↓
 
Home→New Essays→KING KONG/ 1933

KING KONG/ 1933

56thst.com Posted on by
Wikipedia
The Free Encyclopedia

King Kong (1933 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

King Kong
Theatrical release poster
Directed byMerian C. CooperErnest B. Schoedsack
Screenplay byJames CreelmanRuth Rose
Story byEdgar WallaceMerian C. Cooper[1]
Produced byMerian C. CooperErnest B. Schoedsack
StarringFay WrayRobert ArmstrongBruce Cabot
CinematographyEddie LindenVernon WalkerJ.O. Taylor
Edited byTed Cheesman
Music byMax Steiner
Distributed byRKO Radio Pictures
Release datesMarch 2, 1933 (New York City)April 7, 1933 (United States)
Running time100 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$672,254.75[2][3]
Box office$10 million[4]

King Kong is a 1933 American pre-Code adventure horror monster film[5] directed and produced by Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack, with special effects by Willis H. O’Brien and music by Max Steiner. Produced and distributed by RKO Radio Pictures, King Kong is the first film in the self-titled franchise, combining live-action sequences with stop-motion animation using rear-screen projection. The idea for the film came when Cooper decided to create a motion picture about a giant gorilla struggling against modern civilization. The film stars Fay Wray, Robert Armstrong, and Bruce Cabot. The story follows said gorilla dubbed Kong who feels affection for a beautiful young woman offered to him as a sacrifice.

King Kong premiered in New York City on March 2, 1933, to many rave reviews, with praise for its stop-motion animation and musical score. During its initial run, the film earned a profit of $650,000, which increased to $2,847,000 by the time of its re-release in 1952. Various scenes were deleted by censors, but they were restored in 1970. Later, in 1991, the film was deemed “culturally, historically and aesthetically significant” by the Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.[6][7] In 2010, the film was ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as the greatest horror film of all time[8] and the fifty-sixth greatest film of all time.[9] Various new editions of the film have also been released. A sequel, entitled Son of Kong, was made the same year as the original film, and several more films have been made, including two remakes in 1976 and 2005.

The film’s novelization, published prior to its release, entered the public domain through a failure to include a copyright notice, making the characters and story public domain; the film’s copyright is set to expire in 2029 in the US.[10] Analysis of the film has included such topics as racial stereotypes, Ann’s relationship with the other characters, and the struggle between nature and civilization.

Plot

In New York Harbor, filmmaker Carl Denham, known for wildlife films in remote exotic locations, is chartering Captain Englehorn’s ship, the Venture, for his new project. However, he is unable to secure an actress for a female role he has been reluctant to disclose. In the streets of New York City, he finds struggling actress Ann Darrow and promises her “the thrill of a lifetime”. The Venture sets off, during which Denham reveals that their destination is an uncharted island with a mountain the shape of a skull. He alludes to a mysterious entity named Kong, rumored to dwell on the island. The crew arrives and anchors offshore. They encounter a native village separated from the rest of the island by an enormous stone wall with a large wooden gate. They witness a group of natives preparing to sacrifice a young woman, termed the “bride of Kong”. The intruders are spotted and the native chief stops the ceremony. When he sees the blonde-haired Ann, he offers to trade six of his tribal women for the “golden woman”. They refuse him and return to the ship.

That night, after the ship’s first mate, Jack Driscoll, admits his love for Ann, the natives kidnap Ann from the ship and take her through the gate and onto an altar. There she is offered to Kong, who is revealed to be a giant gorilla-looking beast. Kong carries a terrified Ann away into the jungle as Denham, Jack, and some crewmen give chase. The men encounter living dinosaurs; they manage to kill a charging Stegosaurus, but are attacked by an aggressive Brontosaurus and eventually Kong himself, leaving Jack and Denham as the only survivors. After Kong slays a Tyrannosaurus to save Ann, Jack keeps following them while Denham returns to the village. Upon arriving in Kong’s mountain lair, Ann is menaced by a serpent-like Elasmosaurus, which Kong also kills. When a Pteranodon tries to fly away with Ann, and is killed by Kong, Jack saves her and they climb down a vine dangling from a cliff ledge. When Kong starts pulling them back up, the two drop into the water below; they flee back to the village, where Denham, Englehorn, and the surviving crewmen await. Kong pursues, breaks open the gate, and relentlessly rampages through the village. Onshore, Denham, determined to bring Kong back alive, renders him unconscious with a gas bomb.

Shackled in chains, Kong is taken to New York City and presented to a Broadway theatre audience as, “King Kong, the Eighth Wonder of the World!” Ann and Jack join him on stage, surrounded by press photographers. The ensuing flash photography causes Kong to break loose as the audience flees in terror. Ann is whisked away to a hotel room on a high floor, but Kong scales the building and reclaims her. He makes his way through the city with Ann in his grasp, wrecks a crowded elevated train, and begins climbing the Empire State Building. Jack suggests that airplanes shoot Kong off the building without hitting Ann. Four biplanes take off; seeing them arrive, Jack becomes agitated for Ann’s safety and rushes inside with Denham. At the top, Kong is shot at by the planes as he swats at them. Kong destroys one, but is wounded by the gunfire. After he gazes at Ann, he is shot more, loses his strength, and plummets to the streets below to his death. Jack reunites with Ann. Denham heads back down and is allowed through a crowd surrounding Kong’s corpse in the street. When a policeman remarks that the planes got him, Denham sadly states, “Oh, no, it wasn’t the airplanes. It was Beauty killed the Beast.”

Cast

Production

Development

Further information: King Kong § Conception and creation

Charles R. Knight‘s Tyrannosaurus in the American Museum of Natural History, on which the large theropod of the film was based[11]

King Kong co-director Ernest B. Schoedsack had earlier experience filming monkeys while directing Chang: A Drama of the Wilderness (1927), also with Merian C. Cooper, and Rango (1931), both of which prominently featured monkeys in authentic jungle settings. Capitalizing on this trend, Congo Pictures released the hoax documentary Ingagi (1930), advertising the film as “an authentic incontestable celluloid document showing the sacrifice of a living woman to mammoth gorillas.” Ingagi is now often recognized as a racial exploitation film as it implicitly depicted black women having sex with gorillas and baby offspring that looked more ape than human.[12] The film was an immediate hit, and by some estimates, it was one of the highest-grossing films of the 1930s at over $4 million. Although Cooper never listed Ingagi among his influences for King Kong, it has long been held that RKO greenlighted Kong because of the bottom-line example of Ingagi and the formula that “gorillas plus sexy women in peril equals enormous profits.”[13]

Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack develop King Kong.

Since 1929, Cooper had wanted to create a film about gorillas.[14] Inspired by the travels of his friend W. Douglas Burden, Cooper considered filming in the jungles of Komodo.[15] He had read Burden’s The Dragon Lizards of Komodo and as a result conceived the idea to film a gorilla fighting giant lizards.[16] Cooper later remarked that this was “the most important influence” on the final film.[17] By the time he joined RKO in 1931, Cooper decided to incorporate a “beauty and the beast” theme into the plot.[18] The “Arabian proverb” at the beginning of the film was created by Cooper: “And lo! The Beast looked upon the face of Beauty, and it stayed its hand from killing. And from that day, it was as one dead.”[19] Initially Cooper planned to film in Africa and Komodo Island, but the idea was abandoned when RKO executives decided it would be too expensive.[20] RKO was at risk for bankruptcy because of the Great Depression.[21] Stop-motion animator Willis O’Brien, hearing that Cooper wanted to make a gorilla film, painted a picture depicting a large gorilla carrying a woman and gave it to Cooper. Afterward Cooper requested a test reel, which was approved by Selznick.[22] O’Brien experimented with different scenes in the test reel.[23] These two scenes, which were incorporated into the final film,[24] portray a fight between King Kong and a Tyrannosaurus Rex as well as Kong shaking men off a log.[25] The test reel was created concurrently with the production of The Most Dangerous Game.[26] Meanwhile, Cooper hired actors and had sets built for King Kong.[27] For live-action sequences in the jungle, Cooper utilized the set of The Most Dangerous Game.[26] Cooper directed the live-action sequences until Schoedsack completed work on The Most Dangerous Game.[28] Afterward Shoedsack directed the live action scenes while Cooper focused on the live action scenes that were to be combined with the already-filmed animated sequences.[29] Marcel Delgado developed sample models of King Kong, the dinosaurs, and the people; the models did not have armatures.[30] After about three months the test reel was complete.[31] After studio executives approved the film for production, Cooper developed the story further.[32] O’Brien’s ideas also helped with story development. He suggested that King Kong be seen by the characters as a sort of deity.[17]

Promotional image featuring Kong battling the Tyrannosaurus, though Cooper emphasized in an interview with film historian Rudy Behlmer that it was an Allosaurus

Filming commenced without a complete screenplay.[33] Cooper hired Edgar Wallace to write the screenplay,[34] which he started in December 1931.[35] Cooper told Wallace what he wanted included in the script.[35] Wallace’s draft included several instances of attempted sexual assault,[36] which were later removed by Ruth Rose.[37] His draft also included racial tensions between characters.[37] While drafting he wrote, “I am hoping still to get a good horror picture without corpses, and I am certain that Kong is going to be a wow.”[38] Wallace had a rough draft ready in January 1932[39] and died a month later.[40] Some of his ideas ended up in the final film, such as Kong removing Ann’s clothes from her body.[24] He also roughly outlined the New York scenes, which were similar to how they appeared in the completed film, as well as a jungle chase scene.[36] James A. Creelman picked up work on the screenplay.[41] In his draft he changed character roles, making Denham Ann’s cruel uncle. Cooper disliked it, remarking that “The heavy is far too heavy.”[37] Creelman adapted Wallace’s jungle chase scene to appear as it does in the finished film.[42] Creelman found it difficult to meet Cooper’s plot requests,[43] feeling that there were too many fantastical elements for the film to be believable.[44] He objected, “[T]here is certainly such a thing as reaching a limit to the number of elements a story can contain and make sense.”[45] Though he incorporated Cooper’s requests, the dialogue proved to be too extensive.[46] Cooper was unsatisfied with Creelman’s work, and in June Creelman decided to quit.[47] After some difficulty finding a replacement for Creelman, in July Cooper hired Ruth Rose,[28] who had never written a screenplay before.[48] She rewrote the majority of Creelman’s dialogue.[49] Though Creelman initially wrote the film’s New York prologue, Rose polished it while writing most of the city scenes.[50] Rose was able to incorporate the love story between Ann and Jack, something the other screenwriters had struggled with.[51] Rose also added more “fairy tale-like” aspects.[37] Upon the film’s release Wallace was credited with the screenplay, as Cooper had promised to give him the credit. The studio also saw it as an opportunity to gain positive publicity because Wallace was a well-established writer.[52]

Copyright concerns

The creators of King Kong took inspiration from other films such as Dracula and Frankenstein. The influence was heavy enough that RKO executives were worried about copyright violation.[53] Executives discussed the potential issue with RKO’s lawyers.[54] Also among their concerns were the film’s connections to Ingagi, Murders in the Rue Morgue, Journey to the Center of the Earth, and The Lost World. The other works being ruled out, Arthur Conan Doyle‘s The Lost World posed the most concern.[55] Both The Lost World and King Kong concerned primitive creatures being taken to modern society.[56] Even though Cooper argued against the similarities,[56] the studio purchased the novel’s copyright.[57] Afterward Cooper feared that if the studio were to connect Doyle’s name to the film for promotional purposes, consumers might not think the film was fresh. Eventually the Doyle estate granted the studio permission to not associate the film with Doyle’s name.[58]

Special effects

Colored publicity shot combining live actors with stop motion animation

King Kong is groundbreaking in the use of special effects, such as stop-motion animation, matte painting, rear projection, and miniatures.[59] The prehistoric creatures inhabiting Skull Island were brought to life through the use of stop-motion animation by Willis H. O’Brien and his assistant animators, E. B. “Buzz” Gibson, Carroll Shepphird, Marcel Delgado, Orville Goldner, and Fred Reefe.[60][61] The stop-motion animation scenes were painstaking and difficult to achieve and complete. The special effects crew could not leave the studio during the day because the lighting would not be consistent.[62] The jungle scenery was created by layering glass paintings, which were created by Mario Larrinaga and Byron L. Crabbe.[63] They were used when Denham’s crew first arrives. The scene was composited with separate bird elements and rear-projected behind the ship and actors.[64]

The most difficult task for the special effects crew to achieve was to make live-action footage interact with separately filmed stop-motion animation, making the interaction between the humans and the creatures seem believable. The most simple of these effects were accomplished by exposing part of the frame, then running the same piece of the film through the camera again by exposing the other part of the frame with a different image. This process is called a matte.[65] The most complex shots, where the live-action actors interacted with the stop-motion animation, were achieved via two different techniques, the Dunning process and the Williams process, to produce the effect of a traveling matte.[66][67]

Brontosaurus stop motion armature

Another technique that was used in combining live actors and stop-motion animation was rear-screen projection.[68] The actor would have a translucent screen behind him where a projector would project footage onto the back of the translucent screen.[64] This was the first film for which RKO used the method.[69] It was used in the scene where Kong and the Tyrannosaurus fight while Ann watches from the branches of a nearby tree. The stop-motion animation was filmed first. Afterward Fay Wray spent a 22-hour period sitting in a fake tree acting out her observation of the battle, which was projected onto the translucent screen while the camera filmed her witnessing the projected stop-motion battle.[70] She was sore for days after the shoot. The same process was also used for the scene where sailors from the Venture kill a Stegosaurus.[71] O’Brien and his special effects crew also devised a way to use rear projection in miniature sets.[72] A tiny screen was built into the miniature onto which live-action footage would then be projected.[64] A fan was used to prevent the footage that was projected from melting or catching fire. This miniature rear projection was used in the scene where Kong tries to grab Driscoll, who is hiding in a cave. For the scene in which Kong places Ann in a tree, Wray acted out her sequences as Kong’s sequences were projected in the rear.[73] She was unable to clearly see the projected images and had to act based on the blurs she saw.[29] Animation for the film was completed after 55 weeks.[74]

Producer Merian C. Cooper eyes the huge life-size King Kong mechanical model used in certain close-up scenes, circa 1933

Cooper, wishing to create a point of authenticity, insisted that Kong not be played by an actor in a gorilla suit.[56] Over the years, some media reports have alleged that in certain scenes Kong was played by an actor wearing a gorilla suit.[75][76] However, film historians have generally agreed that all scenes involving Kong were achieved with animated models.[77][78] These models were about 14 to 18 inches (36 to 46 cm) in height.[79][80] They were made of metal armatures padded with cotton, latex, and rabbit fur.[81] The fur moved as the animators handled the models, becoming an unintentional feature of Kong. The models required maintenance after each day of filming.[82] Closeups of Kong’s face and upper body were accomplished by filming a full-size mechanical model of Kong’s head and shoulders, designed by Delgado.[83] The model, scaled to the dimensions of a fifty-foot creature, was covered with forty bearskins.[84] Six operators were required[84] to manipulate the eyes and mouth to simulate a living monster.[65] A proportionally large arm and paw were also created for closeup shots of Kong holding Ann.[80] Dinosaur models were reused from O’Brien’s aborted film project Creation.[41] Production was completed in January 1933.[35] Production costs added up to $672,254.75, part of which included costs for Creation.[85]

Sound effects and score

Murray Spivack developed the sound effects for the film. Kong’s roar was created by mixing the recorded vocals of lions and tigers and slowly playing them backward.[86] Spivak himself provided Kong’s “love grunts” by grunting into a megaphone and playing it at a slow speed. For Kong’s footsteps, Spivak stomped across a gravel-filled box with plungers attached to his feet and wrapped in foam.[87] The sounds of Kong’s chest beats are recordings of Spivak hitting his assistant, who had a microphone held to his back, on the chest with a drumstick.[88] Spivak created the hisses and croaks of the dinosaurs with an air compressor for the former and his own vocals for the latter.[89] The vocalizations of the Tyrannosaurus were additionally mixed in with puma growls.[89] Spivak also provided the screams of the various sailors.[89] Fay Wray herself provided all of her character’s screams in a single recording session.[90][91] Wray explained that afterward she “couldn’t speak even in a whisper for days”.[49] Her screams have been used in other movies such as Son of Kong and Game of Death.[3]

Even though funding for the film was nearly gone, Cooper and Schoedsack decided it needed an original score because they worried that Kong might be too unbelievable as a character and also did not want to use a generic soundtrack.[92] They hired Max Steiner for the job.[93] Steiner began composing the score on December 9, 1932, and completed it after eight weeks.[94] The orchestra comprised 46 members, but upon recording sounded so full it is sometimes described as having 80 members.[95] A 46-member orchestra was large compared to many other film orchestras of the time.[96] According to Steiner, Cooper paid him $50,000 of his own money to pay for the orchestra.[97]

Steiner decided to make the music, in his own words, “impressionistic and terrifying”.[93] During composition he took inspiration from Debussy and Ravel, specifically for the music that was to play during the ocean scene when Denham and his crew travel to Skull Island.[98] During this scene “Boat in the Fog” begins to play; the harp reflects the waves and the stringed instruments reflect of the fog.[99] Steiner also incorporated dissonance into the score for action scenes, such as when Kong falls to his death.[100] Laurence MacDonald explains that this dissonance is also reflective of Debussy’s compositions.[101] The ocean scene is the first instance in which music begins to play. This is because Steiner wanted an association between music and the film’s fantasy elements.[102] Music historian Michael Slowik suggests that such an association invokes a sense of the unfamiliar,[103] also pointing out that music is connected to the audience’s need to suspend belief.[104] Music does not play during Kong’s fight with the T-rex and is replaced by animal sounds, making it the only Skull Island scene without music.[105][106] Music plays in the later New York City scenes except for when the airplanes surround Kong.[107] One of the techniques that Steiner often wrote into the score is called mickey-mousing. MacDonald dubs it “perhaps the single most noteworthy aspect of Steiner’s score”.[108] According to Slowik, the score includes more mickey-mousing than other film scores of its period.[108] He remarks that its “obsessive mickey-mousing”[109] is reminiscent of the music that would play for a cartoon rather than for a Hollywood production.[110] In one scene the chief of the island people walks toward Denham’s group and the music aligns with his steps.[108] The score also reflects actions happening off-screen, such as when Kong walks toward the altar where Ann is to be offered to him. Formerly, this technique had been used for silent films.[110]

