↓
 
Home→New Essays→UPPER CLASS

UPPER CLASS

56thst.com Posted on by
Wikipedia
The Free Encyclopedia

Search

Wiki Loves Folklore Logo

Wiki Loves FolklorePhotograph your local culture, help Wikipedia and win!Participate Now

Folklore Graphics

[Help with translations!]

Contents

hide

Upper class

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

  • SmallStandardLarge

Width

  • StandardWide

Color (beta)

  • AutomaticLightDark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Upper class in modern societies is the social class composed of people who hold the highest social status. Usually, these are the wealthiest members of class society, and wield the greatest political power.[1] According to this view, the upper class is generally distinguished by immense wealth which is passed on from generation to generation.[2] Prior to the 20th century, the emphasis was on aristocracy, which emphasized generations of inherited noble status, not just recent wealth.[3]

Because the upper classes of a society may no longer rule the society in which they are living, they are often referred to as the old upper classes, and they are often culturally distinct from the newly rich middle classes that tend to dominate public life in modern social democracies. According to the latter view held by the traditional upper classes, no amount of individual wealth or fame would make a person from an undistinguished background into a member of the upper class as one must be born into a family of that class and raised in a particular manner to understand and share upper class values, traditions, and cultural norms. The term is often used in conjunction with terms like upper-middle class, middle class, and working class as part of a model of social stratification.

Historical meaning

Portrait of the family Fagoaga Arozqueta, about 1730. Painter unknown. The family was part of the upper class in Mexico City, New Spain.

Historically in some cultures, members of an upper class often did not have to work for a living, as they were supported by earned or inherited investments (often real estate), although members of the upper class may have had less actual money than merchants.[4] Upper-class status commonly derived from the social position of one’s family and not from one’s own achievements or wealth. Much of the population that composed the upper class consisted of aristocrats, ruling families, titled people, and religious hierarchs. These people were usually born into their status and historically there was not much movement across class boundaries.

Ball in colonial Chile by Pedro Subercaseaux. In Spain’s American colonies, the upper classes were made up of Europeans and American born Spaniards and were heavily influenced by European trends.

In many countries, the term “upper class” was intimately associated with hereditary land ownership.[5] Political power was often in the hands of the landowners in many pre-industrial societies despite there being no legal barriers to land ownership for other social classes. Upper-class landowners in Europe were often also members of the titled nobility, though not necessarily: the prevalence of titles of nobility varied widely from country to country. Some upper classes were almost entirely untitled, for example, the Szlachta of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth.[6]

Great Britain and Ireland

Main article: Social structure of the United Kingdom § Upper class

The upmarket Harrods department store in London, 1909

In Great Britain and Ireland, the “upper class” traditionally comprised the landed gentry and the aristocracy of noble families with hereditary titles. The vast majority of post-medieval aristocratic families originated in the merchant class and were ennobled between the 14th and 19th centuries while intermarrying with the old nobility and gentry.[7] Since the Second World War, the term has come to encompass rich and powerful members of the managerial and professional classes as well.[8] In the years since Irish independence in 1922 the upper class has all but vanished in the Republic of Ireland. Aristocratic titles within the Peerage of Ireland granted by the British monarch have no recognition in the Irish Constitution. Contemporary Ireland is generally perceived to have a two-tier social class system composed of working class and middle class (with the exception of a small number of wealthy billionaires).

United States

Main articles: American upper class and African-American upper class

First edition dust cover of Edith Wharton‘s 1920 Pulitzer Prize-winning novel The Age of Innocence, a story set in upper-class New York City in the 1870s

The American upper class is a social group within the United States consisting of people who have the highest social rank primarily due to economic wealth.[9][10] The American upper class is estimated to constitute less than 1% of the population. By self-identification, according to this 2001–2012 Gallup Poll data, 98% of Americans identify with the five other class terms used, 48–50% identifying as “middle class”.[11]

The main distinguishing feature of the upper class is its ability to derive enormous incomes from wealth through techniques such as money management and investing, rather than engaging in wage-labor salaried employment, although most upper-class individuals today will still hold some sort of employment, which differs from historical norms.[12][13][14] Successful entrepreneurs, CEOs, investment bankers, venture capitalists, heir to fortunes, celebrities, and a few number of professionals, are considered members of this class by contemporary sociologists, such as James Henslin or Dennis Gilbert.[12] There may be prestige differences between different upper-class households. An A-list actor, for example, might not be accorded as much prestige as a former U.S. President,[13] yet all members of this class are so influential and wealthy as to be considered members of the upper class.[12] At the pinnacle of U.S. wealth, 2004 saw a dramatic increase in the numbers of billionaires. According to Forbes Magazine, there are now 374 U.S. billionaires. The growth in billionaires took a dramatic leap since the early 1980s, when the average net worth of the individuals on the Forbes 400 list was $400 million. Today[when?], the average net worth is $2.8 billion.

