↓
 
Home→New Essays→BIOLOGICAL STIMULI TO IMPACT TRANSGENDERISM

BIOLOGICAL STIMULI TO IMPACT TRANSGENDERISM

56thst.com Posted on by
Wikipedia
The Free Encyclopedia

Search

Contents

hide

Causes of gender incongruence

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

  • SmallStandardLarge

Width

  • StandardWide

Color (beta)

  • AutomaticLightDark
Page extended-confirmed-protected

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on
Transgender topics
     
OutlineHistoryTimeline
Gender identities
Health care practicesGender clinicGender dysphoria in childrencausesSex assignmentHormone therapy feminizingmasculinizingDIYPuberty-suppressing hormone therapyGender-affirming surgery masculinizingfeminizingFacial feminization surgeryFacial masculinization surgeryHair removalPregnancyAssisted reproductive technologyVoice therapyWPATH Standards of CareTransgender health care misinformation
Rights and legal status
Society and culture
Theory and concepts
By country
See also
 LGBTQ portal Category
vte

Gender incongruence is the state of having a gender identity that does not correspond to one’s sex assigned at birth. This is experienced by people who identify as transgender or transsexual, and often results in gender dysphoria.[1] The causes of gender incongruence have been studied for decades.

Transgender brain studies, especially those on trans women attracted to women (gynephilic), and those on trans men attracted to men (androphilic), are limited, as they include only a small number of tested individuals.[2] Twin studies indicate that genes play a role in gender incongruence, although the precise genes involved are not known or well understood.[3][4][5]

Environmental factors, such as prenatal hormone exposure, have also been investigated but are difficult to test.[5]

Genetics

Gender identity is genetically heritable, but no convincing candidate genes are known.[6][7] Gender incongruence has been associated with certain alleles relevant to steroidogenesis.[8]

In 2013, a twin study combined a survey of pairs of twins where one or both had undergone, or had plans and medical approval to undergo, gender transition, with a literature review of published reports of transgender twins. The study found that one third of identical twin pairs in the sample were both transgender: 13 of 39 (33%) monozygotic or identical pairs of assigned males and 8 of 35 (22.8%) pairs of assigned females. Among dizygotic or genetically non-identical twin pairs, there was only 1 of 38 (2.6%) pairs where both twins were trans.[9] The significant percentage of identical twin pairs in which both twins are trans and the virtual absence of dizygotic twins (raised in the same family at the same time) in which both were trans would provide evidence that transgender identity is significantly influenced by genetics if both sets were raised in different families.[9]

In 2018 a review of family and twin studies found that there was “significant and consistent evidence” for gender identity being genetically heritable.[7]

Prenatal hormonal environment

Sex hormones in the prenatal environment differentiate the male and female brain. One hypothesis proposes that transgender individuals may have been exposed to atypical levels of sex hormones during later stages of fetal development, leading to brain structures atypical of their sex assigned at birth.[5][10][11]

In people with XX chromosomes, congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) results in heightened exposure to prenatal androgens, resulting in masculinization of the genitalia. Individuals with CAH are typically subjected to medical interventions including prenatal hormone treatment[12] and postnatal genital reconstructive surgeries.[13] Such treatments are sometimes criticized by intersex rights organizations as non-consensual, invasive, and unnecessary interventions. Individuals with CAH are usually assigned female and tend to develop similar cognitive abilities to the typical females, including spatial ability, verbal ability, language lateralization, handedness and aggression. Research has shown that people with CAH and XX chromosomes will be more likely to experience same-sex attraction,[12] and at least 5.2% of these individuals develop serious gender dysphoria.[14]

In males with 5-alpha-reductase deficiency, conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone is disrupted, decreasing the masculinization of genitalia. Individuals with this condition are typically assigned female and raised as girls due to their feminine appearance at a young age. However, more than half of males with this condition raised as females come to identify as male later in life. Scientists speculate that the definition of masculine characteristics during puberty and the increased social status afforded to men are two possible motivations for a female-to-male transition.[14]

