993). “Sexual behaviors – a continuum”. In I. E. Gil & T. Cavanagh Johnson. Sexualized Children (pp. 39 – 52); Friedrich, W. N., Grambsch, P., Damon, L., Hewitt, S., Koverola, C., Lang, R., Wolfe, V., Broughton, D. (1992). “Child sexual behavior inventory: Normative and clinical comparisons”. Psychological Assessment, vol. 4, no.3:303 – 311. Cited in Larsson, 2000, op. cit.
  23.  Cohn, D. S. (1991). “Anatomic doll play of preschoolers referred for sexual abuse and those not referred”. Child Abuse & Neglect 15:455 – 466; Everson & Boat, 1991; Jampole, L. & Weber, M. K. (1987). “An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and nonabused children with anatomically correct dolls”. Child Abuse & Neglect: 11 187 – 192; Sivan, A., Schor, D., Koeppl, G., Noble, L. (1988). “Interaction of normal children with anatomic dolls”. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12:295 – 304. Cited in Larsson, 2000, op. cit.
  24.  Haugaard, J. J. & Tilly, C (1988). “Characteristics predicting children’s responses to sexual encounters with other children”. Child Abuse & Neglect 12:209 – 218; Haugaard, J. J. (1996). “Sexual behaviors between children: Professionals’ opinions and undergraduates’ recollections”. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 2:81 – 89; Lamb & Coakley, 1993; Larsson, Lindell & Svedin, publication datat not available; cited in Larsson, 2000, op. cit.
  25.  Friedrich, W. N., Grambsch, P., Broughton, D., Kuiper, J., Beilke, R. L. (1991). “Normative sexual behavior in children”. Pediatrics 88: 456 – 464; Phipps-Yonas, S., Yonas, A., Turner, M., Kauper, M, (1993). “Sexuality in early childhood”. University of Minnesota Center for Urban and Regional Affairs Reports, 23:1 – 5; Lindblad, F., Gustafsson, P., Larsson, I., Lundin, B. (1995). “Preschooler’s sexual behaviour at daycare centers: an epidemiological study”. Child Abuse & Neglect vol. 19, no. 5:569 – 577; Fitzpatrick & Deehan, 1995; Larsson, I., Svedin, C-G. (1999). Sexual behaviour in Swedish preschool children as observed by their parents. Manuscript; Larsson, I., Svedin C-G., Friedrich, W. “Differences and similarities in sexual behaviour among preschoolers in Sweden and USA”. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. Printing information unavailable; Smith & Grocke, 1995; cited in Larsson, 2000, op. cit.
  26.  History of sexual research(PDF) Archived 2011-11-11 at the Wayback Machine
  27.  Sauerteig, Lutz D.H. (2012). “Loss of Innocence: Albert Moll, Sigmund Freud and the Invention of Childhood Sexuality Around 1900”. Medical History. 56 (2): 156–183. doi:10.1017/mdh.2011.31. ISSN 0025-7273. PMC 3381499. PMID 23002291.
  28.  Salter, Ph.D., Anna C. (1988). Treating Child Sex Offenders and Victims: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications Inc. pp. 22–24. ISBN 978-0-8039-3182-4.
  29.  Pool, Gary (Sep–Oct 1996). “Sex, science, and Kinsey: a conversation with Dr. John Bancroft – head of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction”. Humanist. Archived from the original on 2008-03-27. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
  30.  “Kinsey Institute director denies allegations by Reisman”. Kinseyinstitute.org. Archived from the original on 2014-02-12. Retrieved 2013-12-04.
  31.  Dill, Karen (2009). How Fantasy Becomes Reality: Seeing Through Media Influence. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195372083.
  32.  Zadrozny, Brandy (May 14, 2015). “Are These the World’s Most Graphic Sex-Ed Videos?”. The Daily Beast.
  33.  Joel W Grube, Enid Gruber (2000). “Adolescent sexuality and the media: a review of current knowledge and implications”. Western Journal of Medicine. 172 (3): 210–214. doi:10.1136/ewjm.172.3.210. PMC 1070813. PMID 10734819.
  34.  Nancy Allen, Matthew Broom (2017). “Social Media and Sexual Behavior Among Adolescents: Is there a link?”. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 3 (2): e28. doi:10.2196/publichealth.7149. PMC 5457530. PMID 28526670.