Slowik identifies three musical themes throughout the score: Kong’s theme, Ann’s theme, and the jungle theme.[111] Steiner took inspiration from Wagner in creating Kong’s theme.[112] Steiner used a method called chromaticism in Kong’s theme, which comprises three descending notes.[113] According to Peter Franklin, the other themes stem from the three-note sequence in Kong’s theme.[111] “King Kong March”, a Broadway-style score played during Denham’s show, is an adaptation of Kong’s theme, though the notes ascend rather than descend.[114] Ann’s theme (“Stolen Love”) is a Viennese waltz and begins with notes similar to those in Kong’s theme.[115] Steiner eventually combined both themes in one melody just before Kong dies.[116] Musician biographer Steven C. Smith identifies what he calls the “danger theme”. It is written with four notes and is meant to sound “questioning”. It first appears in “The Forgotten Island”.[115] Later, it is reworked into a major key when Driscoll confesses his love for Ann. Smith suggests that this points to what he calls “the perils of romance”.[115] Later in life Cooper expressed that “much of the reason for [King Kong‘s success] is because Maxie Steiner was able to create what no other man that I knew of in Hollywood at that time could”.[117] Steiner himself remarked that the film “was made for music”.[93]

Upon the film’s release its score received little critical review, being overshadowed by the film’s innovations in special effects.[118] However, it received more attention as the movie became more famous in the years that followed.[117] Christopher Palmer wrote that the score “marked the real beginnings of Hollywood music”.[119] Mervyn Cooke adds that it “almost single-handedly marked the coming-of-age of nondiegetic film music”.[119] In his book After the Silents: Hollywood Film Music in the Early Sound Era, 1926–1934, Slowik argues that King Kong‘s score did not influence Hollywood film scores that many music scholars think it did. He suggests that, because the movie was unusual, the score was unable to introduce an alternate way to write film scores.[120] He also suggests that Steiner drew upon already-established patterns of Hollywood music.[121] He writes that rather than single-handedly shaping the Golden Age of Hollywood music, King Kong is just one film among others that helped shape it.[122] Slowik explains that the score features both “original and symphonic music”, something that was not common in film scores of the time.[123] Portions of the score were reused in Double Harness, The Last Days of Pompeii, and The Last of the Mohicans, among others.[124] The island music appears as an orchestra scene in Jackson’s 2005 remake.[125] Over the years, Steiner’s score was recorded by multiple record labels and the original motion picture soundtrack has been issued on a compact disc.[126]

Release and censorship

Initial release and box office

Grauman’s Chinese Theatre, where King Kong held its Hollywood premiere.

King Kong’s campaign included newspaper ads, radio ads, and posters.[127] It premiered in the Radio City Music Hall and RKO Roxy in New York City on March 2, 1933.[74][128] U. S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared the four-day nationwide bank holiday three days after the film’s premiere in New York City.[129][130] The film was a box-office success and during the opening weekend earned an estimated $90,000.[1] Receipts fell by up to 50% during the second week of the film’s release because of the national bank holiday.[131] Attendance of the film dropped within the second and third weeks of its New York release.[132] During the film’s first run it made a profit of $650,000.[133] Before the 1952 re-release, the film is reported to have worldwide rentals of $2,847,000 including $1,070,000 from the United States and Canada and profits of $1,310,000.[2] The Hollywood premiere was held on March 24, 1933, in Grauman’s Chinese Theatre.[134] The screening was preceded by a performance featuring dances of Indigenous people and trapeze performances[135] and RKO had decorated the theater’s lobby so that it looked like a jungle.[136] It was not officially released until April 7, 1933.[3] It was re-released in 1952 following the promising re-release of Snow White.[137] After the 1952 re-release, Variety estimated the film had earned an additional $1.6 million in the United States and Canada, bringing its total to $3.9 million in cumulative rentals in the United States.[138] Profits from the re-release were estimated by the studio to be at about $2.5 million,[3] which was about double of what the film earned in 1933.[139]

Theatrical advertisement from 1933

Censorship and restorations

The Production Code‘s stricter rules were put into effect in Hollywood after the film’s 1933 premiere and it was progressively censored further, with several scenes being either trimmed or excised altogether for the 1938–1956 rereleases.[140][141] Censors removed the scene of the Brontosaurus mauling crewmen in the water, chasing one up a tree and killing him.[142] They also removed the scenes where Kong undresses Ann Darrow,[1][142] bites and steps on people.[1] The scene where Kong mistakes a sleeping woman for Ann and drops her to her death after realizing his mistake was also removed.[1][142] An additional scene portraying giant insects, spiders, a reptile-like predator and a tentacled creature devouring the crew members shaken off the log by Kong onto the floor of the canyon below was deemed too gruesome by RKO even by pre-Code standards. Cooper thought it “stopped the story”, and thus the scene was censored by the studio before the original release.[74] Members of the preview audience also left the film early because they were concerned about the scene.[143] The footage is considered lost, except for only a few stills and pre-production drawings.[90][144] There are also claims that it was never filmed and was only in the script and novelization.[145]

The film was initially banned in Nazi Germany, with the censors describing it as an “attack against the nerves of the German people” and a “violation of German race feeling”.[146] Shortly following its release the film was also banned in Finland for violence; the ban was released in 1939.[147]Duration: 1 minute and 32 seconds.1:32Trailer for the 1938 re-release of King Kong (1:32).

RKO did not preserve copies of the film’s negative or release prints with the excised footage, and the cut scenes were considered lost for many years. In 1969, a 16mm print, including the censored footage, was found in Philadelphia. The cut scenes were added to the film, restoring it to its original theatrical running time of 100 minutes. This version was re-released to art houses by Janus Films in 1970.[90] Over the next two decades, Universal Studios undertook further photochemical restoration of King Kong. This was based on a 1942 release print with missing censor cuts taken from a 1937 print, which “contained heavy vertical scratches from projection.”[148] An original release print located in the UK in the 1980s was found to contain the cut scenes in better quality.[140] After a 6-year worldwide search for the best surviving materials, a further, fully digital restoration utilizing 4K resolution scanning was completed by Warner Bros. in 2005. This restoration also had a 4-minute overture added, bringing the overall running time to 104 minutes.[149] The project was funded by The Film Foundation and the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.[141] Somewhat controversially, King Kong was colorized for a 1989 Turner Home Entertainment video release.[150][3]

Television and home media

After the 1956 re-release, the film was sold to television and was first broadcast on March 5, 1956.[151] King Kong had numerous VHS and LaserDisc releases of varying quality before receiving an official studio release on DVD. In 1984, King Kong was one of the first films to be released on LaserDisc as part of the Criterion Collection, and was the first movie to have an audio commentary track included.[152] Criterion’s audio commentary was by film historian Ron Haver.[153] The Haver commentary was available on the FilmStruck streaming service.[154] Image Entertainment released another LaserDisc around 1993.[155] The VHS release from Turner was a 60th-anniversary edition in 1992 featuring a front cover that had the sound effect of Kong roaring when his chest was pressed. It had orders for over 140,000 copies, with the colorized version being preferred. It also included a 25-minute documentary, It Was Beauty Killed the Beast (1992).[156]

In 2005, Warner Bros. released its digital restoration of King Kong in a US 2-disc Special Edition DVD, coinciding with the theatrical release of Peter Jackson‘s remake.[3] The restoration was funded partially by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.[157] The DVD release had numerous extra features, including a new, third audio commentary by visual effects artists Ray Harryhausen and Ken Ralston, with archival excerpts from actress Fay Wray and producer/director Merian C. Cooper. At American Cinematographer, Kenneth Sweeney found the extras on disc 1 lackluster for such an important release. Disc 2 included more in-depth features, with a short biographical film on Cooper, and “RKO Production 601: The Making of King Kong“, produced by Peter Jackson. Disc 2 included additional interviews with many relevant people. The DVD was also sold in a limited edition with Son of Kong and Mighty Joe Young[158] Warners issued a US digibook-packaged Blu-ray in 2010, presented in a aspect ratio of 1.37:1, and with a 1080p master upgrade over the 2005 two-disc DVD release. Rudy Behlmer wrote the accompanying 32-page booklet.[159]

Reception

Contemporary

Front cover of King Kong’s Los Angeles premiere program included in the 1933 edition of Hollywood Reporter.

King Kong received generally positive reviews upon its release. Meehan of Motion Picture Herald predicted it would be “one of the sensational pictures of the year”, opining that “no more thrilling climax ever was filmed”.[160] A reviewer for The Hollywood Reporter claimed the film “bears all the earmarks of a winner”, predicting it would make “plenty of money”.[161] Another review in the same periodical declared it was “superbly produced-acted”, a “great piece of imagination, hatched in the brain of a showman for showmen”.[162] A Motion Picture Herald review by McCarthy called King Kong “imagination-stunning” and praised the “buildup of suspense”, dubbing it “a showman’s picture”.[163] The Chicago Tribune called it “one of the most original, thrilling and mammoth novelties to emerge from a movie studio.”[164] The New York Times gave readers an enthusiastic account of the plot and thought the film a fascinating adventure.[165] The New York World-Telegram said it was “one of the very best of all the screen thrillers, done with all the cinema’s slickest camera tricks.”[166]

The Film Daily wrote, “The picture has plenty of shocker stuff, and the terror is heightened by [Fay Wray’s screaming], while the film’s musical score adds its blare to keep the audience in a state of turmoil.” The reviewer cautioned that “some women and children” might dislike the film’s intensity.[167] John Mosher of The New Yorker called it “ridiculous,” but wrote that there were “many scenes in this picture that are certainly diverting.”[168] Joe Bigelow of Variety thought the film held “power” once a viewer got used to the “phoney atmosphere”. He remarked that “a few details were too strong to swallow the picture” and the technical innovations overshadowed the plot and acting. The film’s “many flaws”, he added, were “overcome by the general results”.[169] Newsweek wrote that Cooper and Schoedsack were no longer “scientists” because the film was “exaggerated in its faked views of wild life”.[170]

The Hollywood Reporter included a multi-page booklet in its March issue, featuring production stills and concept sketches alongside critical praise for the film.[171] The booklet was the program for the film’s Los Angeles premiere.[51]

Recent

Ed Symkus of USA Today claims the film “stands tall as a groundbreaking piece of jaw-dropping, eye-widening entertainment”.[172] The Washington City Paper called it “a movie upon whose foundation we’ve built a sizable section of contemporary pop culture”.[173] Film historian Michael Price calls the film “the product of a remarkable group of daredevils, artists, and craftsmen.”[85] Brian Eggert claims that “King Kong’s greatness remains in part because it demonstrates a compendium of Classic Hollywood production strategies.” He additionally praises the music as “guid[ing] every emotion”.[174] Almar Haflidason of BBC praises the “fantastic atmosphere” of the score and the “richness of Kong’s character.” Haflidason adds that the animation is “technically brilliant [and] highly imaginative in terms of cinematic action”.[175] Roger Ebert included King Kong in his “Great Movies” list, writing that “in the very artificiality of some of the special effects, there is a creepiness that isn’t there in today’s slick, flawless, computer-aided images… Even allowing for its slow start, wooden acting, and wall-to-wall screaming, there is something ageless and primeval about King Kong that still somehow works.”[176]

James Berardinelli writes that “advances in technology and acting have dated aspects of the production”. He also adds that the acting is weak and that he feels “some sense of awe” in consideration of the special effects.[177] The Guardian pointed out Kong’s perceptible size changes, and remarked that compared to today’s filmmaking techniques, King Kong “has ceased to be the thriller…and has become of the best comedies seen for years”.[178] In its review Time wrote that Kong “sometimes doubled in size”.[179] TIFF wrote that it is “reductive in its portrayal of humans, especially the Indigenous people”.[180]

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 97% based on 116 reviews, with an average rating of 9/10. The site’s critical consensus reads, “King Kong explores the soul of a monster – making audiences scream and cry throughout the film – in large part due to Kong’s breakthrough special effects.”[181] On Metacritic the film currently has a rare weighted average score of 92 out of 100, based on 12 critics, indicating “universal acclaim”.[182]

Analysis

Racial stereotypes

King Kong has undergone extensive analysis of its portrayal of race. NPR producer Robert Malesky remarks that, “To many, the eroticism and racism of the original film are just side themes and part of the fabric of 1930s America.”[183] Author Ryan Britt feels that critics were willing to overlook the film’s problematic aspects as “just unattractive byproducts of the era in which the film was made”. He adds, “the meta-fictional aspects almost excuse some of the cultural insensitivity”.[184] In the 19th and early 20th century, people of African descent were commonly represented visually as ape-like, a metaphor that fit racist stereotypes further bolstered by the emergence of scientific racism.[185] Early films frequently mirrored racial tensions. While King Kong is often compared to the story of Beauty and the Beast, many film scholars have argued that the film was a cautionary tale about interracial romance, in which the film’s “carrier of blackness is not a human being, but an ape.”[186][187] Jordan Zakarin of Inverse quotes author John Michlig, who explains that even though many modern viewers see the film as racist, it exhibits 1930s perceptions of obscure locations and peoples.[188]

The film has been criticized for racial stereotyping of the native people and Charlie the cook, the latter of whom exclaims, “Crazy black man been here!” when he discovers Ann has been kidnapped.[189] Filmmaker Fatimah Rony argues that Charlie is feminized in his occupation and gesticulations.[190] She also views the native people’s “savagery” as being associated with their dark skin.[191] In 2013 Atlanta Black Star described the people native to the island “as subhuman, or primate…[without] a distinct way of communicating”.[192] Rony points out that African Americans and a Yaqui man were cast to portray Indonesian people.[191] In her view, racial undertones are present when Ann is preferred for the sacrifice rather than the girl who is native to Skull Island.[191] Wayne State University film professor Cynthia Erb remarks that “Ann’s prized whiteness” is “the most disturbing racial” component, rather than “Kong’s blackness”.[193] Erb explains that in jungle films “the depiction of natives was often patronizing, stereotypical, racist.” She adds, “I think it does happen with the Skull Islanders.”[194]

Critics have also seen Kong himself as a perpetuation of racial tensions. Atlanta Black Star perceived a racial allegory between Kong and black men, remarking that Kong “meets his demise due to his insatiable desire for a white woman”.[192] Erb argues that the portrayal of Kong is one of a “noble savage” and a fighter rather than a “sexual aggressor”.[195] In her analysis Rony relates Kong to the “noble savage” because he fights off the dinosaurs due to his affection for Ann.[196] She remarks that Kong is “not exclusively black”, as he is connected to Asia due to his Eastern-inspired name as well as the Indonesian location of Skull Island.[197] She calls it “one of the most outrageous ‘racial films’ ever made”,[198] opining that it is one among several films of the time that portrays a person with African, Asian, or Pacific Islander ancestry “as an ape-monster”.[199] According to Rony, Cooper decided to make Ann blonde to emphasize the difference between her and Kong,[200] and as a white woman she was established as “a kind of lure for the monster-like beast”.[201] Her fair complexion contrasts with his dark complexion, which film analyst Rhona Berenstein argues is implicitly associated with his “monstrosity”.[202]

Concerns surrounding biracial interactions in the film have also arisen. Rony claims the film “ultimately celebrates cinema’s tendency to create monsters which mirror the anxieties of any given age”.[203] According to Rony, Kong symbolizes biracial sexual relationships, which were looked down upon at the time of the film’s release.[204] Berenstein sees Kong and Ann’s relationship as “a vehicle for racial crossing”, arguing that the film both “confirms” and “destablizes” the idea of “white supremacy“.[205] She explains that Ann serves as a warning against and as a summons for “the monstrous possibility of miscegenation“.[202] Writer James A. Snead and German Studies professor Dagmar Lorenz compare Denham to a colonialist and link Kong’s capture to the slave trade.[206][207] Erb takes the idea of Denham as colonialist to argue that, following the prologue, the film appears to “challenge” colonialism.[208] Zakarin claims that elements that may be seen as disturbing stemmed from what Cooper believed would make the film adventurous.[188]

Ann’s relationships

Kong puts Ann (Fay Wray) in a tree for safety (and to prevent her escape) before he battles a Tyrannosaurus

The film has been called sexist in its portrayal of women. J. P. Telotte claims that the film “sets up a pattern of repression” in the largely male ship crew as well as with Denham’s and Jack’s “antiromantic remarks”.[209] According to author Joseph Andriano, the film attempts to reduce the idea of sexism by creating a relationship between King Kong and Ann. He adds that this attempt does not work because Ann is portrayed as helpless. Because Kong’s eventual downfall results from “feminine charm”, Andriano suggests that the film implies a “helpless female” is more powerful than an able male.[210] According to Rhona Berenstein, screaming women are “central to [the] jungle-horror” genre.[211] Denham coaches Ann’s screaming when there is nothing to scream at. Berenstein remarks that this coached screaming may bleed into her reaction to Kong, rendering it a performance.[212] She furthers the argument by stating that the practiced screaming indicates that Ann’s and Kong’s relationship “is not simply that between a victim and a monster”,[212] adding that Ann’s victimization via Kong comes only after she seeks independence.[213]

Berenstein parallels Ann’s sacrifice to Kong with Denham’s Kong exhibit in New York City, suggesting that this makes Ann and Kong “both doubles and adversaries”.[214] She views the film as creating a relatability between “people of color, a white woman, and a simian monster”.[215] Mark Rubinstein parallels Kong’s New York rampage to his efforts to protect Ann on Skull Island, remarking that Kong both protects Ann and acts as if she belongs to him.[216] Rubinstein argues that the proverb appearing at the film’s beginning warns about love, specifically that if a man is romantically attracted to a woman he will experience a “downfall”.[217] He argues that Ann does not return Kong’s affection.[217] Wray herself claimed that Ann had no romantic feelings for Kong but instead feared him.[218]

