↓
 
Home→New Essays→REINCARNATION

REINCARNATION

56thst.com Posted on by

Main menu

Search

Personal tools

Contents

hide

Reincarnation

96 languages

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

  • SmallStandardLarge

Width

  • StandardWide

Color (beta)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“Reincarnate” and “Past lives” redirect here. For other uses, see Reincarnation (disambiguation) and Past Lives.

Not to be confused with Resurrection.

For the Futurama episode, see Reincarnation (Futurama).

Illustration of reincarnation in Hindu art.
In Jainism, a soul travels to any one of the four states of existence after death depending on its karmas.

Reincarnation, also known as rebirth or transmigration, is the philosophical or religious concept that the non-physical essence of a living being begins a new life in a different physical form or body after biological death.[1][2] In most beliefs involving reincarnation, the soul of a human being is immortal and does not disperse after the physical body has perished. Upon death, the soul merely becomes transmigrated into a newborn baby or an animal to continue its immortality. The term transmigration means the passing of a soul from one body to another after death.

Reincarnation (punarjanma) is a central tenet of the Indian religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism.[3][4][5][6] In various forms, it occurs as an esoteric belief in many streams of Judaism, certain pagan religions including Wicca, and some beliefs of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas[7] and Aboriginal Australians (though most believe in an afterlife or spirit world).[8] A belief in the soul’s rebirth or migration (metempsychosis) was expressed by certain ancient Greek historical figures, such as Pythagoras, Socrates, and Plato.[9]

Although the majority of denominations within Abrahamic religions do not believe that individuals reincarnate, particular groups within these religions do refer to reincarnation; these groups include the mainstream historical and contemporary followers of Cathars, Alawites, Hassidics, the Druze,[10] Kabbalistics, and the Rosicrucians.[11] The historical relations between these sects and the beliefs about reincarnation that were characteristic of Neoplatonism, Orphism, Hermeticism, Manichaenism, and Gnosticism of the Roman era as well as the Indian religions have been the subject of recent scholarly research.[12] In recent decades, many Europeans and North Americans have developed an interest in reincarnation,[13] and many contemporary works mention it.

Conceptual definitions

[edit]

The word reincarnation derives from a Latin term that literally means ‘entering the flesh again’. Reincarnation refers to the belief that an aspect of every human being (or all living beings in some cultures) continues to exist after death. This aspect may be the soul, mind, consciousness, or something transcendent which is reborn in an interconnected cycle of existence; the transmigration belief varies by culture, and is envisioned to be in the form of a newly born human being, animal, plant, spirit, or as a being in some other non-human realm of existence.[14][15][16]

An alternative term is transmigration, implying migration from one life (body) to another.[17] The term has been used by modern philosophers such as Kurt Gödel[18] and has entered the English language.

The Greek equivalent to reincarnation, metempsychosis (μετεμψύχωσις), derives from meta (‘change’) and empsykhoun (‘to put a soul into’),[19] a term attributed to Pythagoras.[20] Another Greek term sometimes used synonymously is palingenesis, ‘being born again’.[21]

Rebirth is a key concept found in major Indian religions, and discussed using various terms. Reincarnation, or Punarjanman (Sanskrit: पुनर्जन्मन्, ‘rebirth, transmigration’),[22][23] is discussed in the ancient Sanskrit texts of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism, with many alternate terms such as punarāvṛtti (पुनरावृत्ति), punarājāti (पुनराजाति), punarjīvātu (पुनर्जीवातु), punarbhava (पुनर्भव), āgati-gati (आगति-गति, common in Buddhist Pali text), nibbattin (निब्बत्तिन्), upapatti (उपपत्ति), and uppajjana (उप्पज्जन).[22][24]

These religions believe that this reincarnation is cyclic and an endless Saṃsāra, unless one gains spiritual insights that ends this cycle leading to liberation.[3][25] The reincarnation concept is considered in Indian religions as a step that starts each “cycle of aimless drifting, wandering or mundane existence”,[3] but one that is an opportunity to seek spiritual liberation through ethical living and a variety of meditative, yogic (marga), or other spiritual practices.[26] They consider the release from the cycle of reincarnations as the ultimate spiritual goal, and call the liberation by terms such as moksha, nirvana, mukti and kaivalya.[27][28][29] However, the Buddhist, Hindu and Jain traditions have differed, since ancient times, in their assumptions and in their details on what reincarnates, how reincarnation occurs and what leads to liberation.[30][31]

Gilgul, Gilgul neshamot, or Gilgulei Ha Neshamot (Hebrew: גלגול הנשמות) is the concept of reincarnation in Kabbalistic Judaism, found in much Yiddish literature among Ashkenazi Jews. Gilgul means ‘cycle’ and neshamot is ‘souls’. Kabbalistic reincarnation says that humans reincarnate only to humans unless YHWH/Ein Sof/God chooses.

History

[edit]

Origins

[edit]

The origins of the notion of reincarnation are obscure.[32] Discussion of the subject appears in the philosophical traditions of Ancient India. The Greek Pre-Socratics discussed reincarnation, and the Celtic druids are also reported to have taught a doctrine of reincarnation.[33]

Early Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism

[edit]

The concepts of the cycle of birth and death, saṁsāra, and liberation partly derive from ascetic traditions that arose in India around the middle of the first millennium BCE.[34] The first textual references to the idea of reincarnation appear in the Rigveda, Yajurveda and Upanishads of the late Vedic period (c. 1100 – c. 500 BCE), predating the Buddha and Mahavira.[35][36] Though no direct evidence of this has been found, the tribes of the Ganges valley or the Dravidian traditions of South India have been proposed as another early source of reincarnation beliefs.[37]

The idea of reincarnation, saṁsāra, did exist in the early Vedic religions.[38][39][40] The early Vedas does mention the doctrine of karma and rebirth.[25][41][42] It is in the early Upanishads, which are pre-Buddha and pre-Mahavira, where these ideas are developed and described in a general way.[43][44][45] Detailed descriptions first appear around the mid-1st millennium BCE in diverse traditions, including Buddhism, Jainism and various schools of Hindu philosophy, each of which gave unique expression to the general principle.[25]

Sangam literature[46] connotes the ancient Tamil literature and is the earliest known literature of South India. The Tamil tradition and legends link it to three literary gatherings around Madurai. According to Kamil Zvelebil, a Tamil literature and history scholar, the most acceptable range for the Sangam literature is 100 BCE to 250 CE, based on the linguistic, prosodic and quasi-historic allusions within the texts and the colophons.[47] There are several mentions of rebirth and moksha in the Purananuru.[48] The text explains Hindu rituals surrounding death such as making riceballs called pinda and cremation. The text states that good souls get a place in Indraloka where Indra welcomes them.[49]

The texts of ancient Jainism that have survived into the modern era are post-Mahavira, likely from the last centuries of the first millennium BCE, and extensively mention rebirth and karma doctrines.[50][51] The Jaina philosophy assumes that the soul (jiva in Jainism; atman in Hinduism) exists and is eternal, passing through cycles of transmigration and rebirth.[52] After death, reincarnation into a new body is asserted to be instantaneous in early Jaina texts.[51] Depending upon the accumulated karma, rebirth occurs into a higher or lower bodily form, either in heaven or hell or earthly realm.[53][54] No bodily form is permanent: everyone dies and reincarnates further. Liberation (kevalya) from reincarnation is possible, however, through removing and ending karmic accumulations to one’s soul.[55] From the early stages of Jainism on, a human being was considered the highest mortal being, with the potential to achieve liberation, particularly through asceticism.[56][57][58]

The early Buddhist texts discuss rebirth as part of the doctrine of saṃsāra. This asserts that the nature of existence is a “suffering-laden cycle of life, death, and rebirth, without beginning or end”.[59][60] Also referred to as the wheel of existence (Bhavacakra), it is often mentioned in Buddhist texts with the term punarbhava (rebirth, re-becoming). Liberation from this cycle of existence, Nirvana, is the foundation and the most important purpose of Buddhism.[59][61][62] Buddhist texts also assert that an enlightened person knows his previous births, a knowledge achieved through high levels of meditative concentration.[63] Tibetan Buddhism discusses death, bardo (an intermediate state), and rebirth in texts such as the Tibetan Book of the Dead. While Nirvana is taught as the ultimate goal in the Theravadin Buddhism, and is essential to Mahayana Buddhism, the vast majority of contemporary lay Buddhists focus on accumulating good karma and acquiring merit to achieve a better reincarnation in the next life.[64][65]

In early Buddhist traditions, saṃsāra cosmology consisted of five realms through which the wheel of existence cycled.[59] This included hells (niraya), hungry ghosts (pretas), animals (tiryaka), humans (manushya), and gods (devas, heavenly).[59][60][66] In latter Buddhist traditions, this list grew to a list of six realms of rebirth, adding demigods (asuras).[59][67]

Rationale

[edit]

The earliest layers of Vedic text incorporate the concept of life, followed by an afterlife in heaven and hell based on cumulative virtues (merit) or vices (demerit).[68] However, the ancient Vedic rishis challenged this idea of afterlife as simplistic, because people do not live equally moral or immoral lives. Between generally virtuous lives, some are more virtuous; while evil too has degrees, and the texts assert that it would be unfair for people, with varying degrees of virtue or vices, to end up in heaven or hell, in “either or” and disproportionate manner irrespective of how virtuous or vicious their lives were.[69][70][71] They introduced the idea of an afterlife in heaven or hell in proportion to one’s merit.[72][73][74]

Comparison

[edit]

Early texts of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism share the concepts and terminology related to reincarnation.[75] They also emphasize similar virtuous practices and karma as necessary for liberation and what influences future rebirths.[35][76] For example, all three discuss various virtues—sometimes grouped as Yamas and Niyamas—such as non-violence, truthfulness, non-stealing, non-possessiveness, compassion for all living beings, charity and many others.[77][78]

Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism disagree in their assumptions and theories about rebirth. Hinduism relies on its foundational assumption that ‘soul, Self exists’ (atman or attā), in contrast to Buddhist assumption that there is ‘no soul, no Self’ (anatta or anatman).[79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88] Hindu traditions consider soul to be the unchanging eternal essence of a living being, and what journeys across reincarnations until it attains self-knowledge.[89][90][91] Buddhism, in contrast, asserts a rebirth theory without a Self, and considers realization of non-Self or Emptiness as Nirvana (nibbana). Thus Buddhism and Hinduism have a very different view on whether a self or soul exists, which impacts the details of their respective rebirth theories.[92][93][94]

The reincarnation doctrine in Jainism differs from those in Buddhism, even though both are non-theistic Sramana traditions.[95][96] Jainism, in contrast to Buddhism, accepts the foundational assumption that soul exists (Jiva) and asserts this soul is involved in the rebirth mechanism.[97] Further, Jainism considers asceticism as an important means to spiritual liberation that ends all reincarnation, while Buddhism does not.[95][98][99]

Classical antiquity

[edit]

See also: Metempsychosis

A second-century Roman sarcophagus shows the mythology and symbolism of the Orphic and Dionysiac Mystery schools. Orpheus plays his lyre to the left.

Early Greek discussion of the concept dates to the sixth century BCE. An early Greek thinker known to have considered rebirth is Pherecydes of Syros (fl. 540 BCE).[100] His younger contemporary Pythagoras (c. 570–c. 495 BCE[101]), its first famous exponent, instituted societies for its diffusion. Some authorities believe that Pythagoras was Pherecydes’ pupil, others that Pythagoras took up the idea of reincarnation from the doctrine of Orphism, a Thracian religion, or brought the teaching from India.

Plato (428/427–348/347 BCE) presented accounts of reincarnation in his works, particularly the Myth of Er, where Plato makes Socrates tell how Er, the son of Armenius, miraculously returned to life on the twelfth day after death and recounted the secrets of the other world. There are myths and theories to the same effect in other dialogues, in the Chariot allegory of the Phaedrus,[102] in the Meno,[103] Timaeus and Laws. The soul, once separated from the body, spends an indeterminate amount of time in the intelligible realm (see The Allegory of the Cave in The Republic) and then assumes another body. In the Timaeus, Plato believes that the soul moves from body to body without any distinct reward-or-punishment phase between lives, because the reincarnation is itself a punishment or reward for how a person has lived.[104]

In Phaedo, Plato has his teacher Socrates, prior to his death, state: “I am confident that there truly is such a thing as living again, and that the living spring from the dead.” However, Xenophon does not mention Socrates as believing in reincarnation, and Plato may have systematized Socrates’ thought with concepts he took directly from Pythagoreanism or Orphism. Recent scholars have come to see that Plato has multiple reasons for the belief in reincarnation.[105] One argument concerns the theory of reincarnation’s usefulness for explaining why non-human animals exist: they are former humans, being punished for their vices; Plato gives this argument at the end of the Timaeus.[106]

Mystery cults

[edit]

The Orphic religion, which taught reincarnation, about the sixth century BCE, produced a copious literature.[107][108][109] Orpheus, its legendary founder, is said to have taught that the immortal soul aspires to freedom while the body holds it prisoner. The wheel of birth revolves, the soul alternates between freedom and captivity round the wide circle of necessity. Orpheus proclaimed the need of the grace of the gods, Dionysus in particular, and of self-purification until the soul has completed the spiral ascent of destiny to live forever.

An association between Pythagorean philosophy and reincarnation was routinely accepted throughout antiquity, as Pythagoras also taught about reincarnation. However, unlike the Orphics, who considered metempsychosis a cycle of grief that could be escaped by attaining liberation from it, Pythagoras seems to postulate an eternal, neutral reincarnation where subsequent lives would not be conditioned by any action done in the previous.[110]

Later authors

[edit]

In later Greek literature the doctrine is mentioned in a fragment of Menander[111] and satirized by Lucian.[112] In Roman literature it is found as early as Ennius,[113] who, in a lost passage of his Annals, told how he had seen Homer in a dream, who had assured him that the same soul which had animated both the poets had once belonged to a peacock. Persius in his satires (vi. 9) laughs at this; it is referred to also by Lucretius[114] and Horace.[115]

Virgil works the idea into his account of the Underworld in the sixth book of the Aeneid.[116] It persists down to the late classic thinkers, Plotinus and the other Neoplatonists. In the Hermetica, a Graeco-Egyptian series of writings on cosmology and spirituality attributed to Hermes Trismegistus/Thoth, the doctrine of reincarnation is central.

Celtic paganism

[edit]

In the first century BCE Alexander Cornelius Polyhistor wrote:

The Pythagorean doctrine prevails among the Gauls‘ teaching that the souls of men are immortal, and that after a fixed number of years they will enter into another body.

Julius Caesar recorded that the druids of Gaul, Britain and Ireland had metempsychosis as one of their core doctrines:[117]

The principal point of their doctrine is that the soul does not die and that after death it passes from one body into another… the main object of all education is, in their opinion, to imbue their scholars with a firm belief in the indestructibility of the human soul, which, according to their belief, merely passes at death from one tenement to another; for by such doctrine alone, they say, which robs death of all its terrors, can the highest form of human courage be developed.