  35.  Collins, Rebecca L; Strasburger, Victor C; Brown, Jane D (2017). “Sexual Media and Childhood Well-being and Health”. Pediatrics. 140 (2): S162–S166. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758X. PMID 29093054.
  36.  De Ridder, Sander (2017). “Social Media and Young People’s Sexualities: Values, Norms, and Battlegrounds”. Social Media + Society. 3 (4) 2056305117738992. doi:10.1177/2056305117738992.
  37.  Chan, Randolph C.H. (2023). “Benefits and risks of LGBT social media use for sexual and gender minority individuals: An investigation of psychosocial mechanisms of LGBT social media use and well-being”. Computers in Human Behavior. 139 107531. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107531.
  38.  Ripes, Jessie (26 May 2021). “The Pros and Cons of Social Media on Sexuality”. Modern Intimacy.
  39.  Kaeser, Fred (2001-10-30). “The effects of increasing sexualization on children”. Towards a Better Understanding of Children’s Sexual Behavior. NYU Child Study Center. Retrieved February 22, 2007. We know that exposure to sexualized messages, particularly those that are incomprehensible, can have several effects on children.
  40.  Lamb, Sharon; Zurbriggen, Ellen L.; Collins, Rebecca L.; Roberts, Tomi-Ann; Tolman, Deborah L.; Ward, L. Monique; Blake, Jeanne (2007). Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (Report). American Psychological Association (APA).
  41.  Lamb, Sharon (2006). Sex, therapy, and kids: addressing their concerns through talk and play. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. ISBN 9780393704792.
  42.  Lamb, Sharon; Zurbriggen, Ellen L.; Collins, Rebecca L.; Roberts, Tomi-Ann; Tolman, Deborah L.; Ward, L. Monique; Blake, Jeanne (2007). Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (Report). American Psychological Association (APA). The proliferation of sexualized images of girls and young women in advertising, merchandising, and media is harming girls’ self-image and healthy development. This report explores the cognitive and emotional consequences, consequences for mental and physical health, and impact on development of a healthy sexual self-image
  43.  Martin, Charlie. “The dangers of child sexualization in media”. The Black and White. Retrieved 2025-12-28.
  44.  USA, CHILD (2023-04-18). “Oversexualization in Hollywood: Brooke Shields”. CHILD USA. Retrieved 2025-12-28.
  45.  Lang, Brent (2021-11-30). “Björn Andrésen on His Tortured Relationship With Luchino Visconti’s ‘Death in Venice’: ‘That Son of a Bitch Sexualized Me'”. Variety. Retrieved 2025-12-28.
  46.  “MSN”. www.msn.com. Retrieved 2025-12-28.
  47.  Thiel, David; DiResta, Renee (24 July 2023). “Addressing Child Exploitation on Federated Social Media”. Stanford University. Cyber Policy Center.
  48.  “How the Internet is Drowning in Child Sex Abuse Content”. Alliance to counter crime online.
  49.  Company, Fast; Article, Curated (30 November 2022). “SOCIAL MEDIA IS ACCELERATING THE SPREAD OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE MATERIAL”. Giving Compass. {{cite web}}: |last1= has generic name (help)
  50.  “Child Sexual Abuse”. Medline Plus. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2008-04-02.
  51.  “Guidelines for psychological evaluations in child protection matters. Committee on Professional Practice and Standards, APA Board of Professional Affairs”. The American Psychologist. 54 (8): 586–93. August 1999. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.586. PMID 10453704. Abuse, sexual (child): generally defined as contacts between a child and an adult or other person significantly older or in a position of power or control over the child, where the child is being used for sexual stimulation of the adult or other person.