Brain structure

This section may be confusing or unclear to readers. Please help clarify the section. There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. (November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Transgender brain studies, especially those on trans women attracted to women (gynephilic), and those on trans men attracted to men (androphilic), are limited, as they include only a small number of tested individuals.[2]

Several studies have found a correlation between gender identity and brain structure.[15][16] A first-of-its-kind study by Zhou et al. (1995) found that in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BSTc), a region of the brain known for sex and anxiety responses (and which is affected by prenatal androgens),[17] cadavers of six trans women had female-normal BSTc size, similar to the study’s cadavers of cisgender women. While the trans women had undergone hormone therapy, and all but one had undergone sex reassignment surgery, this was accounted for by including cadavers of cisgender men and cisgender women as controls who, for a variety of medical reasons, had experienced hormone reversal. The controls still had sizes typical for their sex, and thus no relationship to post-natal hormone levels (nor to sexual orientation) was found.[18][19] Other post-mortem studies also found brain differences between cisgender and transgender individuals.[20]

In 2002, a follow-up study by Chung et al. found that significant sexual dimorphism in BSTc did not establish until adulthood. Chung et al. theorized that changes in fetal hormone levels produce changes in BSTc synaptic density, neuronal activity, or neurochemical content which later lead to size and neuron count changes in BSTc, or alternatively, that the size of BSTc is affected by the generation of a gender identity inconsistent with one’s assigned sex.[21][19]

In the textbook Adult Psychopathology and Diagnosis, 7th edition, Lawrence and Zucker suggested that the BSTc may not be a valid biomarker for gender incongruence, as differences in size could be caused by gender-affirming hormone therapy or paraphilias, and might not occur in homosexual transsexuals.[2][22]

In a review of the evidence in 2006, Gooren considered the earlier research as supporting the concept of gender incongruence as a “sexual differentiation disorder” of the sexually dimorphic brain.[23] Dick Swaab (2004) concurred.[24]

In 2008, Garcia-Falgueras & Swaab discovered that the interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH-3), part of the hypothalamic uncinate nucleus, had properties similar to the BSTc with respect to sexual dimorphism and gender incongruence, likewise in line with the trans individuals’ declared genders and likewise regardless of if hormonal transition had occurred or not.[19][25]

A 2009 MRI study by Luders et al. found that among 24 trans women not treated with hormone therapy, regional gray matter concentrations were more similar to those of cisgender men than of cisgender women, but there was a significantly greater volume of gray matter in the right putamen compared to cisgender men. Like earlier studies, researchers concluded that transgender identity was associated with a distinct cerebral pattern.[26][non-primary source needed] MRI scanning allows easier study of larger brain structures, but independent nuclei are not visible due to lack of contrast between different neurological tissue types, hence other studies on e.g. BSTc were done by dissecting brains post-mortem.[scientific citation needed]

Rametti et al. (2011) studied 18 trans men who had not undergone hormone therapy using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), an MRI technique which allows visualizing white matter, the structure of which is sexually dimorphic. Rametti et al. discovered that the trans men’s white matter, compared to 19 cisgender gynephilic females, showed higher fractional anisotropy values in posterior part of the right SLF, the forceps minor and corticospinal tract“. Compared to 24 cisgender males, they showed only lower FA values in the corticospinal tract. The white matter patterns in trans men were found to be shifted in the direction of cis men.[27][non-primary source needed]

A 2011 review published in Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology found that “Female INAH3 and BSTc have been found in MtF transsexual persons. The only female-to-male (FtM) transsexual person available to us for study so far had a BSTc and INAH3 with clear male characteristics. (…) These sex reversals were found not to be influenced by circulating hormone levels in adulthood, and seem thus to have arisen during development” and that “All observations that support the neurobiological theory about the origin of transsexuality, i.e. that it is the sizes, the neuron numbers, and the functions and connectivity of brain structures, not the sex of their sexual organs, birth certificates or passports, that match their gender identities”.[28]