Diodorus also recorded the Gaul belief that human souls were immortal, and that after a prescribed number of years they would commence upon a new life in another body. He added that Gauls had the custom of casting letters to their deceased upon the funeral pyres, through which the dead would be able to read them.[118] Valerius Maximus also recounted they had the custom of lending sums of money to each other which would be repayable in the next world.[119] This was mentioned by Pomponius Mela, who also recorded Gauls buried or burnt with them things they would need in a next life, to the point some would jump into the funeral piles of their relatives in order to cohabit in the new life with them.[120]

Hippolytus of Rome believed the Gauls had been taught the doctrine of reincarnation by a slave of Pythagoras named Zalmoxis. Conversely, Clement of Alexandria believed Pythagoras himself had learned it from the Celts and not the opposite, claiming he had been taught by Galatian Gauls, Hindu priests and Zoroastrians.[121][122] However, author T. D. Kendrick rejected a real connection between Pythagoras and the Celtic idea reincarnation, noting their beliefs to have substantial differences, and any contact to be historically unlikely.[120] Nonetheless, he proposed the possibility of an ancient common source, also related to the Orphic religion and Thracian systems of belief.[123]

Germanic paganism

[edit]

Main article: Rebirth in Germanic paganism

Surviving texts indicate that there was a belief in rebirth in Germanic paganism. Examples include figures from eddic poetry and sagas, potentially by way of a process of naming and/or through the family line. Scholars have discussed the implications of these attestations and proposed theories regarding belief in reincarnation among the Germanic peoples prior to Christianization and potentially to some extent in folk belief thereafter.

Judaism

[edit]

The belief in reincarnation developed among Jewish mystics in the medieval world, among whom differing explanations were given of the afterlife, although with a universal belief in an immortal soul.[124] It was explicitly rejected by Saadiah Gaon.[125] Today, reincarnation is an esoteric belief within many streams of modern Judaism. Kabbalah teaches a belief in gilgul, transmigration of souls, and hence the belief in reincarnation is universal in Hasidic Judaism, which regards the Kabbalah as sacred and authoritative, and is also sometimes held as an esoteric belief within other strains of Orthodox Judaism. In Judaism, the Zohar, first published in the 13th century, discusses reincarnation at length, especially in the Torah portion “Balak.” The most comprehensive kabbalistic work on reincarnation, Shaar HaGilgulim,[126][127] was written by Chaim Vital, based on the teachings of his mentor, the 16th-century kabbalist Isaac Luria, who was said to know the past lives of each person through his semi-prophetic abilities. The 18th-century Lithuanian master scholar and kabbalist, Elijah of Vilna, known as the Vilna Gaon, authored a commentary on the biblical Book of Jonah as an allegory of reincarnation.

The practice of conversion to Judaism is sometimes understood within Orthodox Judaism in terms of reincarnation. According to this school of thought in Judaism, when non-Jews are drawn to Judaism, it is because they had been Jews in a former life. Such souls may “wander among nations” through multiple lives, until they find their way back to Judaism, including through finding themselves born in a gentile family with a “lost” Jewish ancestor.[128]

There is an extensive literature of Jewish folk and traditional stories that refer to reincarnation.[129]

Christianity

[edit]

Reincarnationism or biblical reincarnation is the belief that certain people are or can be reincarnations of biblical figures, such as Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary.[130] Some Christians believe that certain New Testament figures are reincarnations of Old Testament figures. For example, John the Baptist is believed by some to be a reincarnation of the prophet Elijah, and a few take this further by suggesting Jesus was the reincarnation of Elijah’s disciple Elisha.[130][131] Other Christians believe the Second Coming of Jesus would be fulfilled by reincarnation. Sun Myung Moon, the founder of the Unification Church, considered himself to be the fulfillment of Jesus’ return.

The Catholic Church does not believe in reincarnation, which it regards as being incompatible with death.[132] Nonetheless, the leaders of certain sects in the church have taught that they are reincarnations of Mary – for example, Marie-Paule Giguère of the Army of Mary[133][134] and Maria Franciszka of the former Mariavites.[135] The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith excommunicated the Army of Mary for teaching heresy, including reincarnationism.[136]

Gnosticism

[edit]

Several Gnostic sects professed reincarnation. The Sethians and followers of Valentinus believed in it.[137] The followers of Bardaisan of Mesopotamia, a sect of the second century deemed heretical by the Catholic Church, drew upon Chaldean astrology, to which Bardaisan’s son Harmonius, educated in Athens, added Greek ideas including a sort of metempsychosis. Another such teacher was Basilides (132–? CE/AD), known to us through the criticisms of Irenaeus and the work of Clement of Alexandria (see also Neoplatonism and Gnosticism and Buddhism and Gnosticism).

In the third Christian century Manichaeism spread both east and west from Babylonia, then within the Sassanid Empire, where its founder Mani lived about 216–276. Manichaean monasteries existed in Rome in 312 AD. Noting Mani’s early travels to the Kushan Empire and other Buddhist influences in Manichaeism, Richard Foltz[138] attributes Mani’s teaching of reincarnation to Buddhist influence. However the inter-relation of Manicheanism, Orphism, Gnosticism and neo-Platonism is far from clear.

Taoism

[edit]

Taoist documents from as early as the Han Dynasty claimed that Lao Tzu appeared on earth as different persons in different times beginning in the legendary era of Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors. The (ca. third century BC) Chuang Tzu states: “Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting-point. Existence without limitation is Space. Continuity without a starting point is Time. There is birth, there is death, there is issuing forth, there is entering in.”[139][better source needed]

European Middle Ages

[edit]

Around the 11–12th century in Europe, several reincarnationist movements were persecuted as heresies, through the establishment of the Inquisition in the Latin west. These included the Cathar, Paterene or Albigensian church of western Europe, the Paulician movement, which arose in Armenia,[140] and the Bogomils in Bulgaria.[141]

Christian sects such as the Bogomils and the Cathars, who professed reincarnation and other gnostic beliefs, were referred to as “Manichaean”, and are today sometimes described by scholars as “Neo-Manichaean”.[142] As there is no known Manichaean mythology or terminology in the writings of these groups there has been some dispute among historians as to whether these groups truly were descendants of Manichaeism.[143]

Renaissance and Early Modern period

[edit]

While reincarnation has been a matter of faith in some communities from an early date it has also frequently been argued for on principle, as Plato does when he argues that the number of souls must be finite because souls are indestructible,[144] Benjamin Franklin held a similar view.[145] Sometimes such convictions, as in Socrates’ case, arise from a more general personal faith, at other times from anecdotal evidence such as Plato makes Socrates offer in the Myth of Er.

During the Renaissance translations of Plato, the Hermetica and other works fostered new European interest in reincarnation. Marsilio Ficino[146] argued that Plato’s references to reincarnation were intended allegorically, Shakespeare alluded to the doctrine of reincarnation[147] but Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake by authorities after being found guilty of heresy by the Roman Inquisition for his teachings.[148] But the Greek philosophical works remained available and, particularly in north Europe, were discussed by groups such as the Cambridge Platonists. Emanuel Swedenborg believed that we leave the physical world once, but then go through several lives in the spiritual world—a kind of hybrid of Christian tradition and the popular view of reincarnation.[149]

19th to 20th centuries

[edit]

By the 19th century the philosophers Schopenhauer[150] and Nietzsche[151] could access the Indian scriptures for discussion of the doctrine of reincarnation, which recommended itself to the American Transcendentalists Henry David Thoreau, Walt Whitman and Ralph Waldo Emerson and was adapted by Francis Bowen into Christian Metempsychosis.[152]

By the early 20th century, interest in reincarnation had been introduced into the nascent discipline of psychology, largely due to the influence of William James, who raised aspects of the philosophy of mind, comparative religion, the psychology of religious experience and the nature of empiricism.[153] James was influential in the founding of the American Society for Psychical Research (ASPR) in New York City in 1885, three years after the British Society for Psychical Research (SPR) was inaugurated in London,[154] leading to systematic, critical investigation of paranormal phenomena. Famous World War II American General George Patton was a strong believer in reincarnation, believing, among other things, he was a reincarnation of the Carthaginian General Hannibal.

At this time popular awareness of the idea of reincarnation was boosted by the Theosophical Society‘s dissemination of systematised and universalised Indian concepts and also by the influence of magical societies like The Golden Dawn. Notable personalities like Annie Besant, W. B. Yeats and Dion Fortune made the subject almost as familiar an element of the popular culture of the west as of the east. By 1924 the subject could be satirised in popular children’s books.[155] Humorist Don Marquis created a fictional cat named Mehitabel who claimed to be a reincarnation of Queen Cleopatra.[156]

Théodore Flournoy was among the first to study a claim of past-life recall in the course of his investigation of the medium Hélène Smith, published in 1900, in which he defined the possibility of cryptomnesia in such accounts.[157] Carl Gustav Jung, like Flournoy based in Switzerland, also emulated him in his thesis based on a study of cryptomnesia in psychism. Later Jung would emphasise the importance of the persistence of memory and ego in psychological study of reincarnation: “This concept of rebirth necessarily implies the continuity of personality… (that) one is able, at least potentially, to remember that one has lived through previous existences, and that these existences were one’s own….”[152] Hypnosis, used in psychoanalysis for retrieving forgotten memories, was eventually tried as a means of studying the phenomenon of past life recall.

More recently, many people in the West have developed an interest in and acceptance of reincarnation.[13] Many new religious movements include reincarnation among their beliefs, e.g. modern Neopagans, Spiritism, Astara,[158] Dianetics, and Scientology. Many esoteric philosophies also include reincarnation, e.g. Theosophy, Anthroposophy, Kabbalah, and Gnostic and Esoteric Christianity such as the works of Martinus Thomsen.

Demographic survey data from 1999 to 2002 shows a significant minority of people from Europe (22%) and America (20%) believe in the existence of life before birth and after death, leading to a physical rebirth.[13][159] The belief in reincarnation is particularly high in the Baltic countries, with Lithuania having the highest figure for the whole of Europe, 44%, while the lowest figure is in East Germany, 12%.[13] A quarter of U.S. Christians, including 10% of all born again Christians, embrace the idea.[160]

Academic psychiatrist Ian Stevenson reported that belief in reincarnation is held (with variations in details) by adherents of almost all major religions except Christianity and Islam. In addition, between 20 and 30 percent of persons in western countries who may be nominal Christians also believe in reincarnation.[161] One 1999 study by Walter and Waterhouse reviewed the previous data on the level of reincarnation belief and performed a set of thirty in-depth interviews in Britain among people who did not belong to a religion advocating reincarnation.[162] The authors reported that surveys have found about one fifth to one quarter of Europeans have some level of belief in reincarnation, with similar results found in the USA. In the interviewed group, the belief in the existence of this phenomenon appeared independent of their age, or the type of religion that these people belonged to, with most being Christians. The beliefs of this group also did not appear to contain any more than usual of “new age” ideas (broadly defined) and the authors interpreted their ideas on reincarnation as “one way of tackling issues of suffering”, but noted that this seemed to have little effect on their private lives.

Waterhouse also published a detailed discussion of beliefs expressed in the interviews.[163] She noted that although most people “hold their belief in reincarnation quite lightly” and were unclear on the details of their ideas, personal experiences such as past-life memories and near-death experiences had influenced most believers, although only a few had direct experience of these phenomena. Waterhouse analyzed the influences of second-hand accounts of reincarnation, writing that most of the people in the survey had heard other people’s accounts of past-lives from regression hypnosis and dreams and found these fascinating, feeling that there “must be something in it” if other people were having such experiences.

Other influential contemporary figures that have written on reincarnation include Alice Ann Bailey, one of the first writers to use the terms New Age and age of Aquarius, Torkom Saraydarian, an Armenian-American musician and religious author, Dolores Cannon, Atul Gawande, Michael Newton, Bruce Greyson, Raymond Moody and Unity Church founder Charles Fillmore.[164] Neale Donald Walsch, an American author of the series Conversations with God clcaims that he has reincarnated more than 600 times.[165] The Indian spiritual teacher Meher Baba who had significant following in the West taught that reincarnation followed from human desire and ceased once a person was freed from desire.[166]

Religions and philosophies

[edit]

Buddhism

[edit]

Main articles: Rebirth (Buddhism) and Saṃsāra (Buddhism)

In this 8-meter (25-foot) tall Buddhist relief, made between 1177 and 1249, is located at Dazu Rock Carvings, Chongqing, China Mara, Lord of Death and Desire, clutches a Wheel of Reincarnation which outlines the Buddhist cycle of reincarnation.
Part of a series on
Buddhism
GlossaryIndexOutline
showHistory
showDharmaConcepts
showBuddhist texts
showPractices
showNirvāṇa
showTraditions
showBuddhism by country
 Religion portal
vte

According to various Buddhist scriptures, Gautama Buddha believed in the existence of an afterlife in another world and in reincarnation,

Since there actually is another world (any world other than the present human one, i.e. different rebirth realms), one who holds the view ‘there is no other world’ has wrong view…

— Buddha, Majjhima Nikaya i.402, Apannaka Sutta, translated by Peter Harvey[167]

The Buddha also asserted that karma influences rebirth, and that the cycles of repeated births and deaths are endless.[167][168] Before the birth of Buddha, ancient Indian scholars had developed competing theories of afterlife, including the materialistic school such as Charvaka,[169] which posited that death is the end, there is no afterlife, no soul, no rebirth, no karma, and they described death to be a state where a living being is completely annihilated, dissolved.[170] Buddha rejected this theory, adopted the alternative existing theories on rebirth, criticizing the materialistic schools that denied rebirth and karma, states Damien Keown.[171] Such beliefs are inappropriate and dangerous, stated Buddha, because such annihilationism views encourage moral irresponsibility and material hedonism;[172] he tied moral responsibility to rebirth.[167][171]

The Buddha introduced the concept that there is no permanent self (soul), and this central concept in Buddhism is called anattā.[173][174][175] Major contemporary Buddhist traditions such as Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions accept the teachings of Buddha. These teachings assert there is rebirth, there is no permanent self and no irreducible ātman (soul) moving from life to another and tying these lives together, there is impermanence, that all compounded things such as living beings are aggregates dissolve at death, but every being reincarnates.[176][177][178] The rebirth cycles continue endlessly, states Buddhism, and it is a source of duhkha (suffering, pain), but this reincarnation and duhkha cycle can be stopped through nirvana. The anattā doctrine of Buddhism is a contrast to Hinduism, the latter asserting that “soul exists, it is involved in rebirth, and it is through this soul that everything is connected”.[179][180][181]

