Participate in the 2025 international science photo competition!

hide

Transgender rights in the United States

Article
Talk

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

SmallStandardLarge

Width

StandardWide

Color (beta)

AutomaticLightDark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LGBTQ rights
Part of a series on

Lesbian ∙ Gay ∙ Bisexual ∙ Transgender ∙ Queer
OverviewRights Movements Student Germany (pre-1933)United States Intersex rights Social attitudesTransgender rights Legal status Movement
Aspects
Opposition
Organizations
Politics
Timeline
Related
LGBTQ portal
v t e

Transgender topics
Part of a series on

Outline History Timeline
Gender identities
Health care practices
Rights and legal status
Society and culture
Theory and concepts
By country
See also
LGBTQ portal Category
v t e

Transgender rights in the United States vary considerably by jurisdiction. In recent decades, there was an expansion of federal, state, and local laws and rulings to protect transgender Americans; however, many rights remain unprotected, and some rights are being eroded, with significant federal restrictions since 2025. Since at least 2022, there has been a national movement by conservative and right-wing politicians and organizations against transgender rights.^[1] There has been a steady increase in the number of anti-transgender bills introduced each year,^[2]^[3] especially in Republican-led states.^[4] Transgender employees are nationally protected from employment discrimination following a 2020 ruling where the Supreme Court held that Title VII protections against sex discrimination in employment extend to transgender employees. Attempts to pass an Equality Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, federally funded programs, credit, and jury service, have all been unsuccessful.^[5]

Repeated attempts to pass a Transgender Bill of Rights have failed but, if ever successful, would amend the Civil Rights Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, enforce prohibitions on discrimination in health care on the basis of gender identity and amend federal education laws to ensure that trans students are protected from discrimination. This bill would also specifically allow students to join sports teams that match their gender identity and protect access to gender affirming care for minors and adults, which would subsequently overturn various bans passed at a state level by conservative legislatures across the country.^[6]^[7] It would also federally ban conversion therapy practices and forced surgery on intersex children and would invest in community services to prevent violence against trans and nonbinary people and would require the attorney general to designate a liaison within the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice dedicated to advising and overseeing enforcement of the civil rights of transgender people.^[8]

Most states allow change of sex on birth certificates and driver’s licenses, although some require proof of gender-affirming surgery or prohibit updating these fields altogether. Some states legally recognize non-binary citizens, and offer an “X” marker on identification documents.^[9] Gender self-identification (including an “X” option) was permitted for passports between 2022 and 2025, but was subsequently repealed. Laws concerning name changes in U.S. jurisdictions are also a complex mix of federal and state rules. The Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges established that equal protection requires all jurisdictions to recognize same-sex marriages, giving transgender people the right to marry regardless of whether their partners are legally considered to be same-sex or opposite-sex. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, of 2009, added crimes motivated by a victim’s actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability to the federal definition of a hate crime. However, only some states and territories include gender identity in their hate crime laws.

Throughout the United States, transgender rights have increasingly^[10] been a target of conservatives and the Republican Party.^[11]^[12] Since 2022, many red state governments have restricted or eliminated transgender residents’ access to gendered public accommodations, gender-related medical care, and accurate identification documents. Bans or restrictions on drag performances as well as those on queer-related literature and academic curricula (e.g. gender and sexuality studies) in public schools have also been instituted by several state governments.^[13]

After Donald Trump‘s inauguration as president in January 2025, he has actively targeted transgender people. He signed executive orders to prohibit federal recognition of genders beyond male or female assigned at birth,^{[citation needed]} gender-related medical care for people under 19,^[14] military service by openly trans people,^[15]^[16] support of social transition and instruction on gender-related topics in schools,^[17] and the inclusion of trans women in women’s sports.^[18] Two judges have temporarily blocked the under-19 gender-affirming care ban,^[19]^[20]^[21] and other aspects of these orders have faced legal challenges.^[22]^[23]^[24]

On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Skrmetti that bans on gender-affirming care for minors were constitutional.^[25]

Family law

Marriage

In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Court ruled that people have a right to marry without regard to sex. While this is commonly understood as a ruling allowing same-sex marriage, it also meant that a person’s sex, whether assigned at birth or recognized following transitioning, cannot be used to determine their eligibility to marry. Prior to this ruling, the right of transgender people to marry was often subject to legal challenge—as was the status of their marriages after transitioning, particularly in cases where an individual’s birth sex was interpreted to mean a same-sex marriage had taken place.^[26]

Cases

In 1959, Christine Jorgensen, a trans woman, was denied a marriage license by a clerk in New York City, on the basis that her birth certificate listed her as male;^[27]^[28] Jorgensen did not pursue the matter in court. Later that year, Charlotte McLeod, another trans woman who underwent gender-affirming surgery in Denmark, married her husband Ralph H. Heidel in Miami. She did not mention her birth sex, however, or the fact she was still legally male, since Florida’s marriage law did not require a birth certificate for the issuance of a marriage license to an individual over the age of 21.^[29] In 1976, the New Jersey case M.T. v. J.T. held that trans people who had undergone gender-affirming surgery could marry as the legal sex matching their gender identity, the first ruling of its kind. Here the court expressly considered the English Corbett v. Corbett decision but rejected its reasoning.

In Littleton v. Prange (1999),^[30] Christie Lee Littleton, a trans woman who had undergone gender-affirming surgery, argued to the Texas 4th Court of Appeals that her marriage to her genetically male husband (deceased) was legally binding and hence she was entitled to his estate. The court decided that the plaintiff’s sex is equal to her chromosomes, which were XY (male). The court subsequently invalidated her revision to her birth certificate, as well as her Kentucky marriage license, ruling “We hold, as a matter of law, that Christie Littleton is a male. As a male, Christie cannot be married to another male. Her marriage to Jonathon was invalid, and she cannot bring a cause of action as his surviving spouse.” She appealed to the Supreme Court but it denied certiorari in 2000.^[26]

The Kansas Appellate Court ruling in In re Estate of Gardiner (2001)^[31] considered and rejected Littleton, preferring M.T. v. J.T. instead. In this case, the Kansas Appellate Court concluded that “[A] trial court must consider and decide whether an individual was male or female at the time the individual’s marriage license was issued and the individual was married, not simply what the individual’s chromosomes were or were not at the moment of birth. The court may use chromosome makeup as one factor, but not the exclusive factor, in arriving at a decision. Aside from chromosomes, we adopt the criteria set forth by Professor Greenberg. On remand, the trial court is directed to consider factors in addition to chromosome makeup, including: gonadal sex, internal morphologic sex, external morphologic sex, hormonal sex, phenotypic sex, assigned sex and gender of rearing, and sexual identity.” In 2002, the Kansas Supreme Court reversed the Appellate court decision in part, following Littleton.^{[citation needed]}^[32]

The custody case of Michael Kantaras made national news.^[33] Kantaras met a woman and filed for divorce in 1998, requesting primary custody of the children. Though he won that case in 2002, it was reversed on appeal in 2004 by the Florida Second District Court of Appeal,^[34] upholding Forsythe’s claim that the marriage was null and void because her ex-husband was still a woman and same-sex marriages were illegal in Florida.^[35] Review was denied by the Florida Supreme Court.^[36]

In re Jose Mauricio LOVO-Lara (2005),^[37] the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled that for purposes of an immigration visa, “A marriage between a postoperative transsexual and a person of the opposite sex may be the basis for benefits under …, where the State in which the marriage occurred recognizes the change in sex of the postoperative transsexual and considers the marriage a valid heterosexual marriage.”^[37]

In Fields v. Smith (2011), three transgender women in the Wisconsin prison system filed a lawsuit against Wisconsin for passing a law banning hormone treatment or gender-affirming surgery for inmates. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin ruled in favor of the inmates. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed and held that the Wisconsin law violated the Eighth Amendment.^[38] The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Wisconsin’s appeal.^[39]

Custody

Courts are generally allowed to base custody or visitation rulings only on factors that directly affect the best interests of the child. According to this principle, if a transgender parent’s gender identity cannot be shown to hurt the child, contact should not be limited, and other custody and visitation orders should not be changed for this reason. Many courts have upheld this principle and have treated transgender custody cases like any other child custody determination—by focusing on standard factors such as parental skills. In Mayfield v. Mayfield, for instance, the court upheld a transgender parent’s shared parenting plan because there was no evidence in the record that the parent would not be a “fit, loving and capable parent”.^[40]

Other times, courts claiming to consider a child’s interests have ruled against the transgender parent, leading to the parent losing access to their children on the basis of their gender identity. For example, in 1982 in Ohio, in Cisek v. Cisek, the court terminated a transgender parent’s visitation rights. The court asked whether the parent’s gender transition was “simply an indulgence of some fantasy”. It held that there was a risk of both mental and “social harm” to the children, who might be emotionally confused upon seeing “their father as a woman”.^[41]

Reproductive rights

Many U.S. jurisdictions require gender-affirming surgery before the person’s legal sex can be changed. This has been criticized as forced sterilization.^[42] Some trans people wish to retain their ability to procreate. Others do not medically require hysterectomy, phalloplasty, metoidioplasty, penectomy, orchiectomy, or vaginoplasty to treat their gender dysphoria. In these cases, surgery is considered medically unnecessary and, for that reason, medically unethical. Additionally, surgery is generally the final series of medical procedures in a complete sex transition, and is financially prohibitive for many people.^[43]

Some transgender people use assisted reproduction technology services and preservation of reproductive tissue prior to having surgery that would render them infertile. Depending on what type of gametes the person’s body naturally produces, this would include cryopreservation of semen in a sperm bank or preservation of oocytes or ovum. For such individuals, access to surrogacy and in vitro fertilization services is necessary to have children. Some people advocate specifically for transgender people to have a legal right to these services.^[44]

Identity documents

Identity documents are a major area of legal concern for transgender people. Different procedures and requirements for legal name changes and gender marker changes on birth certificates, driver’s licenses, Social Security identification, and passports exist and can be inconsistent. Many states have historically required gender-affirming surgery to change the name and gender marker; however, there are increasingly few states where this is the case, with Alabama being one of the last.^[45]

Also, documents which do not match each other can present difficulties in conducting personal affairs—particularly those which require multiple, matching forms of identification. Furthermore, having documents which do not match a person’s gender presentation has been reported to lead to harassment and discrimination.^[46]^[47]

Previously issued federal documents generally remain valid until expiration under agency guidance; passport policy has changed multiple times since 2021 and—per agency guidance reflected below—was reinstated on June 17, 2025 to allow sex-marker changes (including “X”) after an earlier suspension.^[48]^{[needs update]}

Federal documents

Passports

The State Department determines what identifying biographical information is placed on passports. They currently do not allow gender markers that do not match the gender assigned at birth.^[48]^{[needs update]} Passports issued prior to January 2025 remain valid, regardless of whether the gender marker matches.

On June 30, 2021, the government announced that the State Department would begin offering an “X” gender marker and would also allow changing one’s gender marker without proving any physical changes to one’s sex.^[49] Previously, the policy had been amended on June 10, 2010 to allow permanent gender marker changes only if accompanied by a physician’s statement that “the applicant has had appropriate clinical treatment for gender transition to the new gender.”^[50] Before 2010, the required statement was more specific; it was required to be from a surgeon who said that gender reassignment surgery had been completed.^[51]

From April 11, 2022, any individual who is a valid US passport holder could legally have F, M or X options listed as a sex/gender marker available and recognized by way of self determination.^[52] Starting in late 2023, X was also available for passport cards, emergency passports made by consulates and embassies, consular reports of birth abroad.^[53]

Upon his inauguration on January 20, 2025, Donald Trump issued an executive order titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government which directed the US federal government to replace all uses of gender, including passports, with a new legal category of biological sex from the time of conception, and to only recognize two biological sexes based on size of gametes produced. On January 23, 2025, secretary of state Marco Rubio instructed staff to suspend all applications for passports that requested an “X” sex marker or a change to the existing sex marker.^[54] In February 2025, the State Department issued new guidance stating that already-issued passports with an “X” or amended sex marker would remain valid until expired or replaced.

In-progress passport applications, and applications received as of February 7, 2025, would be limited to male or female designations, as determined by “biological sex from the time of conception” as determined by the aforementioned executive order.^[55]

Persons not born in the United States

Persons not born in the United States and who hold status in the United States can change the gender marker on their USCIS-issued Certificate of Naturalization, Certificate of Citizenship, Permanent Resident Card, and their State Department-issued Consular Report of Birth Abroad; these serve as foundational identity documents that may be substituted for birth certificates.^[56]^[57]

Other options include obtaining a state court order affirming the change of legal gender as a linking document, such as California’s Order Recognizing Change of Gender.^[58]

Third gender option

Main article: Legal recognition of non-binary gender § United States

The United States does not currently recognize non-binary gender at a national level. Some states offer legal documentation of a third gender on birth certificates, driver’s licenses, and/or state ID. Previously issued passports using the gender marker “X” remain valid until their expiration date.^[48]

From 2021 to 2025, the U.S. federal government recognized a third gender option on passports or other national identity documents, joining other countries including Australia, New Zealand, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Germany, Malta, and Canada with similar recognition.^[59]^[60]^[61]^[62] Third genders have traditionally been acknowledged in a number of Native American cultures as “two spirit” people, in traditional Hawaiian culture as the māhū, and as the fa’afafine in American Samoa.^[63]^[64]^[65]^[66] Similarly, immigrants from traditional cultures that acknowledge a third gender would benefit from such a reform, including the muxe gender in southern Mexico and the hijra of south Asian cultures.^[67]^[68]^[69]

On June 10, 2016, an Oregon circuit court ruled that a resident, Elisa Rae Shupe, could obtain a non-binary gender designation. The Transgender Law Center believes this to be “the first ruling of its kind in the U.S.”^[9] On September 26, 2016, intersex California resident Sara Kelly Keenan became the second person in the United States to legally change her gender to ‘non-binary’, citing Shupe’s case as inspiration.^[70] Keenan obtained a birth certificate with an intersex sex marker. Ohio had issued a ‘hermaphrodite’ sex marker in 2012.^[71]

The State Department issued the first passport with an “X” gender marker on October 27, 2021. In January 2025, Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14168 to revoke the recognition of a third gender, and on January 22, 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio directed the Department of State to suspend all applications seeking a sex marker change or a nonbinary “X” sex marker.^[72]

States, the District of Columbia, and territorial documents

US jurisdictions recognizing a third gender

On June 15, 2017, Oregon became the first state in the U.S. to announce it will allow a non-binary “X” gender marker on state IDs and driver’s licenses. The law took effect July 1. No doctor’s note is required for the change.^[73] The following week, Washington, D.C., announced that a non-binary “X” gender marker for district-issued ID cards and driver’s licenses would very shortly be offered with no medical certification required.^[74] The D.C. policy change went into effect on June 27, making the district the first place in the U.S. to offer gender-neutral driver’s licenses and ID cards.^[75] The California State Senate introduced a bill in January 2017 to add a nonbinary marker to all IDs,^[76] signed into law that October and formally available on January 1, 2019.^[77] Other states began offering a third gender marker in 2018, including Maine,^[78] New Jersey,^[79] Minnesota,^[80] Colorado,^[81] New York, and Massachusetts.^[82] New York City, which handles its own documents, began offering birth certificates with an “X” gender marker in January 2019.^[83]

Jurisdictions that currently offer third gender markers on driver’s licenses and/or birth certificates^[84] include California, Colorado, Connecticut,^[85] Delaware, Washington D.C., Hawai’i, IIlinois,^[86] Massachusetts,^[87]^[88] Maine, Maryland, Michigan,^[89]^[90] Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire,^[91] New Jersey,^[92] New York,^[93] Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico,^[94] Pennsylvania,^[95]^[96] Rhode Island,^[97] Utah, Virginia,^[98]^[99] Vermont, and Washington.

Birth certificates

U.S. states make their own laws about birth certificates, and state courts have issued varied rulings about transgender people.^[100]^[101] Most states permit the name and sex to be changed on a birth certificate, either by amending the existing birth certificate or by issuing a new one, although some require medical proof of gender-affirming surgery to do so.

These include:

Texas, by opinion of the local clerk’s office, will make a court-ordered change of sex.
New York State and New York City both passed legislation in 2014 to ease the process for changing sex on the birth certificate, eliminating the requirement for proof of surgery.^[102]^[103]
Nevada eliminated the surgery requirement in November 2016. It requires an affidavit from the person making the change and an affidavit who can attest that the information is accurate.^[104]
Colorado (February 2019) and New Mexico (November 2019) eliminated the surgery requirement and made the gender marker “X” available.^[105]^[106]^[107]
Virginia removed the requirement for surgery to change the gender marker in September 2020.^[108]
Kansas began allowing changes to the gender marker in June 2019. The person must sign an affidavit. If they do not already have documentation (driver’s license or passport) with their preferred gender marker, they must bring a letter from a doctor or psychotherapist affirming their gender, but they do not need proof of surgery.^[109]

Regulations were set up under a signed executive order for the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) by the Governor of Kansas. In 2023, SB 180 was passed by the Kansas Legislature, which changed the laws regarding changing a person’s gender markers on their birth certificate and state identity documents. The KDHE announced it would no longer issue new birth certificates with amended gender markers due to recently passed state law, and any previously issued birth certificates with a changed gender marker would be reverted to the original gender at birth if reissued.^[110]

Additionally, the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR) announced after a temporary restraining order that any credentials issued after July 10, 2023 would be required to reflect the gender of the person at birth, if known to the department.^[111]

Tennessee will not change the sex on a birth certificate under any circumstances.^[112]^[113]^[114]

In December 2020, a federal judge invalidated an unconstitutional departmental rule banning sex changes on an individual’s birth certificate within Ohio.^[115]^{[clarification needed]}

In 2022, Oklahoma became the second state to ban legal gender marker change on birth certificates. This followed an executive order issued by the governor the previous year.^[116]^[117] Oklahoma Senate Bill 1100 also banned non-binary gender markers on birth certificates.^[118]

Montana also issued a rule in 2022 that banned legal gender change on birth certificates.^[119] In 2024, District Judge Mike Menahan issued an injunction blocking Montana’s rule.^[120]

Cases (birth certificates)

The first case to consider legal gender change in the U.S. was Mtr. of Anonymous v. Weiner (1966), in which a transgender woman wished to change her name and sex on her birth certificate in New York City after having undergone gender-affirming surgery. The New York City Health Department denied the request. She took the case to court, but the court ruled that the New York City Health Code did not permit the request, which only permitted a change of sex on the birth certificate if an error was made recording it at birth.^[121]^[122]

The decision of the court in Weiner was again affirmed in Mtr. of Hartin v. Dir. of Bur. of Recs. (1973) and Anonymous v. Mellon (1977). Despite this, there can be noted as time progressed an increasing support expressed in judgments by New York courts for permitting changes in birth certificates, even though they still held to do so would require legislative action. Classification of characteristic sex is a public health matter in New York; and New York City has its own health department which operates separately and autonomously from the New York State health department.^{[citation needed]}

An important case in Connecticut was Darnell v. Lloyd (1975),^[123] where the court found that substantial state interest must be demonstrated to justify refusing to grant a change in sex recorded on a birth certificate.^[124]

In K. v. Health Division (1977),^[125] the Oregon Supreme Court rejected an application for a change of name or sex on the birth certificate of a transgender man who had undergone gender-affirming surgery, on the grounds that there was no legislative authority for such a change to be made.^{[citation needed]}

Driver’s licenses and state identification cards

As of February 2024, all U.S. States except for Kansas and Florida allow the gender marker to be changed on a driver’s license, although the requirements for doing so vary by state. Often, the requirements for changing one’s driver’s license are less stringent than those for changing the marker on the birth certificate. For example, until August 1, 2015, the state of Massachusetts required gender-affirming surgery for a birth certificate change,^[126]^[127] but only a form including a sworn statement from a physician that the applicant is in fact the new gender to correct the sex designation on a driver’s license.^[128] As of November 2019, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts no longer requires any documentation or a sworn statement from a medical doctor in order to change one’s gender marker on their drivers license/state ID. In order to change the gender marker, one only needs to fill out a new drivers license/ID card application reflecting the correct information.^[129] The state of Virginia had policies similar to those of Massachusetts, requiring gender-affirming surgery (GAS) for a birth certificate change, but not for a driver’s license change.^[130]^[131] Virginia removed the requirement for surgery to change the gender marker in September 2020.^[132]

Sometimes, the states’ requirements and laws conflict with and are dependent on each other; for example, a transgender woman who was born in Tennessee but living in Kentucky will be unable to have the gender marker changed on her Kentucky driver’s license. This is due to the fact that Kentucky requires an amended birth certificate reflecting the person’s accurate gender, but the state of Tennessee does not change gender markers on birth certificates at all.^[133]

On July 1, 2023, Kansas Senate Bill 180 went into effect, mandating that gender markers on birth certificates and driver’s licenses reflect a person’s sex at birth – reversing a 2019 federal equal protection lawsuit settlement which allowed birth certificates to be changed to reflect a person’s gender identity.^[134]

In January 2024, Florida banned changing the gender marker on driver’s licenses. Additionally, any person “misrepresenting” their gender would be subject to criminal and civil penalties.^[135]^[136]

In August 2024, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) issued a statement saying they would no longer accept court orders as a basis to change a person’s sex on their drivers license, effectively banning trans people from changing their sex on their drivers license. The statement also “directs drivers license employees to send the names and identification numbers of people seeking to change their sex on their license to a particular email address” with the subject line “Sex Change Court Order.” Drivers license employees are also ordered to “scan into the record” court orders or other documents associated with any sex change requests. The DPS refused to say how this information will be used. However two years prior, Attorney General Ken Paxton ordered workers at DPS to gather a list of people who had changed their sex on their Texas driver’s licenses and other department records.^[137]

In addition, a number of states and city jurisdictions have passed legislation to allow a third gender marker on official identification documents (see below).

Cases

In May 2015, six Michigan transgender people filed Love v. Johnson in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, challenging the state’s policy requiring the information on a person’s driver’s license match the information on their birth certificate.^[138]^[139] This policy requires transgender people to change the information on their birth certificates in order to change their driver’s licenses, which at the time of filing was not possible in Tennessee, Nebraska and Ohio, where three of the plaintiffs were born, and requires a court order in South Carolina, where a fourth was born. The remaining two residents were born in Michigan, and would be required to undergo surgery to change their birth certificates.^[138] The plaintiffs in the case are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union.^[138]^[139]

In November 2015, Judge Nancy Edmunds denied the State of Michigan’s motion to dismiss the case.^[138]

Name change

Transgender people often seek legal recognition for a name change during a gender transition. Laws regarding name changes vary state-by-state. In some states, transgender people can change their name, provided that the change does not perpetrate fraud or enable criminal intent. In other states, the process requires a court order or statute and can be more difficult. An applicant may be required to post legal notices in newspapers to announce the name change—rules that have been criticized on grounds of privacy rights and potentially endangering transgender people to targeted hate crimes.^[140] Some courts require medical or psychiatric documentation to justify a name change, despite having no similar requirement for individuals changing names for reasons other than gender transitioning.^[141]

In April 2025, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that a transgender teen could not legally change his name, despite having the support of both his parents, until he turned 21 citing a “lack of maturity”. The court also misgendered the teen throughout in the ruling. The legal age of majority in Mississippi is 21, however, minors are legally allowed to change their name in other circumstances in Mississippi as long as they have parental permission.^[142]

Death certificates

A study conducted by Oregon epidemiologists found that within the area of Portland, Oregon, more than half of dead trans people were recorded as their assigned sex at birth on their death certificates.^[143]

Housing

Transgender individuals in the United States face severe challenges in securing safe, stable housing. Research from the 2015 U.S. Transgender Health Survey indicates that nearly 30% of transgender people have experienced homelessness at some point in their lives, with rates rising to 41% among Black transgender individuals.^[144]^[145] These figures reflect not only a lack of affordable and inclusive housing options but also systemic barriers, including discrimination in employment, limited access to supportive services, and social stigma, that compound housing instability for trans communities.

In shelters and crisis centers, transgender people often encounter environments that are far from safe. Studies by the Vera Institute have documented routine verbal and physical abuse directed toward trans individuals in these facilities, further exacerbating their vulnerability and negatively impacting their mental and physical health.^[146] In many cases, shelter staff are ill-prepared to address the unique needs of transgender clients, which can lead to misgendering, exclusion, or even violent encounters.

Policy shifts over the past decade have also played a significant role in shaping housing access for transgender people. In 2020, the Trump administration rolled back several Obama-era protections intended to ensure equal access to homeless shelters for transgender individuals. One controversial action was the issuance of guidelines instructing shelter staff on how to identify transgender women, a move widely criticized for legitimizing discriminatory practices and undermining the dignity and safety of trans people.^[147]^[148]

However, there has been progress as well. In 2021, a memo from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) expanded the scope of the 2012 Equal Access Rule. This revised guidance declared that all individuals, regardless of their actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status, must have equal access to HUD programs and affiliated shelters.^[149] This policy aimed to reverse some of the previous setbacks by reinforcing nondiscrimination in federal housing programs.

Housing for trans youth

Housing instability is a pervasive issue for transgender and gender nonconforming youth in the United States. While roughly 28% of LGBTQ+ youth experience homelessness or housing instability, trans and gender nonconforming youth often face even greater risks due to unique challenges related to their gender identity.^[150]^[151]^[152]^[153] Many of these young people are forced to leave home or run away because of family rejection and mistreatment. Studies reveal that while only 23% of cisgender boys/men and 23% of cisgender girls/women report past or current housing instability, rates among trans girls/women and trans boys/men rise to 38% and 39% respectively, with nonbinary youth at 35% and gender-questioning youth at 24%.^[150]^[153]^[152] These figures underscore the disproportionate vulnerability of trans and gender nonconforming youth to unstable living conditions.

The consequences of such instability extend far beyond the absence of a permanent home. Trans and gender nonconforming youth experiencing housing instability are two to four times more likely to report severe mental health challenges (including depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidal ideation) compared to their stably housed peers.^[150]^[153] For instance, among LGBTQ+ youth with stable housing, 35% have seriously considered suicide and 10% have attempted it. In contrast, those who have experienced past housing instability report rates of 58% for suicidal ideation and 28% for suicide attempts, while youth who are currently homeless report rates as high as 62% and 35%, respectively.^[150]^[153] Similarly, the risk of victimization also increases with housing instability: youth with stable housing report threat rates due to sexual orientation and gender identity at 10% and 14%, respectively; these numbers climb to 26% and 34% for those with past instability, and further to 30% and 39% among youth who are currently homeless.^[150]^[153] These statistics indicate a stepwise escalation in mental health and safety risks correlated with the degree of housing instability.

An analysis of the data reveals that housing instability is strongly associated with elevated mental health risks among LGBTQ+ youth. The transition from a stable housing situation, where 35% report considering suicide and 10% report suicide attempts, to a state of past instability, with figures of 58% and 28%.^[150]^[153]^[152] Among those currently homeless, the rates further increase to 62% and 35%, which illustrates a clear gradient of risk corresponding to housing conditions. Similarly, when examining victimization, the baseline threat due to gender identity at 14% in stable conditions rises to 34% with past instability and 39% when currently homeless.^[150]^[153] These figures suggest that as housing stability decreases, the likelihood of encountering threats and abusive behaviors increases significantly, indicating a strong correlation between housing status and personal safety.