It has also been suggested that Ann is under Denham’s control. Erb remarks that while Kong seeks a romantic relationship with Ann, Denham seeks to earn money because of her.[193] She explains that Denham appears “control-oriented” to modern viewers, whereas to 1930s viewers he would have appeared “more as the enterprising showman”.[219] According to Rony and Berenstein, Ann is controlled by Denham,[220] who uses her “as an object of trade and of spectacle”, subjecting her to the male gaze while practicing her screams under Denham’s direction.[221] Snead remarks that in the film women become “a sort of visual capital” rather than “people or potential partners”.[222]

Nature and civilization

While Cooper and Schoedsack insisted in contemporary interviews that there was no hidden meaning to King Kong, a posthumously published interview with Cooper revealed that his inspiration for the film was rooted in the image of a giant ape falling from the tallest building, which would represent how primitive people are doomed by modern civilization.[223][224] This idea has been taken up in scholarly analysis of the film. In her analysis Erb focuses on the struggle between primitivism and civilization.[225] In her view, Kong invokes a sense of primitivism and symbolizes nature, while Denham symbolizes modern society.[226] The film, she argues, demonstrates “nature’s revenge on culture” and nature’s eventual defeat.[227] While Erb explains that she does not disagree with views of the film involving sexism and racism, she argues that Kong’s interactions with Ann reach beyond race and sex.[228] She argues that when Kong partially undresses Ann, it “initiate[s] her into the realm of the wild”.[229] Touching her and smelling her clothes are primitivist actions, Erb suggests, because it focuses on senses other than sight. Heavy reliance on sight is associated with modern society.[229] Erb explains that Kong’s alternation of aggressiveness and gentleness “arguably embodies both the demonic and Edenic impulses of the jungle tradition” common in 1930s film.[225] According to Erb, through contrast Skull Island is set up as a counterpart to New York City.[230]

Telotte takes a similar approach, pointing out that many of the island scenes reflect the events of the city scenes.[231] According to Telotte, Kong is taken from an “Edenic world” to be exploited in the modern world.[232] Kong’s New York City rampage is an “effort to tear down the base of modern culture itself”.[233] Dagmar Lorenz argues that the film establishes “Western civilization as the source of Kong’s destruction”[207] and explains that portraying Skull Island’s “wildness” seems to convey an idea of “barbarity”.[234] Tom Shales of The Washington Post takes a different approach, suggesting that the film is “an allegory about modern man, sort of, facing his own nature”, rather than about beauty killing the beast.[194]

Social impact during the Great Depression

The weekend after Kong‘s release, newly-elected President Franklin Roosevelt ordered a bank holiday to halt the panic in the financial sector. Innovation historian Jason Voiovich calls the film “The First Popcorn Movie,” making the case that King Kong helped nervous people process the extreme economic stress. The movie served its purpose as an escape on one level, but on another, the monster represented the fear of the Great Depression and that people could conquer it in the end.[235]

Legacy and franchise

Legacy

See also: Wasei Kingu Kongu and The King Kong That Appeared in Edo

Since its release the film has received some significant honors. In 1975, Kong was named one of the 50 best American films by the American Film Institute.[236] Around this time it also gained academic attention.[237] In 1981 a video game titled Donkey Kong, starring a character with similarities to Kong, was released. In 1991, the film was deemed “culturally, historically and aesthetically significant” by the Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry.[238][239] In 1998, the AFI ranked the film #43 on its list of the 100 greatest movies of all time.[90][240]

The film’s stop motion effects by Willis H. O’Brien left a lasting impact on the film industry worldwide and inspired other genre films such as Mighty Joe Young,[241] The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms,[242] Creature from the Black Lagoon,[243] Mothra,[244] and Jurassic Park.[245][246] The film was also one of the biggest inspirations for Godzilla, with Tomoyuki Tanaka stating, “I felt like doing something big. That was my motivation. I thought of different ideas. I like monster movies, and I was influenced by King Kong.”[247]

Daiei Film, the company which later produced Gamera, Daimajin and other tokusatsu films, distributed the 1952 re-release of King Kong in Japan, making it the first post-war release of monster movies in the country. The company also distributed The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms in Japan in 1954, and these distributions presumably influenced productions of both Godzilla and Gamera franchises.[248]

Author Daniel Loxton suggested that King Kong inspired the modern day legend of the Loch Ness Monster.[249][250]

In 2025, The Hollywood Reporter listed King Kong as having the best stunts of 1932 to 1933.[251]

American Film Institute Lists

Sequel and franchise

Main article: King Kong (franchise)

Delos W. Lovelace was hired by Cooper to compose a novel version of King Kong. Lovelace appeared as the author alongside the credit “conceived by Edgar Wallace and Merian C. Cooper”.[58] Walter Ripperger wrote a two-part serial version for Mystery, which was credited as “the last creation of Edgar Wallace”.[58]

The film and characters inspired imitations and installments. The same year of King Kong‘s release, Son of Kong, a sequel, was fast-tracked and released.[74] In the 1960s, RKO licensed the King Kong character to Japanese studio Toho, which made two films, King Kong vs. Godzilla,[252] the third film in Toho’s long-running Godzilla series, and King Kong Escapes.[253] Both were directed by Ishirō Honda. These films are mostly unrelated to the original and follow a very different style.[254] In 1976 producer Dino De Laurentiis released a modern remake of King Kong.[253] It follows the same basic plot, but the setting is moved to the present day and several other details are different.[254] This remake was followed by a 1986 sequel King Kong Lives.[252] In 1998, a loosely-adapted direct-to-video animated version, The Mighty Kong, was distributed by Warner Bros.[255] In 2005, Universal Pictures released another remake of King Kong, co-written and directed by Peter Jackson,[252] which is set in the 1930s, as in the original film.[254] Legendary Pictures and Warner Bros. made Kong: Skull Island (2017),[252] which serves as part of a cinematic universe, MonsterVerse,[254] followed by the sequels Godzilla vs. Kong (2021) and Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire (2024).[254]

The search for censored scenes inspired a play called “Censored Scenes from King Kong,” performed in 1980. A reviewer in The Hollywood Reporter called it the “worst offering” in a bad season.[256]

See also

References

  1. “AFI|Catalog – King Kong (1933)”. catalog.afi.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  2. Jewell 1994, p. 39.
  3. “King Kong (1933) – Notes – TCM.com”. December 16, 2019. Archived from the original on January 22, 2025. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
  4. “King Kong Franchise Box Office History”. The Numbers. Retrieved February 27, 2025.
  5. Sprague, Mike (April 7, 2021). “Horror History: King Kong (1933) Is Now 88 Years Old”. Dread Central. Archived from the original on September 9, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
  6. Daniel Eagan, (2010). America’s Film Legacy: The Authoritative Guide to the Landmark Movies in the National Film Registry. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, New York, NY p. 22
  7. Kehr, Dave (September 26, 1991). “U.S. Film Registry Adds 25 Significant Movies”. Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  8. “Best Horror Movies – King Kong (1933)”. Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on April 1, 2010. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
  9. “Top 100 Movies of All Time – Rotten Tomatoes”. Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved October 14, 2016.
  10. “King Kong’s Complicated Rights Issues Explained”. August 17, 2023.
  11. Orville Goldner, George E Turner (1975). Making of King Kong: The Story Behind a Film Classic. ISBN 0498015106. See also Spawn of Skull Island (2002). ISBN 1887664459
  12. Gerald Peary, ‘Missing Links: The Jungle Origins of King Kong’ (1976)[link removed] Gerald Peary: Film Reviews, Interviews, Essays, and Sundry Miscellany, 2004.
  13. Erish, Andrew (January 8, 2006). “Illegitimate Dad of King Kong”. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
  14. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 186.
  15. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 189–190, 193.
  16. Andriano 1999, p. 48; Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 194; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 69; Von Gunden 1989, p. 108
  17. Andriano 1999, p. 48.
  18. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 202; Rovin 1977, p. 33
  19. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 202; Von Gunden 1989, p. 111
  20. Rovin 1977, p. 27.
  21. Smith 2020, p. 99.
  22. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 207; Dyson 1997, p. 30; Von Gunden 1989, p. 109
  23. Rovin 1977, p. 31.
  24. Erb 2009, p. 29.
  25. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 217.
  26. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 214.
  27. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 208.
  28. Erb 2009, p. 31.
  29. Erb 2009, p. 30.
  30. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 71.
  31. Rovin 1977, p. 33; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73
  32. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 71; Dyson 1997, p. 30; Von Gunden 1989, p. 109
  33. Dyson 1997, p. 31; Erb 2009, p. 24
  34. Archer 1993, p. 14; Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 217
  35. Erb 2009, p. 28.
  36. Erb 2009, pp. 35–36.
  37. Erb 2009, p. 40.
  38. Erb 2009, p. 47.
  39. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 218.
  40. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 220; Archer 1993, p. 14
  41. Archer 1993, p. 14.
  42. Erb 2009, p. 35.
  43. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222.
  44. Erb 2009, p. 42.
  45. Erb 2009, p. 43.
  46. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222; Rovin 1977, p. 33
  47. Erb 2009, pp. 29, 31.
  48. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222; Andriano 1999, p. 52
  49. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 223.
  50. Erb 2009, pp. 31, 36.
  51. Erb 2009, p. 32.
  52. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 220; Erb 2009, pp. 38–39
  53. Erb 2009, p. 34.
  54. Erb 2009, pp. 36–37.
  55. Erb 2009, p. 37.
  56. “Vaz, Mark Cotta”. Fresh Air Archive: Interviews with Terry Gross. September 14, 2005. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
  57. Erb 2009, p. 38.
  58. Erb 2009, p. 39.
  59. Wasko, Janet. (2003). How Hollywood Works. California: Sage Publications Ltd. p. 53.
  60. Bordwell, David, Thompson, Kristin, Smith, Jeff. (2017). Film Art: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 388.
  61. Archer 1993, pp. 176, 197.
  62. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, pp. 74–75.
  63. Rovin 1977, pp. 31, 41.
  64. Harryhausen 1985, p. 173.
  65. Harryhausen 1985, p. 172.
  66. Corrigan, Timothy, White, Patricia. (2015). The Film Experience. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s. pp. 120–121.
  67. Von Gunden 1989, p. 115.
  68. Dyson 1997, p. 30.
  69. Rovin 1977, p. 33.
  70. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 216.
  71. “King Kong | Giant Ape, Stop-Motion Animation, Adventure | Britannica”. www.britannica.com. November 22, 2024. Retrieved December 27, 2024.
  72. Rovin 1977, p. 41.
  73. Harryhausen 1985, p. 171.
  74. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 84.
  75. “Charlie Gemora, 58, had King Kong role”. The New York Times. August 20, 1961. Archived from the original on March 18, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2017.(subscription required)
  76. Greene, Bob (November 27, 1990). “Saying so long to Mr. Kong”. Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on December 21, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
  77. Glut, Donald F. (2001). Jurassic Classics: A Collection of Saurian Essays and Mesozoic Musings. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. p. 192. ISBN 9780786462469. Over the years, various actors have claimed to have played Kong in this [Empire State Building] scene, including a virtually unknown performer named Carmen Nigro (AKA Ken Roady), and also noted gorilla impersonator Charles Gemora… In Nigro’s case, the claim seems to have been simply fraudulent, in Gemora’s, the inaccurate claim was apparently based on the actor’s memory of playing a giant ape in a never-completed King Kong spoof entitled The Lost Island.
  78. Glut, Donald F. (2005). “His Majesty, King Kong – IV”. In Woods, Paul A. (ed.). King Kong Cometh!. London: Plexus. p. 64. ISBN 9780859653626. Cooper denied any performance by an actor in a gorilla costume in King Kong… Perhaps a human actor was used in a bit of forgotten test footage before the film went into production, but thus far the matter remains a mystery.
  79. Brierton, Tom (2004). Stop-Motion Puppet Sculpting: A Manual of foam Injection, Build-Up, and Finishing Techniques. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. p. 22. ISBN 0-7864-1873-7.
  80. Von Gunden 1989, p. 114.
  81. Rovin 1977, p. 31; Von Gunden 1989, p. 114; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73
  82. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73.
  83. Rovin 1977, p. 43.
  84. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 227.
  85. Price, Michael. “King Kong” (PDF). Library of Congress.
  86. Dyson 1997, pp. 36–37; Von Gunden 1989, p. 117
  87. Dyson 1997, p. 37.
  88. Dyson 1997, p. 37; Von Gunden 1989, p. 117
  89. Von Gunden 1989, p. 117.
  90. Morton 2005, pp. 75–76.
  91. Von Gunden, Kenneth (2001). Flights of Fancy: The Great Fantasy Films. McFarland. p. 117. ISBN 9780786412143.
  92. Smith 2020, p. 100; Slowik 2014, p. 235; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 135
  93. Smith 2020, p. 100.
  94. Smith 2020, pp. 101, 110.
  95. Smith 2020, p. 110.
  96. Slowik 2014, p. 237.
  97. Smith 2020, p. 100; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 135; Tatna 2020
  98. Smith 2020, pp. Smith 100–101.
  99. Smith 2020, p. 101.
  100. Smith 2020, pp. 100–101, 110.
  101. Slowik 2014, p. 244.
  102. Smith 2020, p. 101; Slowik 2014, pp. 231, 233
  103. Slowik 2014, p. 233.
  104. Slowik 2014, p. 234.
  105. Smith 2020, p. 105.
  106. Slowik 2014, p. 235.
  107. Slowik 2014, pp. 232–233.
  108. Slowik 2014, p. 239.
  109. Slowik 2014, p. 264.
  110. Slowik 2014, p. 240.
  111. Slowik 2014, p. 238.
  112. Smith 2020, pp. 100–101.
  113. Smith 2020, p. 102.
  114. Smith 2020, p. 106.
  115. Smith 2020, p. 103.
  116. Smith 2020, p. 109.
  117. Smith 2020, p. 114.
  118. Smith 2020, p. 113; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 133
  119. Slowik 2014, p. 230.
  120. Slowik 2014, p. 249.
  121. Slowik 2014, pp. 2, 231.
  122. Slowik 2014, p. 263.
  123. Slowik 2014, p. 236.
  124. Slowik 2014, pp. 113–114.
  125. Wierzbicki 2009, p. 223.
  126. “King Kong – 75th anniversary of the film and Max Steiner’s great film score”. Archived from the original on March 6, 2019. Retrieved March 2, 2019.
  127. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 233, 236.
  128. Lasky 1984, p. 94.
  129. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 236.
  130. Lasky 1984, pp. 94–95.
  131. Ahamed, Liaquat (2009). Lords of Finance. Penguin Books. p. 452. ISBN 9780143116806.
  132. Erb 2009, p. 45.
  133. Jewell 1994, p. 43.
  134. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 236; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 84
  135. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 236–237.
  136. Holliss, Richard. Harryhausen: The Movie Posters. London: Titan Books, 2018. p. 9,
  137. Erb 2009, p. 125.
  138. “‘Gone,’ With $26,000,000, Still Tops All-Timers, Greatest Show Heads 1952”. Variety. January 21, 1953. p. 4.
  139. Erb 2009, p. 126.
  140. Miller, Frank (March 2, 2007). “Pop Culture 101: King Kong”. Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on February 17, 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  141. Tatna, Meher (November 9, 2020). “Out of the Vaults: ‘King Kong’, 1933”. Golden Globes. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  142. Morton 2005, p. 84.
  143. Von Gunden 1989, p. 119.
  144. Wednesday, WTM • (December 12, 2018). “The Lost Scene from 1933’s King Kong – the Spider Pit”. Neatorama. Archived from the original on January 28, 2020. Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  145. “King Kong (non-existent cut content of Pre-code monster adventure film; 1933) – The Lost Media Wiki”. April 2, 2024. Archived from the original on April 2, 2024. Retrieved April 28, 2024.
  146. “Hitlers Kino: “Führer”-Faible für Garbo oder Dick und Doof”. Der Spiegel Online. Hamburg, Germany. December 2, 2015. Archived from the original on April 4, 2019. Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  147. Flavorwire Staff (February 3, 2012). “Movies Banned in Foreign Countries for Weird Reasons”. Flavorwire. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  148. Millimeter Magazine article, 1 January 2006. Retrieved: March 15, 2012. Archived May 21, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  149. “Robert A. Harris On King Kong”. Retrieved: March 15, 2012. Archived August 13, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.
  150. Wickstrom, Andy (February 17, 1989). “Colorized King Kong May Bug Fans”. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
  151. Rainho, Manny (March 2015). “This Month in Movie History”. Classic Images (477): 26.
  152. “If DVD killed the film star, Criterion honors the ghost”. The Denver Post. August 24, 2005. Archived from the original on November 11, 2019. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
  153. Schneider, Wolf (January 21, 1985). “Criterion for laserdisc sales”. The Hollywood Reporter. 285 (21): 1–2.
  154. “Watch a Clip of Criterion’s Long-Lost ‘King Kong’ Audio Commentary”. Nerdist.
  155. King Kong. WorldCat. OCLC 28363532.
  156. Toumarkine, Doris (September 11, 1992). “Retailers going ape over ‘Kong'”. The Hollywood Reporter. 323 (40): 1, 50.; Parisi, Paula (December 14, 1992). “Vid dealers have sets to suit”. The Hollywood Reporter. 325 (3): 9, 13.
  157. “Restored King Kong At LACMA”. Golden Globes. December 9, 2013.
  158. Sweeney, Kenneth (February 2006). “DVD Playback”. American Cinematographer. 87 (2): 14.
  159. Tribbey, Chris (May 31, 2010). “Warner brings original ‘Kong’ to Blu-ray Sept. 28”. Home Media Magazine. 32 (22).
  160. Meehan (February 18, 1933). “King Kong”. Motion Picture Herald. 110 (8): 27 – via Internet Archive.
  161. “‘King Kong’ a Winner: Radio Production Should Be Answer to Exhibitor Prayers – Exploitation Value Limitless”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (23): 1, 6. February 15, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  162. “‘King Kong’ Excellent Pix Superbly Produced-Acted: Fay Wray Shines; Rest of Cast Good”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (23): 3. February 15, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  163. McCarthy (February 25, 1933). “King Kong”. Motion Picture Herald. 110 (9): 37, 40 – via Internet Archive.
  164. “Monster Ape Packs Thrills in New Talkie”. Chicago Tribune. Chicago. April 23, 1933. p. Part 7, p. 8.
  165. Hall
  166. “New York Reviews”. The Hollywood Reporter. Los Angeles. March 7, 1933. p. 2.
  167. “King Kong”. The Film Daily. LXI (46): 4. February 25, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  168. Mosher, John (March 11, 1933). “The Current Cinema”. The New Yorker. New York: F-R Publishing Corporation. p. 56.
  169. Bigelow, Joe (March 6, 1933). “King Kong”. Variety. Retrieved February 20, 2010.
  170. Erb 2009, p. 48.
  171. “King Kong”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (39). March 6, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  172. Symkus, Ed. “Here’s why the original ‘King Kong’ is still one of the greatest films of all time”. USA Today. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  173. Lennon, Will. “King Kong (1933)”. Washington City Paper. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  174. Eggert, Brian (April 27, 2020). “King Kong”. Deep Focus Review. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  175. Haflidason, Almar. “BBC – Films – review – King Kong”. www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  176. Ebert, Roger (February 3, 2002). “King Kong movie review & film summary (1933)”. RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on April 17, 2013. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  177. Berardinelli, James. “King Kong”. Reelviews Movie Reviews. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  178. RH (April 12, 2023). “King Kong: ‘the film caters for all tastes’ – archive, 1933”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  179. Latson, Jennifer (March 2, 2015). “How ‘King Kong’ Gripped Audiences, Despite Ham-Handed Effects”. Time. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  180. “King Kong – 90th Anniversary”. TIFF. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  181. “King Kong”. Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on December 30, 2009. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
  182. “King Kong (1933) Reviews –Metacritic”. Metacritic.com. Metacritic. Archived from the original on July 29, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
  183. “‘King Kong’: The Eighth Wonder of the World”. NPR. June 29, 2008. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  184. “Think He’s Crazy? Nah, Just Enthusiastic. Rewatching King Kong (1933)”. October 24, 2011.
  185. Grant, Elizabeth. (1996). ‘Here Comes the Bride.’ In: Grant, Barry Keith (ed.). The Dread of Difference: Gender and the Horror Film. Austin: University of Texas Press. p. 373
  186. Goff, Phillip Atiba; Eberhardt, Jennifer L.; Williams, Melissa J.; Jackson, Matthew Christian (2008). “Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94 (2): 293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292. ISSN 1939-1315. PMID 18211178.
  187. Kuhn, Annette. (2007). King Kong. In: Cook, Pam. (ed.) The Cinema Book. London: British Film Institute. p. 41. and Robinson, D. (1983). King Kong. In: Lloyd, A. (ed.) Movies of the Thirties. Orbis Publishing Ltd. p. 58.
  188. Zakarin, Jordan (March 9, 2017). “King Kong’s Long Journey from Racist Monster to Woke Hero”. Inverse. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  189. “King Kong: Special Edition”. www.starburstmagazine.com/. June 29, 2021. Retrieved June 4, 2024.
  190. Rony 1996, p. 175.
  191. Rony 1996, p. 177.
  192. “11 of The Most Racist Movies Ever Made”. Atlanta Black Star. November 22, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2024.
  193. Erb 2009, p. 105.
  194. Malesky, Robert (June 29, 2008). “‘King Kong’: The Eighth Wonder of the World”. NCPR. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  195. Erb 2009, pp. 89, 117.
  196. Rony 1996, p. 180.
  197. Erb 2009, p. 102.
  198. Rony 1996, p. 154.
  199. Rony 1996, p. 15.
  200. Rony 1996, p. 172.
  201. Rony 1996, pp. 165, 181.
  202. Berenstein 1996, pp. 163–164.
  203. Rony 1996, p. 189.
  204. Rony 1996, pp. 165, 176.
  205. Berenstein 1996, pp. 195–196.
  206. Rony 1996, p. 176.
  207. Lorenz 2007, p. 159.
  208. Erb 2009, p. 106.
  209. Telotte 1988, pp. 389–390.
  210. Andriano 1999, p. 50.
  211. Berenstein 1996, pp. 186–187.
  212. Berenstein 1996, p. 188.
  213. Berenstein 1996, pp. 193–194.
  214. Berenstein 1996, p. 189.
  215. Berenstein 1996, p. 192.
  216. Rubinstein 1977, pp. 5–6.
  217. Rubinstein 1977, p. 8.
  218. Lloyd & Robinson 1985, p. 57.
  219. Erb 2009, p. 104.
  220. Berenstein 1996, p. 187.
  221. Rony 1996, pp. 172, 176.
  222. Berenstein 1996, p. 191.
  223. Smith 2020, pp. 99–100.
  224. Haver, Ron (December 1976). “Merian C. Cooper: The First King of Kong”. American Film Magazine. New York: American Film Institute. p. 18. Archived from the original on August 2, 2020. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
  225. Erb 2009, p. 89.
  226. Erb 2009, pp. 89, 102.
  227. Erb 2009, pp. 102–103.
  228. Erb 2009, p. 88.
  229. Erb 2009, p. 112.
  230. Erb 2009, p. 103.
  231. Telotte 1988, p. 396.
  232. Telotte 1988, p. 390.
  233. Erb 2009, p. 117.
  234. Lorenz 2007, p. 167.
  235. Voiovich, Jason (May 13, 2025). Bullfrogs, Bingo, and the Little House on the Prairie: How Innovators of the Great Depression Made the Best of the Worst of Times. Jaywalker Publishing. pp. 145–158. ISBN 978-1737001379.
  236. Morton 2005, p. 85.
  237. Erb 2009, p. 161.
  238. Eagan 22
  239. “Complete National Film Registry Listing”. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on November 10, 2020. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
  240. “AFI’s 100 YEARS…100 MOVIES”. American Film Institute. Archived from the original on December 13, 2020. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  241. Erb 2009, p. 129.
  242. Rovin, Jeff (1989). The Encyclopedia of Monsters. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-1824-3.
  243. Weaver, Tom (2014). The Creature Chronicles: Exploring the Black Lagoon Trilogy. McFarland & Company. p. 30. ISBN 978-0786494187.
  244. Memories of Ishiro Honda. Twenty Years After The Passing Of Godzilla’s Famed Director by Hajime Ishida. Famous Monsters of Filmland #269. Movieland Classics LLC, 2013. Pg. 20
  245. Mottram, James (2021). Jurassic Park: The Ultimate Visual History. Insight Editions. p. 17. ISBN 978-1683835455.
  246. Jones, James Earl (Host) (1995). The Making of Jurassic Park (VHS). Universal.
  247. Wudunn, Sheryl (April 4, 1997). “Tomoyuki Tanaka, the Creator of Godzilla, Is Dead at 86”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 26, 2017. Retrieved August 3, 2021.
  248. Hisayuki Ui, January 1, 1994, From Gamera to Daimajin: all of Daiei tokusatsu films, p.63, Kindaieigasha
  249. “Did King Kong inspire Nessie?”. The New Zealand Herald. August 17, 2014. Retrieved January 9, 2015.
  250. “Nessie’s starring role”. The Week. January 9, 2015. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
  251. Doherty, Thomas (June 7, 2025). “The Best Stunts of All Time, Over Nearly 100 Years of the Oscars”. The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 20, 2025.
  252. Eggert, Brian (April 27, 2020). “King Kong”. Deep Focus Review. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
  253. Newman, Kim (January 1, 2000). “EMPIRE ESSAY: King Kong“. Empire. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
  254. Bruce, Amanda; Summers, Megan; McCormick, Colin (November 27, 2020). “Every King Kong Movie (In Chronological Order)”. ScreenRant. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
  255. “The Mighty Kong | Rotten Tomatoes”. www.rottentomatoes.com. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
  256. “Censored Scenes from Hong Kong”. The Hollywood Reporter. 260 (44): 26. March 13, 1980.