Different traditions within Buddhism have offered different theories on what reincarnates and how reincarnation happens. One theory suggests that it occurs through consciousness (Sanskrit: vijñāna; Pali: samvattanika-viññana)[182][183] or stream of consciousness (Sanskrit: citta-santāna, vijñāna-srotām, or vijñāna-santāna; Pali: viññana-sotam)[184] upon death, which reincarnates into a new aggregation. This process, states this theory, is similar to the flame of a dying candle lighting up another.[185][186] The consciousness in the newly born being is neither identical to nor entirely different from that in the deceased but the two form a causal continuum or stream in this Buddhist theory. Transmigration is influenced by a being’s past karma (Pali: kamma).[187][188] The root cause of rebirth, states Buddhism, is the abiding of consciousness in ignorance (Sanskrit: avidya; Pali: avijja) about the nature of reality, and when this ignorance is uprooted, rebirth ceases.[189]

A 12th-century Japanese painting showing one of the six Buddhist realms of reincarnation (rokudō, 六道)

Buddhist traditions also vary in their mechanistic details on rebirth. Most Theravada Buddhists assert that rebirth is immediate while the Tibetan and most Chinese and Japanese schools hold to the notion of a bardo (intermediate state) that can last up to 49 days.[190][191] The bardo rebirth concept of Tibetan Buddhism, originally developed in India but spread to Tibet and other Buddhist countries, and involves 42 peaceful deities, and 58 wrathful deities.[192] These ideas led to maps on karma and what form of rebirth one takes after death, discussed in texts such as The Tibetan Book of the Dead.[193][194] The major Buddhist traditions accept that the reincarnation of a being depends on the past karma and merit (demerit) accumulated, and that there are six realms of existence in which the rebirth may occur after each death.[195][15][64]

Within Japanese Zen, reincarnation is accepted by some, but rejected by others. A distinction can be drawn between ‘folk Zen’, as in the Zen practiced by devotional lay people, and ‘philosophical Zen’. Folk Zen generally accepts the various supernatural elements of Buddhism such as rebirth. Philosophical Zen, however, places more emphasis on the present moment.[196][197]

Some schools conclude that karma continues to exist and adhere to the person until it works out its consequences. For the Sautrantika school, each act “perfumes” the individual or “plants a seed” that later germinates. Tibetan Buddhism stresses the state of mind at the time of death. To die with a peaceful mind will stimulate a virtuous seed and a fortunate rebirth; a disturbed mind will stimulate a non-virtuous seed and an unfortunate rebirth.[198]

Christianity

[edit]

In a survey by the Pew Forum in 2009, 22% of American Christians expressed a belief in reincarnation,[199] and in a 1981 survey 31% of regular churchgoing European Catholics expressed a belief in reincarnation.[200]

Some Christian theologians interpret certain Biblical passages as referring to reincarnation. These passages include the questioning of Jesus as to whether he is Elijah, John the Baptist, Jeremiah, or another prophet (Matthew 16:13–15 and John 1:21–22) and, less clearly (while Elijah was said not to have died, but to have been taken up to heaven), John the Baptist being asked if he is not Elijah (John 1:25).[201][202][203] Geddes MacGregor, an Episcopalian priest and professor of philosophy, has made a case for the compatibility of Christian doctrine and reincarnation.[204] The Catholic Church and theologians such as Norman Geisler argue that reincarnation is unorthodox and reject the reincarnationist interpretation of texts about John the Baptist and biblical texts used to defend this belief.[205][206]

Early

[edit]

There is evidence[207][208] that Origen, a Church father in early Christian times, taught reincarnation in his lifetime but that when his works were translated into Latin these references were concealed. One of the epistles written by St. Jerome, “To Avitus” (Letter 124; Ad Avitum. Epistula CXXIV),[209] which asserts that Origen’s On the First Principles (Latin: De Principiis; Greek: Περὶ Ἀρχῶν)[210] was mistranscribed:

About ten years ago that saintly man Pammachius sent me a copy of a certain person’s [ Rufinus‘s[209] ] rendering, or rather misrendering, of Origen’s First Principles; with a request that in a Latin version I should give the true sense of the Greek and should set down the writer’s words for good or for evil without bias in either direction. When I did as he wished and sent him the book, he was shocked to read it and locked it up in his desk lest being circulated it might wound the souls of many.[208]

Under the impression that Origen was a heretic like Arius, St. Jerome criticizes ideas described in On the First Principles. Further in “To Avitus” (Letter 124), St. Jerome writes about “convincing proof” that Origen teaches reincarnation in the original version of the book:

The following passage is a convincing proof that he holds the transmigration of the souls and annihilation of bodies. ‘If it can be shown that an incorporeal and reasonable being has life in itself independently of the body and that it is worse off in the body than out of it; then beyond a doubt bodies are only of secondary importance and arise from time to time to meet the varying conditions of reasonable creatures. Those who require bodies are clothed with them, and contrariwise, when fallen souls have lifted themselves up to better things, their bodies are once more annihilated. They are thus ever vanishing and ever reappearing.’[208]

The original text of On First Principles has almost completely disappeared. It remains extant as De Principiis in fragments faithfully translated into Latin by St. Jerome and in “the not very reliable Latin translation of Rufinus.”[210]

However, Origen’s supposed belief in reincarnation is controversial. Christian scholar Dan R. Schlesinger has written an extensive monograph in which he argues that Origen never taught reincarnation.[211]

Reincarnation was taught by several gnostics such as Marcion of Sinope.[212] Belief in reincarnation was rejected by several church fathers, including Augustine of Hippo in The City of God.[213][214][206]

Druze

[edit]

showPart of a series on
Druze

See also: Druze § Beliefs

Reincarnation is a paramount tenet in the Druze faith.[215] There is an eternal duality of the body and the soul and it is impossible for the soul to exist without the body. Therefore, reincarnations occur instantly at one’s death. While in the Hindu and Buddhist belief system a soul can be transmitted to any living creature, in the Druze belief system this is not possible and a human soul will only transfer to a human body. Furthermore, souls cannot be divided into different or separate parts and the number of souls existing is finite.[216]

Few Druzes are able to recall their past but, if they are able to they are called a Nateq. Typically souls who have died violent deaths in their previous incarnation will be able to recall memories. Since death is seen as a quick transient state, mourning is discouraged.[216] Unlike other Abrahamic faiths, heaven and hell are spiritual. Heaven is the ultimate happiness received when soul escapes the cycle of rebirths and reunites with the Creator, while hell is conceptualized as the bitterness of being unable to reunite with the Creator and escape from the cycle of rebirth.[217]

Hinduism

[edit]

Further information: Saṃsāra, Karma, and Moksha

Hindus believe the self or soul (atman) repeatedly takes on a physical body, until moksha.
Part of a series on
Hinduism
HindusHistory
showOrigins
showTraditions
showDeities
showConcepts
showPractices
showPhilosophical schools
showGurus, sants, philosophers
showTexts
showSociety
showOther topics
GlossaryOutline Hinduism portal
vte

The body dies, assert the Hindu traditions, but not the soul, which they assume to be the eternal reality, indestructible and bliss.[218] Everything and all existence is believed to be connected and cyclical in many Hinduism-sects, all living beings composed of two things, the soul and the body or matter.[219] Ātman does not change and cannot change by its innate nature in the Hindu belief.[220] Current Karma impacts the future circumstances in this life, as well as the future forms and realms of lives.[221] Good intent and actions lead to good future, bad intent and actions lead to bad future, impacting how one reincarnates, in the Hindu view of existence.[222]

There is no permanent heaven or hell in most Hinduism-sects.[223] In the afterlife, based on one’s karma, the soul is reborn as another being in heaven, hell, or a living being on earth (human, animal).[223] Gods, too, die once their past karmic merit runs out, as do those in hell, and they return getting another chance on earth. This reincarnation continues, endlessly in cycles, until one embarks on a spiritual pursuit, realizes self-knowledge, and thereby gains mokṣa, the final release out of the reincarnation cycles.[224] This release is believed to be a state of utter bliss, which Hindu traditions believe is either related or identical to Brahman, the unchanging reality that existed before the creation of universe, continues to exist, and shall exist after the universe ends.[225][226][227]

The Upanishads, part of the scriptures of the Hindu traditions, primarily focus on the liberation from reincarnation.[228][229] The Bhagavad Gita discusses various paths to liberation.[218] The Upanishads, states Harold Coward, offer a “very optimistic view regarding the perfectibility of human nature”, and the goal of human effort in these texts is a continuous journey to self-perfection and self-knowledge so as to end Saṃsāra—the endless cycle of rebirth and redeath.[230] The aim of spiritual quest in the Upanishadic traditions is find the true self within and to know one’s soul, a state that they assert leads to blissful state of freedom, moksha.[231]

The Bhagavad Gita states:

Just as in the body childhood, adulthood and old age happen to an embodied being. So also he (the embodied being) acquires another body. The wise one is not deluded about this. (2:13)[232]

As, after casting away worn out garments, a man later takes new ones. So after casting away worn out bodies, the embodied Self encounters other new ones. (2:22)[233]

When an embodied being transcends, these three qualities which are the source of the body, Released from birth, death, old age and pain, he attains immortality. (14:20)[234]

There are internal differences within Hindu traditions on reincarnation and the state of moksha. For example, the dualistic devotional traditions such as Madhvacharya‘s Dvaita Vedanta tradition of Hinduism champion a theistic premise, assert that human soul and Brahman are different, loving devotion to Brahman (god Vishnu in Madhvacharya’s theology) is the means to release from Samsara, it is the grace of God which leads to moksha, and spiritual liberation is achievable only in after-life (videhamukti).[235] The non-dualistic traditions such as Adi Shankara‘s Advaita Vedanta tradition of Hinduism champion a monistic premise, asserting that the individual human soul and Brahman are identical, only ignorance, impulsiveness and inertia leads to suffering through Saṃsāra, in reality there are no dualities, meditation and self-knowledge is the path to liberation, the realization that one’s soul is identical to Brahman is moksha, and spiritual liberation is achievable in this life (jivanmukti).[86][236]

Twentieth-century Indian philosopher Sri Aurobindo said that rebirth was the mechanism of evolution – plants are reborn as animals, which are reborn as humans, gaining intelligence each time.[237] He said that this progression was irreversible, and that a human cannot be reborn as an animal.[238]

Islam

[edit]

Most Islamic schools of thought reject any idea of reincarnation of living beings.[239][240][241] It teaches a linear concept of life, wherein a human being has only one life and upon death he or she is judged by God, then rewarded in heaven or punished in hell.[239][242] Islam teaches final resurrection and Judgement Day,[240] but there is no prospect for the reincarnation of a human being into a different body or being.[239] During the early history of Islam, some of the Caliphs persecuted all reincarnation-believing people, such as Manichaeism, to the point of extinction in Mesopotamia and Persia (modern day Iraq and Iran).[240] However, some Muslim minority sects such as those found among Sufis, and some Muslims in South Asia and Indonesia have retained their pre-Islamic Hindu and Buddhist beliefs in reincarnation.[240] For instance, historically, South Asian Isma’ilis performed chantas yearly, one of which is for seeking forgiveness of sins committed in past lives.[243]

Ghulat sects

[edit]

The idea of reincarnation is accepted by a few heterodox sects, particularly of the Ghulat.[244] Alawites hold that they were originally stars or divine lights that were cast out of heaven through disobedience and must undergo repeated reincarnation (or metempsychosis) before returning to heaven.[245] They can be reincarnated as Christians or others through sin and as animals if they become infidels.[246]

Jainism

[edit]

Further information: Saṃsāra (Jainism) and Karma in Jainism

17th-century cloth painting depicting seven levels of Jain hell according to Jain cosmology. Left panel depicts the demi-god and his animal vehicle presiding over each hell.
Part of a series on
Jainism
JainsHistoryTimelineIndex
showPhilosophy
showEthics
showJain prayers
showMajor figures
showMajor sects
showJain literature
showFestivals
showPilgrimages
showOther
 Religion portal
vte

In Jainism, the reincarnation doctrine, along with its theories of Saṃsāra and Karma, are central to its theological foundations, as evidenced by the extensive literature on it in the major sects of Jainism, and their pioneering ideas on these topics from the earliest times of the Jaina tradition.[247][51] Reincarnation in contemporary Jainism traditions is the belief that the worldly life is characterized by continuous rebirths and suffering in various realms of existence.[52][51][248]

Karma forms a central and fundamental part of Jain faith, being intricately connected to other of its philosophical concepts like transmigration, reincarnation, liberation, non-violence (ahiṃsā) and non-attachment, among others. Actions are seen to have consequences: some immediate, some delayed, even into future incarnations. So the doctrine of karma is not considered simply in relation to one life-time, but also in relation to both future incarnations and past lives.[249] Uttarādhyayana Sūtra 3.3–4 states: “The jīva or the soul is sometimes born in the world of gods, sometimes in hell. Sometimes it acquires the body of a demon; all this happens on account of its karma. This jīva sometimes takes birth as a worm, as an insect or as an ant.”[250] The text further states (32.7): “Karma is the root of birth and death. The souls bound by karma go round and round in the cycle of existence.”[250]

Actions and emotions in the current lifetime affect future incarnations depending on the nature of the particular karma. For example, a good and virtuous life indicates a latent desire to experience good and virtuous themes of life. Therefore, such a person attracts karma that ensures that their future births will allow them to experience and manifest their virtues and good feelings unhindered.[251] In this case, they may take birth in heaven or in a prosperous and virtuous human family. On the other hand, a person who has indulged in immoral deeds, or with a cruel disposition, indicates a latent desire to experience cruel themes of life.[252] As a natural consequence, they will attract karma which will ensure that they are reincarnated in hell, or in lower life forms, to enable their soul to experience the cruel themes of life.[252]

There is no retribution, judgment or reward involved but a natural consequences of the choices in life made either knowingly or unknowingly. Hence, whatever suffering or pleasure that a soul may be experiencing in its present life is on account of choices that it has made in the past.[253] As a result of this doctrine, Jainism attributes supreme importance to pure thinking and moral behavior.[254]

The Jain texts postulate four gatis, that is states-of-existence or birth-categories, within which the soul transmigrates. The four gatis are: deva (demigods), manuṣya (humans), nāraki (hell beings), and tiryañca (animals, plants, and microorganisms).[255] The four gatis have four corresponding realms or habitation levels in the vertically tiered Jain universe: deva occupy the higher levels where the heavens are situated; manuṣya and tiryañca occupy the middle levels; and nāraki occupy the lower levels where seven hells are situated.[255]

Single-sensed souls, however, called nigoda,[256] and element-bodied souls pervade all tiers of this universe. Nigodas are souls at the bottom end of the existential hierarchy. They are so tiny and undifferentiated, that they lack even individual bodies, living in colonies. According to Jain texts, this infinity of nigodas can also be found in plant tissues, root vegetables and animal bodies.[257] Depending on its karma, a soul transmigrates and reincarnates within the scope of this cosmology of destinies. The four main destinies are further divided into sub-categories and still smaller sub-sub-categories. In all, Jain texts speak of a cycle of 8.4 million birth destinies in which souls find themselves again and again as they cycle within samsara.[258]