Further dissection of the data by gender identity highlights distinct disparities among subgroups within the LGBTQ+ community. Cisgender youth, both boys/men and girls/women, report housing instability at a rate of 23%, whereas the rates for trans girls/women and trans boys/men are substantially higher, at 38% and 39% respectively.^[150]^[153] Nonbinary youth also face a high rate of instability at 35%, with gender-questioning youth reporting slightly lower rates at 24%.^[150]^[153] These disparities suggest that transgender and gender nonconforming youth experience a roughly 1.5 to 1.7 times higher prevalence of housing instability compared to their cisgender peers. The data, when combined with the elevated rates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and victimization, underscore the compounded challenges that these youth face.

In response to this crisis, several efforts have emerged at the policy and institutional level to address LGBTQ+ youth homelessness. Experts have emphasized the need for stronger anti-discrimination protections, such as those proposed in the federal Equality Act, which would add sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes under the Civil Rights Act.^[154] Researchers and advocates also call for increased investment in equitable housing, better inclusion of LGBTQ+ data in federal surveys, and the development of targeted resources, including LGBTQ-affirming shelters and transitional housing programs.^[154]

Genocide

Main article: Transgender genocide

Some critics, including journalists Emily St. James and Saeed Jones and civil rights lawyer Chase Strangio, have described US laws as fitting the United Nations’ definition of genocide, such as those laws which ban proper transgender healthcare (“causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”), and those mandating that trans children be taken away by the state (“forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”).^[155]^[156]^[157]

On March 3, 2023, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, political commentator Michael Knowles declared that “If it is false, then for the good of society, and especially for the good of the poor people who have fallen prey to this confusion, transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely—the whole preposterous ideology, at every level.” This statement, and other parts of his speech, led the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention to raise a ‘Red Flag Alert’ in the US, stating “Now that ideologues of hate can openly call for the elimination of transgender identity – in the very country that has been most open to the transgender community over the last decade – we are at a new stage in the global threat against transgender people.”^[158]

Transgender healthcare bans have been described as dire by members of the medical community. A medical report which was published by Yale in response to bans on gender-affirming care argued that the bans were no more ethical than a prohibition on healthcare for any other life-threatening medical condition.^[159] The president of the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) wrote an opinion article in the New York Times stating her view that these laws constituted an effort to “rid the world of transgender people.”^[160] Similar sentiments were expressed in a WPATH public communique: “Anti-transgender health care legislation is not about protections for children but about eliminating transgender persons on a micro and macro scale.”^[161]

According to the legal definition of crimes against humanity which is propagated at the Hague by the International Criminal Court, “‘extermination‘ includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population” when “pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack.”^[162]

Governments’ lists of trans people

The compiling of lists of transgender citizens by governments, such as the list which was compiled by the state of Texas in 2022,^[163] has been criticized by trans advocates who feared the state would “use the information to further persecute the already vulnerable trans community.”^[164] In August 2024, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) issued a statement saying they would no longer accept court orders as a basis to change a person’s sex on their drivers license, effectively banning trans people from changing their sex on their drivers license. The statement also “directs drivers license employees to send the names and identification numbers of people seeking to change their sex on their license to a particular email address” with the subject line “Sex Change Court Order.” Drivers license employees are also ordered to “scan into the record” court orders or other documents associated with any sex change requests. The DPS refused to say how this information will be used.^[165]

In June 2023, the Attorney General’s office for the state of Tennessee mandated the Vanderbilt University Medical Center to turn over the medical records of all of its transgender patients. The VUMC complied.^[166]

Trump presidency (2025–present)

Main article: Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration

Federal

As part of his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump stated that if elected, he would sign an executive order instructing every federal agency to cease the promotion of sex or gender transition at any age as well as ask Congress to pass a bill stating that the United States will only recognize two genders as determined at birth, and promised to crackdown on gender-affirming care for all ages. Additionally, Trump stated that he would make hospitals and health care providers that provide transitional hormones or surgery no longer qualify for federal funding, including Medicare and Medicaid funding. Trump has also stated he will push to prohibit hormonal and surgical intervention for minors in all 50 states.^[167]^[168]^[169]^[170]

Executive Order 14168

Main article: Executive Order 14168

On the January 20, 2025, shortly after being inaugurated, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order,^[171]^[172] which defined sex in the eyes of the federal government as a male-female binary, with “female” and “male” defined as “a person belonging, at conception to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell” and a “person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell” respectively.^[171] The order also mandated that:

Federal agencies should use “sex” instead of “gender”, remove materials that “promote gender ideology”, and halt “funding of gender ideology”^[171]^{: § 3(a), 3(e)}
Official government documents such as passports and visas stop allowing self-selection of gender^[171]^{: § 3(d)}
Transgender people be barred from government-funded single-sex facilities congruent with their gender identity^[171]^{: § 4}
The Bureau of Prisons halt any federal funding for gender-affirming care.^[171]^{: § 4(c)}
That federal funding no longer go to gender-affirming care^[173]
The attorney general provide guidance “to correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) to sex-based distinctions” in federal agency activities.^[171]^{: § 3(f)}
Prior policies and federal government documents that are inconsistent with this order be rescinded, including policies that require the use of names and pronouns consistent with a person’s gender identity in federal workplaces.

Provisions of the order have faced legal challenges, with temporary restraining orders having been issued to suspend the withholding of federal funding to programs that fund gender-affirming care and promote “gender ideology”, the forced transfers of transgender inmates to facilities congruent with their sex assigned at birth, and the mass removal of documents published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services that mention topics related to “gender ideology”.^[24]^[174]^[175]

Executive Order 14183

Main article: Executive Order 14183

On January 27, 2025, Trump signed an executive order declaring that a soldier being trans “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life” and that trans people “cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service”.^[176]

On March 18, 2025, Judge Ana C. Reyes blocked the executive order, ruling that banning trans people from the military likely violated their constitutional rights.^[177]

Executive Order 14187

Main article: Executive Order 14187

On January 28, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to “Protect Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation”. The order described gender-affirming care for minors as “chemical and surgical mutilation of children” as well as “maiming” and “sterilizing”.^[178] It stated “countless children” who received such care would regret a “horrifying tragedy that they will never be able to conceive children of their own or nurture their children through breastfeeding.”^[179] The order also described the World Professional Association for Transgender Health‘s (WPATH) guidance as “junk science”.^[179]^[178]

The order states that the US Federal Government will not “fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another.”^[26] The provisions include:

Directing the United States Department of Health and Human Services to review the terms of insurance under Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act to end certain gender affirming care;^[26]
Told federal agencies providing federal grants to medical institutions to make sure those institutions were not carrying out any gender-related procedures;^[26]
Protects whistleblowers who report on institutions that provide gender affirming care in violation of the executive order.^[180]

In response, some hospitals paused providing gender-affirming care for minors, while others continued. Attorneys general from 15 states said their states are committed to continuing to provide gender-affirming care to minors. Multiple groups filed lawsuits challenging the legality of the executive order. In response to one of the lawsuits, several federal judges issued injunctions blocking the government from withholding federal funds from hospitals that provide gender affirming care to minors.^[181]^[175] Following the injunction, some hospitals that initially paused gender-affirming care for minors resumed the care.^[182]^[183]

In the summer of that year, the Department of Justice began sending subpoenas to “over 20” hospitals demanding the full records of patients who received medical care under 19 – including their names, social security numbers, doctors’ notes, and treatments prescribed.^[184]^[185]

Federal funding freeze

On January 28, 2025, Trump ordered a freeze on all federal funding grants, loans, and aid while those receiving them were assessed to make sure they were not promoting “advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies”.^[186]

Executive Order 14190

Main article: Executive Order 14190

On January 29, 2025, Trump signed an executive order “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling”.^[187]

Executive Order 14201

Main article: Executive Order 14201

On February 5, 2025, Trump signed an executive order titled “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports“, which directs federal agencies and state attorneys general to immediately enforce a prohibition of transgender girls and women from participating in women’s sports.^[18]^[188] The order does not ban transgender men athletes from playing on male sports teams.^[189] As part of this order’s implementation, the Department of Education urged high school and college athletics organizations NCAA and NFHS to revoke female transgender athletes’ records and restore cisgender athletes’ ones.^[190]^[191] The State Department also announced a ban on transgender athletes from entering the United States if they attempt to compete in women’s sports, and that visa applicants suspected of such would have their file marked with the letters ‘SWS25’ for the purposes of tracking.^[192]

Firearm rights

The Trump administration is purportedly looking to restrict transgender people’s right to possess firearms. Talks to that effect were held in the wake of the Minneapolis Annunciation Catholic Church shooting.^[193]

Physical violence

A 2014 report by the Department of Justice found that 2% of trans people report being physically attacked upon visiting a doctor’s office, with 3% reporting being forcibly subjected to unwanted medical procedures.^[194]

According to a study published by the UCLA Williams Institute, transgender people are the victims of violent crimes at over four times the rate of cisgender people. The study found that from 2017 to 2018, trans people experienced violent victimizations at a rate of 86.2 per 1000 people, compared to 21.7 among cis people. Trans women suffered at a rate of 86.1 per 1000, compared to cis women’s 23.7, and trans men suffered at a rate of 107.5 per 1000 compared to cis men’s 19.8.^[195]

According to the Department of Justice in 2022, 50% of people who die in anti-LGBT hate crimes are trans women, with sexual assault being a frequent occurrence after their murders. Additionally, 50% of transgender people are physically abused after coming out as trans to a significant other.^[196]

In June 2022, NBC reported “Events for transgender rights (…) have become frequent targets of extremists, militias, and far-right personalities”.^[197]

In August 2022, a draft report from the California Attorney General’s Office found that trans people were four times more likely to be stopped by police for “reasonable suspicion” than cis people.^[198]

Sexual violence

According to the Department of Justice in 2022, 66% of trans people experience sexual assault at some point in their lives. 15% of trans people report being sexually assaulted by police or prison staff (32% for African-American trans people), while another 10% report being sexually assaulted by healthcare professionals.^[199] An older study conducted by the DOJ in 2014 also found that it was not uncommon for psychiatric professionals to mandate that trans patients of theirs perform sexual favors for them in exchange for continued access to gender affirming healthcare.^[194]

The Trafficking in Persons report by the State Department found that trans people are significantly overrepresented in sex trafficking victims, and a study by Loyola University Chicago found that trans people in the US are 5.6x more likely to engage in survival sex—where sex is traded for money, food, shelter, or other essential items such as phones or clothing—than their cis peers.^[200]^[201]^[202]

According to the 2015 US Transgender survey, 13% of K-12 students who were out as or perceived as transgender were sexually assaulted specifically for being transgender.^[203]

It is considered relatively common for transgender people to be subjected to pat downs and secondary searches while going through airport security, due to their body types deviating from the presets expected by the body scanners. These searches can range from being groped in the groin area, to being forced to strip entirely.^[204]^[205]

Displacement and sanctuary states

Anti-trans legislation in numerous conservative states has caused some trans people and their families to flee their homes, whether to another state or another country, including the families of those who actively advocated against anti-trans laws in their states.^[207]^[208]^[209]

A number of states have passed laws protecting trans people and their families, as well as their healthcare providers, fleeing anti-trans states, from extradition. In 2022, Connecticut became the first state to implement such a law, alongside similar protections for reproductive healthcare providers and recipients.^[210] Since then, Massachusetts, California, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Vermont, Colorado, Washington, New York, Arizona, Maine, Rhode Island, Oregon, Maryland, and the District of Columbia have passed similar laws.^[4]^[211]^[212]^[213]^[214]^[206]^[215]^[216]^[217]^[218]^[219]

In June 2023, polling from Data for Progress found that 8% of transgender adults in the US have been displaced from their community or state by hostile legislation.^[220]

Discrimination protections

Employment

In June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time on a case directly regarding Transgender rights. In the case R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Supreme Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964 extends protections to individuals who are transgender in Employment. This is based on discrimination on the grounds of transgender status is a form of discrimination based on sex. Prior to the rulings that Title VII protections covered transgender status, four states (Alaska, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Missouri) had not enacted specific protections based on transgender status in any employment, and 22 states had extended protections to public employment only.^[221]

Laws

Federal laws

There is no federal law designating transgender as a protected class, or specifically requiring equal treatment for transgender people. Some versions of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act introduced in the U.S. Congress have included protections against discrimination for transgender people, but as of 2021 no version of ENDA has passed. Whether or not to include such language has been a controversial part of the debate over the bill. In 2016 and again in 2017, Rep. Pete Olson [R-TX] introduced legislation to strictly interpret gender identity according to biology, which would end federal civil rights protection of gender identity. It remains legal at the federal level for parents to subject transgender children to conversion therapy.

On October 4, 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions released a Department of Justice memo stating that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on sex, which he stated “is ordinarily defined to mean biologically male or female,” but the law “does not prohibit discrimination based on gender identity per se.”^[222]

On January 30, 2012, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan announced new regulations that would require all housing providers that receive HUD funding to prevent housing discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.^[223] These regulations went into effect on March 5, 2012.^[224]

State and local laws

Over 225 jurisdictions including the District of Columbia (as of 2016)^[225] and 22 states (as of 2018) feature legislation that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity in either employment, housing, and/or public accommodations. In Anchorage, Alaska, voters chose in April 2018 to keep the existing protections for transgender people.^[226] In Massachusetts, a state law prohibited discrimination in public accommodations on the basis of gender identity; in October 2016, anti-transgender activists submitted the minimum number of signatures necessary to the Secretary of the Commonwealth of within Massachusetts to put the law up for repeal on a statewide ballot measure,^[227] Massachusetts voters chose on November 6, 2018 to retain the state law, with 68% in favor of upholding law, and 32% opposed. The Massachusetts Gender Identity Anti-Discrimination Initiative was the first-ever statewide ballot question of its kind in the United States.

Some states and cities have banned conversion therapy for minors.

State	Date effective	Employment	Housing	Public accommodations
Minnesota	1993^[228]
Rhode Island	Dec 6, 1995 (public accommodation) July 17, 2001 (employment and housing)^[229]
New Mexico	July 1, 2003 (employment and housing) 2004 (public accommodation)
California^[230]	2004 (employment and housing) Oct 9, 2011 (public accommodations)
District of Columbia	2005 (employment and housing) March 8, 2006 (public accommodations)
Maine	December 28, 2005
Illinois	2005 (employment and housing) 2006 (public accommodations)
Hawaii	July 11, 2005 (housing and public accommodations) May 5, 2011 (employment)
Washington	2006
New Jersey	2006
Vermont	2007
Oregon	2007
Michigan	Codified in March 2023^[231]
Iowa	2007–2025 (Gender identity no longer protected from July 1, 2025)^[232]
Colorado^[233]	2007 (employment and housing) 2008 (public accommodations)
Nevada	2011
Connecticut^[234]	October 1, 2011
Massachusetts^[235]	2012 (employment and housing) 2016 (public accommodations)^[235]
Delaware	2013
Maryland	2014
Utah	2015
New York^[236]	January 20, 2016
New Hampshire^[237]^[238]	July 8, 2018
Virginia^[239]	July 1, 2020

Cases

In 2000, a court ruling in Connecticut determined that conventional sex discrimination laws protected transgender persons. However, in 2011, to clarify and codify this ruling, a separate law was passed defining legal anti-discrimination protections on the basis of gender identity.^[240]

On October 16, 1976, the Court rejected plaintiff’s appeal in sex discrimination case involving termination from teaching job after gender-affirming surgery from a New Jersey school system.^[241]

Carroll v. Talman Fed. Savs. & Loan Association, 604 F.2d 1028, 1032 (7th Cir.) 1979, held that dress codes are permissible. “So long as [dress codes] and some justification in commonly accepted social norms and are reasonably related to the employer’s business needs, such regulations are not necessarily violations of Title VII even though the standards prescribed differ somewhat for men and women.”^[242]

In Ulane v. Eastern Airlines Inc. 742 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1984) Karen Ulane, a pilot who was assigned male at birth, underwent gender-affirming surgery to attain typically female characteristics. The Seventh Circuit denied Title VII sex discrimination protection by narrowly interpreting “sex” discrimination as discrimination “against women” [and denying Ulane’s womanhood].^[243]

The case of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 490 U.S. 228 (1989), expanded the protection of Title VII by prohibiting gender discrimination, which includes sex stereotyping. In that case, a woman who was discriminated against by her employer for being too “masculine” was granted Title VII relief.^[244]

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. 523 U.S. 75 (1998), found that same-sex sexual harassment is actionable under Title VII.^[245]

A gender stereotype is an assumption about how a person should dress which could encompass a significant range of transgender behavior. This potentially significant change in the law was not tested until Smith v. City of Salem 378 F.3d 566, 568 (6th Cir. 2004). Smith, a trans woman, had been employed as a lieutenant in the fire department without incident for seven years. After doctors diagnosed Smith with Gender Identity Disorder (“GID”), she began to experience harassment and retaliation following complaint. She filed Title VII claims of sex discrimination and retaliation, equal protection and due process claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and state law claims of invasion of privacy and civil conspiracy. On appeal, the Price Waterhouse precedent was applied at p. 574: “[i]t follows that employers who discriminate against men because they do wear dresses and makeup, or otherwise act femininely, are also engaging in sex discrimination, because the discrimination would not occur but for the victim’s sex.”^[246] Chow (2005 at p214) comments that the Sixth Circuit’s holding and reasoning represents a significant victory for transgender people. By reiterating that discrimination based on both sex and gender expression is forbidden under Title VII, the court steers transgender jurisprudence in a more expansive direction. But dress codes, which frequently have separate rules based solely on gender, continue. Carroll v. Talman Fed. Savs. & Loan Association, 604 F.2d 1028, 1032 (7th Cir.) 1979, has not been overruled.

Harrah’s implemented a policy named “Personal Best”, in which it dictated a general dress code for its male and female employees. Females were required to wear makeup, and there were similar rules for males. One female employee, Darlene Jesperson, objected and sued under Title VII. In Jespersen v. Harrah’s Operating Co., No. 03-15045 (9th Cir. April 14, 2006), plaintiff conceded that dress codes could be legitimate but that certain aspects could nevertheless be demeaning; plaintiff also cited Price Waterhouse. The Ninth Circuit disagreed, upholding the practice of business-related gender-specific dress codes. When such a dress code is in force, an employee amid transition could find it impossible to obey the rules.^{[citation needed]}

In Glenn v. Brumby, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Equal Protection Clause prevented the state of Georgia from discriminating against an employee for being transgender.^[247]^[248]

Drag shows

On March 2, 2023, Tennessee governor Bill Lee signed the Adult Entertainment Act, which prohibits drag performances for children.^[249]^[250] This bill sparked outrage from the LGBT community.^[251] On June 3, 2023, a federal judge ruled that the law is unconstitutional.^[252] On July 18, 2024, a three judge panel on the Sixth Circuit reinstated the law by ruling that the plaintiffs had lacked the standing to sue. The ruling did not address whether the law was constitutional.^[253]

The states of Florida, Montana, and Texas have also passed laws banning public drag performances.^[254]^[255] However, all three of these drag show bans were blocked by courts from taking effect.^[256]^[257]^[258]^[259]

Education

Main article: Gender identity under Title IX

The Obama administration took the position that Title IX‘s prohibition on discrimination on the basis of “sex” encompasses discrimination on the basis of gender identity and gender expression. In 2016, the Fourth Circuit became the first^[260] Court of Appeals to agree with the administration on the scope of Title IX as applied to transgender students, in the case of Virginia high school student Gavin Grimm (G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board).^[261] The validity of the executive’s position is being tested further in the federal courts. In 2017 the ACLU, representing Grimm, stated that they had stopped Grimm’s “request for an immediate halt to the Gloucester County School Board’s policy prohibiting him and other transgender students from using the common restrooms at school” but were “moving forward with his claim for damages and his demand to end the anti-trans policy permanently.”^[262] Judge Allen of the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, in May 2018, ruled that Grimm’s discrimination claim was valid based upon Title IX and the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause.^[263]^[264]

Executive Order 14190

Main article: Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling

In 2025, after Donald Trump signed an executive order prohibiting federal agencies from recognizing transgender identity, the U.S. Department of Education told all employees to end all programs, contracts, and policies that “fail to affirm the reality of biological sex” by affirming transgender people.^[265] Another executive order titled “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling”^[266] declares transgender ideas or concepts to be “anti-American” and “subversive”,^[267] and directs law enforcement to criminally prosecute any teacher who “unlawfully facilitates” the social transition of a transgender minor. Listed examples of unlawful facilitation include psychiatric counseling by a school counselor, referring to the student using their preferred name and/or pronouns, referring to a student as “nonbinary“, and allowing the student to use segregated facilities or participate on segregated sports teams differing from those of their assigned sex. The order directs that educators in violation of this law be prosecuted as having committed sexual exploitation of a minor, and/or practicing medicine without a license.^[268]^[267]^[269] Additionally, schools found in violation would have their federal funding revoked.^[270] The order conflicted with preexisting legal precedents, as federal courts had protected gender identity from discrimination in schooling, and the federal government had limited jurisdiction over curriculum.^[271]

Anti-discrimination

According to the Vera Institute in 2016, “transgender youth are more likely to leave school due to harassment, physical assault, and sexual violence”.^[146] In 2016, guidance was issued by the Departments of Justice and Education stating that schools which receive federal money must treat a student’s gender identity as their sex (for example, in regard to bathrooms).^[272] However, this policy was revoked in 2017.^[272]

The U.S. Department of Agriculture requires schools participating in federal food assistance programs to investigate allegations of discrimination due to sexual orientation or gender identity. In July 2022, Texas, along with more than 20 other states, sued to overturn this requirement.^[273]^[274]

Parental authority

In 2024, the U.S. House of Representatives considered the “Parental Rights Over The Education and Care of Their Kids Act” aka the “PROTECT Kids Act” (HR 736). Students up to Grade 8 would need “parental consent” to change their “gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school form” or “sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or bathrooms.” Schools that ignore the requirement for parental consent would lose federal funding.^[275] This bill was merged into the “Parental Bill of Rights Act” and passed the House in 2024.^[276]

State and local policies

Local K-12 school boards have adopted a variety of policies regarding trans students, ranging from allowing fully equal rights and non-discrimination for trans students, to requiring trans students to submit to a criminal background check to be allowed to use the bathroom consistent with their gender identity, to implementing full bans on expressing one’s self-declared gender at all, including bans on chosen pronouns and pride flags, to even bans on mentioning the very existence of trans people.^[277]^[278]^[279]^[280]

States have similarly passed laws both protecting and restricting LGBT inclusion in classrooms. In 2014, the Maryland Senate passed a bill that “bans discrimination based on sexual orientation and sexual identity but includes an exemption for religious organizations, private clubs and educational institutions.^[281]

In 2022, the state of Florida enacted the Parental Rights in Education Act, commonly known as the “Don’t Say Gay Bill”, banning any “classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity” by school personnel or third parties, up through third grade.^[282] For older students, any discussion of such must be “age appropriate or developmentally appropriate”, with the goal to, according to the text of the legislation, “reinforce the fundamental right of parents to make decisions regarding the upbringing and control of their children”.^[283] As of July 2022, five more states have enacted similar laws.^[284] In early 2023, a national proposal based on this Florida law was introduced as HR 5, “The Parents Bill of Rights Act.”^[285] In July 2022, the Florida Department of Education issued a memo to all Florida schools referring to transgender non-discrimination policies regarding access to public facilities as “imposing a sexual ideology” on schools, saying that any school that did not sufficiently discriminate against transgender students could be acting in violation of state law.^[286]

As of April 2024, at least six states—Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana and North Carolina—have laws that, if a teacher believes a child is transgender, the teacher must notify the child’s parents.^[287] Additionally, Virginia asked schools to write guidance on this matter.^[288] In 2025, the Utah legislature passed a bill banning transgender students of public universities from living in dorms consistent with their gender identity.^[289]

Employment

In a 2021 survey by the UCLA Williams Institute, 48.8% of trans people reported experiencing employment discrimination due to their trans status. 43.8% reported receiving verbal harassment in the workplace for being trans, and 22.4% reported being sexually harassed in the workplace in the preceding five years.^[290]

According to the Human Rights Campaign, in 2021 transgender women in the US were paid 60 cents for every dollar the average worker was paid.^[291]

A study conducted by the Center for Public Integrity in July 2022 found that in preceding month, 30% of trans adults had lost their jobs or lived with someone who had, and that in that month trans people experienced hunger at more than twice the rate that cis people did.^[292] According to Ross Wicks, director of LGBTQ+ Canadian non-profit Pflag, While more than 60% of Americans favor transgender rights in education and public employment, 41% support a ban on teaching about gender identity in elementary schools.^[293]

According to the 2022 US Transgender Survey, 18% of all trans adults face unemployment, while the number living below the poverty line is 34%.^[294]

In February 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission moved to dismiss six of its own pending cases alleging gender identity discrimination: One in Alabama, one in California, three in Illinois and one in New York.^[295]^[296] It cited Trump’s January 20, 2025, executive order, “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government“, which defines sex as binary.^[296]^[297]

Public factors

Public support for transgender people has shifted in recent years.

As of 2021, a PBS report found that an “overwhelming” majority of Americans regardless of party affiliation supported maintaining the rights of transgender Americans, and opposed laws that would restrict their access to healthcare or participation in sports.^[298]

According to the Public Religion Research Institute, support for mandating that trans people use the bathroom corresponding to their gender assigned at birth has risen among all religious groups, with white Protestant evangelicals being the highest change, going from 41% in support to 72% in support between 2017 and 2021. 41% of total Americans hold this stance, with 31% disagreeing, and 28% not holding a position on the issue.^[299] However, according to a 2022 meta-analysis of research studies, these views vary widely between religious groups and denominations. The meta-analysis states that religiously Jewish people were more likely to report more positive attitudes towards transgender people, and Black Protestant Christians were more likely to endorse that gender can be different from the one assigned at birth.^[300]

60% of American adults reported in the summer of 2022 that they opposed allowing nonbinary marker options on government documents, while 58% reported supporting mandating that trans athletes compete on teams matching their gender assigned at birth.^[299]

On the other hand, most Americans have more positive attitudes regarding transgender individuals in the workplace.^[301] Although American adults overreport their support in surveys, over two-thirds of them would be comfortable with a transgender manager and support employment nondiscrimination protection for transgender people, even after correcting for this overreporting. However, stated labor market support for transgender people is lower than support for gay, lesbian, and bisexual people.