Bibliography

External links

Wikimedia Commons logo

Wikimedia Commons has media related to King Kong (1933 film).

vteKing Kong
vteFilms directed by Ernest B. Schoedsack
vteEdgar Wallace
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata

Categories:

Wikipedia
The Free Encyclopedia

King Kong (1933 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

King Kong
Theatrical release poster
Directed byMerian C. CooperErnest B. Schoedsack
Screenplay byJames CreelmanRuth Rose
Story byEdgar WallaceMerian C. Cooper[1]
Produced byMerian C. CooperErnest B. Schoedsack
StarringFay WrayRobert ArmstrongBruce Cabot
CinematographyEddie LindenVernon WalkerJ.O. Taylor
Edited byTed Cheesman
Music byMax Steiner
Distributed byRKO Radio Pictures
Release datesMarch 2, 1933 (New York City)April 7, 1933 (United States)
Running time100 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$672,254.75[2][3]
Box office$10 million[4]

King Kong is a 1933 American pre-Code adventure horror monster film[5] directed and produced by Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack, with special effects by Willis H. O’Brien and music by Max Steiner. Produced and distributed by RKO Radio Pictures, King Kong is the first film in the self-titled franchise, combining live-action sequences with stop-motion animation using rear-screen projection. The idea for the film came when Cooper decided to create a motion picture about a giant gorilla struggling against modern civilization. The film stars Fay Wray, Robert Armstrong, and Bruce Cabot. The story follows said gorilla dubbed Kong who feels affection for a beautiful young woman offered to him as a sacrifice.

King Kong premiered in New York City on March 2, 1933, to many rave reviews, with praise for its stop-motion animation and musical score. During its initial run, the film earned a profit of $650,000, which increased to $2,847,000 by the time of its re-release in 1952. Various scenes were deleted by censors, but they were restored in 1970. Later, in 1991, the film was deemed “culturally, historically and aesthetically significant” by the Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.[6][7] In 2010, the film was ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as the greatest horror film of all time[8] and the fifty-sixth greatest film of all time.[9] Various new editions of the film have also been released. A sequel, entitled Son of Kong, was made the same year as the original film, and several more films have been made, including two remakes in 1976 and 2005.

The film’s novelization, published prior to its release, entered the public domain through a failure to include a copyright notice, making the characters and story public domain; the film’s copyright is set to expire in 2029 in the US.[10] Analysis of the film has included such topics as racial stereotypes, Ann’s relationship with the other characters, and the struggle between nature and civilization.

Plot

In New York Harbor, filmmaker Carl Denham, known for wildlife films in remote exotic locations, is chartering Captain Englehorn’s ship, the Venture, for his new project. However, he is unable to secure an actress for a female role he has been reluctant to disclose. In the streets of New York City, he finds struggling actress Ann Darrow and promises her “the thrill of a lifetime”. The Venture sets off, during which Denham reveals that their destination is an uncharted island with a mountain the shape of a skull. He alludes to a mysterious entity named Kong, rumored to dwell on the island. The crew arrives and anchors offshore. They encounter a native village separated from the rest of the island by an enormous stone wall with a large wooden gate. They witness a group of natives preparing to sacrifice a young woman, termed the “bride of Kong”. The intruders are spotted and the native chief stops the ceremony. When he sees the blonde-haired Ann, he offers to trade six of his tribal women for the “golden woman”. They refuse him and return to the ship.

That night, after the ship’s first mate, Jack Driscoll, admits his love for Ann, the natives kidnap Ann from the ship and take her through the gate and onto an altar. There she is offered to Kong, who is revealed to be a giant gorilla-looking beast. Kong carries a terrified Ann away into the jungle as Denham, Jack, and some crewmen give chase. The men encounter living dinosaurs; they manage to kill a charging Stegosaurus, but are attacked by an aggressive Brontosaurus and eventually Kong himself, leaving Jack and Denham as the only survivors. After Kong slays a Tyrannosaurus to save Ann, Jack keeps following them while Denham returns to the village. Upon arriving in Kong’s mountain lair, Ann is menaced by a serpent-like Elasmosaurus, which Kong also kills. When a Pteranodon tries to fly away with Ann, and is killed by Kong, Jack saves her and they climb down a vine dangling from a cliff ledge. When Kong starts pulling them back up, the two drop into the water below; they flee back to the village, where Denham, Englehorn, and the surviving crewmen await. Kong pursues, breaks open the gate, and relentlessly rampages through the village. Onshore, Denham, determined to bring Kong back alive, renders him unconscious with a gas bomb.

Shackled in chains, Kong is taken to New York City and presented to a Broadway theatre audience as, “King Kong, the Eighth Wonder of the World!” Ann and Jack join him on stage, surrounded by press photographers. The ensuing flash photography causes Kong to break loose as the audience flees in terror. Ann is whisked away to a hotel room on a high floor, but Kong scales the building and reclaims her. He makes his way through the city with Ann in his grasp, wrecks a crowded elevated train, and begins climbing the Empire State Building. Jack suggests that airplanes shoot Kong off the building without hitting Ann. Four biplanes take off; seeing them arrive, Jack becomes agitated for Ann’s safety and rushes inside with Denham. At the top, Kong is shot at by the planes as he swats at them. Kong destroys one, but is wounded by the gunfire. After he gazes at Ann, he is shot more, loses his strength, and plummets to the streets below to his death. Jack reunites with Ann. Denham heads back down and is allowed through a crowd surrounding Kong’s corpse in the street. When a policeman remarks that the planes got him, Denham sadly states, “Oh, no, it wasn’t the airplanes. It was Beauty killed the Beast.”

Cast

Production

Development

Further information: King Kong § Conception and creation

Charles R. Knight‘s Tyrannosaurus in the American Museum of Natural History, on which the large theropod of the film was based[11]

King Kong co-director Ernest B. Schoedsack had earlier experience filming monkeys while directing Chang: A Drama of the Wilderness (1927), also with Merian C. Cooper, and Rango (1931), both of which prominently featured monkeys in authentic jungle settings. Capitalizing on this trend, Congo Pictures released the hoax documentary Ingagi (1930), advertising the film as “an authentic incontestable celluloid document showing the sacrifice of a living woman to mammoth gorillas.” Ingagi is now often recognized as a racial exploitation film as it implicitly depicted black women having sex with gorillas and baby offspring that looked more ape than human.[12] The film was an immediate hit, and by some estimates, it was one of the highest-grossing films of the 1930s at over $4 million. Although Cooper never listed Ingagi among his influences for King Kong, it has long been held that RKO greenlighted Kong because of the bottom-line example of Ingagi and the formula that “gorillas plus sexy women in peril equals enormous profits.”[13]

Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack develop King Kong.

Since 1929, Cooper had wanted to create a film about gorillas.[14] Inspired by the travels of his friend W. Douglas Burden, Cooper considered filming in the jungles of Komodo.[15] He had read Burden’s The Dragon Lizards of Komodo and as a result conceived the idea to film a gorilla fighting giant lizards.[16] Cooper later remarked that this was “the most important influence” on the final film.[17] By the time he joined RKO in 1931, Cooper decided to incorporate a “beauty and the beast” theme into the plot.[18] The “Arabian proverb” at the beginning of the film was created by Cooper: “And lo! The Beast looked upon the face of Beauty, and it stayed its hand from killing. And from that day, it was as one dead.”[19] Initially Cooper planned to film in Africa and Komodo Island, but the idea was abandoned when RKO executives decided it would be too expensive.[20] RKO was at risk for bankruptcy because of the Great Depression.[21] Stop-motion animator Willis O’Brien, hearing that Cooper wanted to make a gorilla film, painted a picture depicting a large gorilla carrying a woman and gave it to Cooper. Afterward Cooper requested a test reel, which was approved by Selznick.[22] O’Brien experimented with different scenes in the test reel.[23] These two scenes, which were incorporated into the final film,[24] portray a fight between King Kong and a Tyrannosaurus Rex as well as Kong shaking men off a log.[25] The test reel was created concurrently with the production of The Most Dangerous Game.[26] Meanwhile, Cooper hired actors and had sets built for King Kong.[27] For live-action sequences in the jungle, Cooper utilized the set of The Most Dangerous Game.[26] Cooper directed the live-action sequences until Schoedsack completed work on The Most Dangerous Game.[28] Afterward Shoedsack directed the live action scenes while Cooper focused on the live action scenes that were to be combined with the already-filmed animated sequences.[29] Marcel Delgado developed sample models of King Kong, the dinosaurs, and the people; the models did not have armatures.[30] After about three months the test reel was complete.[31] After studio executives approved the film for production, Cooper developed the story further.[32] O’Brien’s ideas also helped with story development. He suggested that King Kong be seen by the characters as a sort of deity.[17]

Promotional image featuring Kong battling the Tyrannosaurus, though Cooper emphasized in an interview with film historian Rudy Behlmer that it was an Allosaurus