In Jainism, God has no role to play in an individual’s destiny; one’s personal destiny is not seen as a consequence of any system of reward or punishment, but rather as a result of its own personal karma. A text from a volume of the ancient Jain canon, Bhagvati sūtra 8.9.9, links specific states of existence to specific karmas. Violent deeds, killing of creatures having five sense organs, eating fish, and so on, lead to rebirth in hell. Deception, fraud and falsehood lead to rebirth in the animal and vegetable world. Kindness, compassion and humble character result in human birth; while austerities and the making and keeping of vows lead to rebirth in heaven.[259]

Each soul is thus responsible for its own predicament, as well as its own salvation. Accumulated karma represent a sum total of all unfulfilled desires, attachments and aspirations of a soul.[260][261] It enables the soul to experience the various themes of the lives that it desires to experience.[260] Hence a soul may transmigrate from one life form to another for countless of years, taking with it the karma that it has earned, until it finds conditions that bring about the required fruits. In certain philosophies, heavens and hells are often viewed as places for eternal salvation or eternal damnation for good and bad deeds. But according to Jainism, such places, including the earth are simply the places which allow the soul to experience its unfulfilled karma.[262]

Judaism

[edit]

See also: Gilgul

Part of a series on
Kabbalah
showConcepts
showHistory
showPractices
showPeople
showRole
vte

The doctrine of reincarnation has had a complex evolution within Judaism. Initially alien to Jewish tradition, it began to emerge in the 8th century, possibly influenced by Muslim mystics, gaining acceptance among Karaites and Jewish dissenters.[263][264] It was first mentioned in Jewish literature by Saadia Gaon, who criticized it.[265][263] However, it remained a minority belief, facing little resistance until the spread of Kabbalah in the 12th century. The “Book of Clarity” (Sefer ha-Bahir) of this period introduced concepts such as the transmigration of souls, strengthening the foundation of Kabbalah with mystical symbolism.[266] Kabbalah also teaches that “The soul of Moses is reincarnated in every generation.”[267] This teaching found more significant ground in Kabbalistic circles in Provence and Spain.[264]

Despite not being widely accepted in Orthodox Judaism, the doctrine of reincarnation attracted some modern Jews involved in mysticism.[263] Hasidic Judaism and followers of Kabbalah remained firm in their belief in the transmigration of souls. Other branches of Judaism, such as Reform and Conservative, do not teach it.[268]

The 16th century mystical renaissance in communal Safed replaced scholastic Rationalism as mainstream traditional Jewish theology, both in scholarly circles and in the popular imagination. References to gilgul in former Kabbalah became systematized as part of the metaphysical purpose of creation. Isaac Luria (the Ari) brought the issue to the centre of his new mystical articulation, for the first time, and advocated identification of the reincarnations of historic Jewish figures that were compiled by Haim Vital in his Shaar HaGilgulim.[269] Gilgul is contrasted with the other processes in Kabbalah of Ibbur (‘pregnancy’), the attachment of a second soul to an individual for (or by) good means, and Dybuk (‘possession’), the attachment of a spirit, demon, etc. to an individual for (or by) “bad” means.

In Lurianic Kabbalah, reincarnation is not retributive or fatalistic, but an expression of Divine compassion, the microcosm of the doctrine of cosmic rectification of creation. Gilgul is a heavenly agreement with the individual soul, conditional upon circumstances. Luria’s radical system focused on rectification of the Divine soul, played out through Creation. The true essence of anything is the divine spark within that gives it existence. Even a stone or leaf possesses such a soul that “came into this world to receive a rectification”. A human soul may occasionally be exiled into lower inanimate, vegetative or animal creations. The most basic component of the soul, the nefesh, must leave at the cessation of blood production. There are four other soul components and different nations of the world possess different forms of souls with different purposes. Each Jewish soul is reincarnated in order to fulfill each of the 613 Mosaic commandments that elevate a particular spark of holiness associated with each commandment. Once all the Sparks are redeemed to their spiritual source, the Messianic Era begins. Non-Jewish observance of the 7 Laws of Noah assists the Jewish people, though Biblical adversaries of Israel reincarnate to oppose.

Among the many rabbis who accepted reincarnation are Kabbalists like Nahmanides (the Ramban) and Rabbenu Bahya ben Asher, Levi ibn Habib (the Ralbah), Shelomoh Alkabez, Moses Cordovero, Moses Chaim Luzzatto; early Hasidic masters such as the Baal Shem Tov, Schneur Zalman of Liadi and Nachman of Breslov, as well as virtually all later Hasidic masters; contemporary Hasidic teachers such as DovBer Pinson, Moshe Weinberger and Joel Landau; and key Mitnagdic leaders, such as the Vilna Gaon and Chaim Volozhin and their school, as well as Rabbi Shalom Sharabi (known at the RaShaSH), the Ben Ish Chai of Baghdad, and the Baba Sali.[270] Rabbis who have rejected the idea include Saadia Gaon, David Kimhi, Hasdai Crescas, Joseph Albo, Abraham ibn Daud, Leon de Modena, Solomon ben Aderet, Maimonides and Asher ben Jehiel. Among the Geonim, Hai Gaon argued in favour of gilgulim.

Inuit

[edit]

In the Western Hemisphere, belief in reincarnation is most prevalent in the now heavily Christian Polar North (now mainly parts of Greenland and Nunavut).[271] The concept of reincarnation is enshrined in the Inuit languages,[272] and in many Inuit cultures it is traditional to name a newborn child after a recently deceased person under the belief that the child is the namesake reincarnated.[271]

Ho-Chunk

[edit]

Reincarnation is an intrinsic part of some Northeastern Native American traditions.[271] The following is a story of human-to-human reincarnation as told by Thunder Cloud, a Winnebago (Ho-Chunk) shaman. Here Thunder Cloud talks about his two previous lives and how he died and came back again to this his third lifetime. He describes his time between lives, when he was “blessed” by Earth Maker and all the abiding spirits and given special powers, including the ability to heal the sick.

Thunder Cloud’s account of his two reincarnations:

I (my ghost) was taken to the place where the sun sets (the west). … While at that place, I thought I would come back to earth again, and the old man with whom I was staying said to me, “My son, did you not speak about wanting to go to the earth again?” I had, as a matter of fact, only thought of it, yet he knew what I wanted. Then he said to me, “You can go, but you must ask the chief first.” Then I went and told the chief of the village of my desire, and he said to me, “You may go and obtain your revenge upon the people who killed your relatives and you.” Then I was brought down to earth. … There I lived until I died of old age. … As I was lying [in my grave], someone said to me, “Come, let us go away.” So then we went toward the setting of the sun. There we came to a village where we met all the dead. … From that place I came to this earth again for the third time, and here I am.

— Radin (1923)[273]

Sikhism

[edit]

Founded in the 15th century, Sikhism‘s founder Guru Nanak had a choice between the cyclical reincarnation concept of ancient Indian religions and the linear concept of Islam, he chose the cyclical concept of time.[274][275] Sikhism teaches reincarnation theory similar to those in Hinduism, but with some differences from its traditional doctrines.[276] Sikh rebirth theories about the nature of existence are similar to ideas that developed during the devotional Bhakti movement particularly within some Vaishnava traditions, which define liberation as a state of union with God attained through the grace of God.[277][278][279]

The doctrines of Sikhism teach that the soul exists, and is passed from one body to another in endless cycles of Saṃsāra, until liberation from the death and rebirth cycle. Each birth begins with karma (karam), and these actions leave a karmic signature (karni) on one’s soul which influences future rebirths, but it is God whose grace that liberates from the death and rebirth cycle.[276] The way out of the reincarnation cycle, asserts Sikhism, is to live an ethical life, devote oneself to God and constantly remember God’s name.[276] The precepts of Sikhism encourage the bhakti of One Lord for mukti (liberation from the death and rebirth cycle).[276][280]

Yoruba

[edit]

See also: Yoruba religion

The Yoruba religion teaches that Olodumare, the Supreme Being and divine Creator who rules over His Creation, created eniyan, or humanity, to achieve balance between heaven and earth and bring about Ipo Rere, or the Good Condition.[281] To cause achievement of the Good Condition, humanity reincarnates.[282] Once achieved, Ipo Rere provides the ultimate state of supreme existence with Olodumare, a goal which elevates reincarnation to a key position in the Yoruba religion.[283]

Atunwaye[284] (also called atunwa[281]) is the Yoruba term for reincarnation. Predestination is a foundational component of atunwaye. Just prior to incarnation, a person first chooses their Ayanmo (destiny) before also choosing their Akunyelan (lot) in the presence of Olodumare and Orunmila with Olodumare’s approval.[285] By atunwaye, a person may incarnate only in a human being and may choose to reincarnate in either sex, regardless of choice in the prior incarnation.[283]

Ipadawaye

[edit]

The most common, widespread Yoruba reincarnation belief is ipadawaye, meaning “the ancestor’s rebirth”.[284] According to this belief, the reincarnating person will reincarnate along their familial lineage.[282][283][286][287] When a person dies, they go to orun (heaven) and will live with the ancestors in either orunrere (good heaven) or orunapaadi (bad heaven). Reincarnation is believed to be a gift bestowed on ancestors who lived well and experienced a “good” death. Only ancestors living in orunrere may return as grandchildren, reincarnating out of their love for the family or the world. Children may be given names to indicate which ancestor is believed to have returned, such as Babatide (“father has come”), Babatunde (“father has come again”), and Yetunde (“mother has come again”).[284][286]

A “bad” death (which includes deaths of children, cruel, or childless people and deaths by punishments from the gods, accidents, suicides, and gruesome murders) is generally believed to prevent the deceased from joining the ancestors and reincarnating again,[288] though some practitioners also believe a person experiencing a “bad” death will be reborn much later into conditions of poverty.[281]

Abiku

[edit]

Another Yoruba reincarnation belief is abiku, meaning “born to die”[281][284][289] According to Yoruba custom, an abiku is a reincarnating child who repeatedly experiences death and rebirth with the same mother in a vicious cycle. Because childlessness is considered a curse in Yoruba culture,[289] parents with an abiku child will always attempt to help the abiku child by preventing their death. However, abiku are believed to possess a power to ensure their eventual death, so rendering assistance is often a frustrating endeavor causing significant pain to the parents. This pain is believed to bring happiness to the abiku.[289]

Abiku are believed to be a “species of spirit” thought to live apart from people in, for example, secluded parts of villages, jungles, and footpaths. Modern belief in abiku has significantly waned among urban populations, with the decline attributed to improved hygiene and medical care reducing infant mortality rates.[289]

Akudaaya

[edit]

Akudaaya, meaning “born to die and reappear”[284] (also called akuda[290]), is a Yoruba reincarnation belief of “a person that is dead[] but has not gone to heaven”.[291] Akudaaya is based on the belief that, if a recently-deceased person’s destiny in that life remained unfulfilled, the deceased cannot join the ancestors and therefore must roam the world.[290] Following death, an akudaaya returns to their previous existence by reappearing in the same physical form. However, the new existence will be lived in a different physical location from the first, and the akudaaya will not be recognized by a still-living relative, should they happen to meet. The akudaaya lives their new existence working to fulfill their destiny from the previous life.

The concept of akudaaya is the subject of Akudaaya (The Wraith), a 2023 Nigerian drama film in the Yoruba language.[292] The film is said to center on a deceased son who “has begun living life as a spirit in another state and has fallen in love”.[293]

New religious and spiritual movements

[edit]

Part of a series on the
Paranormal
showMain articles
showSkepticism
showParapsychology
showRelated
vte

Spiritism

[edit]

Tomb of Allan Kardec, founder of spiritism. The inscription says in French “To be born, die, again be reborn, and so progress unceasingly, such is the law”.

Spiritism, a spiritualist philosophy codified in the 19th century by the French educator Allan Kardec, teaches reincarnation or rebirth into human life after death. According to this doctrine, free will and cause and effect are the corollaries of reincarnation, and reincarnation provides a mechanism for a person’s spiritual evolution in successive lives.[294]

Theosophy

[edit]

See also: Theosophy § Reincarnation and karma

The Theosophical Society draws much of its inspiration from India.[295] In the Theosophical world-view reincarnation is the vast rhythmic process by which the soul, the part of a person which belongs to the formless non-material and timeless worlds, unfolds its spiritual powers in the world and comes to know itself.[296] It descends from sublime, free, spiritual realms and gathers experience through its effort to express itself in the world. Afterwards there is a withdrawal from the physical plane to successively higher levels of reality, in death, a purification and assimilation of the past life. Having cast off all instruments of personal experience it stands again in its spiritual and formless nature, ready to begin its next rhythmic manifestation, every lifetime bringing it closer to complete self-knowledge and self-expression.[296] However, it may attract old mental, emotional, and energetic karma patterns to form the new personality.[297]

Anthroposophy

[edit]

Anthroposophy describes reincarnation from the point of view of Western philosophy and culture. The ego is believed to transmute transient soul experiences into universals that form the basis for an individuality that can endure after death. These universals include ideas, which are intersubjective and thus transcend the purely personal (spiritual consciousness), intentionally formed human character (spiritual life), and becoming a fully conscious human being (spiritual humanity). Rudolf Steiner described both the general principles he believed to be operative in reincarnation, such as that one’s will activity in one life forms the basis for the thinking of the next,[298] and a number of successive lives of various individualities.[299]

Similarly, other famous people’s life stories are not primarily the result of genes, upbringing or biographical vicissitudes. Steiner relates that a large estate in north-eastern France was held during the early Middle Ages by a martial feudal lord. During a military campaign, this estate was captured by a rival. The previous owner had no means of retaliating, and was forced to see his property lost to an enemy. He was filled with a smoldering resentment towards the propertied classes, not only for the remainder of his life in the Middle Ages, but also in a much later incarnation—as Karl Marx. His rival was reborn as Friedrich Engels.[300]

— Olav Hammer, Coda. On Belief and Evidence

Modern astrology

[edit]

Inspired by Helena Blavatsky‘s major works, including Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine, astrologers in the early twentieth-century integrated the concepts of karma and reincarnation into the practice of Western astrology. Notable astrologers who advanced this development included Alan Leo, Charles E. O. Carter, Marc Edmund Jones, and Dane Rudhyar. A new synthesis of East and West resulted as Hindu and Buddhist concepts of reincarnation were fused with Western astrology’s deep roots in Hermeticism and Neoplatonism. In the case of Rudhyar, this synthesis was enhanced with the addition of Jungian depth psychology.[301] This dynamic integration of astrology, reincarnation and depth psychology has continued into the modern era with the work of astrologers Steven Forrest and Jeffrey Wolf Green. Their respective schools of Evolutionary Astrology are based on “an acceptance of the fact that human beings incarnate in a succession of lifetimes”.[302]

Scientology

[edit]

See also: Scientology beliefs and practices

Past reincarnation, usually termed past lives, is a key part of the principles and practices of the Church of Scientology. Scientologists believe that the human individual is actually a thetan, an immortal spiritual entity, that has fallen into a degraded state as a result of past-life experiences. Scientology auditing is intended to free the person of these past-life traumas and recover past-life memory, leading to a higher state of spiritual awareness.