In 2012 and 2016 studies by Taziaux et al. reported that MtF subjects had infundibular nuclei similar to those of cis women.[2][29][30]

A 2015 review reported that two studies found a pattern of white matter microstructure differences away from a transgender person’s birth sex, and toward their desired sex. In one of these studies, sexual orientation had no effect on the diffusivity measured.[31]

A 2016 review reported that, for androphilic trans women and gynephilic trans men, hormone treatment may have large effects on the brain, and that cortical thickness, which is generally thicker in cisgender women’s brains than in cisgender men’s brains, may also be thicker in trans women’s brains, but is present in a different location to cisgender women’s brains.[2] It also stated that for both trans women and trans men, “cross-sex hormone treatment affects the gross morphology as well as the white matter microstructure of the brain. Changes are to be expected when hormones reach the brain in pharmacological doses. Consequently, one cannot take hormone-treated transsexual brain patterns as evidence of the transsexual brain phenotype because the treatment alters brain morphology and obscures the pre-treatment brain pattern.”[2]

A 2019 review in Neuropsychopharmacology found that among transgender individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria, “cortical thickness, gray matter volume, white matter microstructure, structural connectivity, and corpus callosum shape have been found to be more similar to cisgender control subjects of the same preferred gender compared with those of the same natal sex.”[32]

A 2021 review of brain studies published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that “although the majority of neuroanatomical, neurophysiological, and neurometabolic features” in transgender people “resemble those of their natal sex rather than those of their experienced gender”, for trans women they found feminine and demasculinized traits, and vice versa for trans men. They stated that due to limitations and conflicting results in the studies that had been done, they could not draw general conclusions or identify-specific features that consistently differed between cisgender and transgender people. The review also found differences when comparing cisgender homosexual and heterosexual people, with the same limitations applying.[33]

Androphilic vs. gynephilic trans women

A 2016 review reported that early-onset androphilic transgender women have a brain structure similar to cisgender women’s and unlike cisgender men’s, but that they have their own brain phenotype.[2] It also reported that gynephilic trans women differ from both cisgender female and male controls in non-dimorphic brain areas.[2]

The available research indicates that the brain structure of androphilic trans women with early-onset gender dysphoria is closer to that of cisgender women than that of cisgender men.[2] It also reports that gynephilic trans women differ from both cisgender female and male controls in non-dimorphic brain areas.[2] Cortical thickness, which is generally thicker in cisgender women’s brains than in cisgender men’s brains, may also be thicker in trans women’s brains, but is present in a different location to cisgender women’s brains.[2] For trans men, research indicates that those with early-onset gender dysphoria and who are gynephilic have brains that generally correspond to their assigned sex, but that they have their own phenotype with respect to cortical thickness, subcortical structures, and white matter microstructure, especially in the right hemisphere.[2] Hormone therapy can also affect transgender people’s brain structure; estrogen can cause transgender women’s brains to become closer to those of cisgender women, and morphological changes observed in the brains of trans men might be due to the anabolic effects of testosterone.[2]

MRI taken on gynephilic trans women have likewise shown differences in the brain from non-trans people, though in ways not directly related to sexual dimorphism.[2]

Gynephilic trans men

Fewer brain structure studies have been performed on transgender men than on transgender women.[2] A 2016 review reported that the brain structure of early-onset gynephilic trans men generally corresponds to their assigned sex, but that they have their own phenotype with respect to cortical thickness, subcortical structures, and white matter microstructure, especially in the right hemisphere.[2] Morphological increments observed in the brains of trans men might be due to the anabolic effects of testosterone.[2]