Filming commenced without a complete screenplay.[33] Cooper hired Edgar Wallace to write the screenplay,[34] which he started in December 1931.[35] Cooper told Wallace what he wanted included in the script.[35] Wallace’s draft included several instances of attempted sexual assault,[36] which were later removed by Ruth Rose.[37] His draft also included racial tensions between characters.[37] While drafting he wrote, “I am hoping still to get a good horror picture without corpses, and I am certain that Kong is going to be a wow.”[38] Wallace had a rough draft ready in January 1932[39] and died a month later.[40] Some of his ideas ended up in the final film, such as Kong removing Ann’s clothes from her body.[24] He also roughly outlined the New York scenes, which were similar to how they appeared in the completed film, as well as a jungle chase scene.[36] James A. Creelman picked up work on the screenplay.[41] In his draft he changed character roles, making Denham Ann’s cruel uncle. Cooper disliked it, remarking that “The heavy is far too heavy.”[37] Creelman adapted Wallace’s jungle chase scene to appear as it does in the finished film.[42] Creelman found it difficult to meet Cooper’s plot requests,[43] feeling that there were too many fantastical elements for the film to be believable.[44] He objected, “[T]here is certainly such a thing as reaching a limit to the number of elements a story can contain and make sense.”[45] Though he incorporated Cooper’s requests, the dialogue proved to be too extensive.[46] Cooper was unsatisfied with Creelman’s work, and in June Creelman decided to quit.[47] After some difficulty finding a replacement for Creelman, in July Cooper hired Ruth Rose,[28] who had never written a screenplay before.[48] She rewrote the majority of Creelman’s dialogue.[49] Though Creelman initially wrote the film’s New York prologue, Rose polished it while writing most of the city scenes.[50] Rose was able to incorporate the love story between Ann and Jack, something the other screenwriters had struggled with.[51] Rose also added more “fairy tale-like” aspects.[37] Upon the film’s release Wallace was credited with the screenplay, as Cooper had promised to give him the credit. The studio also saw it as an opportunity to gain positive publicity because Wallace was a well-established writer.[52]

Copyright concerns

The creators of King Kong took inspiration from other films such as Dracula and Frankenstein. The influence was heavy enough that RKO executives were worried about copyright violation.[53] Executives discussed the potential issue with RKO’s lawyers.[54] Also among their concerns were the film’s connections to Ingagi, Murders in the Rue Morgue, Journey to the Center of the Earth, and The Lost World. The other works being ruled out, Arthur Conan Doyle‘s The Lost World posed the most concern.[55] Both The Lost World and King Kong concerned primitive creatures being taken to modern society.[56] Even though Cooper argued against the similarities,[56] the studio purchased the novel’s copyright.[57] Afterward Cooper feared that if the studio were to connect Doyle’s name to the film for promotional purposes, consumers might not think the film was fresh. Eventually the Doyle estate granted the studio permission to not associate the film with Doyle’s name.[58]

Special effects

Colored publicity shot combining live actors with stop motion animation

King Kong is groundbreaking in the use of special effects, such as stop-motion animation, matte painting, rear projection, and miniatures.[59] The prehistoric creatures inhabiting Skull Island were brought to life through the use of stop-motion animation by Willis H. O’Brien and his assistant animators, E. B. “Buzz” Gibson, Carroll Shepphird, Marcel Delgado, Orville Goldner, and Fred Reefe.[60][61] The stop-motion animation scenes were painstaking and difficult to achieve and complete. The special effects crew could not leave the studio during the day because the lighting would not be consistent.[62] The jungle scenery was created by layering glass paintings, which were created by Mario Larrinaga and Byron L. Crabbe.[63] They were used when Denham’s crew first arrives. The scene was composited with separate bird elements and rear-projected behind the ship and actors.[64]

The most difficult task for the special effects crew to achieve was to make live-action footage interact with separately filmed stop-motion animation, making the interaction between the humans and the creatures seem believable. The most simple of these effects were accomplished by exposing part of the frame, then running the same piece of the film through the camera again by exposing the other part of the frame with a different image. This process is called a matte.[65] The most complex shots, where the live-action actors interacted with the stop-motion animation, were achieved via two different techniques, the Dunning process and the Williams process, to produce the effect of a traveling matte.[66][67]

Brontosaurus stop motion armature

Another technique that was used in combining live actors and stop-motion animation was rear-screen projection.[68] The actor would have a translucent screen behind him where a projector would project footage onto the back of the translucent screen.[64] This was the first film for which RKO used the method.[69] It was used in the scene where Kong and the Tyrannosaurus fight while Ann watches from the branches of a nearby tree. The stop-motion animation was filmed first. Afterward Fay Wray spent a 22-hour period sitting in a fake tree acting out her observation of the battle, which was projected onto the translucent screen while the camera filmed her witnessing the projected stop-motion battle.[70] She was sore for days after the shoot. The same process was also used for the scene where sailors from the Venture kill a Stegosaurus.[71] O’Brien and his special effects crew also devised a way to use rear projection in miniature sets.[72] A tiny screen was built into the miniature onto which live-action footage would then be projected.[64] A fan was used to prevent the footage that was projected from melting or catching fire. This miniature rear projection was used in the scene where Kong tries to grab Driscoll, who is hiding in a cave. For the scene in which Kong places Ann in a tree, Wray acted out her sequences as Kong’s sequences were projected in the rear.[73] She was unable to clearly see the projected images and had to act based on the blurs she saw.[29] Animation for the film was completed after 55 weeks.[74]

Producer Merian C. Cooper eyes the huge life-size King Kong mechanical model used in certain close-up scenes, circa 1933

Cooper, wishing to create a point of authenticity, insisted that Kong not be played by an actor in a gorilla suit.[56] Over the years, some media reports have alleged that in certain scenes Kong was played by an actor wearing a gorilla suit.[75][76] However, film historians have generally agreed that all scenes involving Kong were achieved with animated models.[77][78] These models were about 14 to 18 inches (36 to 46 cm) in height.[79][80] They were made of metal armatures padded with cotton, latex, and rabbit fur.[81] The fur moved as the animators handled the models, becoming an unintentional feature of Kong. The models required maintenance after each day of filming.[82] Closeups of Kong’s face and upper body were accomplished by filming a full-size mechanical model of Kong’s head and shoulders, designed by Delgado.[83] The model, scaled to the dimensions of a fifty-foot creature, was covered with forty bearskins.[84] Six operators were required[84] to manipulate the eyes and mouth to simulate a living monster.[65] A proportionally large arm and paw were also created for closeup shots of Kong holding Ann.[80] Dinosaur models were reused from O’Brien’s aborted film project Creation.[41] Production was completed in January 1933.[35] Production costs added up to $672,254.75, part of which included costs for Creation.[85]

Sound effects and score

Murray Spivack developed the sound effects for the film. Kong’s roar was created by mixing the recorded vocals of lions and tigers and slowly playing them backward.[86] Spivak himself provided Kong’s “love grunts” by grunting into a megaphone and playing it at a slow speed. For Kong’s footsteps, Spivak stomped across a gravel-filled box with plungers attached to his feet and wrapped in foam.[87] The sounds of Kong’s chest beats are recordings of Spivak hitting his assistant, who had a microphone held to his back, on the chest with a drumstick.[88] Spivak created the hisses and croaks of the dinosaurs with an air compressor for the former and his own vocals for the latter.[89] The vocalizations of the Tyrannosaurus were additionally mixed in with puma growls.[89] Spivak also provided the screams of the various sailors.[89] Fay Wray herself provided all of her character’s screams in a single recording session.[90][91] Wray explained that afterward she “couldn’t speak even in a whisper for days”.[49] Her screams have been used in other movies such as Son of Kong and Game of Death.[3]

Even though funding for the film was nearly gone, Cooper and Schoedsack decided it needed an original score because they worried that Kong might be too unbelievable as a character and also did not want to use a generic soundtrack.[92] They hired Max Steiner for the job.[93] Steiner began composing the score on December 9, 1932, and completed it after eight weeks.[94] The orchestra comprised 46 members, but upon recording sounded so full it is sometimes described as having 80 members.[95] A 46-member orchestra was large compared to many other film orchestras of the time.[96] According to Steiner, Cooper paid him $50,000 of his own money to pay for the orchestra.[97]

Steiner decided to make the music, in his own words, “impressionistic and terrifying”.[93] During composition he took inspiration from Debussy and Ravel, specifically for the music that was to play during the ocean scene when Denham and his crew travel to Skull Island.[98] During this scene “Boat in the Fog” begins to play; the harp reflects the waves and the stringed instruments reflect of the fog.[99] Steiner also incorporated dissonance into the score for action scenes, such as when Kong falls to his death.[100] Laurence MacDonald explains that this dissonance is also reflective of Debussy’s compositions.[101] The ocean scene is the first instance in which music begins to play. This is because Steiner wanted an association between music and the film’s fantasy elements.[102] Music historian Michael Slowik suggests that such an association invokes a sense of the unfamiliar,[103] also pointing out that music is connected to the audience’s need to suspend belief.[104] Music does not play during Kong’s fight with the T-rex and is replaced by animal sounds, making it the only Skull Island scene without music.[105][106] Music plays in the later New York City scenes except for when the airplanes surround Kong.[107] One of the techniques that Steiner often wrote into the score is called mickey-mousing. MacDonald dubs it “perhaps the single most noteworthy aspect of Steiner’s score”.[108] According to Slowik, the score includes more mickey-mousing than other film scores of its period.[108] He remarks that its “obsessive mickey-mousing”[109] is reminiscent of the music that would play for a cartoon rather than for a Hollywood production.[110] In one scene the chief of the island people walks toward Denham’s group and the music aligns with his steps.[108] The score also reflects actions happening off-screen, such as when Kong walks toward the altar where Ann is to be offered to him. Formerly, this technique had been used for silent films.[110]

Slowik identifies three musical themes throughout the score: Kong’s theme, Ann’s theme, and the jungle theme.[111] Steiner took inspiration from Wagner in creating Kong’s theme.[112] Steiner used a method called chromaticism in Kong’s theme, which comprises three descending notes.[113] According to Peter Franklin, the other themes stem from the three-note sequence in Kong’s theme.[111] “King Kong March”, a Broadway-style score played during Denham’s show, is an adaptation of Kong’s theme, though the notes ascend rather than descend.[114] Ann’s theme (“Stolen Love”) is a Viennese waltz and begins with notes similar to those in Kong’s theme.[115] Steiner eventually combined both themes in one melody just before Kong dies.[116] Musician biographer Steven C. Smith identifies what he calls the “danger theme”. It is written with four notes and is meant to sound “questioning”. It first appears in “The Forgotten Island”.[115] Later, it is reworked into a major key when Driscoll confesses his love for Ann. Smith suggests that this points to what he calls “the perils of romance”.[115] Later in life Cooper expressed that “much of the reason for [King Kong‘s success] is because Maxie Steiner was able to create what no other man that I knew of in Hollywood at that time could”.[117] Steiner himself remarked that the film “was made for music”.[93]

Upon the film’s release its score received little critical review, being overshadowed by the film’s innovations in special effects.[118] However, it received more attention as the movie became more famous in the years that followed.[117] Christopher Palmer wrote that the score “marked the real beginnings of Hollywood music”.[119] Mervyn Cooke adds that it “almost single-handedly marked the coming-of-age of nondiegetic film music”.[119] In his book After the Silents: Hollywood Film Music in the Early Sound Era, 1926–1934, Slowik argues that King Kong‘s score did not influence Hollywood film scores that many music scholars think it did. He suggests that, because the movie was unusual, the score was unable to introduce an alternate way to write film scores.[120] He also suggests that Steiner drew upon already-established patterns of Hollywood music.[121] He writes that rather than single-handedly shaping the Golden Age of Hollywood music, King Kong is just one film among others that helped shape it.[122] Slowik explains that the score features both “original and symphonic music”, something that was not common in film scores of the time.[123] Portions of the score were reused in Double Harness, The Last Days of Pompeii, and The Last of the Mohicans, among others.[124] The island music appears as an orchestra scene in Jackson’s 2005 remake.[125] Over the years, Steiner’s score was recorded by multiple record labels and the original motion picture soundtrack has been issued on a compact disc.[126]

Release and censorship

Initial release and box office

Grauman’s Chinese Theatre, where King Kong held its Hollywood premiere.

King Kong’s campaign included newspaper ads, radio ads, and posters.[127] It premiered in the Radio City Music Hall and RKO Roxy in New York City on March 2, 1933.[74][128] U. S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared the four-day nationwide bank holiday three days after the film’s premiere in New York City.[129][130] The film was a box-office success and during the opening weekend earned an estimated $90,000.[1] Receipts fell by up to 50% during the second week of the film’s release because of the national bank holiday.[131] Attendance of the film dropped within the second and third weeks of its New York release.[132] During the film’s first run it made a profit of $650,000.[133] Before the 1952 re-release, the film is reported to have worldwide rentals of $2,847,000 including $1,070,000 from the United States and Canada and profits of $1,310,000.[2] The Hollywood premiere was held on March 24, 1933, in Grauman’s Chinese Theatre.[134] The screening was preceded by a performance featuring dances of Indigenous people and trapeze performances[135] and RKO had decorated the theater’s lobby so that it looked like a jungle.[136] It was not officially released until April 7, 1933.[3] It was re-released in 1952 following the promising re-release of Snow White.[137] After the 1952 re-release, Variety estimated the film had earned an additional $1.6 million in the United States and Canada, bringing its total to $3.9 million in cumulative rentals in the United States.[138] Profits from the re-release were estimated by the studio to be at about $2.5 million,[3] which was about double of what the film earned in 1933.[139]

Theatrical advertisement from 1933

Censorship and restorations

The Production Code‘s stricter rules were put into effect in Hollywood after the film’s 1933 premiere and it was progressively censored further, with several scenes being either trimmed or excised altogether for the 1938–1956 rereleases.[140][141] Censors removed the scene of the Brontosaurus mauling crewmen in the water, chasing one up a tree and killing him.[142] They also removed the scenes where Kong undresses Ann Darrow,[1][142] bites and steps on people.[1] The scene where Kong mistakes a sleeping woman for Ann and drops her to her death after realizing his mistake was also removed.[1][142] An additional scene portraying giant insects, spiders, a reptile-like predator and a tentacled creature devouring the crew members shaken off the log by Kong onto the floor of the canyon below was deemed too gruesome by RKO even by pre-Code standards. Cooper thought it “stopped the story”, and thus the scene was censored by the studio before the original release.[74] Members of the preview audience also left the film early because they were concerned about the scene.[143] The footage is considered lost, except for only a few stills and pre-production drawings.[90][144] There are also claims that it was never filmed and was only in the script and novelization.[145]

The film was initially banned in Nazi Germany, with the censors describing it as an “attack against the nerves of the German people” and a “violation of German race feeling”.[146] Shortly following its release the film was also banned in Finland for violence; the ban was released in 1939.[147]Duration: 1 minute and 32 seconds.1:32Trailer for the 1938 re-release of King Kong (1:32).

RKO did not preserve copies of the film’s negative or release prints with the excised footage, and the cut scenes were considered lost for many years. In 1969, a 16mm print, including the censored footage, was found in Philadelphia. The cut scenes were added to the film, restoring it to its original theatrical running time of 100 minutes. This version was re-released to art houses by Janus Films in 1970.[90] Over the next two decades, Universal Studios undertook further photochemical restoration of King Kong. This was based on a 1942 release print with missing censor cuts taken from a 1937 print, which “contained heavy vertical scratches from projection.”[148] An original release print located in the UK in the 1980s was found to contain the cut scenes in better quality.[140] After a 6-year worldwide search for the best surviving materials, a further, fully digital restoration utilizing 4K resolution scanning was completed by Warner Bros. in 2005. This restoration also had a 4-minute overture added, bringing the overall running time to 104 minutes.[149] The project was funded by The Film Foundation and the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.[141] Somewhat controversially, King Kong was colorized for a 1989 Turner Home Entertainment video release.[150][3]

Television and home media

After the 1956 re-release, the film was sold to television and was first broadcast on March 5, 1956.[151] King Kong had numerous VHS and LaserDisc releases of varying quality before receiving an official studio release on DVD. In 1984, King Kong was one of the first films to be released on LaserDisc as part of the Criterion Collection, and was the first movie to have an audio commentary track included.[152] Criterion’s audio commentary was by film historian Ron Haver.[153] The Haver commentary was available on the FilmStruck streaming service.[154] Image Entertainment released another LaserDisc around 1993.[155] The VHS release from Turner was a 60th-anniversary edition in 1992 featuring a front cover that had the sound effect of Kong roaring when his chest was pressed. It had orders for over 140,000 copies, with the colorized version being preferred. It also included a 25-minute documentary, It Was Beauty Killed the Beast (1992).[156]

In 2005, Warner Bros. released its digital restoration of King Kong in a US 2-disc Special Edition DVD, coinciding with the theatrical release of Peter Jackson‘s remake.[3] The restoration was funded partially by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.[157] The DVD release had numerous extra features, including a new, third audio commentary by visual effects artists Ray Harryhausen and Ken Ralston, with archival excerpts from actress Fay Wray and producer/director Merian C. Cooper. At American Cinematographer, Kenneth Sweeney found the extras on disc 1 lackluster for such an important release. Disc 2 included more in-depth features, with a short biographical film on Cooper, and “RKO Production 601: The Making of King Kong“, produced by Peter Jackson. Disc 2 included additional interviews with many relevant people. The DVD was also sold in a limited edition with Son of Kong and Mighty Joe Young[158] Warners issued a US digibook-packaged Blu-ray in 2010, presented in a aspect ratio of 1.37:1, and with a 1080p master upgrade over the 2005 two-disc DVD release. Rudy Behlmer wrote the accompanying 32-page booklet.[159]

Reception

Contemporary

Front cover of King Kong’s Los Angeles premiere program included in the 1933 edition of Hollywood Reporter.