This idea is echoed in their highest fraternal religious order, Sea Org, whose motto is “Revenimus” (‘We Come Back’), and whose members sign a “billion-year contract” as a sign of commitment to that ideal. L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, does not use the word “reincarnation” to describe its beliefs, noting that: “The common definition of reincarnation has been altered from its original meaning. The word has come to mean ‘to be born again in different life forms’ whereas its actual definition is ‘to be born again into the flesh of another body.’ Scientology ascribes to this latter, original definition of reincarnation.”[303]

The first writings in Scientology regarding past lives date from around 1951 and slightly earlier. In 1960, Hubbard published a book on past lives entitled Have You Lived Before This Life. In 1968 he wrote Mission Into Time, a report on a five-week sailing expedition to Sardinia, Sicily and Carthage to see if specific evidence could be found to substantiate L. Ron Hubbard’s recall of incidents in his own past, centuries ago.

Wicca

[edit]

Wicca is a neo-pagan religion focused on nature, guided by the philosophy of Wiccan Rede that advocates the tenets “Harm None, Do As Ye Will”. Wiccans believe in a form of karmic return where one’s deeds are returned, either in the current life or in another life, threefold or multiple times in order to teach one lessons (the Threefold Law). Reincarnation is therefore an accepted part of the Wiccan faith.[304][full citation needed] Wiccans also believe that death and afterlife are important experiences for the soul to transform and prepare for future lifetimes.[citation needed]

Reincarnation and science

[edit]

See also: Relationship between religion and science

The 14th Dalai Lama has stated his belief that it would be difficult for science to disprove reincarnation.

While there has been no scientific confirmation of the physical reality of reincarnation, where the subject has been discussed, there are questions of whether and how such beliefs may be justified within the discourse of science and religion. Some champions of academic parapsychology have argued that they have scientific evidence even while their detractors have accused them of practicing a form of pseudoscience.[305][306] Skeptic Carl Sagan asked the Dalai Lama what he would do if a fundamental tenet of his religion (reincarnation) were definitively disproved by science. The Dalai Lama answered, “If science can disprove reincarnation, Tibetan Buddhism would abandon reincarnation…but it’s going to be mighty hard to disprove reincarnation.”[307] Sagan considered claims of memories of past lives to be worthy of research, although he considered reincarnation to be an unlikely explanation for these.[308]

Claims of past lives

[edit]

Over a period of 40 years, psychiatrist Ian Stevenson, from the University of Virginia, recorded case studies of young children who claimed to remember past lives. He published twelve books, including Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation, Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects (a two-part monograph), European Cases of the Reincarnation Type, and Where Reincarnation and Biology Intersect. In his cases he reported the child’s statements and testimony from family members and others, often along with what he considered to be correlates to a deceased person who in some ways seemed to match the child’s memory. Stevenson also investigated cases where he thought that birthmarks and birth defects seemed to match wounds and scars on the deceased. Sometimes included in his documentation were medical records like autopsy photographs.[309] As any claim of past life memory is subject to charges of false memories and the ease with which such claims can be hoaxed, Stevenson expected the controversy and skepticism of his beliefs that followed. He said that he looked for disconfirming evidence and alternative explanations for reports, but, as the Washington Post reported, he typically concluded that no normal explanation sufficed.[310]

Other academic researchers who have undertaken similar pursuits include Jim B. Tucker, Antonia Mills,[311] Satwant Pasricha, Godwin Samararatne, and Erlendur Haraldsson, but Stevenson’s publications remain the most well known.[312] Stevenson’s work in this regard was impressive enough to Carl Sagan that he referred to what were apparently Stevenson’s investigations in his book The Demon-Haunted World as an example of carefully collected empirical data, and though he rejected reincarnation as a parsimonious explanation for the stories, he wrote that the phenomenon of alleged past-life memories should be further researched.[313][314] Sam Harris cited Stevenson’s works in his book The End of Faith as part of a body of data that seems to attest to the reality of psychic phenomena.[315][316]

Stevenson’s claims have been subject to criticism and debunking, for example by the philosopher Paul Edwards, who contended that Ian Stevenson’s accounts of reincarnation were purely anecdotal and cherry-picked.[317] Edwards attributed the stories to selective thinking, suggestion, and false memories that result from the family’s or researcher’s belief systems and thus did not rise to the standard of fairly sampled empirical evidence.[318] The philosopher Keith Augustine wrote in critique that the fact that “the vast majority of Stevenson’s cases come from countries where a religious belief in reincarnation is strong, and rarely elsewhere, seems to indicate that cultural conditioning (rather than reincarnation) generates claims of spontaneous past-life memories.”[319] Further, Ian Wilson wrote that a large number of Stevenson’s cases consisted of poor children remembering wealthy lives or belonging to a higher caste. In these societies, claims of reincarnation have been used as schemes to obtain money from the richer families of alleged former incarnations.[320] Robert Baker asserted that all the past-life experiences investigated by Stevenson and other parapsychologists are understandable in terms of known psychological factors including a mixture of cryptomnesia and confabulation.[321] Edwards also objected that reincarnation invokes assumptions that are inconsistent with modern science.[322] As the vast majority of people do not remember previous lives and there is no empirically documented mechanism known that allows personality to survive death and travel to another body, positing the existence of reincarnation is subject to the principle that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence“.

Stevenson also claimed there were a handful of cases that suggested evidence of xenoglossy, including two where a subject under hypnosis allegedly conversed with people speaking the foreign language, instead of merely being able to recite foreign words. Sarah Thomason, a linguist (and skeptical researcher) at the University of Michigan, reanalyzed these cases, concluding that “the linguistic evidence is too weak to provide support for the claims of xenoglossy”.[323]

Past life regression

[edit]

Some believers in reincarnation (Stevenson not among them) give much importance to supposed past-life memories retrieved under hypnosis during past life regressions. Popularized by psychiatrist Brian Weiss, who claims he has regressed more than 4,000 patients since 1980,[324][325] the technique is often identified as a kind of pseudoscientific practice.[326] Such supposed memories have been documented to contain historical inaccuracies originating from modern popular culture, common beliefs about history, or books that discuss historical events. Experiments with subjects undergoing past life regression indicate that a belief in reincarnation and suggestions by the hypnotist are the two most important factors regarding the contents of memories reported.[327][326][328] The use of hypnosis and suggestive questions can tend to leave the subject particularly likely to hold distorted or false memories.[329] Rather than recall of a previous existence, the source of the memories is more likely cryptomnesia and confabulations that combine experiences, knowledge, imagination and suggestion or guidance from the hypnotist. Once created, those memories are indistinguishable from memories based on events that occurred during the subject’s life.[327][330]

Past-life regression has been critiqued for being unethical on the grounds that it lacks any evidence to support its claims and that it increases one’s susceptibility to false memories. Luis Cordón states that this can be problematic as it creates delusions under the guise of therapy. The memories are experienced as being as vivid as those based on events experienced in one’s life and impossible to differentiate from true memories of actual events, and accordingly any damage can be difficult to undo.[330][331]

APA accredited organizations have challenged the use of past-life regressions as a therapeutic method, calling it unethical. Additionally, the hypnotic methodology that underpins past-life regression has been criticized as placing the participant in a vulnerable position, susceptible to implantation of false memories.[331] Because the implantation of false memories may be harmful, Gabriel Andrade argues that past-life regression violates the principle of first, do no harm (non-maleficence), part of the Hippocratic Oath.[331]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