Social media

In 2019, a report analyzing 10 million US and UK social media posts over three and a half years found that of that 10 million social media posts, 15% (1.5 million) expressed transphobic sentiment.^[302]

A study conducted by Media Matters between February 2019 and February 2020 found that the top five most-interacted sources on Facebook regarding transgender people were LifeSite News, the Daily Caller, the Daily Wire, Western Journal, and the Alliance Defending Freedom, with right wing sources on trans issues receiving 43.33 million interactions, compared to left wing sources receiving only 2.56 million.^[303]

In the wake of the Colorado Springs nightclub shooting, in which a man walked into an LGBTQ nightclub and opened fire, Twitter unbanned the accounts of several major anti-trans figures that had previously been suspended for breaking Twitter policies regarding the targeting of LGBTQ people,^[304] while reformatting its hateful conduct policy so that a provision that banned “targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals” was “now effectively dead”, according to Vanity Fair.^[305]

Politicians

In February 2022, United States Senate candidate J. D. Vance from Ohio falsely attributed the then looming Russian invasion of Ukraine to transgender rights, saying “We didn’t serve in the Marine Corps to go and fight Vladimir Putin because he didn’t believe in transgender rights”^[306]

In May 2022, United States Representative Paul Gosar issued a statement via Twitter falsely claiming that the mass shooter in the Uvalde school shooting which killed 19 elementary school children, was a “transsexual leftist illegal alien”.^[307]

A joint report by the Human Rights Campaign and the Center for Countering Digital Hate found that the Twitter accounts of Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and Representative Lauren Boebert were among the top three sources in the United States for the promotion and propagation of the grooming conspiracy theory.^[308] In response, Lauren Boebert stated via Twitter “My tweets about groomers are only third? Guess that means I have to tweet about these sick, demented groomers even more”.^[309]^[310]

In September 2022, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas cast attention on a gender affirming healthcare doctor at University of Wisconsin, saying “She does this to children. Sterilizes & mutilates them”.^[311] Providing gender-affirming healthcare to trans minors is considered best practice by the American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association, the Endocrine Society, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health.^[312]^[313]^[314]^[315]^[316]

That same month, Republican Representative Bob Good from Virginia stated his belief that the high suicide rates among trans youth, widely believed to be due to systemic discrimination and lack of access to proper healthcare, were in fact due to sexual “grooming” into being transgender.^[317]^[318] Senate Candidate Herschel Walker from Georgia was also reported as saying that trans children would not be able to get into heaven.^[319]

Media involvement

In April 2022, the left-leaning media watchdog Media Matters published a study stating that within a three week period spanning from March 17 to April 6, Fox News ran 170 segments on trans people, throughout which “the network spread dangerous lies about the trans community and repeatedly invoked the long-debunked myth that trans people pose a threat to minors and seek to groom them”.^[320]

The New York Times

In June 2022, the New York Times published a front page article titled “The Battle Over Gender Therapy”, which reportedly “uncritically platformed gender-critical group Genspect, and the New York Times Magazine’s article said the group has held ‘web-based seminars that are critical of social and medical transition'”, and that “Some parents, who are part of Genspect, told [the author] that they believed the ‘rise in trans-identified teenagers was the result of a ‘gender cult’ – a mass craze'”.^[321] The Texas Observer described the article as elevating “a handful of outliers and their discredited theories about trans people to prominence they do not enjoy among the medical community” and that “the article echoes right-wing fear-mongering about whether trans kids should be allowed to transition and even suggests their existence could be dangerous to other young people”, noting that “the state of Texas is using it as evidence in an ongoing attempt to investigate trans-supportive healthcare as ‘child abuse'”.^[322]

In July 2022, the New York Times published an op-ed falsely attributing the overturning of Roe v. Wade by six conservative Supreme Court justices, to the existence of trans women causing the “erasure” of “women as a biological category”.^[323] This article was widely circulated, with Representative Rashida Tlaib issuing a statement in response saying that “During escalating assaults on trans people & trans rights nationwide, the New York Times is featuring writers debating whether trans people should even exist and scapegoating this already-marginalized community.”^[324]

Since then, the New York Times has published several more pieces arguing in favor of restricting access to gender affirming healthcare for trans people, many of which have been widely criticized as “misinformation” by medical experts.^[325]^[326]^[327]^[328]

In February 2023, more than 200 NYT contributors signed an open letter expressing “serious concerns about editorial bias in the newspaper’s reporting on transgender, non⁠-⁠binary, and gender nonconforming people”. The letter characterized the NYT’s reporting as using “an eerily familiar mix of pseudoscience and euphemistic, charged language”, and raised concerns regarding the NYT’s employment practices regarding trans contributors.^[329]

Grooming conspiracy theory

Main article: LGBT grooming conspiracy theory

Popularization of the grooming conspiracy theory in the United States has been linked to Christopher Rufo, who tweeted in August 2021 about “winning the language war,” and James A. Lindsay.^[330]^[331] Following the Wi Spa controversy in July 2021, Julia Serano noted that there a rise in false accusations of grooming directed towards transgender people, saying that it appeared as if there was a movement to “lay the foundation for just smearing all trans people as child sexual predators.”^[332] Libs of TikTok (LoTT) also helped popularize the term ‘groomer’ as a pejorative for LGBT people, supporters of LGBT youth,^[333]^[334] and those who teach about sexuality.^[335] In November 2021 LoTT claimed that the Trevor Project was a “grooming organization” and later in the year claimed that Chasten Buttigieg was “grooming kids.”^[333]

On February 24, The Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington, D.C.-based think tank, tweeted that the bill “protects young children from sexual grooming“.^[336] On March 4, Christina Pushaw, press secretary for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, referred to the bill as “an anti-grooming bill” and stated via twitter that anyone against it was “probably a groomer”.^[336]

Since then, numerous right wing pundits began describing the behavior of parents and teachers who want to allow children to express their transgender identity as grooming, and the term “groomer” has become widely used by conservative media and politicians to imply that the LGBTQ community and their allies are pedophiles or pedophile-enablers.^[337]^[338] Slate magazine later described the word “grooming” as “the buzzword of the season”.^[336]

The Canadian Anti-Hate Network has stated that trans people are “slandered the same way homosexual men were slandered in the 70s, and for the same reason: to deny them safety and equal rights,” adding that “the far-right and their fellow travelers in the so-called Gender Critical or Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist movements use the exact same tropes in a bid to deny equal rights to trans persons.”^[339] Florence Ashley of the University of Toronto has stated that the focus of the conspiracy on LGBT+ people and on trans people in particular is used to radicalize public opinion towards the far-right, comparing it to the White genocide conspiracy theory.^[340]

According to a joint report in August 2022 by the American Human Rights Campaign, and the British Center for Countering Digital Hate found that the 500 most influential hateful “grooming” tweets were seen 72 million times, and that “grooming” tweets from just ten influential sources were seen 48 million times. It also found that Meta, formerly known as Facebook, had accepted up to $24,987 for ads pushing the grooming conspiracy theory, which had been served to users over 2.1 million times, and that Twitter – despite saying groomer slurs were a violation of its hate speech policy – failed to act on 99% of tweets reported for such.^[308]

Facilities access

Federal sex-segregated facilities access policy

On June 1, 2015, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued nonbinding guidance titled A Guide to Restroom Access for Transgender Workers, recommending that all employers, including federal contractors, allow employees to use restrooms consistent with their gender identity.^[346] The guidance remains publicly available but has no legal force. On August 18, 2016, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) issued GSA Bulletin FMR 2016-B1, formally titled Implementation of Executive Order 13672 – Gender Identity Non-Discrimination in Federal Facilities Managed by GSA and published in the Federal Register under the heading Clarification of Nondiscrimination in the Federal Workplace. The bulletin interpreted the prohibition of sex discrimination under the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) to include gender identity, thereby extending nondiscrimination protections to transgender individuals in GSA-managed facilities—including restrooms, locker rooms, and other sex-segregated spaces—without documentation requirements.^[347] The policy applied to both federal employees and members of the public visiting GSA-managed federal buildings.

On January 20, 2021, President Joe Biden signed Executive Order 13988: Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation, which directed agencies to ensure that access to bathrooms and other sex-segregated facilities in federal buildings was provided based on gender identity, consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020). EO 13988 was never formally repealed, but its enforcement was largely superseded in practice beginning January 21, 2025, following President Donald Trump‘s issuance of Executive Order 14168: Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government, which redefined federal policy to recognize only “biological sex” and directed agencies to remove gender-identity-based access rules from federal facilities.^[348]^{[circular reference]}^[349]^{[circular reference]}

On April 29, 2024, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued and immediately put into effect its updated Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace, which for the first time explicitly stated that gender identity discrimination under Title VII includes denying employees access to restrooms consistent with their gender identity, as well as imposing dress codes or pronoun usage inconsistent with a person’s gender identity. The guidance applied to all covered employers, including federal agencies, and was intended to provide interpretive clarity in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County.^[350]

On May 5, 2025, a federal class-action Equal Employment Opportunity complaint titled Withrow v. National Guard, et al. was filed by LeAnne Withrow, a civilian employee of the Illinois National Guard, against the National Guard Bureau, Department of Defense, and Office of Personnel Management. The complaint alleges that enforcement of “biological sex” bathroom rules against transgender federal employees violates Title VII, as interpreted by Bostock v. Clayton County, as well as the Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act.^[351] The case remains pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

On May 9, 2025, GSA formally rescinded Bulletin 2016-B1, ending the explicit requirement for gender-identity–based access to sex-segregated facilities in GSA-managed federal buildings.^[352] On May 15, 2025, in the case State of Texas and the Heritage Foundation v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (N.D. Tex., No. 2:24-CV-173), a federal district court—Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk—vacated nationwide the portions of the April 2024 EEOC guidance that addressed gender identity, including restroom, dress, and pronoun accommodations, ruling that EEOC had exceeded its statutory authority under Title VII.^[353]^[354]

On July 10, 2025, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued updated government-wide guidance to all executive branch agencies to implement Executive Order 14168‘s redefinition of “sex” as biological. The memo directed agencies to remove gender identity language and related promotional material from all internal and external policies, forms, and communications; to designate all single-sex intimate spaces—explicitly including restrooms, locker rooms, and lactation rooms—based solely on biological sex as defined at birth; and to certify compliance to OPM by August 11, 2025.^[355] The guidance applies to all employees of the executive branch and to individuals accessing single-sex facilities within federally controlled workplaces and properties, but does not impose requirements on state or local government facilities outside of federal jurisdiction.

Comprehensive legislation

Numerous jurisdictions and states have passed or considered so-called “bathroom bills” which restrict the use of bathrooms by transgender people, forcing them to choose facilities in accordance with their biological sex.^[356]^[357]^[358] As of May 2024, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Utah have such laws.^[359]^[360]

On March 23, 2016, North Carolina passed a comprehensive bathroom restriction bill (the Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, also known as “HB2”), overriding a prior municipal Charlotte non-discrimination ordinance on the same subject.^[361] It was quickly signed into law by Gov. Pat McCrory, but on March 30, 2017, following national controversy, the part of the law related to bathrooms was repealed.^[362] According to the ACLU, the partial repeal still allowed discrimination against transgender persons.^[363]

In April 2016, objecting to the “bathroom predator myth”, a coalition of over 200 U.S. organizations for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors noted that, while “over 200 municipalities and 18 states” had legal protections for transgender people, none of these places had tied an increase in sexual violence to these nondiscrimination laws.^[364]

In September 2016, California governor Jerry Brown signed a bill requiring all single-occupancy bathrooms to be gender-neutral, effective since March 1, 2017.^[365] California is the first U.S. state to adopt such legislation.^[366] Vermont, New Mexico and Illinois have since followed suit in 2019.^[367]

On May 2, 2019, Tennessee governor Bill Lee signed into law legislation defining a trans person using the bathroom corresponding with their gender identity as “indecent exposure.” The Tennessee Equality Project had complained about the bill’s original language, and although that language was altered before it became law, the organization still believed the bill was harmful to trans people.^[368]

On April 8, 2022, Alabama Governor Ivey signed a bathroom bill applying to public schools.^[369] As of March 2024, she is likely to sign a similar bill applying to universities.^[370]

On May 3, 2023, the Florida legislature passed the “Safety in Private Spaces Act”, which the governor was expected to sign, making it a second-degree misdemeanor to use a bathroom other than that which is designated for people of one’s sex assigned at birth.^[371] An earlier attempt in 2015 had failed.^[372]

Indecent exposure charges for restroom use

In September 2021, following extensive right wing protests, a Los Angeles trans woman was charged by the LAPD with felony indecent exposure after she was recorded using the women’s changing room at a local nude spa. The trans woman had two previous convictions for indecent exposure and a conviction for failing to register as a sex offender.^[373]^[374] The nude spa in question had an explicitly trans-inclusive policy, and mandated nudity in gender segregated areas.^[375]

In February 2023, another trans woman was charged with indecent exposure for using the changing room at the YWCA in Xenia, Ohio, despite the facility’s policy also being one of support.^[376]

Schools

In Doe v. Regional School Unit, the Maine Supreme Court held that a transgender girl had a right to use the women’s bathroom at school because her psychological well-being and educational success depended on her transition. The school, in denying her access, had “treated [her] differently from other students solely because of her status as a transgender girl.” The court determined that this was a form of discrimination.^[377]

In Mathis v. Fountain-Fort Carson School District 8 (2013), Colorado’s Division of Civil Rights found that denying a transgender girl access to the women’s restroom at school was discrimination. They reasoned, “By not permitting the [student] to use the restroom with which she identifies, as non-transgender students are permitted to do, the [school] treated the [student] less favorably than other students seeking the same service.” Furthermore, the court rejected the school’s defense—that the discriminatory policy was implemented to protect the transgender student from harassment—and observed that transgender students are in fact safest when a school does not single them out as different. Based on this finding, it is no longer acceptable to institute different kinds of bathroom rules for transgender and cisgender people.^[377]

In May 2016, guidance was issued by the United States Department of Justice and the United States Department of Education stating that schools which receive federal money must treat a student’s gender identity as their sex (for example, in regard to bathrooms).^[272] However, this policy was revoked in 2017.^[272]

Main article: G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board

In October 2016, the Court agreed to take on the case of whether a transgender boy, Gavin Grimm, could use the boys’ bathroom in his Virginia high school. Grimm was assigned female at birth but is a transgender male. For a while, he was permitted access to the boys’ bathroom but was later denied access after a new policy was adopted by the local school board. The ACLU took on the case, stating that girls objected when he tried to use the girls’ bathroom in accordance with the new policy and that he was humiliated when the school directed him to use a private bathroom, unlike other boys. After challenging the policy, he won his case in the Court of Appeals in 2015 in a tie vote.^[378]^[379] This marked the first ruling by an appeals court to find that transgender students are protected under federal laws that ban sex-based discrimination.^[380] However, later in 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to put that ruling on hold.^[381] Then in 2017 the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the decision of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and refused to hear the case.^[382] Later in 2017, it was announced that the 4th Circuit would send the case back to the district court for the judge to determine whether the case was moot because Grimm graduated.^[383] The District Court found the case was not moot, and ruled in favor of Grimm, which was later upheld by the Fourth Circuit on appeal in August 2020, using the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. Clayton County as a basis for their decision.^[384]

A similar case had occurred in the public schools of Dallas, Oregon, which had allowed transgender students to use the restrooms and locker rooms of the school based on their gender identity on the basis of the 2016 federal policy. Parents of other students had sued to have the policy overturned, but the policy was upheld at both the United States District Court for the District of Oregon and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Supreme Court denied to hear the challenge to the Ninth Circuit in November 2020, leaving that decision in place.^[385]

Workplace

Rights to restrooms that match one’s gender identity have also been recognized in the workplace and are actively being asserted in public accommodations. In Iowa, for example, discrimination in public accommodations on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity has been prohibited by law since 2007 through the Iowa Civil Rights Act.^[377]

In Cruzan v. Special School District #1, decided in 2002, a Minnesota federal appeals court ruled that it is not the job of the transgender person to accommodate the concerns of cisgender people who express discomfort with sharing a facility with a transgender person. Employers need to offer an alternative to the complaining employee in these situations, such as an individual restroom.^[377]

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) chair Charlotte A. Burrows issued guidelines in 2021 stating that “employers may not deny an employee equal access to a bathroom, locker room, or shower that corresponds to the employee’s gender identity.”^[386]

Hate crimes legislation

Further information: Hate crime laws in the United States

Federal hate crimes legislation include limited protections for gender identity. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 criminalized “willfully causing bodily injury (or attempting to do so with fire, firearm, or other dangerous weapon)” on the basis of an “actual or perceived” identity. However, protections for hate crimes motivated on the basis of a victim’s gender identity or sexual orientation is limited to “crime affect[ing] interstate or foreign commerce or occur[ring] within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction.” This limitation only applies to gender identity and sexual orientation, and not to race, color, religion or national origin.^[387] Therefore, hate crimes which occur outside these jurisdictions are not protected by federal law.

22 states plus Washington D.C. have hate crimes legislation which includes gender identity or expression as a protected group. They are Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Missouri, Minnesota, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Rhode Island, Washington, Oregon, California, Hawaii, Maine, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, Utah, Virginia^[388] and New York. Twenty-seven states have hate-crimes legislation which exclude transgender people. Six states have no hate-crimes legislation at all.^[389]

Numerous municipalities have passed hate-crime legislation, some of which include transgender people. However Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee recently passed laws which ban municipalities from enacting such protections for sexual orientation, gender identity or expression.^[390]^[391]

Healthcare

Transgender people confront two major legal issues within the healthcare system: access to health care for gender transitioning and discrimination by health care workers.

Treatment for adults

Many Republican legislators across the country are increasingly proposing legislation to restrict gender-affirming care for adults or make such care harder to access. However, no states have outright banned gender-affirming care for adults. Efforts to restrict adults’ access to healthcare relies heavily on claims from self-described “gender-critical” organizations such as Genspect that young people should not be recognized as adults until they turn 25.^[392]^[393]^[394]

As of January 2024, seven states limit access to gender-affirming care for adults without banning it, such as allowing private health plans, Medicaid, and correctional facilities to exclude all coverage for gender-affirming care, prohibiting the use of federal funds for gender-affirming care or requiring special informed consent practices.^[395]

In January 2024, in a conversation about trans healthcare with several Republican legislators, Michigan State Rep. Josh Schriver asked, “If we are going to stop this for anyone under 18, why not apply it for anyone over 18? It’s harmful across the board and that’s something we need to take into consideration in terms of the endgame.” Michigan State Rep. Brad Paquette and Ohio State Rep. Gary Click expressed agreement with that sentiment.^[396]^[397]

In December 2024, Tennessee Senator, Bo Watson said that, although banning gender-affirming care for adults may not currently be of interest to the Tennessee legislature, he would not rule out a ban in the future.^[398]

In 2025, Texas Representative, Brent Money introduced a bill in the Texas House of Representatives that would ban gender affirming care for transgender individuals of all ages.^[399]^[400]

In July 2025, Puerto Rico became the first place in the United States to pass a ban on gender-affirming care for people over 18, banning it for anyone under 21 years of age. Puerto Rico’s LGBTQ+ Federation immediately announced plans to challenge the ban in court.^[401]^[402]

These states make it easy for trans adults to sue their doctors:

Utah: In January 2023, Utah stripped liability protections from any doctor who treats a trans person under the age of 25, and allowed any trans person under 25 to retroactively “disaffirm” consent and sue the doctor for providing care they previously consented to.^[403]^[404]^[405]^[406]
South Dakota: In February 2023, South Dakota passed a law stating that any civil action to recover damages for injury suffered as a result of gender-affirming care performed on a minor must be commenced before the date on which the person reaches age 25.^[407]
Arkansas: On March 13, 2023, Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed a bill giving adults 15 years to file malpractice lawsuits for gender-affirming care they received as minors, whereas for other types of care (under preexisting law) a malpractice lawsuit must generally be filed within two years.^[408]

These states restrict treatment for trans adults (as well as younger people):

Florida: In August 2022, the state of Florida voted to require any trans adult seeking gender affirming healthcare to receive approval from the Florida Board of Medicine at least 24 hours in advance.^[409] On May 17, 2023, DeSantis signed a law^[410] banning insurance providers from covering gender-affirming care for adults, as well as banning nurse practitioners and physicians’ assistants (estimated to make up 80% of gender affirming care providers) from administering it, and banning it from being offered via telehealth. The Florida state legislature had passed the bill the previous month.^[411]^[412] In June 2024, a judge permanently blocked the law from taking effect.^[413] In August 2024, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the permanent injunction while the matter is appealed.^[414]
Missouri: In April 2023, the state attorney general issued an emergency order instituting a three-year waiting period of continuous documented dysphoria before qualifying for gender-affirming care, disqualifying people if they have untreated depression or anxiety, mandating screening for autism, and mandating periodic screenings for “social contagion”.^[415]^[416]^[417]^[418] This has been characterized by many as a de facto ban on trans healthcare for adults, since depression and anxiety are common symptoms of gender dysphoria.^[419]^[420]^[421] A judge temporarily blocked enforcement of the order and scheduled a hearing for May 11.^[422] The attorney general withdrew this order on May 16 after the state legislature passed two bills restricting gender-affirming care for trans youth.^[423]^[424] On June 7, 2023, Governor Mike Parson signed a bill that contained a provision banning gender-affirming care for prisoners, which took effect on August 28.
Puerto Rico: In July, 2025, Puerto Rico implemented a ban on gender affirming care for anyone under 21 years of age. Puerto Rico’s LGBTQ+ Federation immediately announced plans to challenge the ban in court.^[401]^[402]

In August 2025, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) stated in an internal memo that beginning in 2026, gender-affirming care would no longer be covered by the Federal Employees Health Benefits and Postal Service Health Benefits programs.^[425]

Treatment for minors

Each state may pass its own laws about gender-affirming care for minors. The U.S. Supreme Court decided this on June 18, 2025 in United States v. Skrmetti, ruling that such bans do not classify by sex and thus do not require intermediate scrutiny according to the 14th Amendment‘s Equal Protection Clause.^[25]

Five months before the outcome of U.S. v. Skrmetti, President Donald Trump signed an executive order in an effort to federally prevent gender-affirming care for all people under 19 years old.^[426] The order revokes federal funding for any institutions providing such care and directs federal agencies to take further steps.^[427] Multiple states sued,^[428] and a federal judge, Brendan A. Hurson, blocked the order from taking effect while the PFLAG v. Trump lawsuit is ongoing.^[429]^[430]^[431]

Gender-affirming care for minors has a long history in the United States and is supported by major medical associations.^[432]^[433] Efforts to prohibit gender-affirming care for minors began in the 2010s, but did not immediately receive much attention from state legislatures.^[434] The conservative organization Do No Harm was influential in developing model legislation that appeared starting in 2022 in Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, and West Virginia legislatures.^[435]^[436] In 2023, 19 bans were enacted,^[437]^[438] 16 of which were being challenged in court as of January 2024.^[395]

In February 2024, the American Psychological Association approved a policy statement supporting unobstructed access to health care and evidence-based clinical care for transgender, gender-diverse, and nonbinary children, adolescents, and adults, as well as opposing state bans and policies intended to limit access to such care.^[439]^[440]

As of August 2025, 27 states had enacted some form of ban on gender-affirming care for minors.^[441] Of those, 21 have complete bans in effect, four have partial bans, and two passed bans that are currently blocked from taking effect. While some states have banned all forms of medical transition, others such as Arizona, Nebraska and Georgia have banned only specific types such as hormone therapy or surgery. Seven states have exceptions which allow minors who were already receiving gender-affirming care prior to the ban to continue their treatments.^[395] Currently, all 27 states make exceptions for puberty blockers, hormones and surgery for cisgender and intersex children.^[395] Only one state, West Virginia, makes exceptions in cases of “severe dysphoria”. There is also currently only one state, Missouri, that has a ban which is set to expire after a certain period of time. Nearly all states with restrictions include specific provisions with penalties for providers and 4 states include provisions directed at parents or guardians.^[395] An additional 4 states include laws/policies that impact school officials such as teachers and counselors, among others.^[395]

At the same time, many Democrat-controlled states have gone in the opposite direction and enacted laws protecting access to gender affirming care for minors and adults. These laws, often called “shield” laws, often explicitly combine protections for gender-affirming care and abortion and cover a variety of protections including protecting both providers and patients from being punished, mandating insurance providers to cover the procedures and acting as “sanctuary states” that protect patients traveling to the state from other states that have banned such treatments among other things.^[442] As of June 2025, 17 states and the District of Columbia have enacted “shield” laws.

