SEX CHANGE STATISTICAL METHODS

In reviewing the statistics relative to sex change much is done with “soft numbers.” That means that there is no baseline, the numbers are not equidistant, and more advance math does not apply. Lacking a baseline and not being able to go beyond a zero baseline, one cannot go beyond the median to the more robust mean. Stepwise statistics needs a best linear unbiased estimator. That suggests that the statistics are too soft for this complex multiple regression analysis.

 What was held constant? What is the denominator? If one group has a characteristics that is twice as much as the other was that determined using a certain denominator? Medicine varies. When one moves on to biochemistry, that is hard science. On the other hand the outcomes are generally in this instance behavioral rather than hard science. Were the calculations multiplied by a constant However, this study humbly suggest the numbers (hard and soft) indicate that sex change sample indicate that about half are satisfied, roughly twice as many commit  suicide over the sex change. Incidentally, what was the denominator? We live a patriarchal society, thus sex change tp a male is easierr than going to a female. Others would indicate, that the individual is losing prestige. Further, young females obtain a penis gain in prestige. She has a sex organ that is easy to compliment them and easier to deal with. Thus, no pregnancies, no menstrual problems, and no vaginal drainage into her clothes.

Politically, this is the case. Every comparison results into a “win” for the social conservatives. What we don’t know is the surgical techniques may improve that the sex organs are interchangeable. At this time they are not.