↓
 
Home→New Essays→ONLY CHILD

ONLY CHILD

56thst.com Posted on by

Main menu

Search

Personal tools

Contents

hide

Only child

20 languages

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

  • SmallStandardLarge

Width

  • StandardWide

Color (beta)

  • AutomaticLightDark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An only child is a person with no siblings, by birth or adoption.

Children who have half-siblings, step-siblings, or have never met their siblings, either living at the same house or at a different house—especially those who were born considerably later—may have a similar family environment to only-children, as may children who have much younger siblings from both of the same parents (generally, ten or more years).[citation needed]

Overview

[edit]

Throughout history, only-children were relatively uncommon. From around the middle of the 20th century, birth rates and average family sizes fell sharply for a number of reasons, including perceived concerns about human overpopulation and more women having their first child later in life due to birth control and women in the workforce. The proportion of families in the United States with only-children increased during the Great Depression but fell during the Post–World War II baby boom.[1] After the Korean War ended in 1953, the South Korean government suggested citizens each have one or two children to boost economic prosperity, which resulted in significantly reduced birth rates and a larger number of only-children in the country.[2][3]

From 1980 to 2015, the one-child policy in the People’s Republic of China restricted most parents to having only one child, although it was subject to local relaxations and individual circumstances (for instance, when twins were conceived).[4][5][6]

Families may have an only child for a variety of reasons, including: personal preference, family planning, financial and emotional or physical health issues, desire to travel, stress in the family, educational advantages, late marriage, stability, focus, time constraints, fears over pregnancy, advanced age, illegitimate birth, infertility, divorce, and death of a sibling or parent. The premature death of one parent also contributed to a small percentage of marriages producing just one child until around the mid-20th century, not to mention the then-rare occurrence of divorce.

Only-children are sometimes said to be more likely to develop precocious interests (from spending more time with adults) and to feel lonely.[1] Sometimes they compensate for the aloneness by developing a stronger relationship with themselves[7] or developing an active fantasy life that includes imaginary friends. Children whose siblings are much older than them sometimes report feeling like an only child.[8]

Stereotypes

[edit]

In Western countries, only-children can be the subject of a stereotype that equates them with “spoiled brats”. G. Stanley Hall was one of the first commentators to give only-children a bad reputation when he referred to their situation as “a disease in itself”. Even today, only-children are commonly stereotyped as “spoiled, selfish, and bratty”.[9] While many only-children receive a lot of attention and resources for their development, it is not clear that, as a class, they are overindulged or differ significantly from children with siblings.[10] Susan Newman, a social psychologist at Rutgers University and the author of Parenting an Only Child, says that this is a myth. “People articulate that only children are spoiled, they’re aggressive, they’re bossy, they’re lonely, they’re maladjusted”, she said. “There have been hundreds and hundreds of research studies that show that only children are no different from their peers.”[9] However, differences have been found. Research involving teacher ratings of U.S. children’s social and interpersonal skills[11][12] has scored only-children lower in self-control and interpersonal skills. While a later study failed to find evidence that this continued through middle and high school,[13][14] a further study showed that deficits persisted until at least the fifth grade.[15] Overall, most findings do not support the negative view of only-children, though there are differences. Only-children have proven through many studies that they are smarter, more autonomous, more well-behaved, and more mature than their peers.[failed verification][16]

In China, perceived behavioral problems in only-children have been called the Little Emperor Syndrome,[17] and the lack of siblings has been blamed for a number of social ills such as materialism and crime. However, recent studies do not support these claims, and show no significant differences in personality between only-children and children in larger families.[18] The one-child policy, which ended in 2015, was speculated to be the underlying cause of forced abortions, female infanticide, underreporting[19] of female births, and has been suggested as a possible cause behind China’s increasing number of crimes and gender imbalance.

The popular media often posit that it is more difficult for only-children to cooperate in a conventional family environment, as they have no competitors for the attention of their parents and other relatives. It is suggested that confusion arises about the norms of ages and roles and that a similar effect exists in understanding during relationships with other peers and youth, all throughout life.[20] Furthermore, it is believed that many feel that their parents place extra pressure and expectations on the only child, and that often, only-children are perfectionists.[21] Only-children are noted to have a tendency to mature faster.[20] Some psychologists believe in the “only child syndrome,” though there is very little evidence to back it up. “Only child syndrome” is the idea that in adulthood, those who have had no siblings are more likely to have less developed social skills and antisocial tendencies that have carried on from childhood.