Upper-class families… dominate corporate America and have a disproportionate influence over the nation’s political, educational, religious, and other institutions. Of all social classes, members of the upper class also have a strong sense of solidarity and ‘consciousness of kind’ that stretches across the nation and even the globe.

— William Thompson & Joseph Hickey, Society in Focus, 2005[13]

Since the 1970s, income inequality in the United States has been increasing, with the top 1% (largely because of the top 0.1%) experiencing significantly larger gains in income than the rest of society.[15][16][17] Alan Greenspan, former chair of the Federal Reserve, sees it as a problem for society, calling it a “very disturbing trend”.[18][19]

According to the book Who Rules America? by William Domhoff, the distribution of wealth in America is the primary highlight of the influence of the upper class. The top 1% of Americans own around 34% of the wealth in the U.S. while the bottom 80% own only approximately 16% of the wealth. This large disparity displays the unequal distribution of wealth in America in absolute terms.[20]

In 1998, Bob Herbert of The New York Times referred to modern American plutocrats as “The Donor Class“[21][22] (list of top donors)[23] and defined the class, for the first time,[24] as “a tiny group – just one-quarter of 1 percent of the population – and it is not representative of the rest of the nation. But its money buys plenty of access.”[21]

See also

References

  1.  Bartels, Larry (8 April 2014). “Rich people rule!”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 17 April 2016. Retrieved 17 July 2016.
  2.  Akhbar-Williams, Tahira (2010). “Class Structure”. In Smith, Jessie C. (ed.). Encyclopedia of African American Popular Culture, Volume 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 322. ISBN 978-0-313-35796-1. Archived from the original on 21 November 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  3.  Gregory Mantsios (2010). “Class in America – 2009”. In Rothenberg, Paula S. (ed.). Race, class, and gender in the United States: an integrated study (8th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. p. 179. ISBN 978-1-4292-1788-0.
  4.  “How should we define working class, middle class and upper class?”. The Guardian. Guardian News and Media Limited. 2011. Archived from the original on 15 September 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
  5.  Smith, Julia A. (2000). “Land Ownership and Social Change in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain”. The Economic History Review. 53 (4): 767–776. doi:10.1111/1468-0289.00177. ISSN 0013-0117. JSTOR 2598603.
  6.  Skwarczyński, Paweł (June 1956). “The Problem of Feudalism in Poland up to the Beginning of the 16th Century”. The Slavonic and East European Review. 34 (83). Salisbury House, Station Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire county, ENGLAND: Modern Humanities Research Association: 302. JSTOR 4204744. In 1459 Ostroróg submitted a memorandum to the parliament (sejm), suggesting that the palatines, or provincial governors, should be given the title of prince and their sons the titles of barons and counts. The title of count was suggested by him for a castellanus. But all these suggestions were not accepted.
  7.  Toynbee, Arnold (1960). A Study of History: Abridgement of Vols I-X in one volume. Oxford University Press.
  8.  Krummel, Victoria (2008). The Old Upper Class – Britain’s Aristocracy. Akademische Schriftenreihe. GRIN Verlag. p. 5. ISBN 978-3-638-74726-4.
  9.  Beeghley, Leonard (2004). The Structure of Social Stratification in the United States. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. ISBN 0-205-37558-8.
  10.  “Upper class”.
  11.  Dugan, Andrew (30 November 2012). “Americans Most Likely to Say They Belong to the Middle Class”. Gallup. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
  12.  Gilbert, Dennis (1998). The American Class Structure. New York: Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 0-534-50520-1.
  13.  Thompson, William; Hickey, Joseph (2005). Society in Focus. Boston, Mass.: Pearson. ISBN 0-205-41365-X.
  14.  Williams, Brian; Sawyer, Stacey C.; Wahlstrom, Carl M. (2005). Marriages, Families & Intimate Relationships. Boston, Mass.: Pearson. ISBN 0-205-36674-0.
  15.  Johnston, David Cay (29 March 2007). “Income Gap is Widening, Data Shows”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 5 November 2007. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
  16.  Thomas, E.; Gross, D. (23 July 2007). “Taxing the Rich”. Newsweek.
  17.  Johnston, David Cay (5 June 2005). “Richest Are Leaving Even the Rich Far Behind”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 9 October 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2015.
  18.  Pizzigati, S. (7 November 2005). “Alan Greenspan, Egalitarian?”. TomPaine.com. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
  19.  Greenspan, Alan (28 August 1998). “Remarks by Chairman Alan Greenspan”. The Federal Reserve Board. Archived from the original on 6 June 2007. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
  20.  Domhoff, G. William (2005). Who Rules America: Power, Politics, & Social Change (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-287625-5.
  21.  Herbert, Bob (19 July 1998). “The Donor Class”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
  22.  Confessore, Nicholas; Cohen, Sarah; Yourish, Karen (10 October 2015). “The Families Funding the 2016 Presidential Election”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
  23.  Lichtblau, Eric; Confessore, Nicholas (10 October 2015). “From Fracking to Finance, a Torrent of Campaign Cash – Top Donors List”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
  24.  McCutcheon, Chuck (26 December 2014). “Why the ‘donor class’ matters, especially in the GOP presidential scrum”. “The Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2016.