Onset

According to the DSM-5, gender dysphoria in those assigned male at birth tends to follow one of two broad trajectories: early-onset or late-onset. Early-onset gender dysphoria is behaviorally visible in childhood. Sometimes, gender dysphoria may stop for a while in this group, and they may identify as gay or homosexual for a period of time, followed by recurrence of gender dysphoria. This group is usually androphilic in adulthood. Late-onset gender dysphoria does not include visible signs in early childhood, but some report having had wishes to be the opposite sex in childhood that they did not report to others. Trans women who experience late-onset gender dysphoria are more likely be attracted to women and may identify as lesbians or bisexual. It is common for people assigned male at birth who have late-onset gender dysphoria to experience sexual excitement from cross-dressing. In those assigned female at birth, early-onset gender dysphoria is the most common course. This group is usually sexually attracted to women. Trans men who experience late-onset gender dysphoria will usually be sexually attracted to men and may identify as gay. In general, onset of symptoms may begin at any time after an individual reaches the age of two or three.[34]

Blanchard’s typology

This section relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: “Causes of gender incongruence” – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Further information: Blanchard’s transsexualism typology

In the 1980s and 1990s, sexologist Ray Blanchard developed a taxonomy of male-to-female transsexualism[35] built upon the work of his colleague Kurt Freund,[36] which argues that trans women have one of two primary causes of gender dysphoria.[37][38][39] Blanchard theorized that “homosexual transsexuals” (a taxonomic category referring to trans women attracted to men) are attracted to men and develop gender dysphoria typically during childhood, and characterizes them as displaying overt and obvious femininity since childhood; he characterizes “non-homosexual transsexuals” (trans women who are sexually attracted to women) as developing gender dysphoria primarily due to autogynephilia (sexual arousal by the thought or image of themselves as a woman[35]), and as attracted to women, attracted to both women and men (Blanchard calls this “pseudo-bisexuality”, believing attraction to males to be not genuine, but part of the performance of an autogynephilic sexual fantasy), or asexual.[citation needed]

Blanchard’s theory has received support from J. Michael Bailey, Anne Lawrence, and James Cantor.[40] Blanchard argued that there are significant differences between the two groups, including sexuality, age of transition, ethnicity, IQ, fetishism, and quality of adjustment.[41][42][35][43]

Blanchard’s typology has been criticized in papers from Veale, Nuttbrock, Moser, and others who argue that it is poorly representative of trans women and non-instructive, and that the experiments behind it are poorly controlled and/or contradicted by other data.[44][45][46][40]: 27–28  Charles Moser conducted a survey of 29 cisgender women in the healthcare field based on Blanchard’s methods for identifying autogynephilia, found that 93% of respondents qualified as autogynephiles based on their own responses. Anne Lawrence criticized the methodology of Mosers survey.[40]: 27 

Blanchard proposed that “homosexual transsexuals”, but not “autogynephilic transsexuals”, would have feminized brain structure, stating: “if there is any neuroanatomic intersexuality, it is in the homosexual group”.[2] James Cantor has argued that MRI studies of transgender women offer support for Blanchard’s prediction.[2][47] A 2016 review of transgender brain structure states: “Cantor seems to be right. Nonhomosexual MtFs present differences with heterosexual males in structures that are not sexually dimorphic (Savic & Arver, 2011), while homosexual MtFs (as well as homosexual FtMs) show differences with respect to male and female controls in a series of brain fascicles”.[2]: 1634  The review notes that only one study has compared gynephilic and androphilic transgender women, and that “more independent studies on nonhomosexual MtFs are needed”.[2]: 1634 