King Kong received generally positive reviews upon its release. Meehan of Motion Picture Herald predicted it would be “one of the sensational pictures of the year”, opining that “no more thrilling climax ever was filmed”.[160] A reviewer for The Hollywood Reporter claimed the film “bears all the earmarks of a winner”, predicting it would make “plenty of money”.[161] Another review in the same periodical declared it was “superbly produced-acted”, a “great piece of imagination, hatched in the brain of a showman for showmen”.[162] A Motion Picture Herald review by McCarthy called King Kong “imagination-stunning” and praised the “buildup of suspense”, dubbing it “a showman’s picture”.[163] The Chicago Tribune called it “one of the most original, thrilling and mammoth novelties to emerge from a movie studio.”[164] The New York Times gave readers an enthusiastic account of the plot and thought the film a fascinating adventure.[165] The New York World-Telegram said it was “one of the very best of all the screen thrillers, done with all the cinema’s slickest camera tricks.”[166]

The Film Daily wrote, “The picture has plenty of shocker stuff, and the terror is heightened by [Fay Wray’s screaming], while the film’s musical score adds its blare to keep the audience in a state of turmoil.” The reviewer cautioned that “some women and children” might dislike the film’s intensity.[167] John Mosher of The New Yorker called it “ridiculous,” but wrote that there were “many scenes in this picture that are certainly diverting.”[168] Joe Bigelow of Variety thought the film held “power” once a viewer got used to the “phoney atmosphere”. He remarked that “a few details were too strong to swallow the picture” and the technical innovations overshadowed the plot and acting. The film’s “many flaws”, he added, were “overcome by the general results”.[169] Newsweek wrote that Cooper and Schoedsack were no longer “scientists” because the film was “exaggerated in its faked views of wild life”.[170]

The Hollywood Reporter included a multi-page booklet in its March issue, featuring production stills and concept sketches alongside critical praise for the film.[171] The booklet was the program for the film’s Los Angeles premiere.[51]

Recent

Ed Symkus of USA Today claims the film “stands tall as a groundbreaking piece of jaw-dropping, eye-widening entertainment”.[172] The Washington City Paper called it “a movie upon whose foundation we’ve built a sizable section of contemporary pop culture”.[173] Film historian Michael Price calls the film “the product of a remarkable group of daredevils, artists, and craftsmen.”[85] Brian Eggert claims that “King Kong’s greatness remains in part because it demonstrates a compendium of Classic Hollywood production strategies.” He additionally praises the music as “guid[ing] every emotion”.[174] Almar Haflidason of BBC praises the “fantastic atmosphere” of the score and the “richness of Kong’s character.” Haflidason adds that the animation is “technically brilliant [and] highly imaginative in terms of cinematic action”.[175] Roger Ebert included King Kong in his “Great Movies” list, writing that “in the very artificiality of some of the special effects, there is a creepiness that isn’t there in today’s slick, flawless, computer-aided images… Even allowing for its slow start, wooden acting, and wall-to-wall screaming, there is something ageless and primeval about King Kong that still somehow works.”[176]

James Berardinelli writes that “advances in technology and acting have dated aspects of the production”. He also adds that the acting is weak and that he feels “some sense of awe” in consideration of the special effects.[177] The Guardian pointed out Kong’s perceptible size changes, and remarked that compared to today’s filmmaking techniques, King Kong “has ceased to be the thriller…and has become of the best comedies seen for years”.[178] In its review Time wrote that Kong “sometimes doubled in size”.[179] TIFF wrote that it is “reductive in its portrayal of humans, especially the Indigenous people”.[180]

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 97% based on 116 reviews, with an average rating of 9/10. The site’s critical consensus reads, “King Kong explores the soul of a monster – making audiences scream and cry throughout the film – in large part due to Kong’s breakthrough special effects.”[181] On Metacritic the film currently has a rare weighted average score of 92 out of 100, based on 12 critics, indicating “universal acclaim”.[182]

Analysis

Racial stereotypes

King Kong has undergone extensive analysis of its portrayal of race. NPR producer Robert Malesky remarks that, “To many, the eroticism and racism of the original film are just side themes and part of the fabric of 1930s America.”[183] Author Ryan Britt feels that critics were willing to overlook the film’s problematic aspects as “just unattractive byproducts of the era in which the film was made”. He adds, “the meta-fictional aspects almost excuse some of the cultural insensitivity”.[184] In the 19th and early 20th century, people of African descent were commonly represented visually as ape-like, a metaphor that fit racist stereotypes further bolstered by the emergence of scientific racism.[185] Early films frequently mirrored racial tensions. While King Kong is often compared to the story of Beauty and the Beast, many film scholars have argued that the film was a cautionary tale about interracial romance, in which the film’s “carrier of blackness is not a human being, but an ape.”[186][187] Jordan Zakarin of Inverse quotes author John Michlig, who explains that even though many modern viewers see the film as racist, it exhibits 1930s perceptions of obscure locations and peoples.[188]

The film has been criticized for racial stereotyping of the native people and Charlie the cook, the latter of whom exclaims, “Crazy black man been here!” when he discovers Ann has been kidnapped.[189] Filmmaker Fatimah Rony argues that Charlie is feminized in his occupation and gesticulations.[190] She also views the native people’s “savagery” as being associated with their dark skin.[191] In 2013 Atlanta Black Star described the people native to the island “as subhuman, or primate…[without] a distinct way of communicating”.[192] Rony points out that African Americans and a Yaqui man were cast to portray Indonesian people.[191] In her view, racial undertones are present when Ann is preferred for the sacrifice rather than the girl who is native to Skull Island.[191] Wayne State University film professor Cynthia Erb remarks that “Ann’s prized whiteness” is “the most disturbing racial” component, rather than “Kong’s blackness”.[193] Erb explains that in jungle films “the depiction of natives was often patronizing, stereotypical, racist.” She adds, “I think it does happen with the Skull Islanders.”[194]

Critics have also seen Kong himself as a perpetuation of racial tensions. Atlanta Black Star perceived a racial allegory between Kong and black men, remarking that Kong “meets his demise due to his insatiable desire for a white woman”.[192] Erb argues that the portrayal of Kong is one of a “noble savage” and a fighter rather than a “sexual aggressor”.[195] In her analysis Rony relates Kong to the “noble savage” because he fights off the dinosaurs due to his affection for Ann.[196] She remarks that Kong is “not exclusively black”, as he is connected to Asia due to his Eastern-inspired name as well as the Indonesian location of Skull Island.[197] She calls it “one of the most outrageous ‘racial films’ ever made”,[198] opining that it is one among several films of the time that portrays a person with African, Asian, or Pacific Islander ancestry “as an ape-monster”.[199] According to Rony, Cooper decided to make Ann blonde to emphasize the difference between her and Kong,[200] and as a white woman she was established as “a kind of lure for the monster-like beast”.[201] Her fair complexion contrasts with his dark complexion, which film analyst Rhona Berenstein argues is implicitly associated with his “monstrosity”.[202]

Concerns surrounding biracial interactions in the film have also arisen. Rony claims the film “ultimately celebrates cinema’s tendency to create monsters which mirror the anxieties of any given age”.[203] According to Rony, Kong symbolizes biracial sexual relationships, which were looked down upon at the time of the film’s release.[204] Berenstein sees Kong and Ann’s relationship as “a vehicle for racial crossing”, arguing that the film both “confirms” and “destablizes” the idea of “white supremacy“.[205] She explains that Ann serves as a warning against and as a summons for “the monstrous possibility of miscegenation“.[202] Writer James A. Snead and German Studies professor Dagmar Lorenz compare Denham to a colonialist and link Kong’s capture to the slave trade.[206][207] Erb takes the idea of Denham as colonialist to argue that, following the prologue, the film appears to “challenge” colonialism.[208] Zakarin claims that elements that may be seen as disturbing stemmed from what Cooper believed would make the film adventurous.[188]

Ann’s relationships

Kong puts Ann (Fay Wray) in a tree for safety (and to prevent her escape) before he battles a Tyrannosaurus

The film has been called sexist in its portrayal of women. J. P. Telotte claims that the film “sets up a pattern of repression” in the largely male ship crew as well as with Denham’s and Jack’s “antiromantic remarks”.[209] According to author Joseph Andriano, the film attempts to reduce the idea of sexism by creating a relationship between King Kong and Ann. He adds that this attempt does not work because Ann is portrayed as helpless. Because Kong’s eventual downfall results from “feminine charm”, Andriano suggests that the film implies a “helpless female” is more powerful than an able male.[210] According to Rhona Berenstein, screaming women are “central to [the] jungle-horror” genre.[211] Denham coaches Ann’s screaming when there is nothing to scream at. Berenstein remarks that this coached screaming may bleed into her reaction to Kong, rendering it a performance.[212] She furthers the argument by stating that the practiced screaming indicates that Ann’s and Kong’s relationship “is not simply that between a victim and a monster”,[212] adding that Ann’s victimization via Kong comes only after she seeks independence.[213]

Berenstein parallels Ann’s sacrifice to Kong with Denham’s Kong exhibit in New York City, suggesting that this makes Ann and Kong “both doubles and adversaries”.[214] She views the film as creating a relatability between “people of color, a white woman, and a simian monster”.[215] Mark Rubinstein parallels Kong’s New York rampage to his efforts to protect Ann on Skull Island, remarking that Kong both protects Ann and acts as if she belongs to him.[216] Rubinstein argues that the proverb appearing at the film’s beginning warns about love, specifically that if a man is romantically attracted to a woman he will experience a “downfall”.[217] He argues that Ann does not return Kong’s affection.[217] Wray herself claimed that Ann had no romantic feelings for Kong but instead feared him.[218]

It has also been suggested that Ann is under Denham’s control. Erb remarks that while Kong seeks a romantic relationship with Ann, Denham seeks to earn money because of her.[193] She explains that Denham appears “control-oriented” to modern viewers, whereas to 1930s viewers he would have appeared “more as the enterprising showman”.[219] According to Rony and Berenstein, Ann is controlled by Denham,[220] who uses her “as an object of trade and of spectacle”, subjecting her to the male gaze while practicing her screams under Denham’s direction.[221] Snead remarks that in the film women become “a sort of visual capital” rather than “people or potential partners”.[222]

Nature and civilization

While Cooper and Schoedsack insisted in contemporary interviews that there was no hidden meaning to King Kong, a posthumously published interview with Cooper revealed that his inspiration for the film was rooted in the image of a giant ape falling from the tallest building, which would represent how primitive people are doomed by modern civilization.[223][224] This idea has been taken up in scholarly analysis of the film. In her analysis Erb focuses on the struggle between primitivism and civilization.[225] In her view, Kong invokes a sense of primitivism and symbolizes nature, while Denham symbolizes modern society.[226] The film, she argues, demonstrates “nature’s revenge on culture” and nature’s eventual defeat.[227] While Erb explains that she does not disagree with views of the film involving sexism and racism, she argues that Kong’s interactions with Ann reach beyond race and sex.[228] She argues that when Kong partially undresses Ann, it “initiate[s] her into the realm of the wild”.[229] Touching her and smelling her clothes are primitivist actions, Erb suggests, because it focuses on senses other than sight. Heavy reliance on sight is associated with modern society.[229] Erb explains that Kong’s alternation of aggressiveness and gentleness “arguably embodies both the demonic and Edenic impulses of the jungle tradition” common in 1930s film.[225] According to Erb, through contrast Skull Island is set up as a counterpart to New York City.[230]

Telotte takes a similar approach, pointing out that many of the island scenes reflect the events of the city scenes.[231] According to Telotte, Kong is taken from an “Edenic world” to be exploited in the modern world.[232] Kong’s New York City rampage is an “effort to tear down the base of modern culture itself”.[233] Dagmar Lorenz argues that the film establishes “Western civilization as the source of Kong’s destruction”[207] and explains that portraying Skull Island’s “wildness” seems to convey an idea of “barbarity”.[234] Tom Shales of The Washington Post takes a different approach, suggesting that the film is “an allegory about modern man, sort of, facing his own nature”, rather than about beauty killing the beast.[194]

Social impact during the Great Depression

The weekend after Kong‘s release, newly-elected President Franklin Roosevelt ordered a bank holiday to halt the panic in the financial sector. Innovation historian Jason Voiovich calls the film “The First Popcorn Movie,” making the case that King Kong helped nervous people process the extreme economic stress. The movie served its purpose as an escape on one level, but on another, the monster represented the fear of the Great Depression and that people could conquer it in the end.[235]

Legacy and franchise

Legacy

See also: Wasei Kingu Kongu and The King Kong That Appeared in Edo

Since its release the film has received some significant honors. In 1975, Kong was named one of the 50 best American films by the American Film Institute.[236] Around this time it also gained academic attention.[237] In 1981 a video game titled Donkey Kong, starring a character with similarities to Kong, was released. In 1991, the film was deemed “culturally, historically and aesthetically significant” by the Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry.[238][239] In 1998, the AFI ranked the film #43 on its list of the 100 greatest movies of all time.[90][240]

The film’s stop motion effects by Willis H. O’Brien left a lasting impact on the film industry worldwide and inspired other genre films such as Mighty Joe Young,[241] The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms,[242] Creature from the Black Lagoon,[243] Mothra,[244] and Jurassic Park.[245][246] The film was also one of the biggest inspirations for Godzilla, with Tomoyuki Tanaka stating, “I felt like doing something big. That was my motivation. I thought of different ideas. I like monster movies, and I was influenced by King Kong.”[247]

Daiei Film, the company which later produced Gamera, Daimajin and other tokusatsu films, distributed the 1952 re-release of King Kong in Japan, making it the first post-war release of monster movies in the country. The company also distributed The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms in Japan in 1954, and these distributions presumably influenced productions of both Godzilla and Gamera franchises.[248]

Author Daniel Loxton suggested that King Kong inspired the modern day legend of the Loch Ness Monster.[249][250]

In 2025, The Hollywood Reporter listed King Kong as having the best stunts of 1932 to 1933.[251]

American Film Institute Lists

Sequel and franchise

Main article: King Kong (franchise)

Delos W. Lovelace was hired by Cooper to compose a novel version of King Kong. Lovelace appeared as the author alongside the credit “conceived by Edgar Wallace and Merian C. Cooper”.[58] Walter Ripperger wrote a two-part serial version for Mystery, which was credited as “the last creation of Edgar Wallace”.[58]

The film and characters inspired imitations and installments. The same year of King Kong‘s release, Son of Kong, a sequel, was fast-tracked and released.[74] In the 1960s, RKO licensed the King Kong character to Japanese studio Toho, which made two films, King Kong vs. Godzilla,[252] the third film in Toho’s long-running Godzilla series, and King Kong Escapes.[253] Both were directed by Ishirō Honda. These films are mostly unrelated to the original and follow a very different style.[254] In 1976 producer Dino De Laurentiis released a modern remake of King Kong.[253] It follows the same basic plot, but the setting is moved to the present day and several other details are different.[254] This remake was followed by a 1986 sequel King Kong Lives.[252] In 1998, a loosely-adapted direct-to-video animated version, The Mighty Kong, was distributed by Warner Bros.[255] In 2005, Universal Pictures released another remake of King Kong, co-written and directed by Peter Jackson,[252] which is set in the 1930s, as in the original film.[254] Legendary Pictures and Warner Bros. made Kong: Skull Island (2017),[252] which serves as part of a cinematic universe, MonsterVerse,[254] followed by the sequels Godzilla vs. Kong (2021) and Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire (2024).[254]

The search for censored scenes inspired a play called “Censored Scenes from King Kong,” performed in 1980. A reviewer in The Hollywood Reporter called it the “worst offering” in a bad season.[256]