  1. ^ McClelland, Norman C. (2010). Encyclopedia of Reincarnation and Karma. McFarland. pp. 24–29, 171. ISBN 978-0-7864-5675-8. Archived from the original on 26 November 2016. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  2. ^ Juergensmeyer, Mark; Roof, Wade Clark (2011). Encyclopedia of Global Religion. SAGE Publications. pp. 271–272. ISBN 978-1-4522-6656-5. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c Juergensmeyer & Roof 2011, pp. 271–272.
  4. ^ Laumakis, Stephen J. (2008). An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 90–99. ISBN 978-1-139-46966-1. Archived from the original on 21 January 2017. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  5. ^ Rita M. Gross (1993). Buddhism After Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis, and Reconstruction of Buddhism. State University of New York Press. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-4384-0513-1.
  6. ^ Flood, Gavin D. (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press
  7. ^ Gananath Obeyesekere, Imagining Karma: Ethical Transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek Rebirth. University of California Press, 2002, p. 15.
  8. ^ Crawley[full citation needed]
  9. ^ see Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, Philip L. Quinn, A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. John Wiley and Sons, 2010, p. 640, Google Books Archived 2022-12-12 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ Hitti, Philip K (2007) [1924]. Origins of the Druze People and Religion, with Extracts from their Sacred Writings (New Edition). Columbia University Oriental Studies. 28. London: Saqi. pp. 13–14. ISBN 0-86356-690-1
  11. ^ Heindel, Max (1985) [1939, 1908] The Rosicrucian Christianity Lectures (Collected Works): The Riddle of Life and Death Archived 2010-06-29 at the Wayback Machine. Oceanside, California. 4th edition. ISBN 0-911274-84-7
  12. ^ An important recent work discussing the mutual influence of ancient Greek and Indian philosophy regarding these matters is The Shape of Ancient Thought by Thomas McEvilley
  13. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Haraldsson, Erlendur (January 2006). “Popular psychology, belief in life after death and reincarnation in the Nordic countries, Western and Eastern Europe”. Nordic Psychology. 58 (2): 171–180. doi:10.1027/1901-2276.58.2.171. S2CID 143453837.
  14. ^ “Encyclopædia Britannica”. Concise.britannica.com. Retrieved 25 June 2016.
  15. ^ Jump up to:a b Keown 2013, pp. 35–40.
  16. ^ Christopher Key Chapple (2006). Jainism and Ecology: Nonviolence in the Web of Life. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 39. ISBN 978-81-208-2045-6.
  17. ^ Oxford Dictionaries (2016). “Transmigration”. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 5 January 2014.
  18. ^ Karl Sigmund. “Gödel Exhibition: Gödel’s Century”. Goedelexhibition.at. Archived from the original on 21 October 2016. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  19. ^ metempsychosis Archived 2016-08-18 at the Wayback Machine, Etymology Dictionary, Douglas Harper (2015)
  20. ^ Carl A. Huffman (2014), Pythagoras, 4.1 The Fate of the Soul–Metempsychosis Archived 2008-10-07 at the Wayback Machine Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University
  21. ^ “Heart of Hinduism: Reincarnation and Samsara”. Hinduism.iskcon.com. Archived from the original on 19 April 2011. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  22. ^ Jump up to:a b Monier Monier-Williams (1872). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. p. 582.
  23. ^ Ronald Wesley Neufeldt (1986). Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments. State University of New York Press. pp. 88–89. ISBN 978-0-87395-990-2.
  24. ^ Thomas William Rhys Davids; William Stede (1921). Pali-English Dictionary. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 95, 144, 151, 361, 475. ISBN 978-81-208-1144-7.
  25. ^ Jump up to:a b c Laumakis 2008, pp. 90–99.
  26. ^ (John Bowker 2014, pp. 84–85) Gavin Flood (2010), Brill’s Encyclopedia of Hinduism (Editor: Knut Jacobsen), Volume II, Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-17893-9, pp. 881–884
  27. ^ Klostermaier, Klaus (1985). “Mokṣa and Critical Theory”. Philosophy East and West. 35 (1): 61–71. doi:10.2307/1398681. JSTOR 1398681. ProQuest 1301471616.
  28. ^ Thomas, Norman E. (April 1988). “Liberation for Life: A Hindu Liberation Philosophy”. Missiology: An International Review. 16 (2): 149–162. doi:10.1177/009182968801600202. S2CID 170870237.
  29. ^ Gerhard Oberhammer (1994), La Délivrance dès cette vie: Jivanmukti, Collège de France, Publications de l’Institut de Civilisation Indienne. Série in-8°, Fasc. 61, Édition-Diffusion de Boccard (Paris), ISBN 978-2-86803-061-0, pp. 1–9
  30. ^ Obeyesekere, Gananath (2005). Wendy Doniger (ed.). Karma and Rebirth: A Cross Cultural Study. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 1–2, 108, 126–128. ISBN 978-81-208-2609-0.
  31. ^ Juergensmeyer & Roof 2011, pp. 272–273.
  32. ^ Irving Steiger Cooper (1920). Reincarnation: The Hope of the World. Theosophical Society in America. p. 15.
  33. ^ Diodorus Siculus thought the druids might have been influenced by the teachings of Pythagoras. Diodorus Siculus v.28.6; Hippolytus Philosophumena i.25.
  34. ^ Flood, Gavin. Olivelle, Patrick. 2003. The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism. Malden: Blackwell. pp. 273–274. “The second half of the first millennium BCE was the period that created many of the ideological and institutional elements that characterize later Indian religions. The renouncer tradition played a central role during this formative period of Indian religious history….Some of the fundamental values and beliefs that we generally associate with Indian religions in general and Hinduism in particular were in part the creation of the renouncer tradition. These include the two pillars of Indian theologies: samsara—the belief that life in this world is one of suffering and subject to repeated deaths and births (rebirth); moksa/nirvana—the goal of human existence…..”
  35. ^ Jump up to:a b Keown, Damien (2013). Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. pp. 28, 32–38. ISBN 978-0-19-966383-5.
  36. ^ Laumakis 2008.
  37. ^ Gavin D. Flood, An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press (1996), UK ISBN 0-521-43878-0 p. 86 – “A third alternative is that the origin of transmigration theory lies outside of vedic or sramana traditions in the tribal religions of the Ganges valley, or even in Dravidian traditions of south India.”
  38. ^ “Rig Veda 10.58.1 [English translation]”. www.wisdomlib.org. 27 August 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
  39. ^ A.M. Boyer: “Etude sur l’origine de la doctrine du samsara.” Journal Asiatique, (1901), Volume 9, Issue 18, S. 451–453, 459–468
  40. ^ Yuvraj Krishan: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1997, ISBN 978-81-208-1233-8
  41. ^ R.D.Ranade (1926). A Constructive Survey of Upanishadic Philosophy. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. pp. 147–148. There we definitely know that the whole hymn is address to a departed spirit, and the poet [of the Rigvedic hymn] says that he is going to recall the departed soul in order that it may return again and live.”
  42. ^ Atsushi Hayakawa (2014). Circulation of Fire in the Veda. LIT Verlag Münster. pp. 66–67, 101–103 with footnotes. ISBN 978-3-643-90472-0.
  43. ^ Laumakis 2008, p. 90.
  44. ^ A.M. Boyer (1901), “Etude sur l’origine de la doctrine du samsara”, Journal Asiatique, Volume 9, Issue 18, pp. 451–453, 459–468
  45. ^ Vallee Pussin (1917). The way to Nirvana: six lectures on ancient Buddhism as a discipline of salvation. Cambridge University Press. pp. 24–25.
  46. ^ K Kailasapathy (1968). Tamil Heroic Poetry. Clarendon Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-19-815434-1.
  47. ^ Kamil Zvelebil 1974, pp. 9–10 with footnotes.
  48. ^ “Poem: Purananuru – Part 134 by George L. III Hart”. www.poetrynook.com. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
  49. ^ “Poem: Purananuru – Part 241 by George L. III Hart”. www.poetrynook.com. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
  50. ^ Jaini, Padmanabh (1980). Wendy Doniger (ed.). Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions. University of California Press. pp. 217–236. ISBN 978-0-520-03923-0.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Paul Dundas (2003). The Jains. Routledge. pp. 14–16, 102–105. ISBN 978-0-415-26605-5.
  52. ^ Jump up to:a b Jaini 1980, pp. 226–228.
  53. ^ Kristi L. Wiley (2009). The A to Z of Jainism. Scarecrow. p. 186. ISBN 978-0-8108-6337-8.
  54. ^ Jaini 1980, pp. 227–228.
  55. ^ Paul Dundas (2003). The Jains. Routledge. pp. 104–105. ISBN 978-0-415-26605-5.
  56. ^ Jeffery D Long (2013). Jainism: An Introduction. I.B.Tauris. pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-0-85773-656-7.
  57. ^ Paul Dundas (2003). The Jains. Routledge. pp. 55–59. ISBN 978-0-415-26605-5.
  58. ^ John E. Cort (2001). Jains in the World: Religious Values and Ideology in India. Oxford University Press. pp. 118–119. ISBN 978-0-19-803037-9.
  59. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Jeff Wilson (2010). Saṃsāra and Rebirth, in Buddhism. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780195393521-0141. ISBN 978-0-19-539352-1.
  60. ^ Jump up to:a b Trainor, Kevin (2004). Buddhism: The Illustrated Guide. Oxford University Press. pp. 62–63. ISBN 978-0-19-517398-7.; Quote: “Buddhist doctrine holds that until they realize nirvana, beings are bound to undergo rebirth and redeath due to their having acted out of ignorance and desire, thereby producing the seeds of karma”.
  61. ^ Edward Conze (2013). Buddhist Thought in India: Three Phases of Buddhist Philosophy. Routledge. p. 71. ISBN 978-1-134-54231-4. Nirvana is the raison d’être of Buddhism, and its ultimate justification.
  62. ^ Gethin, Rupert (1998), Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford University Press, p. 119, ISBN 978-0-19-289223-2
  63. ^ Paul Williams, Anthony Tribe, Buddhist thought: a complete introduction to the Indian tradition. Routledge, 2000, p. 84.
  64. ^ Jump up to:a b Merv Fowler (1999). Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices. Sussex Academic Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-1-898723-66-0. For a vast majority of Buddhists in Theravadin countries, however, the order of monks is seen by lay Buddhists as a means of gaining the most merit in the hope of accumulating good karma for a better rebirth.
  65. ^ Christopher Gowans (2004). Philosophy of the Buddha: An Introduction. Routledge. p. 169. ISBN 978-1-134-46973-4.
  66. ^ Robert DeCaroli (2004). Haunting the Buddha: Indian Popular Religions and the Formation of Buddhism. Oxford University Press. pp. 94–103. ISBN 978-0-19-803765-1.
  67. ^ Akira Sadakata (1997). Buddhist Cosmology: Philosophy and Origins. Kōsei Publishing 佼成出版社, Tokyo. pp. 68–70. ISBN 978-4-333-01682-2.
  68. ^ James Hastings; John Alexander Selbie; Louis Herbert Gray (1922). Volume 12: Suffering-Zwingli. Encyclopædia of Religion and Ethics. T. & T. Clark. pp. 616–618.
  69. ^ Jessica Frazier & Gavin Flood 2011, pp. 84–86.
  70. ^ Kusum P. Merh (1996). Yama, the Glorious Lord of the Other World. Penguin. pp. 213–215. ISBN 978-81-246-0066-5.
  71. ^ Anita Raina Thapan (2006). The Penguin Swami Chinmyananda Reader. Penguin Books. pp. 84–90. ISBN 978-0-14-400062-3.
  72. ^ Jessica Frazier; Gavin Flood (2011). The Continuum Companion to Hindu Studies. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 84–86. ISBN 978-0-8264-9966-0.
  73. ^ Patrul Rinpoche; Dalai Lama (1998). The Words of My Perfect Teacher: A Complete Translation of a Classic Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism. Rowman Altamira. pp. 95–96. ISBN 978-0-7619-9027-7.
  74. ^ Yuvraj Krishan (1997). The Doctrine of Karma: Its Origin and Development in Brāhmaṇical, Buddhist, and Jaina Traditions. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. pp. 17–27. ISBN 978-81-208-1233-8.
  75. ^ Williams, Paul; Tribe, Anthony; Wynne, Alexander (2012). Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. Routledge. pp. 30–42. ISBN 978-1-136-52088-4. Archived from the original on 20 November 2020. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  76. ^ Michael D. Coogan (2003). The Illustrated Guide to World Religions. Oxford University Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-19-521997-5.
  77. ^ David Carpenter; Ian Whicher (2003). Yoga: The Indian Tradition. Routledge. p. 116. ISBN 978-1-135-79606-8.
  78. ^ Rita Langer (2007). Buddhist Rituals of Death and Rebirth: Contemporary Sri Lankan Practice and Its Origins. Routledge. pp. 53–54. ISBN 978-1-134-15873-7.
  79. ^ Christmas Humphreys (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 42–43. ISBN 978-1-136-22877-3.
  80. ^ Brian Morris (2006). Religion and Anthropology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-521-85241-8. (…) anatta is the doctrine of non-self, and is an extreme empiricist doctrine that holds that the notion of an unchanging permanent self is a fiction and has no reality. According to Buddhist doctrine, the individual person consists of five skandhas or heaps—the body, feelings, perceptions, impulses and consciousness. The belief in a self or soul, over these five skandhas, is illusory and the cause of suffering.
  81. ^ Richard Gombrich (2006). Theravada Buddhism. Routledge. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-134-90352-8. (…) Buddha’s teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This ‘no-soul doctrine’ (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon.
  82. ^ Anatta Archived 2015-12-10 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopedia Britannica (2013), Quote: “Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman (“the self”).”;
  83. ^ Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2217-5, p. 64; “Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence.”
  84. ^ Edward Roer (Translator), Shankara’s Introduction, p. 2, at Google Books to Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad, pp. 2–4;
  85. ^ Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist ‘No-Self’ Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana? Archived 2015-02-06 at the Wayback Machine, Philosophy Now;
  86. ^ Jump up to:a b Loy, David (1982). “Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?”. International Philosophical Quarterly. 22 (1): 65–74. doi:10.5840/ipq19822217.
  87. ^ KN Jayatilleke (2010), Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge, ISBN 978-81-208-0619-1, pp. 246–249, from note 385 onwards;
  88. ^ John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0158-5, p. 63, Quote: “The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism”.
  89. ^ Bruce M. Sullivan (1997). Historical Dictionary of Hinduism. Scarecrow. pp. 235–236 (See: Upanishads). ISBN 978-0-8108-3327-2.
  90. ^ Klaus K. Klostermaier (2007). A Survey of Hinduism: Third Edition. State University of New York Press. pp. 119–122, 162–180, 194–195. ISBN 978-0-7914-7082-4.
  91. ^ Kalupahana, David J. (1992). The Principles of Buddhist Psychology. Delhi: ri Satguru Publications. pp. 38–39.
  92. ^ G Obeyesekere (1980). Wendy Doniger (ed.). Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions. University of California Press. pp. 137–141. ISBN 978-0-520-03923-0.
  93. ^ Libby Ahluwalia (2008). Understanding Philosophy of Religion. Folens. pp. 243–249. ISBN 978-1-85008-274-3.
  94. ^ Harold Coward; Julius Lipner; Katherine K. Young (1989). Hindu Ethics. State University of New York Press. pp. 85–94. ISBN 978-0-88706-764-8.
  95. ^ Jump up to:a b Naomi Appleton (2014). Narrating Karma and Rebirth: Buddhist and Jain Multi-Life Stories. Cambridge University Press. pp. 76–89. ISBN 978-1-139-91640-0.
  96. ^ Kristi L. Wiley (2004). Historical Dictionary of Jainism. Scarecrow. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-8108-5051-4.
  97. ^ Kristi L. Wiley (2004). Historical Dictionary of Jainism. Scarecrow. pp. 10–12, 111–112, 119. ISBN 978-0-8108-5051-4.
  98. ^ Gananath Obeyesekere (2006). Karma and Rebirth: A Cross Cultural Study. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 107–108. ISBN 978-81-208-2609-0.;
    Kristi L. Wiley (2004). Historical Dictionary of Jainism. Scarecrow. pp. 118–119. ISBN 978-0-8108-5051-4.
  99. ^ John E. Cort (2001). Jains in the World: Religious Values and Ideology in India. Oxford University Press. pp. 118–123. ISBN 978-0-19-803037-9.
  100. ^ Schibli, S., Hermann, Pherekydes of Syros, p. 104, Oxford Univ. Press 2001
  101. ^ “The dates of his life cannot be fixed exactly, but assuming the approximate correctness of the statement of Aristoxenus (ap. Porph. V.P. 9) that he left Samos to escape the tyranny of Polycrates at the age of forty, we may put his birth round about 570 BCE, or a few years earlier. The length of his life was variously estimated in antiquity, but it is agreed that he lived to a fairly ripe old age, and most probably he died at about seventy-five or eighty.” William Keith Chambers Guthrie, (1978), A history of Greek philosophy, Volume 1: The earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans, p. 173. Cambridge University Press
  102. ^ The Dialogues of Plato (Benjamin Jowett trans., 1875 ed), vol. 2, p. 125
  103. ^ The Dialogues of Plato (Benjamin Jowett trans., 1875 ed), vol. 1, p. 282
  104. ^ See Kamtekar 2016 for a discussion of how Plato’s view of reincarnation changes across texts, especially concerning the existence of a distinct reward-or-punishment phase between lives.
  105. ^ See Campbell 2022 for more on why Plato believes in reincarnation.
  106. ^ See Timaeus 90–92.
  107. ^ Linforth, Ivan M. (1941) The Arts of Orpheus Arno Press, New York, OCLC 514515
  108. ^ Long, Herbert S. (1948) A Study of the doctrine of metempsychosis in Greece, from Pythagoras to Plato (Long’s 1942 Ph.D. dissertation) Princeton, New Jersey, OCLC 1472399
  109. ^ Long, Herbert S. (1948). “Plato’s Doctrine of Metempsychosis and Its Source”. The Classical Weekly. 41 (10): 149–155. doi:10.2307/4342414. JSTOR 4342414. ProQuest 1296280468.
  110. ^ Leonid Zhmud (2012). Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans. OUP Oxford. pp. 232–233. ISBN 978-0-19-928931-8.
  111. ^ Menander, The Inspired Woman
  112. ^ Lucian, Gallus, 18 et seq.
  113. ^ Poesch, Jessie (1962) “Ennius and Basinio of Parma” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 25(1/2):116–118 [117 n15].
  114. ^ Lucretius, (i. 124)
  115. ^ Horace, Epistles, II. i. 52
  116. ^ Virgil, The Aeneid, vv. 724 et seq.
  117. ^ Julius Caesar, “De Bello Gallico”, VI
  118. ^ T. Rice Holmes (1903). Caesar’s Conquest of Gaul: An Historical Narrative.
  119. ^ Kendrick, T.D. (2003) [1927]. Druids and Druidism. Dover. p. 106. ISBN 0-486-42719-6.
  120. ^ Jump up to:a b Kendrick 2003, p. 108.
  121. ^ Kendrick 2003, p. 105.
  122. ^ Robin Melrose (2014). The Druids and King Arthur: A New View of Early Britain. McFarland. ISBN 978-07-864600-5-2.
  123. ^ Kendrick 2003, p. 109.
  124. ^ Essential Judaism: A Complete Guide to Beliefs, Customs & Rituals, By George Robinson, Simon and Schuster 2008, p. 193
  125. ^ The Book of Beliefs and Opinions, chap. VIII
  126. ^ “Mind in the Balance: Meditation in Science, Buddhism, and Christianity”, p. 104, by B. Alan Wallace
  127. ^ “Between Worlds: Dybbuks, Exorcists, and Early Modern Judaism”, p. 190, by J. H. Chajes
  128. ^ Jewish Tales of Reincarnation, By Yonasson Gershom, Yonasson Gershom, Jason Aronson, Incorporated, 31 January 2000
  129. ^ Yonasson Gershom (1999), Jewish Tales of Reincarnation. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. ISBN 0-7657-6083-5
  130. ^ Jump up to:a b “Biblical Accounts that Suggest Reincarnation”. Archived from the original on 8 June 2021. Retrieved 27 August 2023.
  131. ^ “Who Was Jesus Before the Last Incarnation?”. 9 January 2012. Retrieved 7 September 2023.
  132. ^ “CCC – PART 1 SECTION 2 CHAPTER 3 ARTICLE 11”. Vatican.va. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
  133. ^ “Army of Mary Doctrinal Note”. Cccb.ca. Archived from the original on 4 May 2012. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
  134. ^ “Army of Mary / Community of the Lady of All Peoples – WRSP”. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
  135. ^ Pius X (4 September 1904). “Pius X, Tribus Circiter (05/04/1906)”. Vatican.va. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
  136. ^ “Archived copy” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 May 2012. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
  137. ^ Much of this is documented in R.E. Slater’s book Paradise Reconsidered.
  138. ^ Richard Foltz, Religions of the Silk Road, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010
  139. ^ Zhuangzi (1889). Chuang Tzŭ: Mystic, Moralist, and Social Reformer (translated by Herbert Allen Giles). Bernard Quaritch. p. 304.
  140. ^ “Newadvent.org”. Newadvent.org. 1 February 1911. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  141. ^ Steven Runciman, The Medieval Manichee: A Study of the Christian Dualist Heresy, 1982, ISBN 0-521-28926-2, Cambridge University Press, The Bogomils
  142. ^ For example Dondaine, Antoine. O.P. Un traite neo-manicheen du XIIIe siecle: Le Liber de duobus principiis, suivi d’un fragment de rituel Cathare (Rome: Institutum Historicum Fratrum Praedicatorum, 1939)
  143. ^ “Newadvent.org”. Newadvent.org. 1 March 1907. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  144. ^ “the souls must always be the same, for if none be destroyed they will not diminish in number”. Republic X, 611. The Republic of Plato By Plato, Benjamin Jowett Edition: 3 Published by Clarendon press, 1888.
  145. ^ In a letter to his friend George Whatley written 23 May 1785: Kennedy, Jennifer T. (2001). “Death Effects: Revisiting the Conceit of Franklin’s “Memoir””. Early American Literature. 36 (2): 201–234. doi:10.1353/eal.2001.0016. JSTOR 25057231. S2CID 161799223.
  146. ^ Marsilio Ficino, Platonic Theology, 17.3–4
  147. ^ “Again, Rosalind in “As You Like It” (Act III., Scene 2), says: I was never so be-rhimed that I can remember since Pythagoras’s time, when I was an Irish rat”—alluding to the doctrine of the transmigration of souls.” William H. Grattan Flood, quoted at Libraryireland.com Archived 2009-04-21 at the Wayback Machine
  148. ^ Boulting, 1914. pp. 163–164
  149. ^ “Swedenborg and Life Recap: Do We Reincarnate? 3/6/2017”. Swedenborg Foundation. 10 March 2017. Retrieved 24 October 2019.
  150. ^ Schopenhauer, A: “Parerga und Paralipomena” (Eduard Grisebach edition), On Religion, Section 177
  151. ^ Nietzsche and the Doctrine of Metempsychosis, in J. Urpeth & J. Lippitt, Nietzsche and the Divine, Manchester: Clinamen, 2000
  152. ^ Jump up to:a b “Shirleymaclaine.com”. Shirleymaclaine.com. Archived from the original on 6 November 2011. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  153. ^ David Hammerman, Lisa Lenard, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Reincarnation, Penguin, p. 34. For relevant works by James, see; William James, Human Immortality: Two Supposed Objections to the Doctrine (the Ingersoll Lecture, 1897), The Will to Believe, Human Immortality (1956) Dover Publications, ISBN 0-486-20291-7, The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature (1902), ISBN 0-14-039034-0, Essays in Radical Empiricism (1912) Dover Publications 2003, ISBN 0-486-43094-4
  154. ^ Berger, Arthur S.; Berger, Joyce (1991). The Encyclopedia of Parapsychology and Psychical Research. Paragon House Publishers. ISBN 1-55778-043-9.
  155. ^ Richmal Crompton, More William, George Newnes, London, 1924, XIII. William and the Ancient Souls Archived 2012-05-29 at the Wayback Machine; “The memory usually came in a flash. For instance, you might remember in a flash when you were looking at a box of matches that you had been Guy Fawkes.”
  156. ^ Marquis, “Archy and Mehitabel” (1927)
  157. ^ Théodore Flournoy, Des Indes à la planète Mars Archived 2009-12-01 at the Wayback Machine, Étude sur un cas de somnambulisme avec glossolalie, Éditions Alcan et Eggimann, Paris et Genève, 1900
  158. ^ “Astara”. www.encyclopedia.com.
  159. ^ David W. Moore, Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal Archived 2020-01-13 at the Wayback Machine
  160. ^ Buddhism China[dead link]
  161. ^ Jane Henry (2005). Parapsychology: research on exceptional experiences Archived 2022-12-12 at the Wayback Machine Routledge, p. 224.