Of the approximately 1.6 million Americans who are transgender, about 300,000 are under the age of 18.^[443] As of October 2023, approximately 105,200 transgender youth aged 13 to 17 lived in states where gender affirming care is banned for minors. However, around 26,000 of those youth are currently still able to access care in their state due to court orders that prohibit enforcement of the laws. Conversely, around 146,700 transgender youth live in states that have passed gender-affirming care “shield” laws that support access to care by protecting doctors and parents who prescribe or seek access to medical care for youth.^[437] An analysis from KFF in late January 2024 estimated that 38% of trans youth between the ages of 13–17 in the United States lived in states with laws limiting youth access to gender-affirming care.^[395]

Bans on gender-affirming care have been criticized as governments interfering with the patient-doctor relationship and taking away healthcare decisions from parents and families for their children.^[444]^[445] State level bans on gender-affirming care in the United States have led some families with transgender children to move out of their states.^[446]^[447]^[448]

In May 2024, the Department of Justice indicted a Texas doctor, Eithan Haim, for alleged HIPAA violations involving Texas Children’s Hospital which he claimed was secretly providing gender-affirming care to minors. In January 2025, the Trump administration dropped the charges and the case was dismissed with prejudice.^[449]^[450]

In October 2024, Texas attorney general Ken Paxton filed suit against a doctor who allegedly provided gender-affirming care to 21 minors after it had been banned for minors in the state, the first time that such a suit has been brought in the U.S.^[451]

Bans for minors

Laws which are currently unenforceable due to a court injunction

Laws which only partially ban gender affirming care for minors

State	Authority	Signed	Effective	Notes
Arkansas	State legislature	April 6, 2021	Permanently blocked	On April 6, 2021, the legislature—overriding Governor Asa Hutchinson‘s veto on a bill that banned puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery for minors and from referring them to other providers.^[434] However, courts temporarily^[452] and then permanently blocked the law.^[453]
Texas	Texas AG Ken PaxtonGovernor Greg Abbott	February 22, 2022June 2, 2023	Blocked by injunction (order)September 1, 2023 (legislation)	In February 2022, the state Attorney General ordered a ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth, with criminal penalties for failing to report suspected violations.^[454]^[455] However, the order is currently blocked by injunction.^[456]In June 2023, the governor signed a law to ban this care for minors.^[457] On August 25, 2023, a district court judge blocked the law from taking effect. In response, the Attorney General’s office filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court, a move that automatically pauses the judge’s injunction and allowed the law to go into effect on September 1, 2023, as originally planned.^[458] On June 28, 2024, the Texas Supreme Court upheld the law.^[459]
Alabama	Governor Kay Ivey	April 8, 2022^[460]	May 8, 2022^[461]	It is a felony for a medical provider to give gender-affirming healthcare to transgender people under 19 (the age of majority in Alabama). In May 2022, a federal judge ruled that the ban on surgery was enforceable. However, the ban on puberty blockers and hormones was not enforceable while the law is challenged in court.^[462] In August 2023, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, allowing the ban on puberty blockers and hormones to take effect.^[463]
Utah	Governor Spencer Cox	January 27, 2023^[403]^[404]^[405]^[406]
South Dakota	Governor Kristi Noem	February 13, 2023^[464]^[465]^[466]
Mississippi	Governor Tate Reeves	February 28, 2023^[467]^[468]
Tennessee	Governor Bill Lee	March 2, 2023^[469]^[470]
Florida	Florida Board of MedicineGovernor Ron DeSantis		August 26, 2024 (legislation)Blocked (state board of medicine rule)	The state board of medicine rule took effect on March 16, 2023.^[471]^[472] Additionally, on May 17, 2023, Governor DeSantis signed a ban into law, and it took effect immediately. It applies only to new patients, not those who were already receiving gender-affirming care.^[473] However, on June 6, 2023, a court temporarily blocked enforcement of both the board rule and the law.^[474] In June 2024, a judge permanently blocked the law from taking effect.^[413] In August 2024, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the permanent injunction while the matter is appealed.^[414]
Iowa	Governor Kim Reynolds	March 22, 2023^[475]
Georgia	Governor Brian Kemp	March 23, 2023^[476]	July 1, 2023	Bans hormones and surgery while continuing to allow puberty blockers. Minors who began hormones prior to July 1, 2023 are allowed to continue treatment.^[477]^[478]
West Virginia	Governor Jim Justice	March 29, 2023^[479]	May 7, 2025^[480]	The bill made exceptions for minors who have received parental consent and are diagnosed with “severe gender dysphoria” by two doctors. Due to this exception, experts did not expect the ban to have much of an impact.^[481] In May 2025, Governor Patrick Morrisey signed a bill ending this exception.^[482]
Kentucky	State legislature	March 29, 2023	July 14, 2023	The legislature overrode Governor Andy Beshear‘s veto, banning gender-affirming healthcare for trans minors.^[483] Federal appeals judges allowed the ban to remain in effect during legal challenges to overturn it.^[484]^[485]
Arizona	Governor Doug Ducey	March 30, 2022	March 31, 2023	Bans gender-affirming surgery for minors, but not hormones and puberty blockers. The bill also makes some exceptions, including in the case of someone born intersex.^[486]^[487] In mid 2023, a new Governor, Katie Hobbs reversed course by signing a series of executive orders which include shield-style protections for gender-affirming care, ensuring that it remains legal in Arizona. It also bans conversion therapy, requires insurance plans to cover gender-affirming care and bars state agencies from cooperating with civil and criminal cases in states where gender-affirming health care is illegal.^[488]
Idaho	Governor Brad Little^[489]^[490]	April 4, 2023	April 15, 2024	It would also make it a felony for any medical practitioner to help a minor seek gender-affirming treatment. On December 27, 2023, a federal judge blocked the law from taking effect.^[491] On April 15, 2024, the US Supreme Court responded to an emergency request filed in February by temporarily allowing the ban to go into effect while further legal challenges to it play out in the lower courts. The ruling did not resolve the underlying legal challenges raised by the case nor did the justices rule on the larger issue of bans on gender-affirming treatment for minors. The ruling also does not apply to the two plaintiffs in the lawsuit.^[492]^[493]
Indiana	Governor Eric Holcomb^[494]	April 5, 2023	February 27, 2024	On June 16, 2023, a federal judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect.^[495] On February 27, 2024, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision allowing the ban to take effect.^[496]
North Dakota	Governor Doug Burgum	April 20, 2023		On April 20, 2023, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum signed a law criminalizing trans health care for minors. However, the law notably makes exceptions for medication treatment for “rare circumstances with parental consent”. The law also allows medication treatment for early onset puberty and minors who were already receiving gender-affirming care will still be able to receive treatment.^[497]
Montana	Governor Greg Gianforte	April 28, 2023^[498]	Blocked	On September 27, 2023, a Montana District Court judge prevented it from taking effect.^[499] On December 11, 2024, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the ban and suggested the ban is likely unconstitutional and sent it back to the district court for trial.^[500] If the ban does take effect, some treatments would remain legal for minors who are not suffering from gender dysphoria.
North Carolina	State legislature		August 17, 2023	Ban on gender-affirming care, such as hormones, puberty blockers, and surgery, for minors. The ban only applies to transgender children and still allows such treatments for intersex and cisgender children. The ban also only applies to new patients. Transgender children who started treatment prior to August 1, 2023 will be allowed to continue receiving treatment.^[501] Governor Roy Cooper vetoed the bill on July 5, 2023,^[502] but the state legislature overruled his veto on August 17, therefore making the bill law.^[503]
Missouri	Governor Mike Parson	June 7, 2023	August 28, 2023	People receiving puberty blockers or hormones before the ban went into effect may continue taking them. Otherwise, blockers and hormones are banned until 2027. Surgery is also banned. A 2024 lawsuit by the ACLU was unsuccessful.^[504]
Louisiana	State Legislature		January 1, 2024	On June 29, 2023, John Bel Edwards vetoed a ban on blockers, hormones, and surgery for minors. On July 18, the Louisiana State Legislature overrode his veto.
Oklahoma	Governor Kevin Stitt	May 1, 2023		On May 1, 2023, Governor Kevin Stitt signed a bill that makes it a felony for doctors to provide gender-transition medical care for anyone under the age of 18.^[505] In October 2023, a judge declined to stop the law from taking effect.^[506]
Nebraska	Governor Jim Pillen	October 2, 2023	October 2, 2023	On October 2, 2023, the state Department of Health and Human Services announced that Republican Governor Jim Pillen had approved emergency regulations banning gender affirming surgeries for minors. Puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors still remain legal, however applicants must now wait seven days and undergo at least 40 hours of “clinically neutral” therapy before starting them. The new regulations went into effect immediately.^[507]
Ohio	State legislature		April 30, 2025	On January 5, 2024, Governor Mike DeWine signed an executive order banning gender-affirming surgeries for minors.^[508] Previously, on December 29, 2023, he had vetoed the Saving Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act (HB68) passed (mostly along party lines) by the Ohio Legislature on December 13 which banned gender-affirming surgeries as well as hormones and puberty blockers for minors. The bill includes exceptions for this kind of care for non-transgender youth, and it allows children who were already receiving gender-affirming care in Ohio to continue their treatment.^[509] On January 24, 2024, the legislature overrode DeWine’s veto thereby making HB68 law.^[510] On April 16, 2024, a judge temporarily blocked the ban from taking effect.^[511] On August 6, 2024, a judge overturned the injunction and allowed the law to take effect immediately.^[512] On March 18, 2025, the state’s 10th District Court of Appeale reversed the judge’s decision and reinstated the injunction.^[513] On April 30, 2025, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled 4–3 that the ban could take effect while further court battles play out.^[514]
Wyoming	Governor Mark Gordon	March 22, 2024	July 1, 2024	On March 22, 2024, Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon signed a law criminalizing trans health care for minors.^[515]
South Carolina	Governor Henry McMaster	May 21, 2024	May 21, 2024	On May 21, 2024, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster signed a law banning trans health care for minors. The law, which went into effect immediately, also requires principals, teachers and other school staff members to tell parents when their children want to use a name other than their legal one, or pronouns that do not match their sex assigned at birth. It also bars adults under 26 from using Medicaid to cover the costs for trans health care.^[516] This part of the bill is in direct opposition to a 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling from the month prior which ruled that state Medicaid bans on gender-affirming care in the 4th Circuit, which includes South Carolina, are unconstitutional.^[517]
New Hampshire	Governor Chris Sununu (genital surgeries)Governor Kelly Ayotte (puberty blockers, hormones and other surgeries)	July 19, 2024 (genital surgeries)August 1, 2025 (puberty blockers, hormones and other surgeries)	January 1, 2025 (genital surgeries)January 1, 2026 (puberty blockers, hormones and other surgeries)	On July 19, 2024, New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu signed a law banning gender-affirming genital surgeries for minors. However, puberty blockers, hormones and non-genital surgeries such as mastectomies remained legal for trans youth.^[518]^[519] On August 1, 2025, Governor Kelly Ayotte signed a bill ending puberty blockers, hormones and non-genital surgeries for minors in the state too. However, the bill contains an exception which allows minors already receiving care to continue it.^[520]
Kansas	State legislature		February 18, 2025	On February 18, 2025, the Kansas state legislature overrode Governor Laura Kelly‘s veto of Senate Bill 63 which bans gender-affirming care for minors. Children already receiving gender-affirming care in Kansas must stop receiving it by December 31, 2025.^[521]^[522]
Puerto Rico	Governor Jenniffer González-Colón	July 17, 2025	July 17, 2025	On July 17, 2025, Puerto Rico Governor Jenniffer González-Colón signed Senate Bill 350 which bans on gender-affirming care for anyone under 21 years of age. It also bars public funding for gender-affirming care and threatens doctors who violate the ban with up to 15 years in prison, a $50,000 fine, and the permanent loss of their licenses. Puerto Rico’s LGBTQ+ Federation immediately announced plans to challenge the ban in court.^[402]^[401]

Protections for minors

State	Authority	Signed	Effective	Notes
Connecticut	Governor Ned Lamont	May 5, 2022	May 5, 2022	On May 5, 2022, Governor Ned Lamont signed House Bill 5414, a shield law that designates Connecticut as a “safe harbor” which protects people who provide abortions and gender affirming care in the state, as well as legal protections for people seeking abortions and gender-affirming health care from out-of-state.^[523]^[524]
Massachusetts	Governor Charlie Baker	July 29, 2022	July 29, 2022	On July 29, 2022, Governor Charlie Baker signed a shield law which protects access to abortion and gender-affirming health care in the state.^[525]
California	Governor Gavin Newsom	September 30, 2022	January 1, 2023	On September 30, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 107, a shield law which designates California as a “sanctuary state” for trans youth and their families who are fleeing from other states that have banned the practice.^[526]
District of Columbia	Mayor Muriel Bowser	November 21, 2022	November 21, 2022	On November 21, 2022, Mayor Muriel Bowser signed into law D.C. ACT 24-646, the Human Rights Sanctuary Amendment Act of 2022, which protects the right to bodily autonomy and of those seeking care for abortion, contraception, sexual conduct, intimate relationships, and gender affirmation.^[527]
Illinois	Governor JB Pritzker	January 13, 2023^[528]	January 13, 2023	On January 13, 2023, Governor JB Pritzker signed into law HB4664, a reproductive rights and gender affirming care omnibus bill that protects health care providers and their patients from legal attacks by neighboring states and expands reproductive and gender affirming health care access and options across the state. The bill takes historic action to protect Illinois providers and their patients, thousands of whom have traveled to Illinois to access essential care now banned in their home states.
New Mexico	Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham	March 16, 2023	March 16, 2023	On March 16, 2023, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham signed into law House Bill 7, the Reproductive and Gender-Affirming Health Care Act, which prohibits public bodies, including local municipalities, from denying, restricting, or discriminating against an individual’s right to use or refuse reproductive health care or health care related to gender.^[529]
Vermont	Governor Phil Scott	March 29, 2023	September 2023	On March 29, 2023, Governor Phil Scott signed into law House Bill 89 and Senate Bill 37, which establish a slate of protections for both providers and seekers of gender affirming health care, as well as those seeking or administering abortions.^[530]
New Jersey	Governor Phil Murphy	April 4, 2023	April 4, 2023	On April 4, 2023, Governor Phil Murphy signed Executive Order No. 326 establishing New Jersey as a safe haven for gender-affirming health care by directing all state departments and agencies to protect all persons, including health care professionals and patients, against potential repercussions resulting from providing, receiving, assisting in providing or receiving, seeking, or traveling to New Jersey to obtain gender-affirming health care services.^[531]
Colorado	Governor Jared Polis	April 14, 2023	April 14, 2023	On April 14, 2023, Governor Jared Polis signed into law a trio of health care bills enshrining access to abortion and gender-affirming procedures and medications in Colorado. These bills ensure people in surrounding states and beyond can go to Colorado to have an abortion, begin puberty blockers or receive gender-affirming surgery without fear of prosecution.^[532]
Minnesota	Governor Tim Walz	April 27, 2023	April 27, 2023	On April 27, 2023, Governor Tim Walz signed a shield law protecting minors fleeing from other states to receive gender-affirming care. It also amends child custody and child welfare provisions related to out-of-state laws interfering in the use of gender-affirming health care; amending provisions related to warrants, arrests, and extraditions related to out-of-state laws on gender-affirming health care. It also rules that a court order for the removal of a child issued in another state because the child’s parent or guardian assisted the child in receiving gender-affirming care in this state must not be enforced in this state. In addition, it rules that a law of another state that authorizes a state agency to remove a child from the child’s parent or guardian because the parent or guardian allowed the child to receive gender-affirming health care is against the public policy of this state and must not be enforced or applied in a case pending in a court in this state.^[533]
Washington	Governor Jay Inslee	May 9, 2023	May 9, 2023	On May 9, 2023, Governor Jay Inslee signed a shield law designating Washington as a “sanctuary state” for trans youth.^[534]
Maryland	Governor Wes Moore	June 6, 2023	June 6, 2023	On June 6, 2023, Governor Wes Moore signed an executive order to protect gender affirming health care in Maryland. The order will protect those seeking, receiving, or providing gender affirming care in Maryland from attempts at legal punishment by other states.^[535]
New York	Governor Kathy Hochul	June 26, 2023	June 26, 2023	On June 26, 2023, Governor Kathy Hochul signed a shield law designating New York as a “sanctuary state” for trans youth. This law protects access to transition-related medical care for transgender minors and bars state courts from enforcing the laws of other states that might authorize a child to be taken away if the parents provide gender-affirming medical care, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy. It also prohibits New York courts from considering transition-related care for minors as child abuse and bars state and local authorities from cooperating with out-of-state agencies regarding the provision of lawful gender-affirming care in New York.^[536]
Arizona	Governor Katie Hobbs	June 28, 2023	June 28, 2023	On March 30, 2022, Governor Doug Ducey signed a bill banning gender-affirming surgery for minors, but not hormones and puberty blockers. The bill also makes some exceptions, including in the case of someone born intersex.^[486] On June 28, 2023, a new Governor, Katie Hobbs reversed course by signing a series of executive orders which include shield-style protections for gender-affirming care, ensuring that it remains legal in Arizona. It also bans conversion therapy, requires insurance plans to cover gender-affirming care and bars state agencies from cooperating with civil and criminal cases in states where gender-affirming health care is illegal.^[488]
Oregon	Governor Tina Kotek	July 13, 2023	July 13, 2023	On May 9, 2023, Governor Tina Kotek signed a law protecting access to abortion and gender affirming care for trans youth. Minors between the ages of 15 and 17 can receive gender affirming care without parental permission, whereas youth ages 14 and under must have parental permission.^[537]
Maine	Governor Janet Mills	April 23, 2024	April 23, 2024	On April 23, 2024, Governor Janet Mills signed a shield law designating Maine as a “sanctuary state” for gender-affirming care and abortion providers and makes access to such treatments “legal rights” in Maine. It states that criminal and civil actions against providers and patients are not enforceable if the access to that care occurred in Maine. Additionally, the bill prevents cooperation with out-of-state arrest warrants for gender-affirming care and abortion that happen within the state. It also protects doctors who provide gender-affirming care and abortion from actions by medical boards, malpractice insurance, and other regulating entities that seek to economically harm them or dissuade them from providing care. The bill also explicitly enshrines WPATH‘s Standards of Care into state law for the coverage of transgender healthcare.^[538]^[539]
Rhode Island	Governor Daniel McKee	June 25, 2024	June 25, 2024	On June 25, 2024, Governor Daniel McKee signed a shield law designating Rhode Island as a “sanctuary state” for gender-affirming care and abortion providers and makes access to such treatments “legal rights” in Rhode Island. The bill also protects providers from being sued for providing care.^[540]
Delaware	Governor Matt Meyer	June 20, 2025	June 20, 2025	On June 20, 2025, Governor Matt Meyer signed Executive Order No. 11 establishing Delaware as a “sanctuary state” for gender-affirming care by protecting patients and providers from bans and restrictions in other states. It also forbids state agencies from giving up “medical records, data or billing information, or utilize state resources that could help any criminal or civil investigation against someone receiving or providing gender-affirming care” and prohibits the state professional regulations board from disbarring healthcare providers because they provide gender-affirming care.^[541]^[542]

Related studies

In one 2016 study, the effect of puberty blockers was shown to be fully reversible.^[543] Earlier studies (e.g., these in 2012 and 2015) indicated ongoing long-term research into potential effects on the brain.^[544]^[545]

Awareness of providers

The lack of knowledge and education related to transgender health is an obstacle transgender people face.^[546] A 2011 study published in JAMA reported that medical students cover up to “only five hours” of LGBT related content.^[547] A different study done by Lambda Legal in 2010 stated that 89.4% of transgender people felt that there are not enough medical providers that are “adequately trained” for their needs.^[548] This lack of medical training makes it harder for transgender people to find suitable and proper healthcare.^[546] A 2014 report by the Department of Justice found that 50% of trans people had actually had to teach their medical providers about trans healthcare.^[194]

Discrimination

A 2014 report by the Department of Justice found that 28% of trans people reported being harassed in medical settings, 19% reported being refused care, 2% reported being physically attacked in a doctor’s office, 10% reported being sexually assaulted in one, 9% had been involuntarily committed, and 3% subjected to unwanted medical procedures. The report further found that it was not uncommon for trans people to be forced by psychiatric professionals to provide sexual favors in exchange for being allowed continued access to gender affirming medical care.^[194]

Transgender people also sometimes experience discrimination by healthcare professionals, who have refused to treat them for conditions both related and unrelated to their gender identity.^[549]^[550]^[551] A 2017 report by the Center for American Progress found 29 percent of transgender people reporting they were denied care by a medical provider in the preceding year due to their gender identity or sexual orientation. The same study found that 21 percent of trans people reported medical providers used abusive or harsh language when they sought care.^[552]

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, specifically Section 1557, prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded health care facilities, and in 2012 the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) clarified that this includes discrimination based on transgender status. The government’s final rule in 2016 determined that the ACA forbid discrimination based on gender identity.^[553] The ACA also forbids insurance providers from refusing to cover a person based on a pre-existing condition, including being transgender. However, a federal judge in Texas in 2016 issued a nationwide injunction stopping the ACA’s transgender antidiscrimination protections from taking effect, and in 2019 that same court issued a final ruling that was binding on HHS.^[554]^[553] On June 12, 2020, the Trump administration issued a new rule stating that sexual orientation and gender identity were not covered under the anti-discrimination protections of the Affordable Care Act.^[555] This rule was in effect for nearly a year until it was reversed by the Biden administration, restoring the Obama-era policy.^[556]

Complaints sent to HHS during the Trump administration indicated that medical providers were still frequently denying care to transgender people on the basis of their gender identity.^[554]

Some jurisdictions have their own laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity or gender expression in public accommodations, as well as under medical malpractice and misconduct law.^[557]

In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is necessarily also discrimination “because of sex” as prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and thus that Title VII protects employees against such discrimination.

A 2022 study on the allocation of ventilators during the pandemic found that respondents across the entire political spectrum were, when presented with the choice between allocating a ventillator to a cisgender man or a transgender person, on average less likely to allocate it to the trans person than to the cis man. In particular, respondents with conservative political leanings, when given a choice between allocating a ventilator to a cis man or a trans woman, were 14.3% less likely to allocate it to the trans woman, and when given a choice between allocating a ventilator to a cis man or a trans man, were 18.6% less likely to allocate it to the trans man.^[558]

Republican amendments to funding bills could defund trans healthcare, affecting hundreds of thousands of trans adults and children by restricting access to essential medical treatments like hormone therapy and surgeries.^[559]

Catholic hospitals

1 in 6 patients in the United States are treated in a Catholic facility.^[560] In March 2023, the United States Catholic Bishops issued guidelines for Catholic hospitals, entitled “Moral Limits to the Technological Manipulation of the Human Body”, which banned the provision of gender affirming healthcare by such hospitals entirely.^[561]

Trans Broken Arm Syndrome

A form of discrimination in healthcare settings is known as “trans broken arm syndrome”, in which a doctor mistakenly assumes that a trans person’s medical ailments stem from their trans status or gender-affirming care and consequently treats their problem incorrectly or denies them care entirely. Trans patients often hide their trans status when visiting a doctor if their problem, such as a broken arm, is not related to their trans status.^[562] This is especially common in rural or more conservative areas.^[563]

A 2022 survey from the Center for American Progress revealed that 19 percent of trans individuals had experienced this form of discrimination in the past year.^[564]

Medical privacy

Transgender people have the right to medical privacy. According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), medical providers and insurance companies are prohibited from disclosing any personal medical information including a person’s transgender status.^[565] HIPAA also allows transgender people to access and receive a copy of their medical records from health care facilities.^[565]

Insurance coverage

It can be difficult for transgender people to find insurance coverage for their medical needs.^[566]

Even though there is medical consensus that hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery (GAS) are medically necessary for many transgender people, the kinds of health care associated with gender transition are sometimes misunderstood as cosmetic, experimental or simply unnecessary. This has led to public and private insurance companies denying coverage for such treatment.^[567] Courts have repeatedly ruled that these treatments may be medically necessary and have recognized gender dysphoria as a legitimate medical condition constituting a “serious medical need”.^[568]

The ban on Medicare coverage for gender reassignment surgery was repealed by the US Department of Health and Human Services in 2014. Insurance companies, however, still hold the authority to decide whether the procedures are a medical necessity.^[566] Thus, insurance companies can decide whether they will provide Medicare coverage for the surgeries.^[566]

Under federal tax laws, the Internal Revenue Code, section 213, defines the purpose of “medical care” as “for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body.”^[569] Only cosmetic surgeries promoting the physical or mental health of an individual can qualify for medical deductions. Transgender people have used the diagnosis of gender dysphoria to qualify for deductible health care.^[569]

The idea that transition-related care is cosmetic or experimental has been ruled as discriminatory and out of touch with current medical thinking. The AMA and WPATH have specifically rejected these arguments, and courts have affirmed their conclusion.^[570]^[571] In a case brought by Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner, for instance, the Internal Revenue Service lost its claim that such treatments were cosmetic and experimental when a transgender woman deducted her GAS procedures as a medical expense. Courts have also found that psychotherapy alone is insufficient treatment for gender dysphoria, and that for some people, GAS may be the only effective treatment.^[568]

In April 2024, The Biden administration announced expansive new protections for gay and transgender medical patients, prohibiting federally funded health providers and insurers from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The new rules overturn Trump-era restrictions, but preserve religious exemptions.^[572] In June 2024, the Attorneys General in fifteen Republican-led states sued the Biden administration over the new rules. On July 3, 2024 a federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of the new rule.^[573]

State Medicaid Coverage

In June 2022, the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration, the agency which is responsible for overseeing the state’s Medicaid service, released a report which stated that transgender hormone therapy is “experimental and investigational”.^[574]^[575] The report was quickly rebuffed by the wider scientific community, with experts from Yale in July publishing an analysis in which they stated that the report ignored accepted scientific studies and consensus regarding gender dysphoria, had its writers chosen from those with ties to anti-LGBTQ groups specifically for their bias, cited sources with no scientific merit – including a student blog post and a letter to the editor, and that if the state used the same standard it used in the report to evaluate other treatments, it would no longer allow Medicaid to pay for a wide array of common medications.^[575] The Yale analysis also stated that “it seems clear that the report is not a serious scientific analysis but, rather, a document crafted to serve a political agenda” and that “medical treatment for gender dysphoria does meet generally accepted professional medical standards and is not experimental or investigational”.^[576]

On August 21, 2022, Florida issued state Medicaid regulations banning coverage of sexual reassignment surgery, hormone replacement therapy, puberty blockers and “any other transgender healthcare initiatives” for all individuals, regardless of age.^[577]^[578] On June 21, 2023, the court decided in Dekker v. Weida that Medicaid must continue to cover gender-affirming healthcare.^[579] The decision was appealed. On October 13, 2023, legal representatives from 19 states—principally Attorneys General Steve Marshall of Alabama, Tim Griffin of Arkansas, and Jonathan Skrmetti of Tennessee—submitted an amicus brief arguing that the court should reverse its decision and forbid Medicaid coverage of all gender-affirming care, including care for adults. The amicus brief cited the Dobbs decision.^[580] On November 22, 2024, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments appealing the case.^[581]

Prisoners’ rights

In 1992, UC Irvine researchers published an article detailing medical experiments performed on every trans female inmate in the California state prison system, ending with all subjects being indefinitely taken off hormone therapy. When the study began, prison policy was to provide hormone therapy to all inmates who had proof of receiving hormone therapy prior to incarceration. In 1988, prison policy changed on the basis of the claim that “hormone therapy was not beneficial to the inmates’ general health.” The authors wrote: “withdrawal of therapy was also associated with adverse symptoms in 60 of the 86 transsexuals. Rebound androgenization, hot flashes, moodiness, and irritability or depression were the most frequent complaints.”^[582] At the time, no right to access gender appropriate care existed in California state prisons.