Scientific research

[edit]

A 1987 quantitative review[22] of 141 studies on 16 different personality traits failed to support the opinion, held by theorists including Alfred Adler, that only-children are more likely to be maladjusted due to pampering.[23] The study found no evidence of any greater prevalence of maladjustment in only-children. The only statistically significant difference discovered was that only-children possessed a higher achievement motivation, which Denise Polit and Toni Falbo attributed to their greater share of parental resources, expectations, and scrutiny exposing them to a greater degree of reward, and greater likelihood of punishment for falling short. A second analysis by the authors revealed that only-children, children with only one sibling, and first-borns in general score higher on tests of verbal ability than later-borns and children with multiple siblings.[24]

A large (n=8,689) study found no evidence for the idea that only children are more narcissistic than children with siblings.[25]

Toni Falbo & Denise Polit, in their research of only children, gathered 115 studies to address information and evidence for personality, intelligence, adaptability, and relationships with peers and their parents. According to their findings, only-children surpassed all others in each category except for children who were in similar circumstances to them, such as first borns. One of their biggest findings was that the parent-child relationship was positively stronger compared to those children with siblings. Due to this relationship being significantly present in an only child’s life, it correlated to developmental outcomes, showing that only-children were not at a developmental disadvantage.[16]

According to the Resource Dilution Model,[26] parental resources (e.g. time to read to the child) are important in development. Because these resources are finite, children with many siblings are thought to receive fewer resources. However, the Confluence Model[27] suggests there is an opposing effect from the benefits to the non-youngest children of tutoring younger siblings, though being tutored does not make up the reduced share of parental resources. This provides one explanation for the poorer performance on tests of ability of only-children compared to first-borns, commonly seen in the literature,[27][28] though explanations such as the increased and earlier likelihood of experiencing parental separation or loss for last-born and only children have also been suggested, as this may be the cause of their very status.[28]

In his book Maybe One,[29] the environmental campaigner Bill McKibben argues in favor of a voluntary one-child policy on the grounds of climate change and overpopulation. He reassures the reader with a narrative constructed from interviews with researchers and writers on only-children, combined with snippets from the research literature, that this would not be harmful to child development. He argues that most cultural stereotypes are false, that there are not many differences between only-children and other children, and where there are differences, they are favorable to the only child.

Most research on only-children has been quantitative and focused on the behavior of only-children and on how others, for example teachers, assess that behavior. Bernice Sorensen, in contrast, used qualitative methods in order to elicit meaning and to discover what only-children themselves understand, feel, or sense about their lives that are lived without siblings. Her research showed that during their life span, only children often become more aware of their only-child status and are very much affected by society’s stereotype of the only-child, whether or not the stereotype is true or false. She argues in her book, Only Child Experience and Adulthood, that growing up in a predominantly sibling society affects only-children and that their lack of sibling relationships can have an important effect on both the way they see themselves and others and how they interact with the world.[30]

The latest research by Cameron et al. (2011) controls for endogeneity associated with being only-children. Parents that choose to have only one child could differ systematically in their characteristics from parents who choose to have more than one child. The paper concludes that “those who grew up as only children as a consequence of the [one-child] policy [in China] are found to be less trusting, less trustworthy, less likely to take risks, and less competitive than if they had had siblings. They are also less optimistic, less conscientious, and more prone to neuroticism”.[31] Furthermore, according to Professor Cameron, it was found that “greater exposure to other children in childhood – for example, frequent interactions with cousins and/or attending childcare – was not a substitute for having siblings”.[32]

In his book Born to Rebel, Frank Sulloway provides evidence that birth order influences the development of the “big five personality traits” (also known as the Five Factor Model). Sulloway suggests that firstborns and only-children are more conscientious, more socially dominant, less agreeable, and less open to new ideas compared to later-borns.[33] However, his conclusions have been challenged by other researchers,[34] who argue that birth order effects are weak and inconsistent. In one of the largest studies conducted on the effect of birth order on the Big Five, data from a national sample of 9,664 subjects found no association between birth order and scores on the NEO PI-R personality test.[35] Similarly, a large study (n = 8,689) from 2020 did not find any evidence for the hypothesis that only children are more narcissistic than non-only children.[36]

