RAISING “WOMANIZERS”

BABY SITTER/WOMANIZER Hire a babysitter, raise a womanizer?Putting a little boy in the care of a nanny can instill the notion that women are interchangeable and disposable, argues a new bookposted on March 26, 2010, at 4:53 PM ![]() “Is having a nanny a precursor to cheating?” There may be some logic to the argument: While Friedman’s theory is admittedly “far-fetched,” you have to admit it’s a “fascinating idea,” says Carol Midgley in Times Online. After all, a live-in nanny does “arguably blur boundaries” and “reinforce the idea” of juggling female relationships. And what about when that nanny is “sacked?” It’s entirely logical that, to a child, this might leave the “residual impression that women are expendable [and] replaceable.” “Men and affairs? It’s all nanny’s fault”Experience says Friedman is wrong: “I know plenty of serial womanisers among my friends,” says William Cash, also in Times Online. “Most of them married, and after a few calls I can confirm that most didn’t have a nanny.” The true reasons behind their cheating are more complex and ambiguous: “Ego, entitlement, boredom, anger, marital neglect, lust, love of risk, [and] mid-life crisis” would all rank above “nanny syndrome.” “Why it’s wrong to blame nanny” Is Na’vi becoming a living language? |