According to the Vera Institute, 16% of trans adults in the US have been incarcerated, compared to 2.7% of cis adults, and trans people make up 59% of prison sexual assault victims.^[146]

In September 2011, a California state court denied the request of a California inmate, Lyralisa Stevens, for gender-affirming surgery at the state’s expense.^[583]

On January 17, 2014, in Kosilek v. Spencer a three-judge panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the Massachusetts Department of Corrections to provide Michelle Kosilek, a Massachusetts inmate, with gender-affirming surgery. It said denying the surgery violated Kosilek’s Eighth Amendment rights, which included “receiving medically necessary treatment … even if that treatment strikes some as odd or unorthodox”.^[584]

On April 3, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice intervened in a federal lawsuit filed in Georgia to argue that denying hormone treatment for transgender inmates violates their rights. It contended that the state’s policy that only allows for continuing treatments begun before incarceration was insufficient and that inmate treatment needs to be based on ongoing assessments.^[585] The case was brought by Ashley Diamond, an inmate who had used hormone treatment for seventeen years before entering the Georgia prison system.^[586]

On May 11, 2018, the US Bureau of Prisons announced that prison guidelines issued by the Obama Administration in January 2017 to allow transgender prisoners to be transferred to prisons housing inmates of the gender which they identify with had been rescinded and that assigned sex at birth would once again determine where transgender prisoners are jailed.^[587]

In August 2022, a federal judge in Nebraska ruled against a transgender woman who had been denied gender affirming care in prison, and placed in a cell with a male sex offender that proceeded to sexually assault her. In his ruling, the judge declared there to be insufficient evidence of deliberate indifference on the prison’s part to the plaintiff’s gender dysphoria, and that the plaintiff had not sufficiently proven that she had suffered more than minimal injuries from the sexual assault, stating that he found no support for the notion that a substantial risk of harm or deliberate indifference to it “could be plausibly inferred from a prospective cellmate’s conviction of sexual offenses coupled with the alleged vulnerability of a transgender inmate transitioning to a woman in a men’s prison”.^[588]

V-coding

Further information: V-coding

A 2018 report from the Indiana Maurer University School of Law, along with a subsequent report in the UCLA Journal of Gender and Law,^[589] found that, based on accounts of former inmates, it was common for trans women placed in men’s prisons to be assigned to cells with aggressive cisgender male cellmates to maintain social control and to, as one inmate described it, “keep the violence rate down”. Trans women used in this manner are often raped daily. This process is known as “V-coding“, and has been described as so common that it is effectively “a central part of a trans woman’s sentence”.^[590]

The prisoners serving as “customers” for these women are informally referred to as “husbands”. A 2021 California study found that 69% of trans women prisoners reported being made to perform sexual acts they would have rather not, 58.5% reported being violently sexually assaulted, and 88% overall reported having taken part in a “marriage-like relationship”.^[591] Trans women who physically resist the rape are often criminally charged with assault and placed in solitary confinement, the assault charge then being used to extend the woman’s prison stay and deny her parole.^[592]

It is common for correctional officers to publicly strip search trans women inmates, putting their bodies on display for staff members and other inmates. Trans women in this situation are sometimes made to dance, present, or masturbate at the correctional officers’ discretion.^[593] A 2017 study by the Sylvia Rivera Law Project found that 75% of trans women respondents in New York state prisons were subjected to sexual violence by a correctional officer, with 32% being victimized by two or more COs and 27% of respondents being forced to perform oral sex for a CO.^[594]

ICE detention

Transgender men in ICE custody under the Trump Administration have reportedly been specifically subjected to forced labor programs, with justifications given by guards including “If you wanna be a man, I’ll treat you like a man” and “Aren’t you strong enough? Aren’t you a man?”. Those who refused faced punishments including beatings and solitary confinement, with many also reporting severe sexual abuse.^[595]^[596] Data is hard to come by, however, as starting in 2025 ICE stopped complying with a federal law which required them to report data on transgender people in their custody.^[597]

Pronouns

Main article: Preferred gender pronoun

As of October 2023, nine states regulate pronoun use.^[598] In April 2024, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued guidance on gender ID pronouns. Employers refusing to use transgender workers’ preferred pronouns or bar them from using bathrooms that match their known gender identity commit unlawful sex-based harassment acts.^[599]

In February 2025, an employee of the Texas Real Estate Board was fired after refusing to remove pronouns from his email signature. Elon Musk and Texas governor Greg Abbott announced their support for the firing on social media.^[600]

In May 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas struck down the April 2024 EEOC guidance on gender ID pronouns in Texas v. EEOC.^[601] The court ruled that the EEOC guidance is inconsistent with Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and exceeded U.S. Supreme Court precedent.^[602]

Immigration

In 2000, the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that “gay men with female sexual identities [sic] in Mexico constitute a ‘particular social group'” that was persecuted and was entitled to asylum in the US (Hernandez-Montiel v. INS).^[603]^[604] Since then, several cases have reinforced and clarified the decision.^[605] Morales v. Gonzales (2007) is the only published decision in asylum law that uses “male-to-female transsexual” instead of “gay man with female sexual identity”.^[605] An immigration judge stated that, under Hernandez-Montiel, Morales would have been eligible for asylum (if not for her criminal conviction).^[606]

Critics have argued that allowing transgender people to apply for asylum “would invite a flood of people who could claim a ‘well-founded fear’ of persecution”.^[604] Precise numbers are unknown, but Immigration Equality, a nonprofit for LGBT immigrants, estimates hundreds of cases.^[604]

The United States has no process for accepting visa requests for third gender citizens from other countries. In 2015, trans HIV activist Amruta Alpesh Soni’s request for a visa was delayed because her gender is listed as “T” (for transgender) on her Indian passport. In order to receive a visa, the State Department requires the gender identification on the visa to match the gender identification on the passport.^[607] On the other hand, the asylum process is expensive and transgender migrants do not have any voice in the asylum seeking process.^[608] For example, transgender asylum seekers must wait for their case to be processed at the U.S./Mexico Border in detention centers.^[608] Transgender asylum seekers must wait in detention where they may undergo rape, sexual assault, or harassment from authorities.^[609] ICE Detention Center agents and staff have been found to be responsible for more counts of sexual victimization against transgender migrants than detainees or inmates, specifically during strip searches in multiple studies.^[610] Transgender asylum seekers remain in detention oftentimes in solitary confinement which is extremely harmful for physical and mental health.^[610] ICE facilities along the U.S./Mexico Border deny transgender migrants Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) and fail to maintain records on access migrants have to the treatment. In addition, transgender migrants and transgender asylum seekers are sexually assaulted due to unsafe facilities which are separated through gender binaries.^[610]

Military

Main article: Transgender personnel in the United States military

History

Discharges for gender transitioning were once commonplace. In one case, a trans person who had had gender-reassignment surgery was discharged from the Air Force Reserve, a decision supported by the Court of Appeals.^[611]^[612]

Obama administration

In 2015, the Pentagon reviewed its policy regarding transgender service members and announced that its ban would be removed.^[613] It announced on June 30, 2016, that, effective immediately, existing servicemembers who came out as transgender would no longer be discharged, denied reenlistment, involuntarily separated, or denied continuation of service simply because of their gender,^[614] and that, starting in July 2017, people who already identify as transgender were welcome to join the military so long as they had already adapted to their self-identified gender for at least an 18-month period.^[614]

First Trump administration

President Donald Trump tweeted on July 26, 2017, that transgender individuals will not be allowed to “serve in any capacity in the U.S. military”.^[615] Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford pushed back, saying that the Secretary of Defense needed time to review this order. “In the meantime,” he said, “we will continue to treat all of our personnel with respect.”^[616] On August 1, 2017, the Palm Center released a letter signed by 56 retired generals and admirals, opposing the proposed ban on transgender military service members. The letter stated that, if implemented, the ban would “deprive the military of mission-critical talent” and would compel cisgender service members “to choose between reporting their comrades or disobeying policy”.^[617] To challenge Trump’s intended policy, at least four lawsuits were filed (Jane Doe v. Trump, Stone v. Trump, Karnoski v. Trump, and Stockman v. Trump), as well as bipartisan Senate and House bills (S. 1820 and H.R. 4041). On August 25, 2017, Trump signed a presidential memorandum to formalize his request for an implementation plan from the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security.^[618] Several days later, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis announced that he would set up a panel of experts to provide recommendations and that, meanwhile, currently serving transgender troops would be allowed to remain.^[619] After another memorandum in 2018, and a further memorandum in 2019, the procedures regarding serving in the armed forces were finalized.

Biden administration

President Joe Biden reversed the policy the first Trump Administration put in place to ban transgender people from serving in the military on January 25, 2021, only five days after he took the oath of office.^[620] Biden said, “It is my conviction as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces that gender identity should not be a bar to military service. Moreover, there is substantial evidence that allowing transgender individuals to serve in the military does not have any meaningful negative impact on the Armed Forces.”

Biden’s executive order was implemented in a step by step process. The order Trump signed banning transgender people from the military was to be reversed, the Department of Defense was to correct the record of anyone dismissed from service due to their gender identity, and the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security were to begin the process of allowing transgender service members to serve openly. On April 30, 2021, the United States Department of Defense enacted a new policy which required better medical service and assistance to transgender people serving in the United States Military.^[621]

In February 2024, the Veterans Administration issued a final ruling that it would not cover gender-affirming surgery.^[622]^[623]

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025, a bipartisan bill which Biden signed in December 2024, includes language to ban transgender healthcare financing for certain procedures for minor children of military members.^[624] The text states “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization may not be provided to a child under the age of 18.”^[625]

Second Trump administration

On January 27, 2025, Trump signed an executive order called “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness”.^[626] On February 7, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed a memo by the same name.^[627] On February 26, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, Darin S. Selnick, signed a memo with more details. The effect is to ban trans people from the military.^[628] In March, U.S. District Court Judge Ana C. Reyes in Talbott v. United States^[629]^[630] and U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin H. Settle in Shilling v. United States issued preliminary injunctions.^[631] However, on May 6, the Supreme Court allowed the ban on trans personnel to take effect.^[632]

Taxes

IRS Publication 502^[633] lists medical expenses that are tax-deductible to the extent they 1) exceed 7.5% of the individual’s adjusted gross income, and 2) were not paid for by any insurance or other third party. For example, a person with $20,000 gross adjusted income can deduct all medical expenses after the first $1,500 spent. If that person incurred $16,000 in medical expenses during the tax year, then $14,500 is deductible. At higher incomes where the 7.5% floor becomes substantial, the deductible amount is often less than the standard deduction, in which case it is not cost-effective to claim.

IRS Publication 502 includes several deductions that may apply to gender transition treatments, including some operations.^[633] The deduction for operations was denied to a trans woman but was restored in tax court.^[634] The deductibility of the other items in Publication 502 was never in dispute.

Sports

Biden administration rule change

In April 2023, the Biden administration proposed a Title IX rule change which would declare blanket “one size fits all” bans on trans athletes from teams consistent with their genders a violation of Title IX, but would authorize such bans if done for a number of reasons, including “fairness in competition”. According to the proposal, this would most likely mean that bans that apply to elementary school students would be forbidden, but bans on high school and college students would be authorized under Title IX.^[678]^[679]

After two delays, the final changes to Title IX were published in April 2024. The new changes cemented protections for LGBT students under federal law and reversed a number of Trump-era policies that dictated how schools should respond to cases of alleged sexual misconduct in K-12 schools and college campuses. They also effectively broadened the scope of Title IX by extending the law’s reach to prohibit discrimination and harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and widen the range of sexual harassment complaints that schools will be responsible for investigating. However, it did not explicitly say schools are forbidden from banning transgender women from competing in women’s sports.^[680]^[681] In response to these new changes, over 20 republican-led states sued the Biden Administration and refused to follow the new rules.^[682] In June 2024, a judge temporarily blocked President Biden’s proposed changes to the interpretation of Title IX in Texas.^[683] A few days later, a judge issued an injunction temporary blocking the rules in Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi and Montana.^[684]^[685] The week after that, a judge temporarily blocked the law in Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia and West Virginia.^[686] On July 2, 2024, a federal judge temporarily blocked the law in Kansas, Alaska, Utah and Wyoming.^[687] This ruling also blocks the rule from taking effect in schools in Stillwater, Oklahoma, the home of a middle school student who joined the lawsuit, as well as any schools attended by members of the Young America’s Foundation and the children of members of Moms for Liberty — two national conservative groups that signed onto the lawsuit.^[688] On July 17, 2024, the Fifth and Sixth Circuits upheld two of the blocks.^[689] On July 26, 2024, a federal court temporarily blocked the rule from taking effect in Iowa, Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.^[690] On August 1, 2024, the rule went into effect in all the states that had blocked them.^[691]

On August 16, 2024, the Supreme Court, in a 5–4 ruling, denied an emergency request from the Biden Administration to reinstate the law while further legal battles play out in the lower court. The ruling did not address the merits of the lawsuits or whether the new rules were constitutional.^[692]^[693]^[694]

On January 9, 2025, U.S. District court judge Danny C. Reeves struck down the Biden administration’s expanded protections nationwide in response to the lawsuit filed by the states of Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Virginia, and West Virginia.^[695]^[696]

Second Trump administration

In 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14201, titled “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports”. The executive order threatens to ban federal funding from any educational institution that allows transgender girls or women to play on girls’ teams, claiming a violation of Title IX.^[697]^[18] The executive order threatens to revoke federal funding from any elementary, secondary, and post-secondary institution that allows transgender girls to play on girls’ teams, claiming they are in violation of Title IX.^[697] The order is exclusive to transgender women and does not bar transgender male athletes from playing on male sports teams.^[698]

The Supreme Court will hear Little v. Hecox during its 2025–26 term, a case related to state laws in Idaho and West Virginia banning transgender women from playing in women’s sports, both of which were found to violate the Equal Protection Clause and Title IX by the Ninth Circuit and the Fourth Circuit, respectively.^[699]

Summary

Transgender identity	/ (Most states recognize and allow the ability of transgender individuals to change their legal gender, no federal recognition)
Right to change gender on birth certificates or passports	/ (Currently blocked on passport applications;^[700] legal gender change allowed in 47 states and DC; prohibited by statute in Tennessee as of 2020 and in Montana and Oklahoma as of 2022)^[701]^[116]
Legal recognition of non-binary gender	/ (No federal recognition, state-level recognition in 22 states)
Anti-discrimination laws in employment	(Since 2020)
Anti-discrimination laws in housing	/ (Legal protections in 22 states)
Anti-discrimination laws in public accommodations	/ (Protections in only a minority of states)
Anti-discrimination laws in health insurance
LGBT anti-bullying law in schools and colleges	/ (Varies by state)
LGBT anti-discrimination law in hospitals
Freedom of expression	/(Multiple “Don’t say gay” laws in states limit instruction and discussion of LGBT issues in the classroom; other states have formal protections)^[702]
Transgender people allowed to serve openly in the military
Transgender people allowed in the military
Transgender health care, such as access to GAS and hormone medications not restricted by law	/ (Multiple states have blocked state Medicaid funding for transgender health care services, and have also made health care for youth with gender dysphoria illegal. On January 28, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order revoking federal funding for those who provide gender affirming care to those under 19 years of age.)
Transgender identity declassified as a mental illness	(Reclassified as ‘gender dysphoria’ under DSM-5 since 2013)^[703]
Transgender people allowed to play in sports that match their gender identity	/ (Multiple states and an executive order have banned transgender women and girls from competing in women’s sports.)