See also

[edit]

Look up only child in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b Grigoriadis, Vanessa (29 October 2004). “Only Children in New York”. New York Magazine. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  2. ^ Hudson, Gavin (10 November 2008). “Korean Women Say Birth Control Is Men’s Responsibility”. Rewire News Group. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  3. ^ Jiyeon, Lee (4 April 2008). Herskovitz, Jon (ed.). “Illegal abortion, South Korea’s open secret”. Reuters. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  4. ^ Rocha da Silva, Pascal (2006). “La politique de l’enfant unique en République populaire de Chine” (“The politics of one child in the People’s Republic of China”). Université de Genève (University of Geneva). p. 22-8. (in French)
  5. ^ Xiao, Li (4 July 2003). “Marriage of the Only Child: Joys and Worries”. China.org.cn. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  6. ^ Fitzpatrick, Laura (27 July 2009). “A Brief History of China’s One-Child Policy”. Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  7. ^ Sandler, Lauren (8 June 2013). “Only Children: Lonely and Selfish?”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 6 January 2020.
  8. ^ Bradford, Kelly Rose (5 April 2014). “I wish my son wasn’t an only child”. The Guardian.
  9. ^ Jump up to:a b Chang, Juju; Holmberg, Sara (17 August 2007). “The Only Child Myth”. ABC News. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  10. ^ Sandler, Lauren (8 July 2010). “The Only Child: Debunking the Myths”. Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  11. ^ Downey, Douglas B.; Condron, Dennis J. (2004). “Playing Well with Others in Kindergarten: The Benefit of Siblings at Home”. Journal of Marriage and Family. 66 (2): 333–350. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00024.x. ISSN 0022-2445. JSTOR 3599841.
  12. ^ Stoppard, Miriam (30 November 2010). “So is an only child really happier?”. mirror. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  13. ^ Bobbitt-Zeher, Donna; Downey, Douglas B. (2013). “Number of Siblings and Friendship Nominations Among Adolescents”. Journal of Family Issues. 34 (9): 1175–1193. doi:10.1177/0192513X12470370. ISSN 0192-513X. S2CID 141158110.
  14. ^ “Only Child Syndrome a Myth”. Seeker. 16 August 2010. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  15. ^ Downey, Douglas B.; Condron, Dennis J.; Yucel, Deniz (2015). “Number of Siblings and Social Skills Revisited Among American Fifth Graders”. Journal of Family Issues. 36 (2): 273–296. doi:10.1177/0192513X13507569. ISSN 0192-513X. S2CID 145252784.
  16. ^ Jump up to:a b Falbo, Toni; Polit, Denise F. (1986). “Quantitative review of the only child literature: Research evidence and theory development”. Psychological Bulletin. 100 (2): 176–189. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.176. ISSN 1939-1455.
  17. ^ Greenberg, Susan H. (22 April 2001). “The Rise Of The Only Child”. Newsweek. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  18. ^ Wan, Chuanwen; Fan, Cunren; Lin, Guobin; Jing, Qicheng (1994). “Comparison of Personality Traits of Only and Sibling School Children in Beijing”. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 155 (4): 377–388. doi:10.1080/00221325.1994.9914788. ISSN 0022-1325. PMID 7852977.
  19. ^ For studies that reported underreporting or delayed reporting of female births, see the following:
    • M. G. Merli and A. E. Raftery. 1990. “Are births under-reported in rural China? Manipulation of statistical records in response to China’s population policies”, Demography 37 (February): 109-126
    • Johansson, Sten; Nygren, Olga (1991). “The missing girls of China: a new demographic account”. Population and Development Review. 17 (1). Population Council: 35–51. doi:10.2307/1972351. JSTOR 1972351.