See also

References

  1.  Curtis R, Levy A, Martin J, Playdon ZJ, Wylie K, Reed R, Reed R (March 2009). “Transgender experiences – Information and support” (PDF). NHS. p. 12. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 January 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  2.  Guillamon A, Junque C, Gómez-Gil E (October 2016). “A Review of the Status of Brain Structure Research in Transsexualism”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 45 (7): 1615–48. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0768-5. PMC 4987404. PMID 27255307.
  3.  Heylens G, De Cuypere G, Zucker KJ, Schelfaut C, Elaut E, Vanden Bossche H, et al. (March 2012). “Gender identity disorder in twins: a review of the case report literature”. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 9 (3): 751–7. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02567.x. PMID 22146048. Archived from the original on 28 February 2024. Retrieved 9 March 2024. Of 23 monozygotic female and male twins, nine (39.1%) were concordant for GID; in contrast, none of the 21 same‐sex dizygotic female and male twins were concordant for GID, a statistically significant difference (P = 0.005)… These findings suggest a role for genetic factors in the development of GID.
  4.  Diamond M (2013). “Transsexuality Among Twins: Identity Concordance, Transition, Rearing, and Orientation”. International Journal of Transgenderism. 14 (1): 24–38. doi:10.1080/15532739.2013.750222. S2CID 144330783. Combining data from the present survey with those from past-published reports, 20% of all male and female monozygotic twin pairs were found concordant for transsexual identity… The responses of our twins relative to their rearing, along with our findings regarding some of their experiences during childhood and adolescence show their identity was much more influenced by their genetics than their rearing.
  5.  Besser M, Carr S, Cohen-Kettenis P, Connolly P, de Sutter P, Diamond M, Di Ceglie D, Higashi Y, Jones L, Kruijver F, Martin J, Playdon Z, Ralph D, Reed T, Reid R, Reiner W, Swaab D, Terry T, Wilson P, Wylie K (2006). “Atypical Gender Development – A Review”. International Journal of Transgenderism. 9 (1): 29–44. doi:10.1300/J485v09n01_04. ISSN 1553-2739.
  6.  Ristori, Jiska; Cocchetti, Carlotta; Romani, Alessia; Mazzoli, Francesca; Vignozzi, Linda; Maggi, Mario; Fisher, Alessandra Daphne (January 2020). “Brain Sex Differences Related to Gender Identity Development: Genes or Hormones?”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 21 (6): 2123. doi:10.3390/ijms21062123. ISSN 1422-0067. PMC 7139786. PMID 32204531.
  7.  Polderman, Tinca J. C.; Kreukels, Baudewijntje P. C.; Irwig, Michael S.; Beach, Lauren; Chan, Yee-Ming; Derks, Eske M.; Esteva, Isabel; Ehrenfeld, Jesse; Heijer, Martin Den; Posthuma, Danielle; Raynor, Lewis; Tishelman, Amy; Davis, Lea K. (March 2018). “The Biological Contributions to Gender Identity and Gender Diversity: Bringing Data to the Table”. Behavior Genetics. 48 (2): 95–108. doi:10.1007/s10519-018-9889-z. hdl:10668/12154. ISSN 1573-3297. PMID 29460079.
  8.  Gupta, Richie (April 2022). “Gender Affirmation in India—The Current State of Knowledge, Management, Legal and Legislative Situation”. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery. 55 (2): 139–143. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1740528. ISSN 0970-0358. PMC 9398521. PMID 36017406.
  9.  Diamond M (2013). “Transsexuality Among Twins: Identity Concordance, Transition, Rearing, and Orientation”. International Journal of Transgenderism. 14 (1): 24–38. doi:10.1080/15532739.2013.750222. S2CID 144330783. Combining data from the present survey with those from past-published reports, 20% of all male and female monozygotic twin pairs were found concordant for transsexual identity… The responses of our twins relative to their rearing, along with our findings regarding some of their experiences during childhood and adolescence show their identity was much more influenced by their genetics than their rearing.
  10.  Hembree, Wylie C; Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy T; Gooren, Louis; Hannema, Sabine E; Meyer, Walter J; Murad, M Hassan; Rosenthal, Stephen M; Safer, Joshua D; Tangpricha, Vin; T’Sjoen, Guy G (1 November 2017). “Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline”. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 102 (11). Biological Determinants of Gender Identity Development: 3869–3903. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01658. PMID 28945902.