References

Caputo, Marc (May 16, 2022). “GOP candidates unleash wave of ads targeting transgender rights”. NBC News. Archived from the original on June 4, 2023. Retrieved June 3, 2023.
Parks, Casey (June 14, 2023). “LGBTQ+ Americans have stronger support than ever — and fiercer backlash”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
Zoledziowski, Anya (December 21, 2022). “How 2022 Became the Year Trans Hate Went Mainstream”. Vice (magazine). Archived from the original on August 11, 2025. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
Wells, VS (January 16, 2023). “As Republican-led statehouses continue to attack trans rights, some blue states are fighting back”. xtramagazine.com.
“House Passes The Equality Act: Here’s What It Would Do”. NPR. February 24, 2021. Archived from the original on October 2, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Migdon, Brooke (March 30, 2023). “Ahead of Transgender Day of Visibility, Democrats press bill of rights”. The Hill. Archived from the original on August 20, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Rummler, Orion (March 30, 2023). “Exclusive: Democrats reintroduce federal Trans Bill of Rights as GOP tries to advance restrictions”. The 19th. Archived from the original on September 8, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
“Sen. Markey and Rep. Jayapal Introduce the Trans Bill of Rights Ahead of International Transgender Day of Visibility”. markey.senate.gov. March 30, 2023. Archived from the original on August 17, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
O’Hara, Mary Emily (June 10, 2016). “‘Nonbinary’ is now a legal gender, Oregon court rules”. The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on June 10, 2016. Retrieved June 10, 2016.
Oliver, David. “Transgender rights are under attack. But trans people ‘just want to thrive and survive.'”. USA Today. Archived from the original on September 15, 2024. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Warburton, Moria; Horowitch, Rose (July 14, 2022). “Republicans in Congress lay groundwork for anti-transgender push”. Reuters. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved June 3, 2023.
Block, Melissa (June 29, 2022). “Americans are deeply divided on transgender rights, a poll shows”. NPR News. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved June 3, 2023.
“Mapping Attacks on LGBTQ Rights in U.S. State Legislatures”. American Civil Liberties Union. June 3, 2023. Archived from the original on June 4, 2023.
Amatulli, Jenna (January 28, 2025). “Trump signs executive order to curtail gender transition for people under 19”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 4, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Simmons-Duffin, Selena (January 28, 2025). “Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military”. NPR. Archived from the original on October 7, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
“Transgender service members challenge Trump’s military ban”. NBC News. January 28, 2025. Archived from the original on August 18, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Perez, Juan; Wilkes, Mackenzie (January 29, 2025). “Trump issues orders on K-12 ‘indoctrination,’ school choice and campus protests”. Politico. Archived from the original on February 19, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
Dunbar, Marina (February 5, 2025). “Trump signs executive order banning trans athletes from women’s sports”. The Guardian. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
Skene, Lea (February 13, 2025). “Judge Pauses Trump’s Order Restricting Gender-Affirming Care For Trans Youth”. HuffPost. Archived from the original on August 19, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Underwood, Michelle (February 14, 2025). “Federal Judge Agrees with AG Rayfield, Blocks Trump Order on Gender Affirming Care”. Oregon Department of Justice. Archived from the original on August 21, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Johnson, Gene (March 1, 2025). “Judge Blocks Trump Order Threatening Funding For Institutions That Offer Care For Trans Youth”. HuffPost. Archived from the original on September 4, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Templeton, Amelia (February 7, 2025). “Oregon, Washington sue over Trump order targeting gender-affirming care”. OPB (Oregon Public Broadcasting). Archived from the original on August 19, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Londoño, Ernesto (February 7, 2025). “Transgender Americans Challenge Trump’s Passport Policy in Court”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on April 27, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Dewan, Shaila (February 5, 2025). “Judge Blocks Trump Effort to Move Trans Women to Men’s Prisons”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 27, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
Sherman, Carter (June 18, 2025). “US supreme court upholds Tennessee ban on youth gender-affirming care”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 11, 2025. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
J. Courtney Sullivan (July 16, 2015). “What Marriage Equality Means for Transgender Rights”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
(April 4, 1959). Bars Marriage Permit; Clerk Rejects Proof of Sex of Christine Jorgensen (subscription required). The New York Times
“Christine Denied Marriage License”. Toledo Blade. April 4, 1959. Retrieved November 18, 2012.
Bowman, Karl M.; Engle, Bernice (1960). “Sex Offenses: The Medical and Legal Implications of Sex Variations”. Law and Contemporary Problems. 25 (2): 292–308. doi:10.2307/1190379. ISSN 0023-9186. JSTOR 1190379.
“Case # 04-99-00010-CV”. Texas Fourth Court of Appeals. 2000. Archived from the original on May 3, 2010. Retrieved May 7, 2009.
“85030 – In re Estate of Gardiner”. Court of Appeals of the State of Kansas. 2000. Archived from the original on October 11, 2008. Retrieved May 7, 2009.
“FAQ About Transgender People and Marriage Law”. lambdalegal.org. Archived from the original on October 3, 2016.
Canedy, Dana (February 18, 2002). “Sex Change Complicates Battle Over Child Custody”. The New York Times.
Kantaras v. Kantaras, 884 So. 2d 155 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004)
Michael J Kantaras v Linda Kantaras [2003] Case No. 98-5375CA. 511998DR005375xxxWS, 6th Circuit
Kantaras v. Kantaras, 898 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 2005)
“In re Jose Mauricio LOVO-Lara, Beneficiary of a visa petition filed by Gia Teresa LOVO-Ciccone, Petitioner” (PDF). Usdoj.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 25, 2009. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
“Fields v. Smith, No. 10-2339 (7th Cir. 2011)”. Justia Law. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
“Smith v. Fields”. SCOTUSblog. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
“FAQ About Transgender Parenting”. Lambda Legal. Archived from the original on September 7, 2015.
Cisek v. Cisek, 80 113, 401 (Court of Appeals July 20, 1982) (“Judgment reversed.”). – via lexisnexis.com (subscription required)
Tornkvist, Ann (November 2, 2011). “Sweden’s shameful transgender sterilization rule”. Salon.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
Nixon, Laura (December 2013). “The Right to (Trans) Parent: A Reproductive Justice Approach to Reproductive Rights, Fertility, and Family-Building Issues Facing Transgender People”. William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice. 20 (1): 73.
“Reproductive rights of transgender adolescents” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 19, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2015.
“Corbitt v. Taylor”. American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved February 22, 2022.
“Introduction and Anand’s Story”. Lambda Legal. Archived from the original on August 28, 2015.
“Identity Documents & Privacy”. National Center for Transgender Equality. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015.
“Sex Marker in Passports”. Travel.State.Gov. United States Department of State. February 11, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
“Biden administration adds gender marker X to passports”. Dallas Voice. June 30, 2021. Retrieved June 30, 2021.
“8 FAM 403.3 Gender Change”. United States Department of State. June 27, 2018. Retrieved July 18, 2018.
“8 FAM 1004.1 Passport Amendments”. United States Department of State. June 27, 2018. Retrieved July 18, 2018.
Yurcaba, Jo (March 31, 2022). “Gender-neutral X passports will be available in April”. NBC News. Archived from the original on June 28, 2022. Retrieved March 31, 2022.
“Selecting your Gender Marker”. Archived from the original on August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
Gedeon, Joseph (January 23, 2025). “Rubio instructs staff to freeze passport applications with ‘X’ sex markers”. The Guardian. Retrieved January 23, 2025.
Yurcaba, Jo; Williams, Abigail (February 10, 2025). “Passports with ‘X’ sex markers will be valid until they expire or are renewed, State Department says”. NBC News. Retrieved February 10, 2025.
“Chapter 2 – USCIS-Issued Secure Identity Documents”. uscis.gov. April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
“Passports”. National Center for Transgender Equality. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
“How to Change Your Name AND Gender (Adult)”. California Courts. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
“Nepal issues first third-gender passport, after Australia and N. Zealand”. DailySabah. August 10, 2015. Archived from the original on August 17, 2015.
Nandi, Jacinta (November 10, 2013). “Germany got it right by offering a third gender option on birth certificates”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 22, 2016.
Plucinska, Joanna (August 11, 2015). “Nepal Is The Latest Country to Acknowledge A Third Gender on Passports”. Time. Archived from the original on August 24, 2015.
Busby, Mattha (August 31, 2017). “Canada introduces gender-neutral ‘X’ option on passports”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 31, 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2017.
“The ‘two-spirit’ people of indigenous North Americans”. The Guardian. October 11, 2010. Archived from the original on January 28, 2017.
“The Beautiful Way Hawaiian Culture Embraces A Particular Kind Of Transgender Identity”. HuffPost. April 28, 2015. Archived from the original on January 30, 2017.
“Fa’afafines: The Third Gender”. theculturetrip.com. September 15, 2011. Archived from the original on November 27, 2015.
“Society Of Fa’afafine In American Samoa – S.O.F.I.A.S.” Archived from the original on January 4, 2018 – via Facebook.
“In Mexico, Mixed Genders And ‘Muxes'”. NPR. June 5, 2012. Archived from the original on September 12, 2015.
Khaleeli, Homa (April 16, 2014). “Hijra: India’s third gender claims its place in law”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on April 15, 2017.
“Third Gender”. HuffPost. March 19, 2014. Archived from the original on July 29, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
O’Hara, Mary Emily (September 26, 2016). “Californian Becomes Second US Citizen Granted ‘Non-Binary’ Gender Status”. NBC News. Archived from the original on September 26, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
O’Hara, Mary Emily (December 29, 2016). “Nation’s First Known Intersex Birth Certificate Issued in NYC”. NBC News. Archived from the original on December 30, 2016. Retrieved December 30, 2016.
Yurcaba, Jo; Williams, Abigail (January 24, 2025). “State Department to suspend passport applications seeking sex-marker changes”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2025. Retrieved January 27, 2025.
Levin, Sam (June 15, 2017). “‘Huge validation’: Oregon becomes first state to allow official third gender option”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 15, 2017. Retrieved June 15, 2017.
Rook, Erin (June 22, 2017). “Washington, DC joins Oregon in offering third gender marker on drivers’ licenses”. LGBTQ Nation. Archived from the original on October 21, 2017. Retrieved June 22, 2017.
Grinberg, Emanuella (June 27, 2017). “You can now get a gender neutral driver’s license in D.C.” CNN. Archived from the original on June 28, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
“TLC Backs CA Bill to Create New Gender Marker and Ease Process for Gender Change in Court Orders and on State Documents”. Transgender Law Center. January 26, 2017. Archived from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved January 28, 2017.
“SB-179 Gender identity: female, male, or nonbinary”. California Legislative Information. Archived from the original on September 16, 2017. Retrieved October 17, 2017.
Bouchard, Kelly (June 11, 2018). “Maine begins putting ‘non-binary’ on driver’s licenses for those not ‘F’ or ‘M'”. Press Herald. Retrieved June 12, 2018.
Vagianos, Alanna (July 4, 2018). “New Jersey Gov. Signs Bills Giving Transgender Residents More Rights”. HuffPost. Retrieved July 5, 2018.
Church, Danielle (October 3, 2018). “Minnesota Offers “X” Gender Option on Driver’s Licenses”. KVRR. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
“Colorado to begin offering gender X on driver’s licenses, ID cards”. FOX31 Denver. November 8, 2018.
Holtzman, Michael (May 14, 2018). “Female, male or ‘X’: Haddad looks to make 3rd gender option on licenses, IDs”. South Coast Today. Retrieved May 17, 2018.
Simko-Bednarski, Evan (January 2, 2019). “New York City birth certificates get gender-neutral option”. CNN. Retrieved January 26, 2019.
“Movement Advancement Project | Identity Document Laws and Policies”. www.lgbtmap.org. Retrieved November 3, 2022.
“Connecticut”. National Center for Transgender Equality. Retrieved November 3, 2022.
“Gender-affirming identification basics”. www.illinoislegalaid.org. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
“Non-binary gender designation is now available on Mass. Licenses”. The Boston Globe. November 13, 2019.
GLAD (November 13, 2019). “Non-binary gender designation is now available on Mass. licenses”. X (formerly Twitter). Retrieved September 17, 2021 – via Twitter.
“Benson, community members celebrate nonbinary ID option”. Michigan Secretary of State. Retrieved November 22, 2021.
“How to correct Sex Designation on Driver’s License or ID”. Michigan Secretary of State. Retrieved November 22, 2021.
Williams, Pete (January 1, 2020). “2020’s new laws: Gender-neutral ‘X’ licenses, stronger ID, wear your hair the way you want”. NBC News. Retrieved June 10, 2021.
“New Jersey adds ‘X’ gender marker on driver’s licenses and other state identification”. CNN. April 20, 2021.
Campbell, Jon. “New York to offer gender-neutral ‘X’ designation for driver’s licenses with new law”. USA Today. Retrieved April 4, 2022.
“Puerto Rico Supreme Court allows ‘X’ as a third gender choice on birth certificates”. NBC News. June 3, 2025. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
Herreria, Carla (June 27, 2019). “Hawaii Adds Third Gender Option For State-Issued IDs”. HuffPost. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
Goodin-Smith, Oona (July 31, 2019). “Pennsylvania to offer gender-neutral option on state IDs”. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved September 17, 2021.
“Rhode Island to add gender-neutral option ‘X’ for licenses”. WSBT. August 8, 2019. Retrieved September 17, 2021.
Van Slooten, Philip (April 7, 2020). “Northam signs Va. Non-binary driver’s license bill into law”. The Washington Blade. Retrieved September 17, 2021.
“LIS > Bill Tracking > SB246 > 2020 session”. lis.virginia.gov. Retrieved November 3, 2022.
“FindLaw’s Writ – Grossman: When Parentage Turns on Anatomical Sex An Illinois Court Denies a Female-to-Male Transsexual’s Claim of Fatherhood”. findlaw.com. Archived from the original on May 10, 2011.
Grenberg, Julie (2006). “The Roads Less Travelled: The Problem with Binary Sex Categories”. In Currah, Paisley; Juang, Richard; Minter, Shannon (eds.). Transgender Rights. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. pp. 51–73. ISBN 0-8166-4312-1.
“New York Name & Gender Change Information”. National Center for Transgender Equality. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
Hartocollis, Anemona (December 11, 2014). “Insurers in New York Must Cover Gender Reassignment Surgery, Cuomo Says”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 17, 2015.
“Victory: Nevada passes the most progressive birth certificate gender change policy in the nation!”. National Center for Transgender Equality. November 21, 2016. Archived from the original on April 7, 2017. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
“Sex Changes”. June 16, 2014. Archived from the original on May 29, 2019. Retrieved May 29, 2019.
Clark, Carol (November 14, 2019). “New Mexico is Fourth State to allow Gender-Neutral Sex Designation on Birth Certificates”. LA Daily Post. Archived from the original on November 15, 2019. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
“New Mexico”.
“LIS > Bill Tracking > HB1041 > 2020 session”. lis.virginia.gov. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
“Kansas”. National Center for Transgender Equality. Retrieved February 28, 2020.
“SB 180 Impacts on Birth Certificates”. Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
“Kansas Department of Revenue Division of Vehicles – Gender Change”. ksrevenue.gov. Retrieved November 17, 2024.
Loller, Travis (June 23, 2023). “Judge Won’t Let Tennessee Transgender Plaintiffs’ Change Their Birth Certificates”. HuffPost. Retrieved June 24, 2023.
“Kansas to allow trans residents to change birth certificates”. NBC News. June 25, 2019.
“Changing Birth Certificate Sex Designations: State-By-State Guidelines”. Lambda Legal. Archived from the original on June 18, 2014.
Smyth, Julie Carr (December 16, 2020). “Court Rules Ohio Must Allow Gender Changes on Birth Certificates”. HuffPost. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
Stitt, Kevin (November 8, 2021). “Executive Order 2021–24” (PDF). Oklahoma Secretary of State. Retrieved November 3, 2022.
“Oklahoma governor signs transgender bathroom bill”. ABC News. Retrieved July 28, 2022.
Murphy, Sean (April 27, 2022). “Oklahoma governor signs ban on nonbinary birth certificates”. ABC News. Archived from the original on May 5, 2022. Retrieved May 5, 2022.
“Montana permanently blocks transgender people from changing their birth certificates”. PBS NewsHour. September 9, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
“Montana judge blocks rule that prevented transgender people from changing their sex on documents”. AP News. December 17, 2024. Retrieved March 19, 2025.
Turkington, Richard C.; Allen, Anita L. (2002). Privacy law: cases and materials. West Group. pp. 861–. ISBN 978-0314262042. Archived from the original on June 26, 2014. Retrieved November 18, 2012.
Markowitz, Stephanie. “Change of Sex Determination on Transsexuals’ Birth Certificates: Public Policy and Equal Protection” (PDF). Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender. 14: 705–. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 22, 2012.
“Diana M. Darnell v. Douglas Lloyd, Commissioner of Health, State of Connecticut”. Retrieved June 28, 2012.
“Darnell v. Lloyd”. Archived from the original on October 3, 2016.
“Annotations to ORS Chapter 432”. Oregon State Legislature. Archived from the original on January 6, 2013. Retrieved June 28, 2012.
“General Laws”. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Archived from the original on July 2, 2012. Retrieved June 20, 2012.
“Transgender People and Amended Birth Certificates”. Massachusetts Law Updates. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. August 26, 2015. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
“Change of Gender”. Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles. Archived from the original on February 1, 2014. Retrieved June 20, 2012.
“Massachusetts Allows Nonbinary Marker on Licenses, IDs”. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Archived from the original on February 3, 2021. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
“Sources of Authority to Amend Sex Designation on Birth Certificates”. Lambda Legal. Archived from the original on July 16, 2012. Retrieved June 20, 2012.
“Gender Change Request” (PDF). Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 14, 2013. Retrieved June 20, 2012.
“LIS > Bill Tracking > HB1041 > 2020 session”. lis.virginia.gov. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
“Driver’s License Policies by State”. National Center for Transgender Equality. Archived from the original on July 1, 2012. Retrieved June 21, 2012.
Ebrahimji, Alisha (July 11, 2023). “A state judge ordered Kansas to stop letting transgender people change their gender marker on their driver’s licenses”. CNN. Retrieved February 10, 2024.
Migdon, Brooke (January 30, 2024). “Florida bars transgender residents from changing gender on driver’s licenses”. The Hill.
Crowley, Kinsey; Soule, Douglas (January 30, 2024). “Florida barring gender changes on driver’s license puts trans residents at risk, critics say”. USA Today.
Salhotra, Pooja (August 21, 2024). “Transgender Texans blocked from changing their sex on their driver’s license”. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved August 22, 2024.
AlHajal, Khalil (November 16, 2015). “Judge refuses to dismiss challenge to Michigan policy on transgender drivers”. Archived from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
“ACLU Lawsuit: Michigan ID Policy Exposes Transgender Men and Women to Risk of Harassment, Violence”. American Civil Liberties Union. May 21, 2015. Archived from the original on May 25, 2016. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
“California Governor Signs Bill to Remove Barriers for Transgender People to Change Name and Identity Documents”. transgenderlawcenter.org. September 6, 2013. Archived from the original on June 18, 2015.
“Name Change Ruling”. The New York Times. October 21, 2009. Archived from the original on October 27, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
“Transgender teen can’t legally change name until age 21, Mississippi Supreme Court rules”. The Advocate. April 18, 2025. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
Zarkhin, Fedor (October 5, 2022). “Transgender and nonbinary people’s gender identities erased after death, Portland area officials find”.
O’Neill, Kathryn; Wilson, Bianca; Herman, Jody. “Homeless Shelter Access Among Transgender Adults”.
Sonoma, Serena (May 19, 2021). “Kayla Gore, a Black Trans Woman on the Lead to End Homelessness and HIV Prevalence for Black Trans Women”.
Zavidow, Evan. “Transgender people at higher risk for justice system involvement”.
Burns, Katelyn (July 17, 2020). “The Trump administration’s proposed homeless shelter rule spells out how to spot a trans woman”.
Bollinger, Alex (July 20, 2020). “Trump administration memo explains how to spot a transgender woman”.
Rose, K.; Gombos, B.; John, L.; Ivaturi, A. (2023). “TRANSforming Fair Housing in St. Louis: New Protections, New Partnerships, and New Possibilities for the LGBTQ Community”. St. Louis, MO: Metropolitan St. Louis Equal Housing and Opportunity Council.
“Homelessness and Housing Instability Among LGBTQ Youth”. The Trevor Project. February 3, 2022. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
“Housing insecurity and the COVID-19 pandemic” (PDF). Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 2021. p. 21.
“LGBT Youth Shelter and Services”. Ali Forney Center. Retrieved April 15, 2025.
CDC (February 12, 2025). “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS)”. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). Retrieved February 24, 2025.
Abare, Robert (June 18, 2019). How Can We Reduce Housing Instability among LGBTQ Americans? (Report). Urban Institute.
St. James, Emily (March 24, 2022). “The time to panic about anti-trans legislation is now”. Vox.
Burns, Katelyn (March 4, 2022). “Greg Abbott’s death wish for trans kids is on full display”. MSNBC.
Jones, Saeed (May 5, 2021). “The Republican War Against Trans Kids”. GQ.
“Red Flag Alert for Genocide – USA”. Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention. April 14, 2023. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2023.
Boulware, Susan; Kamody, Rebecca; Kuper, Laura. “Biased Science: The Texas and Alabama Measures Criminalizing Medical Treatment for Transgender Children and Adolescents Rely on Inaccurate and Misleading Scientific Claims” (PDF). Yale Medicine. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
Bowers, Marci (April 2023). “What Decades of Providing Trans Health Care Have Taught Me”. The New York Times. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
“Statement of Opposition to Legislation Banning Access to Gender-Affirming Health Care in the US” (PDF). World Professional Association of Transgender Health. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
“Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court” (PDF). International Criminal Court.
Hennessy-Fiske, Molly (December 14, 2022). “Texas attorney general’s office sought state data on transgender Texans”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved December 21, 2022.
Villarreal, Daniel (December 14, 2022). “GOP Texas attorney general’s office allegedly demanded a list of trans people in the state”. LGBTQ Nation. Retrieved December 21, 2022.
Salhotra, Pooja (August 21, 2024). “Transgender Texans blocked from changing their sex on their driver’s license”. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved August 22, 2024.
“Vanderbilt turns over transgender patient records to state in attorney general probe”. The Tennessean.
Colvin, Jill (November 12, 2023). “Trump’s plans if he returns to the White House include deportation raids, tariffs and mass firings”. Associated Press News. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Weigel, David (February 3, 2023). “‘At any age’: Donald Trump pushes the GOP towards targeting transgender adults”. Semafor. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Weill, Kate; Briquelet, Kelly (June 30, 2023). “Trump Says He’ll Ban Federal Government From Promoting Transgender Care at Any Age”. The Daily Beast. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Roarty, Alex (July 14, 2023). “It’s trans adults, too: GOP candidates now back trans medical restrictions for all ages”. Miami Herald. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
“Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government”. White House. January 21, 2025. Archived from the original on January 21, 2025.
“Trump to try to remove ‘nonbinary’ and ‘other’ genders”. Politico. January 20, 2025. Retrieved January 23, 2025.
Demopoulos, Alaina (January 22, 2025). “‘A twist of the knife’: trans Americans respond to Trump’s executive order”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved January 22, 2025.
“Judge tells agencies to restore webpages and data removed after Trump’s executive order”. STAT. Associated Press. February 11, 2025. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
“Judge blocks Trump’s orders to curb youth gender transition care”. The Washington Post. March 1, 2025. Retrieved March 8, 2025.
Watson, Kathryn; Watson, Eleanor; Cook, Sara (January 28, 2025). “Trump signs executive orders for military, focusing on transgender service members, COVID, diversity – CBS News”. CBS News. Retrieved January 28, 2025.
“US judge blocks Trump’s ban on trans people serving in the military”. The Guardian. Associated Press. March 18, 2025. Retrieved March 18, 2025.
“Some hospitals pause gender-affirming care to evaluate Trump’s executive order”. NBC News. Associated Press. January 31, 2025. Retrieved February 1, 2025.
Montague, Zach (January 29, 2025). “Trump Signs Order Restricting Gender-Affirming Treatments for Minors”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 1, 2025.
Strack, Haley (January 28, 2025). “Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Gender Mutilation”. National Review.
Harmon, Amy; Macur, Juliet (February 13, 2025). “Judge Temporarily Stops Trump’s Plan to End Funds for Trans Youths’ Health Providers”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
“UVA Health set to resume transgender care services”. CBS News. February 13, 2025. Retrieved February 16, 2025.
“Phoenix clinic to resume gender-affirming care for children paused by Trump order”. The Arizona Republic. February 15, 2025. Retrieved February 16, 2025.
Factora, James (August 21, 2025). “DOJ Demands “Every Writing or Record” of Trans Youth Care From Hospitals”. Them. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
Cameron, Dell. “US Government Seeks Medical Records of Trans Youth”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
Cordes, Nancy; Watson, Kathryn; Linton, Caroline; Hubbard, Kaia; Quinn, Melissa; Brown, Kristin; Escobedo, Richard (January 28, 2025). “Trump administration orders federal funding freeze on all public loans, grants and more aid – CBS News”. CBS News. Retrieved January 28, 2025.
Office of the Press Secretary (January 29, 2025). “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling”. White House – via National Archives.
“Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports”. The White House. February 5, 2025. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
Yurcaba, Jo (February 11, 2025). “Education Dept. urges NCAA to reverse transgender athletes’ records, titles and awards”. NBC News. Archived from the original on February 11, 2025. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
Yurcaba, Jo (February 11, 2025). “Education Dept. urges NCAA to reverse transgender athletes’ records, titles and awards”. NBC News. Archived from the original on February 11, 2025. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
Walsh, Sheri (February 11, 2025). “Education Department urges NCAA to erase records set by transgender athletes”. United Press International. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
Gedeon, Joseph (February 25, 2025). “US threatens permanent visa bans on trans athletes based on sex markers”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
Perez, Evan; Rabinowitz, Hannah (September 4, 2025). “Trump DOJ is looking at ways to ban transgender Americans from owning guns, sources say”. CNN Politics. Retrieved September 5, 2025.
“Victim Issues: Mistrust of Professionals | Responding to Transgender Victims of Sexual Assault”. ovc.ojp.gov.
“Transgender people over four times more likely than cisgender people to be victims of violent crime”. Williams Institute.
“Responding to Transgender Victims of Sexual Assault”. Archived from the original on June 25, 2022.
Madani, Doha; Collins, Ben (June 18, 2022). “Anti-LGBTQ threats, fueled by internet’s far right ‘machine,’ shut down trans rights and drag events”. NBC News.
Owen, Greg (August 2022). “Police are four times more likely to stop transgender people for ‘reasonable suspicion'”.
“Responding to Transgender Victims of Sexual Assault”. Archived from the original on June 25, 2022.
Goldsmith, Belinda (April 25, 2017). “Transgender sex trafficking survivor hopes her story will help others”. Reuters.
Tomasiewicz, Meaghan. “Sex Traffifficking of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Youth in the United States”.
Newman-Granger, Ellie (December 8, 2021). “Gendered Understandings of Forced Sexual Exploitation”. Archived from the original on September 28, 2022. Retrieved July 28, 2022.
“The Report of the 2015 US Transgender Survey Executive Summary” (PDF). December 2016.
“The trauma of TSA for transgender travelers”. CNN. Archived from the original on March 27, 2023. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
“#TravelingWhileTrans: The trauma of returning to ‘normal'”. WaPo.
Lee, Nicole (March 10, 2023). “Minnesota becomes refuge state in US for gender-affirming care”. GCN. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
Yurcaba, Jo (April 11, 2022). “More Texas families with trans kids plan to flee the state”. NBC News.
Michaels, Samantha. “Transgender Teens and Their Families Prepare to Flee Texas”. Mother Jones.
Yurcaba, Jo (July 7, 2022). “Texas trans activist, 11, flees the state after years of advocacy”. NBC News.
House Bill 5506, Section Sec 484, 485, 486, 487, 488. The Connecticut General Assembly. May 24, 2022. p. 681-686. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022.
Migdon, Brooke (July 29, 2022). “Massachusetts governor signs bill safeguarding reproductive, gender-affirming health care into law”. The Hill. Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
Bebinger, Martha (May 27, 2022). “Mass. Senate moves to protect abortion providers from out-of-state court judgments and investigations”. WBUR.
Holden, Lindsey; Sheeler, Andrew. “California to become sanctuary state for transgender children under new law”. sacbee.com.
Council Bill 240808. Washington DC Council. October 18, 2022.
Walz, Tim (March 8, 2023). “Executive Order 23-03” (PDF). State of Minnesota Executive Department. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
Nieto-Munoz, Sophie (April 4, 2023). “Governor Murphy declares N.J. ‘safe haven’ for transgender, nonbinary people”. New Jersey Monitor. Retrieved April 16, 2023.
Murphy, Philip (April 4, 2023). “State of New Jersey Executive Order No. 326” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 13, 2023. Retrieved April 16, 2023.
“State of Maryland Executive Order 01.01.2023.08” (PDF). State of Maryland Executive Department. June 5, 2023. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
Migdon, Brooke (June 8, 2023). “Maryland governor signs executive order protecting access to gender-affirming care”. The Hill. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
“LGBTQ+ Adults Do Not Feel Safe and Do Not Think the Democratic Party Is Doing Enough to Protect Their Rights”. dataforprogress.org. June 8, 2023.
Liptak, Adam (June 15, 2020). “Civil Rights Law Protects Gay and Transgender Workers, Supreme Court Rules”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
Moreau, Julie (October 5, 2017). “Federal Civil Rights Law Doesn’t Protect Transgender Workers, Justice Department Says”. NBC News. Archived from the original on October 5, 2017. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
“HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan announces new regulations to ensure equal access to housing for all Americans regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity” (Press release). United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. January 30, 2012. Archived from the original on March 6, 2012. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
“Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity” (PDF). Federal Register. February 3, 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 4, 2012. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
“Cities and Counties with Non-Discrimination Ordinances that Include Gender Identity”. Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original on May 30, 2013.
Thiessen, Mark (April 12, 2018). “Anchorage voters are 1st in nation to defeat transgender ‘bathroom bill’ referendum”. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
“Learn More”. Freedom for All Massachusetts. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
Preston, Joshua. “Allan Spear and the Minnesota Human Rights Act.” Minnesota History 65 (2016): 76–87.
“Rhode island adopts transgender-inclusive non-discrimination law”. transgenderlaw.org. Transgender Law and Policy Institute. July 18, 2001. Archived from the original on December 9, 2002. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
Cal Civ Code sec. 51
“Gov. Whitmer Signs Bipartisan Legislation Expanding Rights and Freedoms for LGBTQ+ Michiganders”. michigan.gov. March 16, 2023.
“Iowa governor signs bill removing gender identity from state civil rights protections”. NBC News. February 28, 2025.
“SB08-200” (PDF). Colorado General Assembly.
“Connecticut Becomes 15th State to Ban Discrimination Against Transgender Employees”. The National Law Review. Archived from the original on July 22, 2011.
Ennis, Dawn (July 8, 2016). “Massachusetts governor signs sweeping transgender rights bill”. Archived from the original on June 29, 2017. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
“New York Finalizes Ban On Transgender Discrimination”. January 20, 2016. Archived from the original on December 30, 2017. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
“Transgender anti-discrimination bill set to become law in New Hampshire”. NBC News. Associated Press. May 3, 2018. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
“It’s Done: Governor Sununu Signs #TransBillNH!”. Freedom New Hampshire. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
“Virginia Values Act Signed Into Law”. Human Rights Campaign. April 11, 2020.
Declaratory Ruling on Behalf of John/Jane Doe (Connecticut Human Rights Commission 2000)
“Supreme Court / Sex Discrimination Case / New Jersey Teacher – Oct 18, 1976 – NBC–TV news”. Tvnews.vanderbilt.edu. October 18, 1976. Archived from the original on December 30, 2015. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
“Ca 79-3151 Carroll v. Talman Federal Savings and Loan Association of Chicago”. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. December 6, 1978. p. 1028. Archived from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved June 23, 2012.
“Ulane v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 742 F. 2d 1081 – Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 1984”. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Retrieved June 23, 2012.
“Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins”. American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved June 23, 2012.
Minter, Shannon (2003). “Representing Transsexual Clients: Selected Legal Issues”. National Center for Lesbian Rights. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved October 3, 2007.
“Smith v. City of Salem Ohio”. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Archived from the original on July 19, 2012. Retrieved June 23, 2012.
“Eleventh Circuit upholds victory for transgender employee fired by Georgia Legislature” (video). San Diego Gay & Lesbian News. December 6, 2011. Archived from the original on February 4, 2012. Retrieved June 26, 2012.
Bagby, Dyana (December 9, 2011). “Vandy Beth Glenn may soon return to work at Ga. General Assembly”. The GA Voice. Archived from the original on July 12, 2012. Retrieved June 26, 2012.
“Tennessee governor signs first-of-its-kind bill restricting drag shows”. NBC News. March 3, 2023. Archived from the original on March 3, 2023. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
Fiscus, Kirsten (March 1, 2023). “Tennessee drag show bill: Will drag performances be banned? What we know”. The Tennessean. Archived from the original on August 21, 2023. Retrieved July 22, 2023.
Baker-Jordan, Skylar (March 2, 2023). “Why the Tennessee ban on drag shows should terrify us all”. The Independent. Archived from the original on March 8, 2023. Retrieved March 8, 2023.
Bacallao, Marianna (June 3, 2023). “Tennessee’s drag ban is back after appeals court ruling”. WPLN. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
Bacallao, Marianna (July 18, 2024). “Tennessee’s law restricting drag has been ruled unconstitutional”. WPLN.
Riley, John (June 23, 2023). “Texas Governor Signs Law Banning Drag Performances in Public Businesses”. Metro Weekly. Archived from the original on June 26, 2023. Retrieved June 26, 2023.
Mizelle, Shawna (May 24, 2023). “Montana governor signs bill banning drag performers from reading to children in public schools, libraries”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 26, 2023. Retrieved June 26, 2023.
Kashiwagi, Sydney (June 3, 2023). “Trump-appointed federal judge rules Tennessee’s anti-drag show law is ‘unconstitutional'”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 26, 2023. Retrieved June 26, 2023.
Trotta, Daniel (June 23, 2023). “U.S. court blocks Florida law restricting drag performances”. Reuters. Archived from the original on June 26, 2023. Retrieved June 26, 2023.
Lavietes, Matt (September 26, 2023). “Federal judge declares Texas drag law unconstitutional”. NBC News. Retrieved February 10, 2024.
Hanson, Amy Beth (October 13, 2023). “Montana judge keeps in place a ban on enforcement of law restricting drag shows, drag reading events”. AP News. Retrieved February 10, 2024.
“Gov. McCrory files brief to reverse Gloucester transgender restroom policy case”. NewsChannel 3. May 10, 2016. Archived from the original on May 28, 2016. Retrieved September 17, 2021.
Fausset, Richard (April 19, 2016). “Appeals Court Favors Transgender Student in Virginia Restroom Case”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 14, 2016. Retrieved May 16, 2016.
“Complaint amended in transgender lawsuit”. Daily Press. Archived from the original on August 18, 2017. Retrieved August 18, 2017.
Hurley, Lawrence. “U.S. court backs transgender student at center of bathroom dispute”. Archived from the original on January 28, 2019. Retrieved January 27, 2019.
Freeman, Vernon (May 22, 2018). “Federal court rules in favor of transgender student Gavin Grimm”.
Smith Richards, Jennifer; Cohen, Jodi S. (February 8, 2025). “The Department of Education Told Employees to End Support for Transgender Students”. Pro Publica. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
Trump, Donald (January 29, 2025). “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling”. White House. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
“Trump issues orders on K-12 ‘indoctrination,’ school choice and campus protests”. Politico. January 29, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
“Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling”. The White House. January 29, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
Cochran, Lexi Lonas (January 29, 2025). “Trump signs executive order to defund schools teaching CRT, ‘radical gender ideology'”. The Hill. Archived from the original on February 7, 2025. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
Lang, Nico (January 31, 2025). “How Trump’s “Radical Indoctrination” Executive Order Targets Trans Youth in Schools”. Them. Retrieved February 23, 2025.
Krejci, Cleo (February 12, 2025). “Wisconsin education leaders left confused about legality of Trump executive order on K-12”. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
“Trump Administration Rescinds Protections For Transgender Students”. HuffPost. February 22, 2017. Retrieved January 18, 2018.
Perez-Castells, Ariana (July 27, 2022). “Texas suing USDA over requirement to add LGBTQ protections to nutrition programs’ nondiscrimination policies”.
Lee, Meredith (June 22, 2022). “GOP senator considering blocking school meal funding deal over transgender policy fight”. Politico. Archived from the original on June 23, 2022. Retrieved August 1, 2022.
“Text of H.R. 736: PROTECT Kids Act (Reported by House Committee version)”. GovTrack.us. Retrieved October 9, 2024.
“Walberg’s PROTECT Kids Act Advanced by Committee”. Congressman Tim Walberg. March 9, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
Vander Hart, Shane (April 29, 2022). “Linn-Mar School Board approves controversial transgender policy”.
Marshall, Maggi (August 10, 2022). “Parents, guardians had a lot to say about Hanover’s proposed transgender bathroom policy”.
Wiggins, Christopher (August 2022). “Wisconsin School District Bans Preferred Pronouns & Pride Symbols”.
Monacelli, Steven (August 23, 2022). “‘Don’t Say Trans’ Policy Passes in North Texas School District”.
Kunkle, Fredrick (March 4, 2014). “Maryland Senate Passes Bill Banning Discrimination Against Transgender People”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 12, 2016.
Lavietes, Matt (March 16, 2022). “Here’s what Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill would do and what it wouldn’t do”. NBC News.
Phillips, Amber. “Florida’s law limiting LGBTQ discussion in schools, explained”. The Washington Post.
“LGBTQ Curricular Laws”. Archived from the original on July 26, 2022.
Baptiste, Nathalie (March 10, 2023). “House Republicans Are Taking Their Assault On Trans Rights To The Federal Level”. HuffPost. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
Goni-Lessan, Ana. “Florida schools told they can ignore Biden administration on LGBTQ discrimination rules”.
Mulvihill, Geoff (April 23, 2024). “New federal rule bars transgender school bathroom bans, but it likely isn’t the final word”. AP News. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
“Virginia school boards must adhere to Gov. Youngkin’s new policies on transgender students, AG says”. AP News. August 24, 2023. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
McKellar, Katie (February 10, 2025). “Bill to restrict transgender students in Utah college dorms heads to Gov. Cox”. Utah News Dispatch. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
Sears, Brad; Mallory, Christy; Flores, Andrew; Conron, Kerith. “LGBT people’s experience of workplace discrimination and harassment”.
“The Wage Gap Among LGBTQ+ Workers in the United States”. Archived from the original on January 19, 2022.
Fernandez Campbell, Alexia (July 29, 2022). “Hunger, depression and unemployment: Trans adults are struggling”.
Yang, Maya (2023). “Canada warning over US travel comes at ‘concerning time’, LGBTQ+ groups say”. The Guardian.
“Has Life Improved for Transgender Americans in the Last 10 Years? Not Really”. Teen Vogue.
Savage, Claire; Olson, Alexandra (February 16, 2025). “EEOC Seeks To Drop Transgender Discrimination Cases, Citing Trump’s Executive Order”. HuffPost. Retrieved February 16, 2025.
Helmore, Edward (February 15, 2025). “US civil rights agency seeks to dismiss gender-identity discrimination cases”. The Guardian. Retrieved February 16, 2025.
“Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism And Restoring Biological Truth To The Federal Government”. The White House. January 21, 2025. Retrieved February 1, 2025.
“New poll shows Americans overwhelmingly oppose anti-transgender laws”. PBS. April 16, 2021.
“Trump is exploiting an anti-trans turn in public opinion”. WaPo. February 21, 2023.
Hatch, Hailey A.; Warner, Ruth H.; Broussard, Kristin A.; Harton, Helen C. (December 1, 2022). “Predictors of Transgender Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis”. Sex Roles. 87 (11): 583–602. doi:10.1007/s11199-022-01338-6. ISSN 1573-2762.
Aksoy, Billur; Carpenter, Christopher S.; Sansone, Dario (2024). “Understanding Labor Market Discrimination Against Transgender People: Evidence from a Double List Experiment and a Survey”. Management Science mnsc.2023.02567. arXiv:2209.02335. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.02567.
Haynes, Suyin (October 25, 2019). “A Study Analyzed 10 Million Online Posts Over 3.5 Years. It Found a Torrent of Transphobic Abuse”. TIME.
Fitzsimons, Tim (July 20, 2020). “Transgender Facebook content dominated by right-wing sources, study finds”. NBC News.
Lamoureux, Mack (November 21, 2022). “Elon Musk’s Twitter Reinstates Anti-Trans Activists on Same Weekend as Club Q Attacked”.
Ecarma, Caleb (November 21, 2022). “We’re Officially in the Elon Musk Era of Content Moderation”. Vanity Fair.
Greenberg, Jon. “JD Vance says transgender rights drives looming conflict in Ukraine”.
Yurcaba, Jo; Goggin, Ben; Collins, Ben (May 25, 2022). “Trans woman’s photo used to spread baseless online theory about Texas shooter”. NBC News.
“Digital Hate: Social Media’s Role in Amplifying Dangerous Lies About LGBTQ+ people” (PDF).
“My tweets about groomers are only third? Guess that means I have to tweet about these sick, demented groomers even more”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
Bickerton, James (August 16, 2022). “Boebert Vows ‘Even More’ Groomer Tweets After Coming ‘Only Third’ on List”. Newsweek.
“She does this to children. Sterilizes & mutilates them. Before they are old enough to consent”. Archived from the original on September 24, 2022. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
“Position Statement on Treatment of Transgender (Trans) and Gender Diverse Youth” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on December 7, 2020. Retrieved September 25, 2022.
“Transgender Health: An Endocrine Society Position Statement”. endocrine.org. The Endocrine Society. December 15, 2020. Retrieved June 15, 2022.
Coleman, E.; et al. (2022). “Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8”. International Journal of Transgender Health. 23 (Suppl 1): S1 – S259. doi:10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644. PMC 9553112. PMID 36238954. S2CID 252127302.
Rafferty, Jason; et al. (October 2018). “Ensuring Comprehensive Care and Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents”. Pediatrics. 142 (4) e20182162. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2162. PMID 30224363. S2CID 52288840.
“AMA to states: Stop interfering in health care of transgender children”. American Medical Association. April 26, 2021.
Flynn, Meagan. “Youngkin’s meeting with Va. delegation gets heated over trans policy”. The Washington Post.
“Facts About Suicide Among LGBTQ+ Young People”. December 15, 2021.
Wiggins, Christopher (September 29, 2022). “GOP Senate Candidate Herschel Walker: Trans Kids Won’t Go to Heaven”.
Paterson, Alex (April 8, 2022). “”Doom & Groom”: Fox News has aired 170 segments discussing trans people in the past three weeks”. Media Matters for America.
Baska, Maggie (June 16, 2022). “The New York Times faces searing backlash for publishing ‘harmful’ anti-trans ‘propaganda’: ‘Do better'”. Archived from the original on June 16, 2022.
O’Connell, Kit (July 22, 2022). “There Is No Legitimate ‘Debate’ Over Gender-Affirming Healthcare”.
Gira-Grant, Melissa. “Pamela Paul’s Great Replacement Theory”. The New Republic.
McMenamin, Lexi (July 22, 2022). “The New York Times, The Atlantic, More Keep Publishing Transphobia. Why?”.
“USPATH and WPATH Respond to NY Times Article “They Paused Puberty, But Is There a Cost?” published on November 14, 2022″ (PDF).
Eckert, AJ (December 4, 2022). “What the New York Times gets wrong about puberty blockers for transgender youth”.
Lennard, Natasha (December 31, 2022). “Liberals Rose to Fight the Assault on Abortion — but Not Trans Rights”.
Santoro, Helen (October 11, 2022). “The Myth That Fuels the Panic Over Surgery for Trans Teenagers”. Slate.
Mary, Yang (February 15, 2023). “‘New York Times’ contributors slam paper’s coverage of transgender people”. NPR.
Moynihan, Donald (April 7, 2022) [2022-04-05]. “The QAnon catchphrases that took over the Jackson hearings”. The Washington Post. Washington, D.C. ISSN 0190-8286. OCLC 1330888409.^{[please check these dates]}
“How the Intellectual Dark Web Spawned ‘Groomer’ Panic”. The Daily Beast. April 27, 2022. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
“‘A nightmare scenario’: How an anti-trans Instagram post led to violence in the streets”. The Guardian. July 28, 2021.
Stahl, Jeremy (April 27, 2022). “The Hate-Fueled and Hugely Influential World of Libs of TikTok”. Slate. Retrieved July 27, 2022.
Persaud, Chris. “Babylon Bee CEO of Juno Beach backs Twitter firebrand who calls LGBTQ people pedophiles”. The Palm Beach Post. Retrieved July 27, 2022.
“The Twitter activist behind the far-right ‘Libs of TikTok’ is an Orthodox Jew. Does that matter?”. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. April 19, 2022. Retrieved July 27, 2022.
Mathis-Lilley, Ben (April 21, 2022). “How One Florida Woman With Twitter Problems Plunged Us Into a Nightmarish National Conversation About ‘Grooming'”. Slate.
Romano, Aja (April 21, 2022). “The right’s moral panic over “grooming” invokes age-old homophobia”. Archived from the original on April 25, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2022.
Cameron, Joseph (April 5, 2022). “Conservatives Are Smearing ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Opponents as Pedophile ‘Groomers'”.
“Trans People Are Being Slandered As Groomers And Pedophiles By The Far-Right”. Canadian Anti-Hate Network. April 7, 2022. Retrieved July 29, 2022.
Logan, Nick (July 2, 2022). “Transphobia is gaining ground in the U.S. Gender-diverse people in Canada worry it could happen here”. CBC News.
Ash, Allison (June 27, 2015). “Team 10: Transgender man claims he was harassed in department store bathroom”. 10News. Archived from the original on August 4, 2015.
“Study: Transgender People Experience Discrimination Trying To Use Bathrooms”. ThinkProgress. Archived from the original on September 8, 2015.
Kellaway, Mitch (March 3, 2015). “Angry Activists Confront Trans Teen in Charlotte Bathroom, As Nondiscrimination Ordinance Fails”. Advocate.com. Archived from the original on August 11, 2015.
“Texas Court Sidelines Houston’s Nondiscrimination Ordinance”. keranews.org. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 6, 2015.
Steinmetz, Katy (March 6, 2015). “Transgender Bathroom Laws: Kentucky, Florida Bills to Restrict Access”. Time. Archived from the original on September 18, 2015.
“A Guide to Restroom Access for Transgender Workers”.