    • Merli, M. Giovanna; Raftery, Adrian E. (2000). “Are births underreported in rural China?”. Demography. 37 (1): 109–126. doi:10.2307/2648100. JSTOR 2648100. PMID 10748993.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Gardephe, Colleen Davis (2 October 2022). “12 Tips for Raising an Only Child”. Parents. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  21. ^ Pickhardt, Carl E. (19 July 2009). “The Adolescent Only Child”. Psychology Today. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  22. ^ Polit, Denise F.; Falbo, Toni (1987). “Only Children and Personality Development: A Quantitative Review”. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 49 (2): 309. doi:10.2307/352302. JSTOR 352302.
  23. ^ Adler, A. (1964). Problems of neurosis. New York: Harper and Row.
  24. ^ Polit, D. F. & Falbo, T. (1988), “The intellectual achievement of only children”, Journal of Biosocial Science, 20 (3): 275–285, doi:10.1017/S0021932000006611, PMID 3063715, S2CID 34618696.
  25. ^ Foster, Joshua D.; Raley, Jennifer R.; Isen, Joshua D. (15 July 2020). “Further evidence that only children are not more narcissistic than individuals with siblings”. Personality and Individual Differences. 161: 109977. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109977. ISSN 0191-8869. S2CID 216492755.
  26. ^ Downey, D. B. (2001), “Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation”, American Psychologist, 56 (6–7): 497–504, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.6-7.497, PMID 11413873.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b Zajonc, R. B.; Markus, Gregory B. (1975), “Birth Order and Intellectual Development”, Psychological Review, 82 (1): 74–88, doi:10.1037/h0076229.
  28. ^ Jump up to:a b Falbo, Toni (1978), “Sibling Tutoring and Other Explanations for Intelligence Discontinuities of Only and Last Borns”, Journal of Population, 1 (4): 349–363, doi:10.1007/BF00972557, JSTOR 27507586, S2CID 143544441.
  29. ^ McKibben, B. (1998), Maybe one: A personal and environmental argument for single-child families, New York: Simon & Schuster, ISBN 0-684-85281-0.
  30. ^ Sorensen, B. (2008), Only Child Experience and Adulthood, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 164–195, ISBN 978-0-230-52101-8.
  31. ^ Cameron, Lisa; Erkal, N.; Gangadharan, L. & Meng, Xin (2011), Little Emperors—Behavioral Impacts of China’s One-Child Policy (University of Melbourne).
  32. ^ “Effects of China’s One Child Policy on its children”. Science Daily. 10 January 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  33. ^ Sulloway, F. J. (1996), Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics and creative lives, New York: Pantheon Books, ISBN 0-679-44232-4.
  34. ^ Harris, J. R. (2006), No two alike: Human nature and human individuality, New York: WW Norton & Company, ISBN 0-393-05948-0.
  35. ^ Jefferson, T.; Herbst, J. H. & McCrae, R. R. (1998), “Associations between birth order and personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings”, Journal of Research in Personality, 32 (4): 498–509, doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2233.
  36. ^ Foster, Joshua D.; Raley, Jennifer R.; Isen, Joshua D. (15 July 2020). “Further evidence that only children are not more narcissistic than individuals with siblings”. Personality and Individual Differences. 161: 109977. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109977. ISSN 0191-8869. S2CID 216492755.
showvteFamily
showvteFamily planning policies and population of China
Authority control databases: National Japan

Categories: 

Posted in New Essays permalink

About joelsnell99

Who's Who in all U.S and U.K. Honoraries (Marquis) Numerous publications in over 80 venues DANA SPIRIT AWARD/2009 Oxford Roundtable, Editor of FOCUS, a student Social Science Journal Author Snell Life Cycle Lonliness Curve Professor Emeritus - Kirkwood College Omicron Delta Kappa Grants Online Editor for Psychology and Education.com Research Fellow - Arlington Institute Outstanding Teacher at Kirkwood College Membership in numerous editorial boards or a reviewer of manuscripts Associate Editor - Psychology and Education Co-Author of Snell-Green Professor Index Author of Snell Educator Effectiveness Index Contributer to FutureEdition.com Co-Author of Snell-Allen Medical Rank Index Fellow in Kennedy Foundation Co-Author of Snell-Allen Subjective Assessment Sex Role Index Honors >>> Positions and Courses Taught >>> joelsnell@hotmail.com http://www.socialvibes.net Research Council, Advisory Board

Comments are closed.

↑