  11.  Rao, T. S. Sathyanarayana; De Sousa, Avinash; Lodha, Pragya; Deshpande, Smita N. (2024), Ratan, Simmi K. (ed.), “Gender Dysphoria: Evolution of Terminologies and Psychological Aspects”, Children with Differences in Sex Development, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 757–771, doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1639-5_66, ISBN 978-981-97-1638-8, retrieved 7 February 2025
  12.  Dreger A, Feder EK, Tamar-Mattis A (September 2012). “Prenatal Dexamethasone for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: An Ethics Canary in the Modern Medical Mine”. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 9 (3): 277–294. doi:10.1007/s11673-012-9384-9. PMC 3416978. PMID 22904609.
  13.  Clayton PE, Miller WL, Oberfield SE, Ritzén EM, Sippell WG, Speiser PW (2002). “Consensus statement on 21-hydroxylase deficiency from the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society”. Hormone Research. 58 (4): 188–95. doi:10.1159/000065490. PMID 12324718. S2CID 41346214.
  14.  Erickson-Schroth L (2013). “Update on the Biology of Transgender Identity”. Review. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health. 17 (2): 150–74. doi:10.1080/19359705.2013.753393. S2CID 216136930.
  15.  Altinay, Murat; Anand, Amit (2020). “Neuroimaging gender dysphoria: a novel psychobiological model”. Review. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 14 (4): 1281–1297. doi:10.1007/s11682-019-00121-8. ISSN 1931-7565. PMID 31134582. S2CID 167207854.
  16.  For a survey, see Swaab DF, Castellanos-Cruz L, Bao AM (2016). “The Human Brain and Gender: Sexual Differentiation of Our Brains.”. In Schreiber G (ed.). Transsexuality in Theology and Neuroscience. Findings, Controversies, and Perspectives. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 23–42. ISBN 978-3-11-044080-5.
  17.  Carlson NR (2010). Psychology: The Science of Behavior (7th ed.). Pearson Education. p. 418. ISBN 9780205547869.
  18.  Zhou JN, Hofman MA, Gooren LJ, Swaab DF (November 1995). “A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality”. Nature. 378 (6552): 68–70. Bibcode:1995Natur.378…68Z. doi:10.1038/378068a0. hdl:20.500.11755/9da6a0a1-f622-44f3-ac4f-fec297a7c6c2. PMID 7477289. S2CID 4344570. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
  19.  Fisher, Alessandra D.; Ristori, Jiska; Morelli, Girolamo; Maggi, Mario (15 May 2018). “The molecular mechanisms of sexual orientation and gender identity”. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 467: 3–13. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2017.08.008. PMID 28847741.
  20.  Frigerio, Alberto; Ballerini, Lucia; Valdes-Hernandez, Maria (2021). “Structural, Functional, and Metabolic Brain Differences as a Function of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation: A Systematic Review of the Human Neuroimaging Literature”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50 (8): 3329–3352. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02005-9. hdl:20.500.11820/7258d49f-d222-4094-a40f-dc564d163ea7. PMC 8604863. PMID 33956296. S2CID 233870640.
  21.  Chung WC, De Vries GJ, Swaab DF (February 2002). “Sexual differentiation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in humans may extend into adulthood”. The Journal of Neuroscience. 22 (3): 1027–33. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-03-01027.2002. PMC 6758506. PMID 11826131.
  22.  Beidel, Deborah C.; Beidel, Deborah C. (2014). Adult Psychopathology and Diagnosis (7 ed.). Somerset: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. p. 621. ISBN 9781118657089.
  23.  Gooren L (November 2006). “The biology of human psychosexual differentiation”. Review. Hormones and Behavior. 50 (4): 589–601. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.011. PMID 16870186. S2CID 21060826.
  24.  Swaab DF (December 2004). “Sexual differentiation of the human brain: relevance for gender identity, transsexualism and sexual orientation”. Review. Gynecological Endocrinology. 19 (6): 301–12. doi:10.1080/09513590400018231. PMID 15724806. S2CID 1410435.