“Federal Management Regulation—Nondiscrimination Clarification in the Federal Workplace”. Federal Register. August 18, 2016.
“Executive Order 13988”.
“Executive Order 14168”.
“EEOC Issues Updated Guidance on Workplace Harassment”. April 29, 2024.
“Transgender Federal Worker Challenges Trump’s Federal Bathroom Ban”.
“GSA Revokes Gender Identity Policy for Restrooms, Other Facilities”. May 12, 2025.
“Federal Court Vacated Gender Identity Portions of EEOC Harassment Guidance”. May 29, 2025.
“Federal judge strikes down workplace protections for transgender workers”. May 16, 2025.
“Updated Guidance Regarding Executive Order 14168: Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government”. Office of Personnel Management. July 10, 2025.
“Arizona Transgender Bathroom Bill Won’t Move”. HuffPost. June 6, 2013. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
“Parents Fight Bathroom Bills for Transgender Children”. The Texas Observer. April 28, 2015. Archived from the original on September 6, 2015.
“Statistics Show Exactly How Many Times Trans People Have Attacked You in Bathrooms”. Mic. April 2, 2015.
Lavietes, Matt (May 13, 2024). “Mississippi enacts transgender bathroom ban in public schools”. NBC News. Retrieved May 13, 2024.
“Utah joins 10 other states in regulating bathroom access for transgender people”. NBC News. January 31, 2024. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
Dave Phillips, Philipps, Dave (March 23, 2016). “North Carolina Bans Local Anti-Discrimination Policies”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 5, 2016.
Henderson, Bruce; Funk, Tim (March 30, 2017). “Understanding the HB2 Repeal Law – What it Does and Doesn’t Mean”. Charlotte Observer. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
“ACLU Opposes HB2 Proposal that Would Continue Discrimination”. American Civil Liberties Union. American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
Borrello, Stevie (April 22, 2016). “Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Groups Debunk ‘Bathroom Predator Myth'”. ABC News. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
Howe, Jason (September 29, 2016). “Governor Signs California “All-Gender” Restroom Bill”. Equality California. Archived from the original on December 21, 2016. Retrieved October 5, 2016.
Megarry, Daniel (October 4, 2016). “California becomes first US state to introduce gender-neutral bathroom law”. Gay Times. Archived from the original on October 12, 2016. Retrieved October 5, 2016.
Folley, Aris (July 27, 2019). “Illinois officially passes bill requiring all single bathrooms be designated gender neutral”. The Hill.
“Tennessee governor signs ‘indecent exposure’ bill, sparking fear about anti-trans harassment”. Metro Weekly. May 8, 2019.
Alfonseca, Kiara (April 8, 2022). “Alabama governor signs ‘Don’t Say Gay,’ trans care and bathroom ban bills”. ABC News. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
Griesbach, Rebecca (March 19, 2024). “Alabama passes wide-ranging bill banning college DEI programs, training”. al. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
Shapero, Julia (May 4, 2023). “Florida passes transgender bathroom bill”. The Hill. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
Ennis, Dawn (April 28, 2015). “Florida’s Trans Bathroom Bill Dies”. Advocate.com. Archived from the original on May 10, 2016.
Kelleher, Patrick (September 3, 2021). “Trans woman charged with indecent exposure at spa says she’s victim of harassment”.
Queally, James; Chabria, Anita (September 2, 2021). “Indecent exposure charges filed against trans woman over L.A. spa incident”. Los Angeles Times.
“About Wi Spa”. Wi Spa USA. July 19, 2021. Archived from the original on July 19, 2021. Retrieved November 27, 2021.
Asher, Abe. “Transgender woman charged with indecent exposure for undressing in female YMCA locker room”.
“FAQ: Answers to Some Common Questions about Equal Access to Public Restrooms”. Lambda Legal. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015.
Liptak, Adam (October 28, 2016). “Supreme Court to Rule in Transgender Access Case”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2016. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
Barnes, Robert; Balingit, Moriah (October 28, 2016). “Supreme Court takes up school bathroom rules for transgender students”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 29, 2016. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
Hurley, Lawrence (July 13, 2016). “Transgender bathroom legal fight reaches Supreme Court”. Reuters.
Williams, Pete (August 4, 2016). “Supreme Court Blocks Transgender Bathroom Ruling”. NBC News. Retrieved August 8, 2016.
Grindley, Lucas (March 6, 2017). “Grimm Case Vacated, Sessions Sets Back Trans Rights at Supreme Court”. Advocate.com. Retrieved March 7, 2017.
“Judges send Gavin Grimm case back to lower court”. WAVY-TV. Associated Press. August 2, 2017. Archived from the original on August 4, 2017. Retrieved January 20, 2018.
Davies, Emily (August 26, 2020). “Court rules in favor of transgender student barred from using boys’ bathroom”. The Washington Post. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
Kruzel, John; Coleman, Justine (December 7, 2020). “Supreme Court denies review of school transgender bathroom policy”. The Hill. Retrieved December 7, 2020.
“Protections Against Employment Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission”. www.eeoc.gov. June 15, 2021. Archived from the original on January 22, 2022. Retrieved October 24, 2021.
“The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009”. justice.gov. August 6, 2015. Archived from the original on August 28, 2015.
“Movement Advancement Project | Hate Crime Laws”.
“National Equality Map – Transgender Law Center”. transgenderlawcenter.org. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015.
“Movement Advancement Project | Local Nondiscrimination Ordinances”. lgbtmap.org.
“Arkansas House Votes In Favor Of LGBT Discrimination”. HuffPost. February 13, 2015. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
Migdon, Brooke (January 13, 2023). “Transgender youth health care bans have a new target: adults”. The Hill. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Goldman, Maya (January 10, 2024). “States are limiting gender-affirming care for adults, too”. Axios. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Lang, Nico (February 16, 2024). “Trans Adults Are the Next Target in the GOP’s War on Gender-Affirming Health Care”. them.us. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
Dawson, Lindsey; Kates, Jennifer (January 31, 2024). “The Proliferation of State Actions Limiting Youth Access to Gender Affirming Care”. KFF. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Reed, Erin (January 29, 2024). “Ohio, Michigan Republicans in released audio: ‘Endgame’ is to ban trans care ‘for everyone'”. The Advocate. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
Heywood, Todd (January 30, 2024). “In-depth: Michigan lawmakers discuss gender-affirming care ban”. Yahoo!. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
“Would Tennessee ban gender-affirming care for trans adults? Lawmaker has doubts, but doesn’t rule it out”. Chattanooga Times Free Press. December 25, 2024. Retrieved December 31, 2024.
“89(R) HB 3399 – Introduced version – Bill Text”. capitol.texas.gov. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
“TX HB3399 | Anti-trans legislation”. translegislation.com. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
“Puerto Rico bans hormone therapy and gender surgery for transgender youth”. AP News. July 17, 2025. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
“Breaking: Puerto Rico’s governor just signed one of the harshest gender-affirming care laws yet”. The Advocate. February 18, 2025. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
Schott, Brian. “Blocking gender-affirming health care in Utah could be found unconstitutional, a legal review found”.
McKellar, Katie (January 26, 2023). “Utah House votes to ban transgender surgeries and puberty blockers for kids”.
Transgender Medical Treatments and Procedures Amendments (Senate Bill 16). Utah State Legislature. January 11, 2023.
Schott, Bryan (January 27, 2023). “Ban on health care for transgender youth passed by Utah Legislature”. Salt Lake Tribune.
“House Bill 1080” (PDF). South Dakota Legislature. 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
“Sarah Huckabee Sanders Signs Arkansas Trans Care Malpractice Bill Into Law”. HuffPost. March 14, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
Woodward, Alex (August 5, 2022). “Florida begins rule-changing process to ban gender-affirming care for trans youth”. The Independent.
Yurcaba, Jo (May 17, 2023). “DeSantis signs ‘Don’t Say Gay’ expansion, gender-affirming care ban”. NBC News. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
“In one day, three bills targeting transgender Floridians pass House”.
“Trans patients being dropped as Florida law bans “Up To 80%””. Los Angeles Blade. May 11, 2023.
“Judge Strikes Down Florida’s Ban on Transgender Care for Minors”. The New York Times. June 11, 2024. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
“US appeals court clears way for Florida ban on transgender care for minors”. ABC News. August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
“Missouri’s attorney general opened a new front in the GOP’s attacks on transgender people: Banning treatment for any adult with depression”. Business Insider.
“ASAN Condemns Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Care”. March 22, 2023.
Migdon, Brooke (April 13, 2023). “Missouri AG issues emergency order restricting gender-affirming health care”. The Hill.
“Gender Transition Interventions – EMERGENCY RULE” (PDF). ago.mo.gov. April 13, 2023.
“Gender-Affirming Care for Adults Is Now Basically Banned in Missouri”. Vice.
“Transgender adults brace for treatment cutoffs in Missouri”. The Seattle Times.
“Missouri AG Directly Cites the New York Times’ Anti-Trans Coverage To Justify Horrific New Ban”. The Mary Sue.
Ballentine, Summer (May 2, 2023). “Judge Blocks Missouri Rule That Would Limit Transgender Care”. HuffPost. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
“Missouri attorney general drops controversial emergency rule that would have banned gender-affirming care for children and many adults”. CNN.
“AG Bailey ends emergency rules restricting transgender healthcare”. KMOV.
Adamczeski, Ryn (August 19, 2025). “Trump quietly bans federal health insurance from covering gender-affirming care”. The Advocate. Retrieved August 20, 2025.
“Executive Order: Protecting Children for Chemical and Surgical Mutilation”. US White House. January 28, 2025. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 29, 2025. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
Montague, Zach (January 28, 2025). “Trump Signs Order Restricting Gender-Affirming Treatments for Minors”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 29, 2025.
Christensen, Jen (February 4, 2025). “Social justice groups sue to block Trump executive order restricting care for transgender children”. CNN. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
Portnoy, Jenna; Rizzo, Salvador (February 13, 2025). “Judge blocks Trump order on transgender youth health care”. The Washington Post. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
Hurson, Brendan (March 4, 2025). “Memorandum opinion” (PDF). assets.aclu.org. Retrieved March 5, 2025.
“PFLAG, Inc. v. Donald J. Trump, 8:25-cv-00337 – CourtListener.com”. CourtListener. Retrieved June 25, 2025.
“North Dakota governor signs law criminalizing trans health care for minors”. PBS. April 20, 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
Gill-Peterson, Jules (2018). Histories of the Transgender Child. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 9781517904661.
“Arkansas Lawmakers Override Veto, Enact Transgender Youth Treatment Ban”. Associated Press. April 6, 2021.
McMillan, Jeff; Kruesi, Kimberlee (May 20, 2023). “Meet the influential new player on transgender health bills”. AP News. Archived from the original on July 4, 2023. Retrieved September 6, 2023.
Balevic, Katie. “Do No Harm, a group of ‘medical professionals’ fighting ‘woke healthcare,’ is behind many anti-trans laws”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved September 6, 2023.
“Nearly 100,000 transgender youth live in states that banned access to health care, sports, or school bathrooms in 2023”. Williams Institute. Retrieved December 29, 2023.
“Efforts to restrict transgender health care endure in 2024, with more adults targeted”. NBC News. January 11, 2024. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
“APA Policy Statement on Affirming Evidence-Based Inclusive Care for Transgender, Gender Diverse, and Nonbinary Individuals, Addressing Misinformation, and the Role of Psychological Practice and Science”. American Psychological Association. February 2024. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
Reed, Erin. “World’s largest psych association supports trans youth care”. advocate.com. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
Choi, Annette (July 26, 2025). “See where gender identity care is restricted and where it’s protected”. CNN. Retrieved July 26, 2025.
Panetta, Grace (June 9, 2023). “Lawmakers in blue states are linking protections for abortion and gender-affirming care”. The 19th. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
Hassan, Adeel (June 27, 2023). “States Passed a Record Number of Transgender Laws. Here’s What They Say”. The New York Times.
Block M (February 20, 2023). “Parents raise concerns as Florida bans gender-affirming care for trans kids”. NPR. NPR. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
Schott B. “Why GOP lawmakers want to stop doctors from prescribing gender-affirming care for Utah’s youth”. The Salt Lake Tribune. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
Connell-Bryan A, Kenen J, Holzman J (November 27, 2022). “Conservative states are blocking trans medical care. Families are fleeing”. Politico. Archived from the original on November 30, 2022. Retrieved November 30, 2022.
Ramirez M. “As state laws target transgender children, families flee and become ‘political refugees'”. USA Today. Archived from the original on November 30, 2022. Retrieved November 30, 2022.
Yurcaba J (April 19, 2021). “‘It’s not safe’: Parents of trans kids plan to flee their states as GOP bills loom”. NBC News. Archived from the original on November 30, 2022. Retrieved November 30, 2022.
“DOJ drops case against Texas doctor accused of leaking data on minors’ transgender care after ban – CBS Texas”. CBS News. January 26, 2025. Retrieved January 26, 2025.
Tietz, Kendall (January 24, 2025). “Trump DOJ drops case against Texas doctor who blew whistle on transgender medicine for minors”. Fox News. Retrieved January 26, 2025.
Lavietes, Matt; Yurcaba, Jo (October 17, 2024). “Texas AG sues doctor who allegedly provided transgender care to 21 minors”. NBC News. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
Melissa, Block (July 21, 2021). “Federal Judge Blocks Arkansas Ban On Gender Confirming Treatments For Trans Youth”. NPR.
Branigin, Anne (June 21, 2023). “Arkansas federal judge blocks first ban on gender-affirming care”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved June 21, 2023.
“Texas Governor Greg Abbott orders state agencies to investigate gender-transitioning procedures as child abuse”. CBS News. February 24, 2022. Retrieved March 5, 2022.
Yurcaba, Jo (February 23, 2022). “Texas governor calls on citizens to report parents of transgender kids for abuse”. NBC News.
“Texas Court Expands Injunction Blocking State from Targeting Families of Trans Youth Who Are Members of PFLAG National”.
Nguyen, Alex; Melhado, William (June 2, 2023). “Gov. Greg Abbott signs legislation barring trans youth from accessing transition-related care”. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved June 4, 2023.
Melhado, William (August 25, 2023). “Texas ban on puberty blockers and hormone therapy for trans kids will go into effect despite legal fight”. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
Vertuno, Jim; Demillo, Andrew (June 28, 2024). “Texas Supreme Court upholds ban on youth gender transitions. It’s the largest state with such a law”. AP News. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
Chandler, Kim (April 8, 2022). “Alabama Governor Signs Law Banning Transgender Medication”. HuffPost. Retrieved April 9, 2022.
Caspani, Maria (May 9, 2022). “Alabama ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth takes effect”. Reuters. Reuters. Retrieved May 9, 2022.
Rojas, Rick (May 14, 2022). “Alabama’s Transgender Youth Can Use Medicine to Transition, Judge Rules”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 14, 2022.
Fortinsky, Sarah (August 21, 2023). “Court reverses injunction on Alabama transgender health care ban”. The Hill. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Human Rights Campaign: South Dakota Lawmakers Turn Their Backs on Trans Kids Once Again”. Human Rights Campaign. February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
Cameron, Kesia (February 9, 2023). “SD Senate passes bill prohibiting gender-affirming medical care for minors”. Dakotanewsnow.com. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
Sforza, Lauren (February 14, 2023). “Noem signs gender-affirming care ban for South Dakota youth”. The Hill. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
Yurcaba, Jo (February 28, 2023). “Mississippi governor signs bill banning transgender health care for minors”. NBC News. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
Wagster Pettus, Emily (February 21, 2023). “Mississippi Senate passes limit on gender-affirming health care”. PBS NewsHour. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
Brown, Melissa (February 23, 2023). “Tennessee legislature passes ban on gender-transition health care for minors”. The Tennessean. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
“TN Governor signs drag show, gender-affirming care bills into law”. WJHL | Tri-Cities News & Weather. March 2, 2023. Retrieved March 2, 2023.
Walker, Finch (February 22, 2023). “Ban on health care for trans youth to go into effect in March. More is coming, Fine says”. Florida Today. Retrieved February 22, 2023.
“Florida’s Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors Goes Into Effect Today”. MSN. Retrieved March 16, 2023.
Farrington, Brendan (May 17, 2023). “Florida Gov. DeSantis signs bills targeting drag shows, trans rights and care for transgender children”. PBS NewsHour. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
“Preliminary injunction, Case No. 4:23cv114-RH-MAF, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee” (PDF). storage.courtlistener.com. June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
Rose, Andy; Forrest, Jack (March 23, 2023). “Iowa’s governor signs law banning gender-affirming care for minors”. CNN Politics. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
“Georgia law will ban most transgender care for kids under 18”. NBC News. March 23, 2023. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
Boboltz, Sara (March 21, 2023). “Georgia Legislature Sends Anti-Trans Health Care Bill To GOP Governor”. HuffPost. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
Riedel, Samantha (September 6, 2023). “Georgia’s Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Youth Is Back In Effect”. them.us. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Chen, Shawna; Habeshian, Sareen (March 30, 2023). “Kentucky and West Virginia the latest states to step up anti-trans push”. Axios. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
Kersey, Lori (May 7, 2025). “Morrisey ceremoniously signs gender affirming care bill, DEI ban • West Virginia Watch”. West Virginia Watch. Retrieved June 15, 2025.
Siegler, Allen (March 29, 2023). “W.Va. transgender health bill may have little effect on access to care”. The Register-Herald. Retrieved March 24, 2024.
Kersey, Lori (May 7, 2025). “Morrisey ceremoniously signs gender affirming care bill, DEI ban”. West Virginia Watch. Retrieved August 4, 2025.
“GOP lawmakers override veto of transgender bill in Kentucky”. Associated Press News. March 29, 2023.
Mattise, Jonathan (September 29, 2023). “Judges maintain bans on gender-affirming care for youth in Tennessee and Kentucky”. AP News. Retrieved October 7, 2023.
Schreiner, Bruce; Lovan, Dylan (July 14, 2023). “Kentucky’s ban on gender-affirming care takes effect as federal judge lifts injunction”. AP News. Retrieved October 7, 2023.
Cole, Devan (March 30, 2022). “Arizona governor signs bill outlawing gender-affirming care for transgender youth and approves anti-trans sports ban”. CNN.
“SB 1138” (PDF). AZLeg.gov. 2022. Retrieved April 10, 2023.
“Arizona governor’s executive orders ban conversion therapy, permit transgender health care”. The Hill. June 28, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“House Bill 71 – Idaho State Legislature”. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
Maldonado, Mia (March 27, 2023). “Idaho bill to ban gender care for trans youth clears Senate, heads back to House”. Idaho Capital Sun. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
“Federal judge blocks Idaho gender-affirming transgender care ban”. ABC News. December 27, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Supreme Court temporarily revives Idaho law banning gender affirming care for minors”. NPR. April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
“Supreme Court permits Idaho to enforce ban on gender-affirming care for minors”. CNN. April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
“Indiana and Idaho enact bans on gender-affirming care for transgender youth | CNN Politics”. CNN. April 7, 2023.
“Federal judge blocks most of Indiana’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors”. PBS NewsHour. June 16, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
“Ban on gender-affirming care for minors allowed to take effect in Indiana”. ABC. February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
Ahmed, Trisha (April 20, 2023). “North Dakota governor signs law criminalizing trans health care for minors”. PBS. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
Hanson, Amy Beth (April 28, 2023). “Montana latest to ban gender-affirming care for trans minors”. Associated Press News. Retrieved April 29, 2023.
Montana Fourth Judicial District Court (September 27, 2023). “Order granting plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction” (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2023. Retrieved October 7, 2023.
Hanson, Amy Beth (December 11, 2024). “Montana Supreme Court Supports Gender Affirming Care For Minors”. HuffPost. Retrieved December 11, 2024.
“House Bill 808” ncleg.gov. 2023. Retrieved August 26, 2023
Veto of House Bill 808. webservices.ncleg.gov. 2023. Retrieved August 26, 2023
“House Bill 808” ncleg.gov. 2023. Retrieved August 26, 2023
Grenoble, Ryan (November 25, 2024). “Missouri Judge Upholds Ban On Gender-Affirming Medical Care For Trans Youth”. HuffPost. Retrieved November 26, 2024.
“Oklahoma governor signs ban on gender-affirming care for trans kids”. PBS News. May 1, 2023. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
Murphy, Sean (October 7, 2023). “Federal Judge Allows Oklahoma Ban On Gender-Affirming Care For Minors To Take Effect”. HuffPost. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved October 8, 2023.
“Nebraska imposes 40 hours of therapy and other restrictions on care for trans youths”. NBC News. October 2, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Ohio Governor Bans All Gender-Affirming Surgeries For Minors”. HuffPost. January 6, 2024. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
Kaur, Anumita; Shin, Annys (December 14, 2023). “Ohio legislators pass ban on gender-affirming care for minors, sending bill to governor”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved December 15, 2023.
“Ohio bans gender-affirming care for minors, restricts transgender athletes over Gov. Mike DeWine’s veto”. CBS News. January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
“Ohio judge blocks ban on gender-affirming care for minors”. The Hill. April 16, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
“Judge upholds Ohio’s gender-affirming care ban; civil rights group vows immediate appeal”. ABC News. August 6, 2024. Retrieved August 7, 2024.
“Appeals court blocks Ohio’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors”. AP News. March 19, 2025. Retrieved March 18, 2025.
“High court reinstates enforcement of Ohio’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors during appeal”. ABC News. April 30, 2025. Retrieved May 1, 2025.
“Wyoming Bans Gender Transition Care for Minors”. The New York Times. March 22, 2024. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
“South Carolina Bans Gender Transition Care for Minors”. The New York Times. May 21, 2024. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
“4th Circuit rules gender identity is a protected characteristic”. Washington Blade. April 29, 2024. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
“NH HB619 2024 Regular Session”. LegiScan.
“Sununu signs bans on trans girls in girls’ sports, gender affirming surgeries for minors”. New Hampshire Bulletin. July 19, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
“New Hampshire becomes first state in New England to ban gender-affirming care for minors”. The Boston Globe. August 1, 2025. Retrieved August 4, 2025.
“Kansas has banned gender-affirming care for transgender minors”. The Beacon News. February 18, 2025. Retrieved February 19, 2025.
“Kansas Legislature overrides governor’s veto of legislation that targets trans kids”. Kansas Reflector. February 18, 2025. Retrieved February 19, 2025.
“A parent and child’s perspectives on the need for trans and nonbinary allyship”. ctpublic.org. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
Stracqualursi, Veronica. “Connecticut governor signs law protecting abortion seekers and providers from out-of-state lawsuits”. CNN. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Massachusetts governor signs bill safeguarding reproductive, gender-affirming health care into law”. The Hill. July 29, 2022. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Senator Wiener’s Historic Bill to Provide Refuge for Trans Kids and Their Families Signed into Law”. sd11.senate.ca.gov. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Washington DC Mayor signs ‘comprehensive’ trans and abortion bill”. November 29, 2022. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Gov. Pritzker Signs Sweeping Reproductive Rights Protections Into Law”. illinois.gov. January 13, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Governor signs House Bill 7, Reproductive and Gender-Affirming Health Care Act”. governor.state.nm.us. March 16, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Vermont governor signs bills protecting access to abortion, gender-affirming care”. The Hill. May 10, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Governor Murphy Signs Executive Order Protecting Gender-Affirming Health Care in New Jersey”. nj.gov. April 4, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Colorado offers safe haven for abortion, transgender care”. Associated Press News. April 14, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Minnesota Session Laws – 2023, Regular Session”. revisor.mn.gov. April 27, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
Komenda, Ed (May 9, 2023). “Transgender minors protected from estranged parents under Washington law”. PBS. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Governor Moore Signs Executive Order to Protect Gender Affirming Health Care in Maryland”. governor.maryland.gov. June 6, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
Yurcaba, Jo (June 26, 2023). “New York governor signs ‘safe haven’ law for transgender youth”. NBC News. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
Wyatt, Sydney (August 15, 2023). “Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek celebrates law protecting gender-affirming care, abortion”. Statesman Journal. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
“Gov. Mills signs controversial abortion and gender-affirming care bill into Maine law”. April 23, 2022. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
“Maine’s Governor Mills signs trans & abortion sanctuary bill into law”. April 23, 2022. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
“Bill Texts: RI S2262 2024 Regular Session”. LegiScan.
Huot-Marchand, Amalia (June 21, 2025). “Delaware governor signs executive order protecting gender-affirming care”. The Hill. Retrieved July 10, 2025.
“Gov. Meyer signs executive order protecting gender-affirming care for patients, providers”. June 21, 2025. Retrieved July 10, 2025.
Murchison G, Adkins D, Conard LA, Elliott T, Hawkins LA, Newby H, et al. (September 2016). Supporting and Caring for Transgender Children (PDF) (Report). American Academy of Pediatrics. p. 11. To prevent the consequences of going through a puberty that doesn’t match a transgender child’s identity, healthcare providers may use fully reversible medications that put puberty on hold.
Wang, Yingying; Adamson, Chris; Yuan, Weihong; Altaye, Mekibib; Rajagopal, Akila; Byars, Anna W.; Holland, Scott K. (October 2012). “Sex differences in white matter development during adolescence: A DTI study”. Brain Research. 1478: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.038. PMC 3592389. PMID 22954903.
de Vries, Annelou L.C.; Steensma, Thomas D.; Doreleijers, Theo A.H.; Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy T. (August 2011). “Puberty Suppression in Adolescents With Gender Identity Disorder: A Prospective Follow-Up Study”. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 8 (8): 2276–2283. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01943.x. PMID 20646177.
Schroth, Peter W.; Erickson-Schroth, Laura; Foster, Linda L.; Burgess, Alexis; Erickson, Nancy S. (2018). “Perspectives on Law and Medicine Relating to Transgender People in the United States”. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 66: 91–126. JSTOR 26497456.
Obedin-Maliver, Juno; Goldsmith, Elizabeth S.; Stewart, Leslie; White, William; Tran, Eric; Brenman, Stephanie; Wells, Maggie; Fetterman, David M.; Garcia, Gabriel; Lunn, Mitchell R. (September 7, 2011). “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender–Related Content in Undergraduate Medical Education”. JAMA. 306 (9): 971–977. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1255. PMID 21900137.
“When Healthcare Isn’t Caring” (PDF). Lambda Legal: 1–28. 2010.
“This Trans Man’s Breast Cancer Nightmare Exemplifies The Problem With Transgender Health Care”. HuffPost. June 15, 2015. Archived from the original on August 26, 2015.
“Off to the ER: Will I Be Treated With Dignity?”. HuffPost. February 26, 2015. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
“Parts Unknown”. HuffPost. September 20, 2013. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
Moreau, Julie (May 4, 2019). “‘Religious freedom’ rule could cause ‘significant damage’ to LGBTQ health care, advocates say”. NBC News.
Grinberg, Emanuella; Kantor, Alice; Walker, Christina (May 31, 2018). “To be herself, she needs to change her body. But first, comes the battle with insurers”. CNN. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
Sherman, Carter (April 25, 2019). “Trump plans to take health care protections away from trans patients”. Vice News.
Simmons-Duffin, Selena (June 12, 2020). “Transgender Health Protections Reversed By Trump Administration”. NPR. Retrieved June 28, 2020.
Alonso-Zaldivar, Ricardo (May 10, 2021). “Reversing Trump, U.S. Restores Transgender Health Protections”. HuffPost. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
“FAQ About Health Provider Discrimination”. Lambda Legal. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015.
Ne’eman, Ari; Bell, Elizabeth; Schneider, Monica; Strolovitch, Dara (October 2022). “Identifying And Exploring Bias In Public Opinion On Scarce Resource Allocation During The COVID-19 Pandemic”. Health Affairs. 41 (10): 1513–1522. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00504. PMID 36190885. S2CID 252682023.
“Republicans are quietly pushing to defund transgender healthcare – and not just for minors”. Independent. July 23, 2024. Archived from the original on July 23, 2024. Retrieved July 24, 2024.
Hafner, Katie (August 10, 2018). “As Catholic Hospitals Expand, So Do Limits on Some Procedures”. NYT.
“U.S. bishops’ new guidelines aim to limit trans health care”. Associated Press News.
Payton, Naith (July 9, 2015). “Feature: The dangers of trans broken arm syndrome”. Pink News. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
Oliver, David (July 27, 2021). “‘Being transgender is not a medical condition’: The meaning of trans broken arm syndrome”. USA Today. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
Medina, Caroline; Mahowald, Lindsay (January 12, 2023). “Discrimination and Barriers to Well-Being: The State of the LGBTQI+ Community in 2022”.
“Health Care”. National Center for Transgender Equality. Archived from the original on March 4, 2023. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
Gonzales, Gilbert; Henning-Smith, Carrie (2017). “Barriers to Care Among Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Adults”. The Milbank Quarterly. 95 (4): 726–748. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12297. PMC 5723709. PMID 29226450.
“Transgender Patients Discriminated Against for Health Care Services”. socialworktoday.com. Great Valley Publishing Company. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015.
“FAQ on Access to Transition-Related Care”. Lambda Legal. Archived from the original on August 30, 2015.
Youngman, Julie; Hauck, Courtney (July 1, 2019). “Medical Necessity: A Higher Hurdle for Marginalized Taxpayers?”. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. 51: 1–59 – via EBSCOHost.
“WPATH”. wpath.org. Archived from the original on August 14, 2015.
“Removing Barriers to Care for Transgender Patients: AMA Resolution Supporting Health Insurance Coverage for Treatment of GID” (PDF). GLADanwers.org. Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2015. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
“Biden Administration Restores Health Protections for Gay and Transgender People”. The New York Times. April 26, 2024. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
Migdon, Brooke (July 3, 2024). “Judge blocks Biden administration’s new transgender health protections”. The Hill.
Grossman, Hannah (June 2, 2022). “Florida Medicaid Moves Against Transgender Therapies Coverage, Calls It ‘Experimental'”. Fox News.
O’Donnel, Christopher; Wilson, Kirby. “Florida Report on Transgender Care Flawed, Politically Motivated, Yale Experts Say”.
“Academics Attack Florida Plan to Limit Transgender Treatment”. Associated Press News. July 15, 2022.
Russell, John (August 12, 2022). “Florida bans Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming healthcare”. LGBTQ Nation.
Berg-Brousseau, Henry (August 12, 2022). “Human Rights Campaign Condemns DeSantis Administration Move Banning Medicaid Coverage for Gender-Affirming Health Care”. Human Rights Campaign (Press release).
“Dekker v. Weida, 4:22cv325-RH-MAF”. Casetext. June 21, 2023. Archived from the original on August 4, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2023.
“Brief of Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee, and 15 Other States as Amici Curiae Supporting Appellants and Reversal” (PDF). alabamaag.gov. October 13, 2023. Retrieved October 16, 2023.
“Court hears arguments on Florida’s restrictions on trans care”. NPR. November 22, 2024. Retrieved November 25, 2024.
Valenta, L. J.; Elias, A. N.; Domurat, E. S. (March 1992). “Hormone pattern in pharmacologically feminized male transsexuals in the California State prison system”. Journal of the National Medical Association. 84 (3): 241–250. PMC 2571763. PMID 1578499.
Dolan, Jack (September 22, 2011). “Inmate loses bid for taxpayer-paid sex-change operation”. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 6, 2014. Retrieved January 18, 2014.
Finucane, Martin; Ellement, John R.; Valencia, Milton J. (January 17, 2014). “Mass. appeals court upholds inmate’s right to taxpayer-funded sex change surgery”. Boston Globe. Archived from the original on January 19, 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
Apuzzo, Matt (April 3, 2015). “Transgender Inmate’s Hormone Treatment Lawsuit Gets Justice Dept. Backing”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 6, 2015. Retrieved April 6, 2015.
Sontag, Deborah (April 5, 2015). “Transgender Woman Cites Attacks and Abuse in Men’s Prison”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 6, 2015. Retrieved April 6, 2015.
“U.S. rolls back protections for transgender prison inmates”. Reuters. May 12, 2018. Retrieved November 22, 2019.
Pilger, Lori. “Transgender inmate loses lawsuit over prison’s treatment for her gender dysphoria”. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
Oparah, Julia C. (April 24, 2013). “Feminism and the (Trans)gender Entrapment of Gender Nonconforming Prisoners”. UCLA Women’s Law Journal. 18 (2). doi:10.5070/L3182017822.
Kulak, Ash (May 22, 2018). “Locked Away in SEG ‘For Their Own Protection’: How Congress Gave Federal Corrections the Discretion to House Transgender (Trans) Inmates in Gender-Inappropriate Facilities and Solitary Confinement”. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality. 6 (2).
Jenness, Valerie; Sexton, Lori (May 27, 2022). “The centrality of relationships in context: a comparison of factors that predict the sexual and non-sexual victimization of transgender women in prisons for men”. Journal of Crime and Justice. 45 (3): 259–269. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2021.1935298.
Stanley, Eric; Smith, Nat (October 27, 2015). Captive Genders. AK Press. p. 229. ISBN 9781849352345.
Kulak, Ash Olli (May 22, 2018). “Locked Away in SEG ‘For Their Own Protection’: How Congress Gave Federal Corrections the Discretion to House Transgender (Trans) Inmates in Gender-Inappropriate Facilities and Solitary Confinement”. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality. Archived from the original on April 27, 2021. Retrieved November 9, 2022.
“It’s Still War in Here: A Statewide Report on the Trans, Gender Non-Conforming, Intersex (TGNCI) Experience in New York Prisons and the Fight for Trans Liberation, Self-Determination, and Freedom” (PDF). Sylvia Rivera Law Project. 2017.
Owen, Greg. “ICE allegedly subjected trans men to forced labor & sexual abuse in women’s facility”. LGBTQ Nation. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
“ICE Warden Put Transgender Detainees into Forced Labor Program: Complaint”. Newsweek. September 27, 2025. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
“ICE is Excluding Data on Transgender People in Detention”. Vera Institute of Justice. July 7, 2018. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
“States Are Banning Preferred Pronouns at Work, but Federal Guidelines Promote Inclusion. What Should HR Do?”.
Cohen, Ariel (April 30, 2024). “EEOC Updates Workplace Harassment Guidelines Reinforcing Protections for LGBTQ+ Employees (US)”. Employment Law Worldview. Retrieved September 28, 2025.
Salam, Erum (March 6, 2025). “Elon Musk and Texas governor celebrate firing of worker over pronouns in email signature”. The Guardian.
“Texas v. EEOC”. Bloomberg Law. May 15, 2025. Retrieved September 28, 2025.
Klar, Rebecca (May 16, 2025). “Texas Judge Strikes Transgender Protections in EEOC Guidance (2)”. Bloomberg News. Retrieved September 28, 2025.
Hernandez-Montiel v. INS, 225 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2000).
Smiley, Lauren (November 26, 2008). “Border Crossers”. SF Weekly. Archived from the original on October 24, 2012. Retrieved November 3, 2012.
“Immigration Law and the Transgender Client: Chapter Five”. Immigration Equality. Archived from the original on June 18, 2012. Retrieved September 17, 2021.
Morales v. Gonzales, 478 F.3d 972, 977 (9th Cir. 2007).
Kutner, Jenny (May 8, 2015). “U.S. State Department has no process for accepting transgender passports”. salon.com. Archived from the original on September 6, 2015.
Luibhéid, Eithne; Chávez, Karma R. (eds.). “Queer and Trans Migrations”. University of Illinois Press. Retrieved May 10, 2025.
DasGupta, Debanuj (November 1, 2019). “The Politics of Transgender Asylum and Detention”. Human Geography. 12 (3): 1–16. doi:10.1177/194277861901200304. ISSN 1942-7786.
Marquez-Velarde, Guadalupe; Miller, Gabe H.; Aldana Marquez, Beatriz; Shircliff, Jesse E.; Suárez, Mario I. (December 2024). “Transgender in Detention: Victimization Experiences in Immigration Facilities”. Transgender Health. 9 (6): 591–600. doi:10.1089/trgh.2022.0083. ISSN 2688-4887. PMC 11669631. PMID 39735377.
Green, R. (1994). “Transsexualism and the law”. The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 22 (4): 511–517. PMID 7718924.
Herman, Robin (August 27, 1976). “‘No Exceptions,’ and No Renee Richards”. The New York Times.
Gray, Eliza (July 13, 2015). “Pentagon to Lift Transgender Ban in the Military”. Time. Archived from the original on August 24, 2015.
“TMilitary lifts transgender ban s”. McClatchy. June 30, 2016. Archived from the original on July 1, 2016. Retrieved June 30, 2016.
“Trump announces ban on transgender people in U.S. military”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 26, 2017. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
“Joint Chiefs: ‘No modifications’ to transgender policy from Trump tweet”. Politico. Archived from the original on July 27, 2017. Retrieved July 27, 2017.
Levin, Sam (August 1, 2017). “Top military officials call on Trump to reverse transgender ban”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 23, 2017. Retrieved August 24, 2017.
Trump, Donald J. (August 25, 2017). “Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security”. White House. Retrieved August 26, 2017 – via National Archives.
Siddiqui, Sabrina (August 29, 2017). “Transgender troops can stay in US military for now, James Mattis says”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on August 30, 2017. Retrieved August 29, 2017.
Biden, Joe (January 25, 2021). “Executive Order on Enabling All Qualified Americans to Serve Their Country in Uniform”. The White House. Retrieved January 28, 2021.
“Free to be a Better Soldier: Transgender Service Members Cheer Reversal of Ban”. April 30, 2021.
US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. “LGBTQ+ Veterans”. patientcare.va.gov. Retrieved February 23, 2024.
McDonough, Denis (February 22, 2024). “Letter to M. Dru Levasseur”. ImgBB. Archived from the original on February 24, 2024. Retrieved February 24, 2024.
“Biden signs $895B Defense bill despite transgender care provision”. The Hill. December 24, 2024.
“Text of the house amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 5009” (PDF). docs.house.gov.
“Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness”. The White House. January 28, 2025. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
Rodriguez, Mathew (February 11, 2025). “Hegseth Orders “Pause” on Trans Enlistment and Gender-Affirming Care For Current Servicemembers”. Them. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
“Exhibit 1 – 26 Feb 2025 OSD Policy – #63, Att. #1 in TALBOTT v. TRUMP (D.D.C., 1:25-cv-00240) – CourtListener.com”. CourtListener. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
“US judge blocks Trump’s ban on trans people serving in the military”. The Guardian. March 19, 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved March 19, 2025.
Reyes, Ana (March 18, 2025). “Talbott v. United States”. ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov. Retrieved March 18, 2025.
Settle, Benjamin (March 27, 2025). “Shilling v. United States. Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Document #103”. CourtListener. Retrieved May 6, 2025.
Liptak, Adam (May 6, 2025). “Supreme Court Lets Trump Enforce Transgender Troop Ban as Cases Proceed”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 6, 2025.
“Publication 502 (2008), Medical and Dental Expenses”. Internal Revenue Service. 2009. Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved May 7, 2009.
O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner, 134 T.C. No. 4 (February 2, 2010)
“B.P.J. V. West Virginia State Board of Education – Order Granting Preliminary Injunction”. American Civil Liberties Union.
“Hecox v. Little”. American Civil Liberties Union.
“Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey Signs Anti-Trans Sports Bill into Law”. Human Rights Campaign. April 23, 2021. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
“Arizona Governor Becomes Second Official to Sign Anti-Trans Sports Bill Wednesday”. Sports Illustrated. March 30, 2022.
“Arkansas governor signs transgender sports ban into law”. NBC News. March 26, 2021.
“On the First Day of Pride Month, Florida Signed a Transgender Athlete Bill into Law”. NPR. June 2, 2021.
Xu, Meimei (April 28, 2025). “Georgia Gov. Kemp signs bills to restrict trans athlete participation in schools, create school safety measures”. WABE. Retrieved June 25, 2025.
Block, Melissa (May 3, 2021). “Idaho’s Transgender Sports Ban Faces a Major Legal Hurdle”. NPR.
Smith, Mitch (May 24, 2022). “Indiana Lawmakers Override Transgender Sports Veto”. The New York Times.
“Kim Reynolds bans transgender girls from female sports, signing Republican-backed law”. The Des Moines Register.
“Kansas bans transgender athletes from women’s, girls’ sports”. AP News. April 5, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2025.
“Kentucky Legislature overrides governor’s veto of transgender sports ban”. NBC News. April 13, 2022.
“Louisiana Becomes Latest State to Ban Transgender Athletes in Schools”. HuffPost. June 8, 2022.
“Mississippi governor signs bill banning trans athletes from school sports”. NBC News. March 11, 2021.
“Missouri Limits Transgender Athletes’ Participation in Sports”. Lewis Rice LLC. Retrieved June 25, 2025.
“Montana governor signs bill banning transgender students from sports teams”. The Guardian. May 8, 2021.
“Nebraska is the latest state to ban transgender students from girls sports”. NBC News. June 4, 2025. Retrieved June 25, 2025.
“NC General Assembly overrides veto, bars trans women and girls from competing in sports ‘designated for females'”. The Chronicle. August 16, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2025.
Chen, David W. (April 12, 2023). “North Dakota Bars Trans Girls and Women From Female Sports Teams”. The New York Times.
“Ohio bans gender-affirming care and restricts transgender athletes despite GOP governor’s veto”. AP News. January 24, 2024. Retrieved June 25, 2025.
“Oklahoma governor signs transgender sports ban”. NBC News. March 30, 2022.
“South Carolina becomes the latest state to enact a transgender sports ban”. NPR. May 17, 2022.
“South Dakota governor signs 2022’s first trans athlete ban into law”. NBC News. February 4, 2022.
“Tennessee Governor Signs Legislation Banning Collegiate Transgender Athletes”. Sports Illustrated. May 6, 2022.
“Trans kids and supporters say new Texas law will keep them out of school sports”. January 18, 2022.
“Utah bans transgender athletes in girls sports despite governor’s veto”. NPR. March 25, 2022.
“West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice Signs Anti-Trans Sports Bill into Law”. Human Rights Campaign. April 28, 2021. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
“Wyoming bans transgender youths from girls’ sports teams”. NBC News. March 21, 2023.
“Texas is pushing the most anti-trans bills in the country. Advocates fear deadly consequences”. PBS. September 13, 2021.
Goins, Adria (July 28, 2022). “Parents of student athletes required to sign gender form by state law”. KFOR.com Oklahoma City.
Alexander, Dan (August 2, 2022). “USA Cycling accused of “transphobia” after individual pursuit medallist stripped of national championships medal”.
Axon, Rachel; Schrotenboer, Brent (June 30, 2021). “Conservatives want to ban transgender athletes from girls sports. Their evidence is shaky”. USA Today. Archived from the original on July 2, 2021. Retrieved July 14, 2025.
Witz, Billy (January 24, 2022). “As Lia Thomas Swims, Debate About Transgender Athletes Swirls”. The New York Times.
“Soule v. CIAC – Athletes in Women’s Sports Amicus Brief”.
“Billie Jean King, Megan Rapinoe, Layshia Clarendon, and Brianna Turner Join More Than 150 Athletes and WNBPA in Supporting Trans Youth Participation in Sports”. October 14, 2021.
“Georgia High School Association Chooses to Discriminate Against Transgender Student Athletes, Issuing Ban Against Competing in High School Sports”. Human Rights Campaign. May 4, 2022. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
“Billie Jean King, Megan Rapinoe, and Candace Parker Join Nearly 200 Athletes Supporting Trans Youth Participation in Sports”. December 21, 2020.
“Trans Students Protected Under Title IX, Biden Administration Says”. HuffPost. June 17, 2021.
Wiggins, Christopher (November 3, 2022). “Miss USA Can Reject Trans Contestants, Appeals Court Rules”.
Diaz, Jaclyn (November 3, 2022). “U.S. court says a pageant can exclude transgender women in its competitions”. NPR.
Otten, Tori. “Florida Panel Recommends Forcing Student Athletes to Give Schools Their Menstrual History”.
Cooper, Alex (April 20, 2023). “The U.S. House Passes Anti-Transgender Sports Bill”.
“US Congress House Bill 734”. Legiscan.
“Biden administration says schools may bar trans athletes from competitive teams”. WaPo. April 6, 2023.
“School Sports Cannot ‘Categorically’ Ban Transgender Athletes, Under Biden Proposal”. NYT. April 6, 2023.
“Biden Administration Releases Revised Title IX Rules”. NYT. April 19, 2024.
“Biden dismantles Trump-era Title IX rules, sidesteps issue of trans athletes in girls’ sports”. Fox News. April 19, 2024.
“Over 20 GOP-led states sue Biden administration over Title IX rules for LGBTQ students”. NBC News. May 8, 2024.
“Federal judge blocks Biden’s Title IX transgender protections”. The Hill. June 11, 2024.
“Judge blocks Biden’s Title IX rule in four states, dealing a blow to protections for LGBTQ+ students”. NBC News. June 13, 2024.
“Federal judge sides with Louisiana Attorney General against Joe Biden’s new Title IX rules”. WBRZ-TV. June 13, 2024.
“Title IX rule blocked in 6 more states”. Higher Ed Dive. June 18, 2024.
“Biden extends losing streak as third judge blocks rule adding ‘gender identity’ to Title IX”. The Washington Times. July 2, 2024.
Stanford, Libby (July 3, 2024). “Biden’s Title IX Rule Is Now Blocked in 14 States”. Education Week.
“Block on Biden Trans Rights Rule Upheld by Two Appeals Courts”. Bloomberg Law. July 17, 2024.
“Federal court blocks new Title IX gender identity protections in Iowa, 5 other states”. AOL. July 26, 2024.
“Federal protections of transgender students are in effect where courts haven’t blocked them”. AP News. August 1, 2024.
VanSickle, Abbie; Shear, Michael D. (August 16, 2024). “Supreme Court, for Now, Blocks Expanded Protections for Transgender Students in Some States”. The New York Times. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
Matza, Max (August 16, 2024). “US Supreme Court declines to lift block on expanded trans student protections”. BBC. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
Schonfeld, Zach (August 16, 2024). “Supreme Court refuses DOJ request to partially reinstate new Title IX rule”. The Hill. Retrieved August 17, 2024.
“Biden’s Title IX expansion protecting LGBTQ+ students struck down”. The Guardian. Associated Press. January 9, 2024. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
“Judge Rejects Biden’s Title IX Rules, Scrapping Protections for Trans Students”. The New York Times. January 9, 2025. Retrieved January 11, 2025.
Yilek, Caitlin (February 5, 2025). “Trump signs executive order that will ban transgender athletes from women’s sports”. CBS News. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
Yurcaba, Jo (February 11, 2025). “Education Dept. urges NCAA to reverse transgender athletes’ records, titles and awards”. NBC News. Archived from the original on February 11, 2025. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
Quinn, Melissa (July 3, 2025). “Supreme Court takes up state bans on transgender athletes in girls’ and women’s sports”. CBS News. Retrieved July 3, 2025.
Yurcaba, Jo; Williams, Abigail (January 24, 2025). “State Department to suspend passport applications seeking sex-marker changes”. NBC News. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
Brown, Matthew (September 9, 2022). “Montana permanently blocks transgender people from changing their birth certificates”. PBS NewsHour. Retrieved September 12, 2022.
“#DontEraseUs: FAQ About Anti-LGBT Curriculum Laws”. Lambda Legal.
“What is Gender Dysphoria?”. psychiatry.org.