  162. ^ Walter, Tony; Waterhouse, Helen (1999). “A Very Private Belief: Reincarnation in Contemporary England”. Sociology of Religion. 60 (2): 187–197. doi:10.2307/3711748. JSTOR 3711748.
  163. ^ Waterhouse, H. (1999). “Reincarnation belief in Britain: New age orientation or mainstream option?”. Journal of Contemporary Religion. 14 (1): 97–109. doi:10.1080/13537909908580854.
  164. ^ “Unity Magazine November 1938 – Reincarnation | Truth Unity”. www.truthunity.net. Retrieved 20 February 2023.
  165. ^ “Being at One: Neale Donald Walsch Interview with Gil Dekel (Part 3 of 3, paragraphs 18–19)”. 19 September 2010.
  166. ^ Baba, Meher (1967), Discourses Archived 2018-07-08 at the Wayback Machine, Volume III, Sufism Reoriented, 1967, ISBN 1-880619-09-1, p. 96.
  167. ^ Jump up to:a b c Peter Harvey (2012). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge University Press. pp. 32–33, 38–39, 46–49. ISBN 978-0-521-85942-4.
  168. ^ Ronald Wesley Neufeldt (1986). Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments. State University of New York Press. pp. 123–131. ISBN 978-0-87395-990-2.
  169. ^ Ray Billington (2002). Understanding Eastern Philosophy. Routledge. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-134-79348-8.
  170. ^ Ray Billington (2002). Understanding Eastern Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 43–44, 58–60. ISBN 978-1-134-79349-5.
  171. ^ Jump up to:a b Keown, Damien (2004). A Dictionary of Buddhism (Articles titled ucchedavāda, śāśvata-vāda, rebirth). Oxford University Press. pp. 80, 162, 225, 255, 315. ISBN 978-0-19-860560-7.
  172. ^ McClelland 2010, p. 21.
  173. ^ Kalupahana, David J. (1975). Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. University Press of Hawaii. pp. 115–119. ISBN 978-0-8248-0298-1.
  174. ^ Peter Harvey (2012). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57–62. ISBN 978-0-521-85942-4.
  175. ^ Oliver Leaman (2002). Eastern Philosophy: Key Readings. Routledge. pp. 23–27. ISBN 978-1-134-68919-4.
  176. ^ Malcolm B. Hamilton (2012). The Sociology of Religion: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Routledge. pp. 73–80. ISBN 978-1-134-97626-3.
  177. ^ Raju, P. T. (1985). Structural Depths of Indian Thought. State University of New York Press. pp. 147–151. ISBN 978-0-88706-139-4.
  178. ^ McClelland 2010, p. 89;
    Hugh Nicholson (2016). The Spirit of Contradiction in Christianity and Buddhism. Oxford University Press. pp. 23–25. ISBN 978-0-19-045534-7.
  179. ^ Rahula, Walpola (1990). What the Buddha Taught. London: Gordon Fraser. p. 51.
  180. ^ Trainor 2004, p. 58, Quote: “Buddhism shares with Hinduism the doctrine of Samsara, whereby all beings pass through an unceasing cycle of birth, death and rebirth until they find a means of liberation from the cycle. However, Buddhism differs from Hinduism in rejecting the assertion that every human being possesses a changeless soul which constitutes his or her ultimate identity, and which transmigrates from one incarnation to the next..
  181. ^ Robert E. Buswell Jr.; Donald S. Lopez Jr. (2013). The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. pp. 708–709. ISBN 978-1-4008-4805-8.
  182. ^ (M.1.256) “Post-Classical Developments in the Concepts of Karma and Rebirth in Theravada Buddhism.” by Bruce Matthews. in Karma and Rebirth: Post-Classical Developments State Univ of New York Press: 1986 ISBN 0-87395-990-6 p. 125
  183. ^ Collins, Steven. Selfless persons: imagery and thought in Theravāda Buddhism Cambridge University Press, 1990. ISBN 0-521-39726-X p. 215, Google Books Archived 2022-12-12 at the Wayback Machine
  184. ^ (D.3.105) “Post-Classical Developments in the Concepts of Karma and Rebirth in Theravada Buddhism. by Bruce Matthews. in Karma and Rebirth: Post-Classical Developments State Univ of New York Press: 1986 ISBN 0-87395-990-6 p. 125
  185. ^ Kalupahana 1975, p. 83.
  186. ^ William H. Swatos; Peter Kivisto (1998). Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. Rowman Altamira. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7619-8956-1.
  187. ^ His Holiness the Dalai Lama, How to Practice: The Way to a Meaningful Life (New York: Atria Books, 2002), p. 46
  188. ^ Bruce Matthews in Ronald Wesley Neufeldt, editor, Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments. SUNY Press, 1986, p. 125. Google.com Archived 2022-12-12 at the Wayback Machine
  189. ^ Peter Harvey, The Selfless Mind. Curzon Press 1995, p. 247.
  190. ^ Robert E. Buswell Jr.; Donald S. Lopez Jr. (2013). The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. pp. 49–50, 708–709. ISBN 978-1-4008-4805-8.
  191. ^ The Connected Discourses of the Buddha. A Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya, Bhikkhu Bodhi, Translator. Wisdom Publications. Sutta 44.9
  192. ^ Karma-gliṅ-pa; Chogyam Trungpa; Francesca Fremantle (2000). The Tibetan Book of the Dead: The Great Liberation Through Hearing in the Bardo. Shambhala Publications. pp. xi, xvii–xxiii. ISBN 978-1-57062-747-7.
  193. ^ Karma-gliṅ-pa; Chogyam Trungpa; Francesca Fremantle (2000). The Tibetan Book of the Dead: The Great Liberation Through Hearing in the Bardo. Shambhala Publications. pp. 4–23. ISBN 978-1-57062-747-7.
  194. ^ Trainor 2004, pp. 210–211.
  195. ^ Trainor 2004, pp. 62–63.
  196. ^ McClelland 2010, p. 281.
  197. ^ Warner, Brad (2005), Hardcore Zen, Wisdom Publications, p. 155, ISBN 978-0-86171-989-1
  198. ^ Transform Your Life: A Blissful Journey, p. 52), Tharpa Publications (2001, US ed. 2007) ISBN 978-0-9789067-4-0
  199. ^ ANALYSIS (9 December 2009). “Pewforum.org”. Pewforum.org. Archived from the original on 10 December 2011. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  200. ^ “Spiritual-wholeness.org”. Spiritual-wholeness.org. Archived from the original on 25 April 2001. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  201. ^ Rudolf Frieling, Christianity and Reincarnation, Floris Books 2015
  202. ^ Mark Albrecht, Reincarnation, a Christian Appraisal, InterVarsity Press, 1982
  203. ^ Lynn A. De Silva, Reincarnation in Buddhist and Christian Thought, Christian Literature Society of Ceylon, 1968
  204. ^ Cranston, Sylvia (1990). Reincarnation in Christianity: A New Vision of the Role of Rebirth in Christian Thought (Quest Books) (9780835605014): Geddes MacGregor: Books. Quest Books. ISBN 0-8356-0501-9.
  205. ^ “Part One Section Two I. The Creeds Chapter Three I Believe In The Holy Spirit Article 11 I Believe In The Resurrection Of The Body II. Dying In Christ Jesus”. www.vatican.va. Retrieved 13 May 2024.
  206. ^ Jump up to:a b Geisler, Norman L.; Amano, J. Yutaka (1986). The reincarnation sensation. Wheaton, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers. ISBN 978-0-8423-5404-2.
  207. ^ The Big Book of Reincarnation, by Roy Stemman, p. 14
  208. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Church Fathers: Letter 124 (Jerome)”. www.newadvent.org.
  209. ^ Jump up to:a b “Corpus Corporum”. mlat.uzh.ch.
  210. ^ Jump up to:a b Cross, F. L., and Elizabeth A. Livingstone. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (Second Edition). New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. p. 1009.
  211. ^ Schlesinger, Dan R. (2016). Did Origen teach reincarnation? a response to neo-Gnostic theories of Christian reincarnation with particular reference to Origen and to the Second Council of Constantinople (553) (Thesis). Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
  212. ^ Bjorling, J. (2013). Reincarnation: A Bibliography. Sects and Cults in America (in German). Taylor & Francis. p. 96. ISBN 978-1-136-51133-2. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  213. ^ Augustine of Hippo (1913). The Works of Aurelius Augustine, Bishop of Hippo. Vol. I: The city of God. Translated by Marcus Dods. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark. pp. 508–509. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2018 – via Internet Archive.
  214. ^ “Reincarnation – Did The Church Suppress It?”. www.issuesetcarchive.org. Retrieved 13 May 2024.
  215. ^ Seabrook, W. B., Adventures in Arabia, Harrap and Sons 1928, (chapters on Druze religion)
  216. ^ Jump up to:a b Dwairy, Marwan (March 2006). “The Psychosocial Function Of Reincarnation Among Druze In Israel”. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 30 (1): 29–53. doi:10.1007/s11013-006-9007-1. PMID 16721673. S2CID 9132055.
  217. ^ Lewis, James (2002). The Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religions. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-61592-738-7.
  218. ^ Jump up to:a b Juergensmeyer & Roof 2011, p. 272.
  219. ^ Fowler, Jeaneane D. (1997). Hinduism: Practices and Beliefs. Sussex Academic Press. p. 10.
  220. ^ Fowler 1997, p. 10.
  221. ^ Christopher Chapple (1986), Karma and creativity, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-88706-251-2, pp. 60–64
  222. ^ Fowler 1997, p. 11.
  223. ^ Jump up to:a b Julius Lipner (2012). Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. Routledge. pp. 263–265. ISBN 978-1-135-24061-5.
  224. ^ Jacobsen, Knut (2009). “Three Functions of Hell in the Hindu Traditions”. Numen. 56 (2–3): 385–400. doi:10.1163/156852709X405071. JSTOR 27793797.
  225. ^ Julius Lipner (2012). Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. Routledge. pp. 251–252, 283, 366–369. ISBN 978-1-135-24061-5.
  226. ^ Roy W. Perrett (1998). Hindu Ethics: A Philosophical Study. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 53–54. ISBN 978-0-8248-2085-5.
  227. ^ Bruce M. Sullivan (2001). The A to Z of Hinduism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-8108-4070-6.
  228. ^ Fowler 1997, pp. 111–112.
  229. ^ Yong Choon Kim; David H. Freeman (1981). Oriental Thought: An Introduction to the Philosophical and Religious Thought of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 15–17. ISBN 978-0-8226-0365-8.
  230. ^ Coward, Harold (2008). The Perfectibility of Human Nature in Eastern and Western Thought: The Central Story. State University of New York Press. p. 129. ISBN 978-0-7914-7336-8.
  231. ^ Coward 2008, p. 129, also see pages 130–155.
  232. ^ Chapple, Christopher Key (2010). The Bhagavad Gita: Twenty-fifth–Anniversary Edition. State University of New York Press. p. 98. ISBN 978-1-4384-2842-0.
  233. ^ Chapple 2010, p. 107.
  234. ^ Chapple 2010, p. 582.
  235. ^ Fowler, Jeaneane D. (2002). Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism. Sussex Academic Press. pp. 340–347, 373–375. ISBN 978-1-898723-93-6.
  236. ^ Fowler 2002, pp. 238–240, 243–245, 249–250, 261–263, 279–284.
  237. ^ Aurobindo, Sri (1915–1921). The Problem of Rebirth. Pondicherry, India: Sri Aurobindo Ashram (published 1952). pp. 3–119, 178–9.
  238. ^ Aurobindo, Sri (1914–1919). The Life Divine (5th ed.). Pondicherry, India: Sri Aurobindo Ashram (published 1970). pp. 742–823.
  239. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jane Idelman Smith; Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad (2002). The Islamic Understanding of Death and Resurrection. Oxford University Press. pp. 23–24. ISBN 978-0-19-028880-8.
  240. ^ Jump up to:a b c d McClelland 2010, pp. 122–123.
  241. ^ John L. Esposito (2004). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford University Press. pp. 137, 249. ISBN 978-0-19-975726-8.
  242. ^ Norman L. Geisler; Abdul Saleeb (2002). Answering Islam: The Crescent in Light of the Cross. Baker Academic. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-8010-6430-2.
  243. ^ Gnostic liberation front Archived 17 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine The Sufi Message of Hazrat Inayat Khan
  244. ^ Wilson, Peter Lamborn, Scandal: Essays in Islamic Heresy, Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia. (1988). ISBN 0-936756-13-6 hardcover 0-936756-12-2 paperback
  245. ^ Peters, Francis E.; Esposito, John L. (2006). The children of Abraham: Judaism, Christianity, Islam. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12769-9.
  246. ^ Alawis Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine, Countrystudies.us, U.S. Library of Congress.
  247. ^ Jaini 1980, pp. 217–236.
  248. ^ Tara Sethia (2004). Ahimsā, Anekānta, and Jainism. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-81-208-2036-4.
  249. ^ Kuhn, Hermann (2001) pp. 226–230
  250. ^ Jump up to:a b Krishan, Yuvraj (1997): p. 43.
  251. ^ Kuhn, Hermann (2001) pp. 70–71
  252. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhn, Hermann (2001) pp. 64–66
  253. ^ Kuhn, Hermann (2001) p. 15
  254. ^ Rankin, Aidan (2006) p. 67
  255. ^ Jump up to:a b Jaini, Padmanabh (1998) p. 108
  256. ^ The Jain hierarchy of life classifies living beings on the basis of the senses: five-sensed beings like humans and animals are at the top, and single sensed beings like microbes and plants are at the bottom.
  257. ^ Jaini, Padmanabh (1998) pp. 108–109
  258. ^ Jaini, Padmanabh (2000) p. 130
  259. ^ Krishan, Yuvraj (1997) p. 44
  260. ^ Jump up to:a b Kuhn, Hermann (2001) p. 28
  261. ^ Kuhn, Hermann (2001) p. 69
  262. ^ Kuhn, Hermann (2001) pp. 65–66, 70–71
  263. ^ Jump up to:a b c Jacobs, Louis (1995). The Jewish religion: a companion. Oxford Berlin: Oxford Univ. Press. pp. 417–418. ISBN 978-0-19-826463-7.
  264. ^ Jump up to:a b Fine, Lawrence (2003). Physician of the soul, healer of the cosmos: Isaac Luria and his kabbalistic fellowship. Stanford studies in Jewish history & culture. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press. p. 304. ISBN 978-0-8047-3825-5.
  265. ^ Kohler, Kaufmann; Broydé, Isaac. “Transmigration of souls”. JewishEncyclopedia.com. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  266. ^ “Kabbala | Definition, Beliefs, & Facts”. Britannica. 2 January 2024. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  267. ^ Tikunei Zohar, Tikkun 69, 112a and 114a. Literally, “There is an extension of Moses in every generation and to each and every righteous man.”
  268. ^ Steiger, Brad; Steiger, Sherry Hansen (2003). Gale Encyclopedia of the Unusual and Unexplained: 001. Detroit. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-7876-5383-5.
  269. ^ Sha’ar Ha’Gilgulim, The Gate of Reincarnations, Chaim Vital
  270. ^ “Limmud Bay Area 2016: Judaism and Reincarnation”. limmudbayarea2016.sched.com. Retrieved 22 February 2017.
  271. ^ Jump up to:a b c Antonia Mills and Richard Slobodin, ed. (1994). Amerindian Rebirth: Reincarnation Belief Among North American Indians and Inuit. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-7703-5.
  272. ^ Rink, Henry. “Tales and Traditions of the Eskimo”. adapted by Weimer, Christopher, M. Retrieved 1 December 2011.
  273. ^ Jefferson, Warren (2008). Reincarnation beliefs of North American Indians: soul journeys, metamorphoses, and near-death experiences. Native Voices. ISBN 978-1-57067-212-5. OCLC 272306114.
  274. ^ W.O. Cole; Piara Singh Sambhi (2016). Sikhism and Christianity: A Comparative Study. Springer. pp. 13–14. ISBN 978-1-349-23049-5.
  275. ^ Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair (2013). Sikhism: A Guide for the Perplexed. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-4411-5366-1.
  276. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair (2013). Sikhism: A Guide for the Perplexed. A&C Black. pp. 145–147. ISBN 978-1-4411-0231-7.
  277. ^ John Gordon Melton; Martin Baumann (2002). Religions of the world: a comprehensive encyclopedia of beliefs and practices. Vol. 2. ABC-CLIO. p. 632. ISBN 978-1-57607-223-3.
  278. ^ Eric J. Lott (1988). Vision, Tradition, Interpretation: Theology, Religion, and the Study of Religion. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 49–53. ISBN 978-3-11-009761-0.
  279. ^ Flood, Gavin (1996). An introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge University Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-521-43878-0.
  280. ^ H. S. Singha (2000). The Encyclopedia of Sikhism. Hemkunt Press. pp. 68, 80. ISBN 978-81-7010-301-1.
  281. ^ Jump up to:a b c d O, Obafemi. “Reincarnation”. ObafemiO.com. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  282. ^ Jump up to:a b O, Obafemi. “ObafemiO”. ObafemiO.com. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  283. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Yoruba Religion: History and Beliefs”. LearnReligions. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  284. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Dunmade, Oluwatumininu (20 September 2022). “The concept of reincarnation in Igbo and Yoruba culture”. Pulse Nigeria. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  285. ^ Dopamu, Abiola (2008). “Predestination, destiny and faith in Yorubaland: Any meeting point?”. Global Journal of Humanities. 7 (1&2): 37–39. ISSN 1596-6232. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  286. ^ Jump up to:a b Akinola, Temilorun. “From Life to Death: Death and Dying Beliefs of the Yoruba”. Process. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  287. ^ Olaleye-Oruene, Taiwo O. (June 2002). “The Yoruba’s Cultural Perspective of Death with Special Reference to Twins”. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 5 (3): 154–155. doi:10.1375/twin.5.3.154. PMID 12184881. S2CID 5982761.
  288. ^ Prothero, Stephen R. (2011). God is not one: the eight rival religions that run the world. New York, NY: HarperOne. ISBN 978-0-06-157128-2.
  289. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Mobolade, Timothy (1 September 1973). “The Concept of Abiku”. African Arts. 7 (1). UCLA James S. Coleman African Studies Center: 62–64. doi:10.2307/3334754. JSTOR 3334754.
  290. ^ Jump up to:a b AJE (23 June 2023). “AKUDAAYA (Meaning and Explanation)”. orisa.com.ng. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  291. ^ Aworeni, Babalawo. “The Araba Agbaya: The Akudaaya”. orishada.com. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  292. ^ Irabor, Joan. “”Akudaaya” is Bringing Back the Chills”. thenollywoodreporter.com. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  293. ^ Irabor, Joan. “”Akudaaya” Dramatizes The Dilemma Of A Man Caught Between Worlds”. thenollywoodreporter.com. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
  294. ^ David J. Hess (2010). Spirits and Scientists: Ideology, Spiritism and Brazilian Culture. Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 16–. ISBN 978-0-271-04080-6.
  295. ^ “Theosophical Society | Encyclopedia.com”. www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 9 December 2023.
  296. ^ Jump up to:a b Chajes, Julie (2017). Reincarnation in H.P. Blavatsky’s The Secret Doctrine. pp. 66–90.
  297. ^ Campbell, Bruce F. (1980). Ancient Wisdom Revived: A History of the Theosophical Movement. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520039681.
  298. ^ See e.g. Reincarnation and Karma by Steiner
  299. ^ Steiner, Karmic Relationships, volumes 1–6
  300. ^ Hammer, Olav (2003). Claiming Knowledge: Strategies of Epistemology from Theosophy to the New Age. Brill. p. 495. ISBN 90-04-13638-X.
  301. ^ Woods, Jutta (2013). “The Theosophical Heritage in Modern Astrology”. The Mountain Astrologer.
  302. ^ Steven Forrest and Jeffrey Wolf Green. “About Evolutionary Astrology”. Retrieved 22 November 2014.
  303. ^ “Scientology Church & Religion – What is Scientology?”. Scientology. Archived from the original on 13 June 2006.
  304. ^ Encyclopedia of Wicca and Witchcraft, Raven Grimassi
  305. ^ Grant, John (2015). Spooky Science: Debunking the Pseudoscience of the Afterlife. Sterling Publishing Company, Incorporated. ISBN 978-1-4549-1654-3.
  306. ^ Edwards, Paul (1996). Reincarnation: a critical examination. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-57392-005-6. OCLC 33439860.
  307. ^ The Boundaries of Knowledge in Buddhism, Christianity, and Science, by Paul David Numrich, p. 13, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, ISBN 978-3-525-56987-0
  308. ^ After the afterlife debate Archived 2019-12-28 at the Wayback Machine, referencing Sagan’s book The Demon Haunted World
  309. ^ Cadoret, Remi J. (April 2005). “European Cases of the Reincarnation Type”. American Journal of Psychiatry. 162 (4): 823–824. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.823.
  310. ^ Shroder, Tom (11 February 2007). “Ian Stevenson; Sought To Document Memories Of Past Lives in Children”. The Washington Post.
  311. ^ “Mills”. Signs of Reincarnation.
  312. ^ Moraes, Lucam J.; Barbosa, Gabrielle S.; Castro, João Pedro G.B.; Tucker, Jim B.; Moreira-Almeida, Alexander (May 2022). “Academic studies on claimed past-life memories: A scoping review”. Explore. 18 (3): 371–378. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2021.05.006. PMID 34147343. S2CID 235491940.
  313. ^ Tucker, Jim B. (2018). “Reports of Past-life Memories”. In Presti, David E. (ed.). Mind Beyond Brain: Buddhism, Science, and the Paranormal. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-54839-7.
  314. ^ Sagan, Carl (1996). Demon Haunted World. Random House. pp. 300–302. ISBN 978-0-394-53512-8.
  315. ^ Harris, Sam (17 September 2005). The End of Faith (Reprint ed.). W. W. Norton. p. 41 endnote 18 on page 242. ISBN 0-393-32765-5.
  316. ^ Kelly, Emily Williams (2012). Science, the Self, and Survival after Death: Selected Writings of Ian Stevenson. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 386. ISBN 978-1-4422-2115-4.
  317. ^ Rockley, Richard. (2002). “Book Review: Children who Remember Previous Lives”. SkepticReport. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  318. ^ Edwards, Paul. (1996, reprinted in 2001). Reincarnation: A Critical Examination. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-921-2
  319. ^ “The Case Against Immortality”. Infidels.org. 31 March 1997. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  320. ^ Wilson, Ian. (1981). Mind Out of Time: Reincarnation Investigated. Gollancz. ISBN 0-575-02968-4
  321. ^ Baker, Robert A. (1996). Hidden Memories: Voices and Visions from Within. Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-576-8
  322. ^ Cogan, Robert. (1998). Critical Thinking: Step by Step. University Press of America. pp. 202–203. ISBN0-7618-1067-6 “Edwards catalogs common sense objections which have been made against reincarnation. 1) How does a soul exist between bodies? 2) Tertullian’s objection: If there is reincarnation, why are not babies born with the mental abilities of adults? 3) Reincarnation claims an infinite series of prior incarnations. Evolution teaches that there was a time when humans did not yet exist. So reincarnation is inconsistent with modern science. 4) If there is reincarnation, then what is happening when the population increases? 5) If there is reincarnation, then why do so few, if any people, remember past lives?… To answer these objections believers in reincarnation must accept additional assumptions… Acceptance of these silly assumptions, Edwards says, amounts to a crucifixion of one’s intellect.”
  323. ^ Thomason, Sarah G. “Xenoglossy” Archived 2008-09-11 at the Wayback Machine. In Gordon Stein. (1996). The Encyclopedia of the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-021-5
  324. ^ Breakfast with Brian Weiss Archived 2004-12-12 at the Wayback Machine, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 5 August 2002, Accessed 25 April 2009.
  325. ^ Weinstein-Moser, Edie. “Interview with Brian Weiss” Archived 2019-07-19 at the Wayback Machine. Wisdom magazine. Wisdom-Magazine.com. 2008. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
  326. ^ Jump up to:a b Spanos NP (1996). Multiple Identities & False Memories: A Sociocognitive Perspective. American Psychological Association (APA). pp. 135–40. ISBN 978-1-55798-340-4.
  327. ^ Jump up to:a b Carroll RT (2003). The Skeptic’s Dictionary: a collection of strange beliefs, amusing deceptions, and dangerous delusions. New York: Wiley. pp. 276–277. ISBN 978-0-471-27242-7.
  328. ^ Sumner D (2003). Just Smoke and Mirrors: Religion, Fear and Superstition in Our Modern World. San Jose, [Calif.]: Writers Club Press. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-595-26523-7.
  329. ^ Linse P, Shermer M (2002). The Skeptic encyclopedia of pseudoscience. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO. pp. 206–207. ISBN 978-1-57607-653-8.
  330. ^ Jump up to:a b Cordón LA (2005). Popular psychology: an encyclopedia. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. pp. 183–185. ISBN 978-0-313-32457-4.
  331. ^ Jump up to:a b c Andrade G (December 2017). “Is past life regression therapy ethical?”. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 10: 11. PMC 5797677. PMID 29416831.