  25.  Garcia-Falgueras A, Swaab DF (December 2008). “A sex difference in the hypothalamic uncinate nucleus: relationship to gender identity”. Brain. 131 (Pt 12): 3132–46. doi:10.1093/brain/awn276. PMID 18980961.
  26.  Luders E, Sánchez FJ, Gaser C, Toga AW, Narr KL, Hamilton LS, Vilain E (July 2009). “Regional gray matter variation in male-to-female transsexualism”. NeuroImage. 46 (4): 904–7. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.048. PMC 2754583. PMID 19341803.
  27.  Rametti G, Carrillo B, Gómez-Gil E, Junque C, Segovia S, Gomez Á, Guillamon A (February 2011). “White matter microstructure in female to male transsexuals before cross-sex hormonal treatment. A diffusion tensor imaging study”. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 45 (2): 199–204. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.006. PMID 20562024.
  28.  Bao, Ai-Min; Swaab, Dick (18 February 2011). “Sexual differentiation of the human brain: relation to gender identity, sexual orientation and neuropsychiatric disorders”. Review. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 32 (2): 214–226. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.007. PMID 21334362. S2CID 8735185.
  29.  Taziaux, Melanie; Staphorsius, Annemieke S.; Ghatei, Mohammad A.; Bloom, Stephen R.; Swaab, Dick F.; Bakker, Julie (1 June 2016). “Kisspeptin Expression in the Human Infundibular Nucleus in Relation to Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation”. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 101 (6): 2380–2389. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-4175. hdl:10044/1/37613. PMID 27046106. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
  30.  Taziaux, Melanie; Swaab, Dick F.; Bakker, Julie (1 December 2012). “Sex Differences in the Neurokinin B System in the Human Infundibular Nucleus”. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 97 (12): E2210 – E2220. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-1554. PMID 23019350.
  31.  Smith, Elke Stefanie; Junger, Jessica; Derntl, Birgit; Habel, Ute (1 December 2015). “The transsexual brain – A review of findings on the neural basis of transsexualism”. Review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 59: 251–266. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.008. ISSN 0149-7634. PMID 26429593. S2CID 23913935. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  32.  Nguyen, Hillary B.; Loughead, James; Lipner, Emily; Hantsoo, Liisa; Kornfield, Sara L.; Epperson, C. Neill (January 2019). “What has sex got to do with it? The role of hormones in the transgender brain”. Review. Neuropsychopharmacology. 44 (1): 22–37. doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0140-7. ISSN 1740-634X. PMC 6235900. PMID 30082887.
  33.  Frigerio, Alberto; Ballerini, Lucia; Valdes-Hernandez, Maria (2021). “Structural, Functional, and Metabolic Brain Differences as a Function of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation: A Systematic Review of the Human Neuroimaging Literature”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50 (8): 3329–3352. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02005-9. hdl:20.500.11820/7258d49f-d222-4094-a40f-dc564d163ea7. PMC 8604863. PMID 33956296. S2CID 233870640. Results suggest that, although the majority of neuroanatomical, neurophysiological, and neurometabolic features in transgenders resemble those of their natal sex rather than those of their experienced gender,…in the gender identity investigation, in MtF it was possible to find traits which are “feminine and demasculinized” and in FtM it was possible to find traits which are “masculine and defeminized” (Kreukels & Guillamon, 2016)….Due to conflicting results, it was, however, not possible to identify specific brain features which consistently differ between cisgender and transgender nor between heterosexual and homosexual groups. Very small brain changes, to date undetectable using the current neuroimaging tools, may affect behavior. The small number of studies, the small sample size of each study, the heterogeneity of investigations, the lack of negative results reported by some studies, and the fact that some studies did not report the sexual orientation of the individuals that composed their sample did not allow drawing general conclusions. Moreover, as the samples of the publications involved are not representative of the population analyzed, caution should be taken in the interpretation of the results of this review.