Further reading

  • Cousin, Bruno and Sébastien Chauvin (2021). “Is there a global super-bourgeoisie?” Sociology Compass, vol. 15, issue 6, pp. 1–15. online
  • Allan G. Johnson, ed. (2000). “Upper class”. The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology: A User’s Guide to Sociological Language (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-21681-0.
  • Hartmann, Michael (2007). The Sociology of Elites. Routledge Studies in Social and Political Thought. Vol. 50. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-41197-4.
  • King, Victor T. (2008). The Sociology of Southeast Asia: Transformations in a Developing Region. NIAS Press. ISBN 978-87-91114-60-1.
  • McKibbin, Ross.(2000) Classes and Cultures: England 1918-1951 (2000) pp 1–43.
  • Baraka, Magda. (1998). The Egyptian upper class between revolutions, 1919-1952. ISBS.
  • Scott, John. (1982). The upper classes: Property and privilege in Britain Macmillan Pub Ltd.

United States

  • Baltzell, E. Digby. Philadelphia Gentlemen: The Making of a New Upper Class (1958).
  • Brooks, David. Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there (2010)
  • Burt, Nathaniel. The Perennial Philadelphians: The Anatomy of an American Aristocracy (1999).
  • Davis, Donald F. “The Price of Conspicious [sic] Production: The Detroit Elite and the Automobile Industry, 1900-1933.” Journal of Social History 16.1 (1982): 21–46. online
  • Farnum, Richard. “Prestige in the Ivy League: Democratization and discrimination at Penn and Columbia, 1890-1970.” in Paul W. Kingston and Lionel S. Lewis, eds. The high-status track: Studies of elite schools and stratification (1990).
  • Ghent, Jocelyn Maynard, and Frederic Cople Jaher. “The Chicago Business Elite: 1830–1930. A Collective Biography.” Business History Review 50.3 (1976): 288–328. online
  • Hood. Clifton. In Pursuit of Privilege: A History of New York City’s Upper Class and the Making of a Metropolis (2016). Covers 1760–1970.
  • Jaher, Frederic Cople, ed. The Rich, the Well Born, and the Powerful: Elites and Upper Classes in History (1973), essays by scholars
  • Jaher, Frederick Cople. The Urban Establishment: Upper Strata in Boston, New York, Chicago, Charleston, and Los Angeles (1982).
  • Jensen, Richard. “Family, Career, and Reform: Women Leaders of the Progressive Era.” in Michael Gordon, ed., The American Family in Social-Historical Perspective,(1973): 267–80.
  • Lehmann, Chris (2011). Rich People Things: Real-Life Secrets of the Predator Class. Haymarket Books. ISBN 9781608461523.
  • McConachie, Bruce A. “New York operagoing, 1825-50: creating an elite social ritual.” American Music (1988): 181–192. online
  • Ostrander, Susan A. (1986). Women of the Upper Class. Temple University Press. ISBN 978-0-87722-475-4.
  • Story, Ronald. (1980) The forging of an aristocracy: Harvard & the Boston upper class, 1800-1870
  • Synnott, Marcia. The half-opened door: Discrimination and admissions at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, 1900-1970 (2010).
  • Williams, Peter W. Religion, Art, and Money: Episcopalians and American Culture from the Civil War to the Great Depression (2016), especially in New York City

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Upper-class.

vteSocial class
vteHigh wealth
Authority control databases 

Categories: 

Posted in New Essays permalink

About joelsnell99

Who's Who in all U.S and U.K. Honoraries (Marquis) Numerous publications in over 80 venues DANA SPIRIT AWARD/2009 Oxford Roundtable, Editor of FOCUS, a student Social Science Journal Author Snell Life Cycle Lonliness Curve Professor Emeritus - Kirkwood College Omicron Delta Kappa Grants Online Editor for Psychology and Education.com Research Fellow - Arlington Institute Outstanding Teacher at Kirkwood College Membership in numerous editorial boards or a reviewer of manuscripts Associate Editor - Psychology and Education Co-Author of Snell-Green Professor Index Author of Snell Educator Effectiveness Index Contributer to FutureEdition.com Co-Author of Snell-Allen Medical Rank Index Fellow in Kennedy Foundation Co-Author of Snell-Allen Subjective Assessment Sex Role Index Honors >>> Positions and Courses Taught >>> joelsnell@hotmail.com http://www.socialvibes.net Research Council, Advisory Board

Comments are closed.

↑