Sources

[edit]

[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Reincarnation

Wikiquote has quotations related to Reincarnation.

showvteReincarnation research
showvteModern spirituality
showvteBeliefs condemned as heretical by the Catholic Church (list)
showvteDruze
showvtePaganism (and modern paganism)
Authority control databases: National FranceBnF dataGermanyIsraelUnited StatesCzech Republic

Categories: 

Posted in New Essays permalink

About joelsnell99

Who's Who in all U.S and U.K. Honoraries (Marquis) Numerous publications in over 80 venues DANA SPIRIT AWARD/2009 Oxford Roundtable, Editor of FOCUS, a student Social Science Journal Author Snell Life Cycle Lonliness Curve Professor Emeritus - Kirkwood College Omicron Delta Kappa Grants Online Editor for Psychology and Education.com Research Fellow - Arlington Institute Outstanding Teacher at Kirkwood College Membership in numerous editorial boards or a reviewer of manuscripts Associate Editor - Psychology and Education Co-Author of Snell-Green Professor Index Author of Snell Educator Effectiveness Index Contributer to FutureEdition.com Co-Author of Snell-Allen Medical Rank Index Fellow in Kennedy Foundation Co-Author of Snell-Allen Subjective Assessment Sex Role Index Honors >>> Positions and Courses Taught >>> joelsnell@hotmail.com http://www.socialvibes.net Research Council, Advisory Board

Comments are closed.

↑