v t e Transgender and gender non-conforming topics

v t e LGBTQ in the United States

v t eTransgender rights in North America

Categories:

Contents

Transgender rights in the United States

Family law

Marriage

Cases

Custody

Reproductive rights

Identity documents

Federal documents

Passports

Persons not born in the United States

Third gender option

States, the District of Columbia, and territorial documents

US jurisdictions recognizing a third gender

Birth certificates

Cases (birth certificates)

Driver’s licenses and state identification cards

Cases

Name change

Death certificates

Housing

Housing for trans youth

Genocide

Governments’ lists of trans people

Trump presidency (2025–present)

Federal

Executive Order 14168

Executive Order 14183

Executive Order 14187

Federal funding freeze

Executive Order 14190

Executive Order 14201

Firearm rights

Physical violence

Sexual violence

Displacement and sanctuary states

Discrimination protections

Employment

Laws

Federal laws

State and local laws

Cases

Drag shows

Education

Executive Order 14190

Anti-discrimination

Parental authority

State and local policies

Employment

Public factors

Social media

Politicians

Media involvement

The New York Times

Grooming conspiracy theory

Facilities access

Federal sex-segregated facilities access policy

Comprehensive legislation

Indecent exposure charges for restroom use

Schools

Workplace

Hate crimes legislation

Healthcare

Treatment for adults

Treatment for minors

Bans for minors

Protections for minors

Related studies

Awareness of providers

Discrimination

Catholic hospitals

Trans Broken Arm Syndrome

Medical privacy

Insurance coverage

State Medicaid Coverage

Prisoners’ rights

V-coding

ICE detention

Pronouns

Immigration