See also

References

  1. “AFI|Catalog – King Kong (1933)”. catalog.afi.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  2. Jewell 1994, p. 39.
  3. “King Kong (1933) – Notes – TCM.com”. December 16, 2019. Archived from the original on January 22, 2025. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
  4. “King Kong Franchise Box Office History”. The Numbers. Retrieved February 27, 2025.
  5. Sprague, Mike (April 7, 2021). “Horror History: King Kong (1933) Is Now 88 Years Old”. Dread Central. Archived from the original on September 9, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
  6. Daniel Eagan, (2010). America’s Film Legacy: The Authoritative Guide to the Landmark Movies in the National Film Registry. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, New York, NY p. 22
  7. Kehr, Dave (September 26, 1991). “U.S. Film Registry Adds 25 Significant Movies”. Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  8. “Best Horror Movies – King Kong (1933)”. Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on April 1, 2010. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
  9. “Top 100 Movies of All Time – Rotten Tomatoes”. Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved October 14, 2016.
  10. “King Kong’s Complicated Rights Issues Explained”. August 17, 2023.
  11. Orville Goldner, George E Turner (1975). Making of King Kong: The Story Behind a Film Classic. ISBN 0498015106. See also Spawn of Skull Island (2002). ISBN 1887664459
  12. Gerald Peary, ‘Missing Links: The Jungle Origins of King Kong’ (1976)[link removed] Gerald Peary: Film Reviews, Interviews, Essays, and Sundry Miscellany, 2004.
  13. Erish, Andrew (January 8, 2006). “Illegitimate Dad of King Kong”. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
  14. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 186.
  15. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 189–190, 193.
  16. Andriano 1999, p. 48; Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 194; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 69; Von Gunden 1989, p. 108
  17. Andriano 1999, p. 48.
  18. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 202; Rovin 1977, p. 33
  19. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 202; Von Gunden 1989, p. 111
  20. Rovin 1977, p. 27.
  21. Smith 2020, p. 99.
  22. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 207; Dyson 1997, p. 30; Von Gunden 1989, p. 109
  23. Rovin 1977, p. 31.
  24. Erb 2009, p. 29.
  25. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 217.
  26. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 214.
  27. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 208.
  28. Erb 2009, p. 31.
  29. Erb 2009, p. 30.
  30. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 71.
  31. Rovin 1977, p. 33; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73
  32. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 71; Dyson 1997, p. 30; Von Gunden 1989, p. 109
  33. Dyson 1997, p. 31; Erb 2009, p. 24
  34. Archer 1993, p. 14; Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 217
  35. Erb 2009, p. 28.
  36. Erb 2009, pp. 35–36.
  37. Erb 2009, p. 40.
  38. Erb 2009, p. 47.
  39. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 218.
  40. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 220; Archer 1993, p. 14
  41. Archer 1993, p. 14.
  42. Erb 2009, p. 35.
  43. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222.
  44. Erb 2009, p. 42.
  45. Erb 2009, p. 43.
  46. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222; Rovin 1977, p. 33
  47. Erb 2009, pp. 29, 31.
  48. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222; Andriano 1999, p. 52
  49. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 223.
  50. Erb 2009, pp. 31, 36.
  51. Erb 2009, p. 32.
  52. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 220; Erb 2009, pp. 38–39
  53. Erb 2009, p. 34.
  54. Erb 2009, pp. 36–37.
  55. Erb 2009, p. 37.
  56. “Vaz, Mark Cotta”. Fresh Air Archive: Interviews with Terry Gross. September 14, 2005. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
  57. Erb 2009, p. 38.
  58. Erb 2009, p. 39.
  59. Wasko, Janet. (2003). How Hollywood Works. California: Sage Publications Ltd. p. 53.
  60. Bordwell, David, Thompson, Kristin, Smith, Jeff. (2017). Film Art: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 388.
  61. Archer 1993, pp. 176, 197.
  62. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, pp. 74–75.
  63. Rovin 1977, pp. 31, 41.
  64. Harryhausen 1985, p. 173.
  65. Harryhausen 1985, p. 172.
  66. Corrigan, Timothy, White, Patricia. (2015). The Film Experience. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s. pp. 120–121.
  67. Von Gunden 1989, p. 115.
  68. Dyson 1997, p. 30.
  69. Rovin 1977, p. 33.
  70. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 216.
  71. “King Kong | Giant Ape, Stop-Motion Animation, Adventure | Britannica”. www.britannica.com. November 22, 2024. Retrieved December 27, 2024.
  72. Rovin 1977, p. 41.
  73. Harryhausen 1985, p. 171.
  74. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 84.
  75. “Charlie Gemora, 58, had King Kong role”. The New York Times. August 20, 1961. Archived from the original on March 18, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2017.(subscription required)
  76. Greene, Bob (November 27, 1990). “Saying so long to Mr. Kong”. Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on December 21, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
  77. Glut, Donald F. (2001). Jurassic Classics: A Collection of Saurian Essays and Mesozoic Musings. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. p. 192. ISBN 9780786462469. Over the years, various actors have claimed to have played Kong in this [Empire State Building] scene, including a virtually unknown performer named Carmen Nigro (AKA Ken Roady), and also noted gorilla impersonator Charles Gemora… In Nigro’s case, the claim seems to have been simply fraudulent, in Gemora’s, the inaccurate claim was apparently based on the actor’s memory of playing a giant ape in a never-completed King Kong spoof entitled The Lost Island.
  78. Glut, Donald F. (2005). “His Majesty, King Kong – IV”. In Woods, Paul A. (ed.). King Kong Cometh!. London: Plexus. p. 64. ISBN 9780859653626. Cooper denied any performance by an actor in a gorilla costume in King Kong… Perhaps a human actor was used in a bit of forgotten test footage before the film went into production, but thus far the matter remains a mystery.
  79. Brierton, Tom (2004). Stop-Motion Puppet Sculpting: A Manual of foam Injection, Build-Up, and Finishing Techniques. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. p. 22. ISBN 0-7864-1873-7.
  80. Von Gunden 1989, p. 114.
  81. Rovin 1977, p. 31; Von Gunden 1989, p. 114; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73
  82. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73.
  83. Rovin 1977, p. 43.
  84. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 227.
  85. Price, Michael. “King Kong” (PDF). Library of Congress.
  86. Dyson 1997, pp. 36–37; Von Gunden 1989, p. 117
  87. Dyson 1997, p. 37.
  88. Dyson 1997, p. 37; Von Gunden 1989, p. 117
  89. Von Gunden 1989, p. 117.
  90. Morton 2005, pp. 75–76.
  91. Von Gunden, Kenneth (2001). Flights of Fancy: The Great Fantasy Films. McFarland. p. 117. ISBN 9780786412143.
  92. Smith 2020, p. 100; Slowik 2014, p. 235; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 135
  93. Smith 2020, p. 100.
  94. Smith 2020, pp. 101, 110.
  95. Smith 2020, p. 110.
  96. Slowik 2014, p. 237.
  97. Smith 2020, p. 100; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 135; Tatna 2020
  98. Smith 2020, pp. Smith 100–101.
  99. Smith 2020, p. 101.
  100. Smith 2020, pp. 100–101, 110.
  101. Slowik 2014, p. 244.
  102. Smith 2020, p. 101; Slowik 2014, pp. 231, 233
  103. Slowik 2014, p. 233.
  104. Slowik 2014, p. 234.
  105. Smith 2020, p. 105.
  106. Slowik 2014, p. 235.
  107. Slowik 2014, pp. 232–233.
  108. Slowik 2014, p. 239.
  109. Slowik 2014, p. 264.
  110. Slowik 2014, p. 240.
  111. Slowik 2014, p. 238.
  112. Smith 2020, pp. 100–101.
  113. Smith 2020, p. 102.
  114. Smith 2020, p. 106.
  115. Smith 2020, p. 103.
  116. Smith 2020, p. 109.
  117. Smith 2020, p. 114.
  118. Smith 2020, p. 113; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 133
  119. Slowik 2014, p. 230.
  120. Slowik 2014, p. 249.
  121. Slowik 2014, pp. 2, 231.
  122. Slowik 2014, p. 263.
  123. Slowik 2014, p. 236.
  124. Slowik 2014, pp. 113–114.
  125. Wierzbicki 2009, p. 223.
  126. “King Kong – 75th anniversary of the film and Max Steiner’s great film score”. Archived from the original on March 6, 2019. Retrieved March 2, 2019.
  127. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 233, 236.
  128. Lasky 1984, p. 94.
  129. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 236.
  130. Lasky 1984, pp. 94–95.
  131. Ahamed, Liaquat (2009). Lords of Finance. Penguin Books. p. 452. ISBN 9780143116806.
  132. Erb 2009, p. 45.
  133. Jewell 1994, p. 43.
  134. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 236; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 84
  135. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 236–237.
  136. Holliss, Richard. Harryhausen: The Movie Posters. London: Titan Books, 2018. p. 9,
  137. Erb 2009, p. 125.
  138. “‘Gone,’ With $26,000,000, Still Tops All-Timers, Greatest Show Heads 1952”. Variety. January 21, 1953. p. 4.
  139. Erb 2009, p. 126.
  140. Miller, Frank (March 2, 2007). “Pop Culture 101: King Kong”. Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on February 17, 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  141. Tatna, Meher (November 9, 2020). “Out of the Vaults: ‘King Kong’, 1933”. Golden Globes. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  142. Morton 2005, p. 84.
  143. Von Gunden 1989, p. 119.
  144. Wednesday, WTM • (December 12, 2018). “The Lost Scene from 1933’s King Kong – the Spider Pit”. Neatorama. Archived from the original on January 28, 2020. Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  145. “King Kong (non-existent cut content of Pre-code monster adventure film; 1933) – The Lost Media Wiki”. April 2, 2024. Archived from the original on April 2, 2024. Retrieved April 28, 2024.
  146. “Hitlers Kino: “Führer”-Faible für Garbo oder Dick und Doof”. Der Spiegel Online. Hamburg, Germany. December 2, 2015. Archived from the original on April 4, 2019. Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  147. Flavorwire Staff (February 3, 2012). “Movies Banned in Foreign Countries for Weird Reasons”. Flavorwire. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  148. Millimeter Magazine article, 1 January 2006. Retrieved: March 15, 2012. Archived May 21, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  149. “Robert A. Harris On King Kong”. Retrieved: March 15, 2012. Archived August 13, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.
  150. Wickstrom, Andy (February 17, 1989). “Colorized King Kong May Bug Fans”. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
  151. Rainho, Manny (March 2015). “This Month in Movie History”. Classic Images (477): 26.
  152. “If DVD killed the film star, Criterion honors the ghost”. The Denver Post. August 24, 2005. Archived from the original on November 11, 2019. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
  153. Schneider, Wolf (January 21, 1985). “Criterion for laserdisc sales”. The Hollywood Reporter. 285 (21): 1–2.
  154. “Watch a Clip of Criterion’s Long-Lost ‘King Kong’ Audio Commentary”. Nerdist.
  155. King Kong. WorldCat. OCLC 28363532.
  156. Toumarkine, Doris (September 11, 1992). “Retailers going ape over ‘Kong'”. The Hollywood Reporter. 323 (40): 1, 50.; Parisi, Paula (December 14, 1992). “Vid dealers have sets to suit”. The Hollywood Reporter. 325 (3): 9, 13.
  157. “Restored King Kong At LACMA”. Golden Globes. December 9, 2013.
  158. Sweeney, Kenneth (February 2006). “DVD Playback”. American Cinematographer. 87 (2): 14.
  159. Tribbey, Chris (May 31, 2010). “Warner brings original ‘Kong’ to Blu-ray Sept. 28”. Home Media Magazine. 32 (22).
  160. Meehan (February 18, 1933). “King Kong”. Motion Picture Herald. 110 (8): 27 – via Internet Archive.
  161. “‘King Kong’ a Winner: Radio Production Should Be Answer to Exhibitor Prayers – Exploitation Value Limitless”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (23): 1, 6. February 15, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  162. “‘King Kong’ Excellent Pix Superbly Produced-Acted: Fay Wray Shines; Rest of Cast Good”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (23): 3. February 15, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  163. McCarthy (February 25, 1933). “King Kong”. Motion Picture Herald. 110 (9): 37, 40 – via Internet Archive.
  164. “Monster Ape Packs Thrills in New Talkie”. Chicago Tribune. Chicago. April 23, 1933. p. Part 7, p. 8.
  165. Hall
  166. “New York Reviews”. The Hollywood Reporter. Los Angeles. March 7, 1933. p. 2.
  167. “King Kong”. The Film Daily. LXI (46): 4. February 25, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  168. Mosher, John (March 11, 1933). “The Current Cinema”. The New Yorker. New York: F-R Publishing Corporation. p. 56.
  169. Bigelow, Joe (March 6, 1933). “King Kong”. Variety. Retrieved February 20, 2010.
  170. Erb 2009, p. 48.
  171. “King Kong”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (39). March 6, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  172. Symkus, Ed. “Here’s why the original ‘King Kong’ is still one of the greatest films of all time”. USA Today. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  173. Lennon, Will. “King Kong (1933)”. Washington City Paper. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  174. Eggert, Brian (April 27, 2020). “King Kong”. Deep Focus Review. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  175. Haflidason, Almar. “BBC – Films – review – King Kong”. www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  176. Ebert, Roger (February 3, 2002). “King Kong movie review & film summary (1933)”. RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on April 17, 2013. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  177. Berardinelli, James. “King Kong”. Reelviews Movie Reviews. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  178. RH (April 12, 2023). “King Kong: ‘the film caters for all tastes’ – archive, 1933”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  179. Latson, Jennifer (March 2, 2015). “How ‘King Kong’ Gripped Audiences, Despite Ham-Handed Effects”. Time. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  180. “King Kong – 90th Anniversary”. TIFF. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  181. “King Kong”. Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on December 30, 2009. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
  182. “King Kong (1933) Reviews –Metacritic”. Metacritic.com. Metacritic. Archived from the original on July 29, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
  183. “‘King Kong’: The Eighth Wonder of the World”. NPR. June 29, 2008. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  184. “Think He’s Crazy? Nah, Just Enthusiastic. Rewatching King Kong (1933)”. October 24, 2011.
  185. Grant, Elizabeth. (1996). ‘Here Comes the Bride.’ In: Grant, Barry Keith (ed.). The Dread of Difference: Gender and the Horror Film. Austin: University of Texas Press. p. 373
  186. Goff, Phillip Atiba; Eberhardt, Jennifer L.; Williams, Melissa J.; Jackson, Matthew Christian (2008). “Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94 (2): 293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292. ISSN 1939-1315. PMID 18211178.
  187. Kuhn, Annette. (2007). King Kong. In: Cook, Pam. (ed.) The Cinema Book. London: British Film Institute. p. 41. and Robinson, D. (1983). King Kong. In: Lloyd, A. (ed.) Movies of the Thirties. Orbis Publishing Ltd. p. 58.
  188. Zakarin, Jordan (March 9, 2017). “King Kong’s Long Journey from Racist Monster to Woke Hero”. Inverse. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  189. “King Kong: Special Edition”. www.starburstmagazine.com/. June 29, 2021. Retrieved June 4, 2024.
  190. Rony 1996, p. 175.
  191. Rony 1996, p. 177.
  192. “11 of The Most Racist Movies Ever Made”. Atlanta Black Star. November 22, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2024.
  193. Erb 2009, p. 105.
  194. Malesky, Robert (June 29, 2008). “‘King Kong’: The Eighth Wonder of the World”. NCPR. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  195. Erb 2009, pp. 89, 117.
  196. Rony 1996, p. 180.
  197. Erb 2009, p. 102.
  198. Rony 1996, p. 154.
  199. Rony 1996, p. 15.
  200. Rony 1996, p. 172.
  201. Rony 1996, pp. 165, 181.
  202. Berenstein 1996, pp. 163–164.
  203. Rony 1996, p. 189.
  204. Rony 1996, pp. 165, 176.
  205. Berenstein 1996, pp. 195–196.
  206. Rony 1996, p. 176.
  207. Lorenz 2007, p. 159.
  208. Erb 2009, p. 106.
  209. Telotte 1988, pp. 389–390.
  210. Andriano 1999, p. 50.
  211. Berenstein 1996, pp. 186–187.
  212. Berenstein 1996, p. 188.
  213. Berenstein 1996, pp. 193–194.
  214. Berenstein 1996, p. 189.
  215. Berenstein 1996, p. 192.
  216. Rubinstein 1977, pp. 5–6.
  217. Rubinstein 1977, p. 8.
  218. Lloyd & Robinson 1985, p. 57.
  219. Erb 2009, p. 104.
  220. Berenstein 1996, p. 187.
  221. Rony 1996, pp. 172, 176.
  222. Berenstein 1996, p. 191.
  223. Smith 2020, pp. 99–100.
  224. Haver, Ron (December 1976). “Merian C. Cooper: The First King of Kong”. American Film Magazine. New York: American Film Institute. p. 18. Archived from the original on August 2, 2020. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
  225. Erb 2009, p. 89.
  226. Erb 2009, pp. 89, 102.
  227. Erb 2009, pp. 102–103.
  228. Erb 2009, p. 88.
  229. Erb 2009, p. 112.
  230. Erb 2009, p. 103.
  231. Telotte 1988, p. 396.
  232. Telotte 1988, p. 390.
  233. Erb 2009, p. 117.
  234. Lorenz 2007, p. 167.
  235. Voiovich, Jason (May 13, 2025). Bullfrogs, Bingo, and the Little House on the Prairie: How Innovators of the Great Depression Made the Best of the Worst of Times. Jaywalker Publishing. pp. 145–158. ISBN 978-1737001379.
  236. Morton 2005, p. 85.
  237. Erb 2009, p. 161.
  238. Eagan 22
  239. “Complete National Film Registry Listing”. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on November 10, 2020. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
  240. “AFI’s 100 YEARS…100 MOVIES”. American Film Institute. Archived from the original on December 13, 2020. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  241. Erb 2009, p. 129.
  242. Rovin, Jeff (1989). The Encyclopedia of Monsters. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-1824-3.
  243. Weaver, Tom (2014). The Creature Chronicles: Exploring the Black Lagoon Trilogy. McFarland & Company. p. 30. ISBN 978-0786494187.
  244. Memories of Ishiro Honda. Twenty Years After The Passing Of Godzilla’s Famed Director by Hajime Ishida. Famous Monsters of Filmland #269. Movieland Classics LLC, 2013. Pg. 20
  245. Mottram, James (2021). Jurassic Park: The Ultimate Visual History. Insight Editions. p. 17. ISBN 978-1683835455.
  246. Jones, James Earl (Host) (1995). The Making of Jurassic Park (VHS). Universal.
  247. Wudunn, Sheryl (April 4, 1997). “Tomoyuki Tanaka, the Creator of Godzilla, Is Dead at 86”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 26, 2017. Retrieved August 3, 2021.
  248. Hisayuki Ui, January 1, 1994, From Gamera to Daimajin: all of Daiei tokusatsu films, p.63, Kindaieigasha
  249. “Did King Kong inspire Nessie?”. The New Zealand Herald. August 17, 2014. Retrieved January 9, 2015.
  250. “Nessie’s starring role”. The Week. January 9, 2015. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
  251. Doherty, Thomas (June 7, 2025). “The Best Stunts of All Time, Over Nearly 100 Years of the Oscars”. The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 20, 2025.
  252. Eggert, Brian (April 27, 2020). “King Kong”. Deep Focus Review. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
  253. Newman, Kim (January 1, 2000). “EMPIRE ESSAY: King Kong“. Empire. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
  254. Bruce, Amanda; Summers, Megan; McCormick, Colin (November 27, 2020). “Every King Kong Movie (In Chronological Order)”. ScreenRant. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
  255. “The Mighty Kong | Rotten Tomatoes”. www.rottentomatoes.com. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
  256. “Censored Scenes from Hong Kong”. The Hollywood Reporter. 260 (44): 26. March 13, 1980.

Bibliography

External links

Wikimedia Commons logo

Wikimedia Commons has media related to King Kong (1933 film).

vteKing Kong
vteFilms directed by Ernest B. Schoedsack
vteEdgar Wallace
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata

Categories:

Wikipedia
The Free Encyclopedia

King Kong (1933 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

King Kong
Theatrical release poster
Directed byMerian C. CooperErnest B. Schoedsack
Screenplay byJames CreelmanRuth Rose
Story byEdgar WallaceMerian C. Cooper[1]
Produced byMerian C. CooperErnest B. Schoedsack
StarringFay WrayRobert ArmstrongBruce Cabot
CinematographyEddie LindenVernon WalkerJ.O. Taylor
Edited byTed Cheesman
Music byMax Steiner
Distributed byRKO Radio Pictures
Release datesMarch 2, 1933 (New York City)April 7, 1933 (United States)
Running time100 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$672,254.75[2][3]
Box office$10 million[4]

King Kong is a 1933 American pre-Code adventure horror monster film[5] directed and produced by Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack, with special effects by Willis H. O’Brien and music by Max Steiner. Produced and distributed by RKO Radio Pictures, King Kong is the first film in the self-titled franchise, combining live-action sequences with stop-motion animation using rear-screen projection. The idea for the film came when Cooper decided to create a motion picture about a giant gorilla struggling against modern civilization. The film stars Fay Wray, Robert Armstrong, and Bruce Cabot. The story follows said gorilla dubbed Kong who feels affection for a beautiful young woman offered to him as a sacrifice.