  52.  Roosa, Mark W.; Reinholtz, Cindy; Angelini, Patti Jo (February 1999). “The relation of child sexual abuse and depression in young women: comparisons across four ethnic groups”. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 27 (1): 65–76. PMID 10197407. Pdf version. Archived 2014-07-14 at the Wayback Machine
  53.  Widom, CS; DuMont, K; Czaja, SJ (January 2007). “A prospective investigation of major depressive disorder and comorbidity in abused and neglected children grown up”. Archives of General Psychiatry. 64 (1): 49–56. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.1.49. PMID 17199054. Retrieved January 3, 2007.
  54.  Levitan, Robert D.; Rector, Neil A.; Sheldon, Tess; Goering, Paula (2003). “Childhood adversities associated with major depression and/or anxiety disorders in a community sample of Ontario: issues of co-morbidity and specificity”. Depression and Anxiety. 17 (1): 34–42. doi:10.1002/da.10077. PMID 12577276. S2CID 26031006.
  55.  Messman-Moore, Terri L.; Long, Patricia J. (2000). “Child Sexual Abuse and Revictimization in the Form of Adult Sexual Abuse, Adult Physical Abuse, and Adult Psychological Maltreatment”. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 15 (5): 489. doi:10.1177/088626000015005003. S2CID 145761598.
  56.  Dinwiddie, Stephen H.; Heath, Andrew C.; Dunne, Michael P.; Bucholz, Kathleen K.; Madden, Pamela A.F.; Slutske, W.S.; Bierut, Laura Jean; Statham, Dixie J.; Martin, Nicholas G. (January 2000). “Early sexual abuse and lifetime psychopathology: a co-twin-control study”. Psychological Medicine. 30 (1): 41–52. doi:10.1017/S0033291799001373. PMID 10722174. S2CID 15270464.
  57.  Courtois, Christine A. (1988). Healing the incest wound: adult survivors in therapy. New York: Norton. p. 208. ISBN 978-0-393-31356-7.
  58.  Friedrich et al., 1992, 1993, op. cit.; Kendall-Tackett, K. E., Williams, L., Finkelhor, D. (1993). “The impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies”. Psychological Bulletin, 113:164 – 180; Cosentino, C. E, Meyer-Mahlenburg, H., Alpert, J., Weinberg, S., Gaines, R. (1995). “Sexual behavior problems and psychopathology symptoms in sexually abused girls”. Journal of American Academy Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 8:1033–1042; cited in Larsson, 2000, op. cit.
  59.  Friedrich et al. (1992), op. cit.; cited in Larsson, 2000, op. cit.
  60.  Finkelhor, D. (1980). “Sex among siblings: A survey on prevalence, variety, and effects”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 9 (3): 171–194. doi:10.1007/BF01542244. PMID 7396691. S2CID 7206053.
  61.  Greenwald, Evan; Leitenberg, Harold (October 1989). “Long-term effects of sexual experiences with siblings and nonsiblings during childhood”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 18 (5): 389–399. doi:10.1007/BF01541971. PMID 2818170. S2CID 43279816.

Further reading

vteHuman sexuality and sexology
vteSexual ethics

Categories: 

Posted in New Essays permalink

About joelsnell99

Who's Who in all U.S and U.K. Honoraries (Marquis) Numerous publications in over 80 venues DANA SPIRIT AWARD/2009 Oxford Roundtable, Editor of FOCUS, a student Social Science Journal Author Snell Life Cycle Lonliness Curve Professor Emeritus - Kirkwood College Omicron Delta Kappa Grants Online Editor for Psychology and Education.com Research Fellow - Arlington Institute Outstanding Teacher at Kirkwood College Membership in numerous editorial boards or a reviewer of manuscripts Associate Editor - Psychology and Education Co-Author of Snell-Green Professor Index Author of Snell Educator Effectiveness Index Contributer to FutureEdition.com Co-Author of Snell-Allen Medical Rank Index Fellow in Kennedy Foundation Co-Author of Snell-Allen Subjective Assessment Sex Role Index Honors >>> Positions and Courses Taught >>> joelsnell@hotmail.com http://www.socialvibes.net Research Council, Advisory Board

Comments are closed.

↑