  34.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. 2013. pp. 451–460. ISBN 978-0-89042-554-1.
  35.  Blanchard R (October 1989). “The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria”. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 177 (10): 616–23. doi:10.1097/00005053-198910000-00004. PMID 2794988.
  36.  Freund K, Steiner BW, Chan S (February 1982). “Two types of cross-gender identity”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 11 (1): 49–63. doi:10.1007/BF01541365. PMID 7073469. S2CID 42131695.
  37.  Bailey JM (2003). The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press. p. 170. ISBN 978-0-309-08418-5. OCLC 52779246.
  38.  Blanchard R (August 2005). “Early history of the concept of autogynephilia”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 34 (4): 439–46. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-4343-8. PMID 16010466. S2CID 15986011.
  39.  Smith YL, van Goozen SH, Kuiper AJ, Cohen-Kettenis PT (December 2005). “Transsexual subtypes: clinical and theoretical significance”. Psychiatry Research. 137 (3): 151–60. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2005.01.008. PMID 16298429. S2CID 207445960.
  40.  Lawrence, Anne A. (2012), “Theory and Case Histories”, Men Trapped in Men’s Bodies, Focus on Sexuality Research, New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 19–35, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5182-2_2, ISBN 978-1-4614-5181-5, retrieved 14 January 2025
  41.  Blanchard R (August 1989). “The classification and labeling of nonhomosexual gender dysphorias”. Review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 18 (4): 315–34. doi:10.1007/BF01541951. PMID 2673136. S2CID 43151898.
  42.  Blanchard R (January 1988). “Nonhomosexual gender dysphoria”. Journal of Sex Research. 24 (1): 188–93. doi:10.1080/00224498809551410. PMID 22375647.
  43.  Blanchard R (Winter 1991). “Clinical observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia”. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 17 (4): 235–51. doi:10.1080/00926239108404348. PMID 1815090.
  44.  Veale JF, Clarke DE, Lomax TC (August 2008). “Sexuality of male-to-female transsexuals”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 37 (4): 586–97. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9306-9. PMID 18299976. S2CID 207089236.
  45.  Moser C (2010). “Blanchard’s Autogynephilia Theory: a critique”. Journal of Homosexuality. 57 (6): 790–809. doi:10.1080/00918369.2010.486241. PMID 20582803. S2CID 8765340.
  46.  Nuttbrock L, Bockting W, Mason M, Hwahng S, Rosenblum A, Macri M, Becker J (April 2011). “A further assessment of Blanchard’s typology of homosexual versus non-homosexual or autogynephilic gender dysphoria”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 40 (2): 247–57. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9579-2. PMC 2894986. PMID 20039113.
  47.  Cantor, James M. (2011). “New MRI Studies Support the Blanchard Typology of Male-to-Female Transsexualism”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 40 (5): 863–864. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9805-6. ISSN 0004-0002. PMC 3180619. PMID 21739338.

Further reading

vteTransgender and gender non-conforming topics

vteEvolutionary psychology


Categories: 

Posted in New Essays permalink

About joelsnell99

Who's Who in all U.S and U.K. Honoraries (Marquis) Numerous publications in over 80 venues DANA SPIRIT AWARD/2009 Oxford Roundtable, Editor of FOCUS, a student Social Science Journal Author Snell Life Cycle Lonliness Curve Professor Emeritus - Kirkwood College Omicron Delta Kappa Grants Online Editor for Psychology and Education.com Research Fellow - Arlington Institute Outstanding Teacher at Kirkwood College Membership in numerous editorial boards or a reviewer of manuscripts Associate Editor - Psychology and Education Co-Author of Snell-Green Professor Index Author of Snell Educator Effectiveness Index Contributer to FutureEdition.com Co-Author of Snell-Allen Medical Rank Index Fellow in Kennedy Foundation Co-Author of Snell-Allen Subjective Assessment Sex Role Index Honors >>> Positions and Courses Taught >>> joelsnell@hotmail.com http://www.socialvibes.net Research Council, Advisory Board

Comments are closed.

↑