King Kong premiered in New York City on March 2, 1933, to many rave reviews, with praise for its stop-motion animation and musical score. During its initial run, the film earned a profit of $650,000, which increased to $2,847,000 by the time of its re-release in 1952. Various scenes were deleted by censors, but they were restored in 1970. Later, in 1991, the film was deemed “culturally, historically and aesthetically significant” by the Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.[6][7] In 2010, the film was ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as the greatest horror film of all time[8] and the fifty-sixth greatest film of all time.[9] Various new editions of the film have also been released. A sequel, entitled Son of Kong, was made the same year as the original film, and several more films have been made, including two remakes in 1976 and 2005.

The film’s novelization, published prior to its release, entered the public domain through a failure to include a copyright notice, making the characters and story public domain; the film’s copyright is set to expire in 2029 in the US.[10] Analysis of the film has included such topics as racial stereotypes, Ann’s relationship with the other characters, and the struggle between nature and civilization.

Plot

In New York Harbor, filmmaker Carl Denham, known for wildlife films in remote exotic locations, is chartering Captain Englehorn’s ship, the Venture, for his new project. However, he is unable to secure an actress for a female role he has been reluctant to disclose. In the streets of New York City, he finds struggling actress Ann Darrow and promises her “the thrill of a lifetime”. The Venture sets off, during which Denham reveals that their destination is an uncharted island with a mountain the shape of a skull. He alludes to a mysterious entity named Kong, rumored to dwell on the island. The crew arrives and anchors offshore. They encounter a native village separated from the rest of the island by an enormous stone wall with a large wooden gate. They witness a group of natives preparing to sacrifice a young woman, termed the “bride of Kong”. The intruders are spotted and the native chief stops the ceremony. When he sees the blonde-haired Ann, he offers to trade six of his tribal women for the “golden woman”. They refuse him and return to the ship.

That night, after the ship’s first mate, Jack Driscoll, admits his love for Ann, the natives kidnap Ann from the ship and take her through the gate and onto an altar. There she is offered to Kong, who is revealed to be a giant gorilla-looking beast. Kong carries a terrified Ann away into the jungle as Denham, Jack, and some crewmen give chase. The men encounter living dinosaurs; they manage to kill a charging Stegosaurus, but are attacked by an aggressive Brontosaurus and eventually Kong himself, leaving Jack and Denham as the only survivors. After Kong slays a Tyrannosaurus to save Ann, Jack keeps following them while Denham returns to the village. Upon arriving in Kong’s mountain lair, Ann is menaced by a serpent-like Elasmosaurus, which Kong also kills. When a Pteranodon tries to fly away with Ann, and is killed by Kong, Jack saves her and they climb down a vine dangling from a cliff ledge. When Kong starts pulling them back up, the two drop into the water below; they flee back to the village, where Denham, Englehorn, and the surviving crewmen await. Kong pursues, breaks open the gate, and relentlessly rampages through the village. Onshore, Denham, determined to bring Kong back alive, renders him unconscious with a gas bomb.

Shackled in chains, Kong is taken to New York City and presented to a Broadway theatre audience as, “King Kong, the Eighth Wonder of the World!” Ann and Jack join him on stage, surrounded by press photographers. The ensuing flash photography causes Kong to break loose as the audience flees in terror. Ann is whisked away to a hotel room on a high floor, but Kong scales the building and reclaims her. He makes his way through the city with Ann in his grasp, wrecks a crowded elevated train, and begins climbing the Empire State Building. Jack suggests that airplanes shoot Kong off the building without hitting Ann. Four biplanes take off; seeing them arrive, Jack becomes agitated for Ann’s safety and rushes inside with Denham. At the top, Kong is shot at by the planes as he swats at them. Kong destroys one, but is wounded by the gunfire. After he gazes at Ann, he is shot more, loses his strength, and plummets to the streets below to his death. Jack reunites with Ann. Denham heads back down and is allowed through a crowd surrounding Kong’s corpse in the street. When a policeman remarks that the planes got him, Denham sadly states, “Oh, no, it wasn’t the airplanes. It was Beauty killed the Beast.”

Cast

Production

Development

Further information: King Kong § Conception and creation

Charles R. Knight‘s Tyrannosaurus in the American Museum of Natural History, on which the large theropod of the film was based[11]

King Kong co-director Ernest B. Schoedsack had earlier experience filming monkeys while directing Chang: A Drama of the Wilderness (1927), also with Merian C. Cooper, and Rango (1931), both of which prominently featured monkeys in authentic jungle settings. Capitalizing on this trend, Congo Pictures released the hoax documentary Ingagi (1930), advertising the film as “an authentic incontestable celluloid document showing the sacrifice of a living woman to mammoth gorillas.” Ingagi is now often recognized as a racial exploitation film as it implicitly depicted black women having sex with gorillas and baby offspring that looked more ape than human.[12] The film was an immediate hit, and by some estimates, it was one of the highest-grossing films of the 1930s at over $4 million. Although Cooper never listed Ingagi among his influences for King Kong, it has long been held that RKO greenlighted Kong because of the bottom-line example of Ingagi and the formula that “gorillas plus sexy women in peril equals enormous profits.”[13]

Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack develop King Kong.

Since 1929, Cooper had wanted to create a film about gorillas.[14] Inspired by the travels of his friend W. Douglas Burden, Cooper considered filming in the jungles of Komodo.[15] He had read Burden’s The Dragon Lizards of Komodo and as a result conceived the idea to film a gorilla fighting giant lizards.[16] Cooper later remarked that this was “the most important influence” on the final film.[17] By the time he joined RKO in 1931, Cooper decided to incorporate a “beauty and the beast” theme into the plot.[18] The “Arabian proverb” at the beginning of the film was created by Cooper: “And lo! The Beast looked upon the face of Beauty, and it stayed its hand from killing. And from that day, it was as one dead.”[19] Initially Cooper planned to film in Africa and Komodo Island, but the idea was abandoned when RKO executives decided it would be too expensive.[20] RKO was at risk for bankruptcy because of the Great Depression.[21] Stop-motion animator Willis O’Brien, hearing that Cooper wanted to make a gorilla film, painted a picture depicting a large gorilla carrying a woman and gave it to Cooper. Afterward Cooper requested a test reel, which was approved by Selznick.[22] O’Brien experimented with different scenes in the test reel.[23] These two scenes, which were incorporated into the final film,[24] portray a fight between King Kong and a Tyrannosaurus Rex as well as Kong shaking men off a log.[25] The test reel was created concurrently with the production of The Most Dangerous Game.[26] Meanwhile, Cooper hired actors and had sets built for King Kong.[27] For live-action sequences in the jungle, Cooper utilized the set of The Most Dangerous Game.[26] Cooper directed the live-action sequences until Schoedsack completed work on The Most Dangerous Game.[28] Afterward Shoedsack directed the live action scenes while Cooper focused on the live action scenes that were to be combined with the already-filmed animated sequences.[29] Marcel Delgado developed sample models of King Kong, the dinosaurs, and the people; the models did not have armatures.[30] After about three months the test reel was complete.[31] After studio executives approved the film for production, Cooper developed the story further.[32] O’Brien’s ideas also helped with story development. He suggested that King Kong be seen by the characters as a sort of deity.[17]

Promotional image featuring Kong battling the Tyrannosaurus, though Cooper emphasized in an interview with film historian Rudy Behlmer that it was an Allosaurus

Filming commenced without a complete screenplay.[33] Cooper hired Edgar Wallace to write the screenplay,[34] which he started in December 1931.[35] Cooper told Wallace what he wanted included in the script.[35] Wallace’s draft included several instances of attempted sexual assault,[36] which were later removed by Ruth Rose.[37] His draft also included racial tensions between characters.[37] While drafting he wrote, “I am hoping still to get a good horror picture without corpses, and I am certain that Kong is going to be a wow.”[38] Wallace had a rough draft ready in January 1932[39] and died a month later.[40] Some of his ideas ended up in the final film, such as Kong removing Ann’s clothes from her body.[24] He also roughly outlined the New York scenes, which were similar to how they appeared in the completed film, as well as a jungle chase scene.[36] James A. Creelman picked up work on the screenplay.[41] In his draft he changed character roles, making Denham Ann’s cruel uncle. Cooper disliked it, remarking that “The heavy is far too heavy.”[37] Creelman adapted Wallace’s jungle chase scene to appear as it does in the finished film.[42] Creelman found it difficult to meet Cooper’s plot requests,[43] feeling that there were too many fantastical elements for the film to be believable.[44] He objected, “[T]here is certainly such a thing as reaching a limit to the number of elements a story can contain and make sense.”[45] Though he incorporated Cooper’s requests, the dialogue proved to be too extensive.[46] Cooper was unsatisfied with Creelman’s work, and in June Creelman decided to quit.[47] After some difficulty finding a replacement for Creelman, in July Cooper hired Ruth Rose,[28] who had never written a screenplay before.[48] She rewrote the majority of Creelman’s dialogue.[49] Though Creelman initially wrote the film’s New York prologue, Rose polished it while writing most of the city scenes.[50] Rose was able to incorporate the love story between Ann and Jack, something the other screenwriters had struggled with.[51] Rose also added more “fairy tale-like” aspects.[37] Upon the film’s release Wallace was credited with the screenplay, as Cooper had promised to give him the credit. The studio also saw it as an opportunity to gain positive publicity because Wallace was a well-established writer.[52]

Copyright concerns

The creators of King Kong took inspiration from other films such as Dracula and Frankenstein. The influence was heavy enough that RKO executives were worried about copyright violation.[53] Executives discussed the potential issue with RKO’s lawyers.[54] Also among their concerns were the film’s connections to Ingagi, Murders in the Rue Morgue, Journey to the Center of the Earth, and The Lost World. The other works being ruled out, Arthur Conan Doyle‘s The Lost World posed the most concern.[55] Both The Lost World and King Kong concerned primitive creatures being taken to modern society.[56] Even though Cooper argued against the similarities,[56] the studio purchased the novel’s copyright.[57] Afterward Cooper feared that if the studio were to connect Doyle’s name to the film for promotional purposes, consumers might not think the film was fresh. Eventually the Doyle estate granted the studio permission to not associate the film with Doyle’s name.[58]

Special effects

Colored publicity shot combining live actors with stop motion animation

King Kong is groundbreaking in the use of special effects, such as stop-motion animation, matte painting, rear projection, and miniatures.[59] The prehistoric creatures inhabiting Skull Island were brought to life through the use of stop-motion animation by Willis H. O’Brien and his assistant animators, E. B. “Buzz” Gibson, Carroll Shepphird, Marcel Delgado, Orville Goldner, and Fred Reefe.[60][61] The stop-motion animation scenes were painstaking and difficult to achieve and complete. The special effects crew could not leave the studio during the day because the lighting would not be consistent.[62] The jungle scenery was created by layering glass paintings, which were created by Mario Larrinaga and Byron L. Crabbe.[63] They were used when Denham’s crew first arrives. The scene was composited with separate bird elements and rear-projected behind the ship and actors.[64]

The most difficult task for the special effects crew to achieve was to make live-action footage interact with separately filmed stop-motion animation, making the interaction between the humans and the creatures seem believable. The most simple of these effects were accomplished by exposing part of the frame, then running the same piece of the film through the camera again by exposing the other part of the frame with a different image. This process is called a matte.[65] The most complex shots, where the live-action actors interacted with the stop-motion animation, were achieved via two different techniques, the Dunning process and the Williams process, to produce the effect of a traveling matte.[66][67]

Brontosaurus stop motion armature

Another technique that was used in combining live actors and stop-motion animation was rear-screen projection.[68] The actor would have a translucent screen behind him where a projector would project footage onto the back of the translucent screen.[64] This was the first film for which RKO used the method.[69] It was used in the scene where Kong and the Tyrannosaurus fight while Ann watches from the branches of a nearby tree. The stop-motion animation was filmed first. Afterward Fay Wray spent a 22-hour period sitting in a fake tree acting out her observation of the battle, which was projected onto the translucent screen while the camera filmed her witnessing the projected stop-motion battle.[70] She was sore for days after the shoot. The same process was also used for the scene where sailors from the Venture kill a Stegosaurus.[71] O’Brien and his special effects crew also devised a way to use rear projection in miniature sets.[72] A tiny screen was built into the miniature onto which live-action footage would then be projected.[64] A fan was used to prevent the footage that was projected from melting or catching fire. This miniature rear projection was used in the scene where Kong tries to grab Driscoll, who is hiding in a cave. For the scene in which Kong places Ann in a tree, Wray acted out her sequences as Kong’s sequences were projected in the rear.[73] She was unable to clearly see the projected images and had to act based on the blurs she saw.[29] Animation for the film was completed after 55 weeks.[74]

Producer Merian C. Cooper eyes the huge life-size King Kong mechanical model used in certain close-up scenes, circa 1933

Cooper, wishing to create a point of authenticity, insisted that Kong not be played by an actor in a gorilla suit.[56] Over the years, some media reports have alleged that in certain scenes Kong was played by an actor wearing a gorilla suit.[75][76] However, film historians have generally agreed that all scenes involving Kong were achieved with animated models.[77][78] These models were about 14 to 18 inches (36 to 46 cm) in height.[79][80] They were made of metal armatures padded with cotton, latex, and rabbit fur.[81] The fur moved as the animators handled the models, becoming an unintentional feature of Kong. The models required maintenance after each day of filming.[82] Closeups of Kong’s face and upper body were accomplished by filming a full-size mechanical model of Kong’s head and shoulders, designed by Delgado.[83] The model, scaled to the dimensions of a fifty-foot creature, was covered with forty bearskins.[84] Six operators were required[84] to manipulate the eyes and mouth to simulate a living monster.[65] A proportionally large arm and paw were also created for closeup shots of Kong holding Ann.[80] Dinosaur models were reused from O’Brien’s aborted film project Creation.[41] Production was completed in January 1933.[35] Production costs added up to $672,254.75, part of which included costs for Creation.[85]

Sound effects and score

Murray Spivack developed the sound effects for the film. Kong’s roar was created by mixing the recorded vocals of lions and tigers and slowly playing them backward.[86] Spivak himself provided Kong’s “love grunts” by grunting into a megaphone and playing it at a slow speed. For Kong’s footsteps, Spivak stomped across a gravel-filled box with plungers attached to his feet and wrapped in foam.[87] The sounds of Kong’s chest beats are recordings of Spivak hitting his assistant, who had a microphone held to his back, on the chest with a drumstick.[88] Spivak created the hisses and croaks of the dinosaurs with an air compressor for the former and his own vocals for the latter.[89] The vocalizations of the Tyrannosaurus were additionally mixed in with puma growls.[89] Spivak also provided the screams of the various sailors.[89] Fay Wray herself provided all of her character’s screams in a single recording session.[90][91] Wray explained that afterward she “couldn’t speak even in a whisper for days”.[49] Her screams have been used in other movies such as Son of Kong and Game of Death.[3]

Even though funding for the film was nearly gone, Cooper and Schoedsack decided it needed an original score because they worried that Kong might be too unbelievable as a character and also did not want to use a generic soundtrack.[92] They hired Max Steiner for the job.[93] Steiner began composing the score on December 9, 1932, and completed it after eight weeks.[94] The orchestra comprised 46 members, but upon recording sounded so full it is sometimes described as having 80 members.[95] A 46-member orchestra was large compared to many other film orchestras of the time.[96] According to Steiner, Cooper paid him $50,000 of his own money to pay for the orchestra.[97]

Steiner decided to make the music, in his own words, “impressionistic and terrifying”.[93] During composition he took inspiration from Debussy and Ravel, specifically for the music that was to play during the ocean scene when Denham and his crew travel to Skull Island.[98] During this scene “Boat in the Fog” begins to play; the harp reflects the waves and the stringed instruments reflect of the fog.[99] Steiner also incorporated dissonance into the score for action scenes, such as when Kong falls to his death.[100] Laurence MacDonald explains that this dissonance is also reflective of Debussy’s compositions.[101] The ocean scene is the first instance in which music begins to play. This is because Steiner wanted an association between music and the film’s fantasy elements.[102] Music historian Michael Slowik suggests that such an association invokes a sense of the unfamiliar,[103] also pointing out that music is connected to the audience’s need to suspend belief.[104] Music does not play during Kong’s fight with the T-rex and is replaced by animal sounds, making it the only Skull Island scene without music.[105][106] Music plays in the later New York City scenes except for when the airplanes surround Kong.[107] One of the techniques that Steiner often wrote into the score is called mickey-mousing. MacDonald dubs it “perhaps the single most noteworthy aspect of Steiner’s score”.[108] According to Slowik, the score includes more mickey-mousing than other film scores of its period.[108] He remarks that its “obsessive mickey-mousing”[109] is reminiscent of the music that would play for a cartoon rather than for a Hollywood production.[110] In one scene the chief of the island people walks toward Denham’s group and the music aligns with his steps.[108] The score also reflects actions happening off-screen, such as when Kong walks toward the altar where Ann is to be offered to him. Formerly, this technique had been used for silent films.[110]

Slowik identifies three musical themes throughout the score: Kong’s theme, Ann’s theme, and the jungle theme.[111] Steiner took inspiration from Wagner in creating Kong’s theme.[112] Steiner used a method called chromaticism in Kong’s theme, which comprises three descending notes.[113] According to Peter Franklin, the other themes stem from the three-note sequence in Kong’s theme.[111] “King Kong March”, a Broadway-style score played during Denham’s show, is an adaptation of Kong’s theme, though the notes ascend rather than descend.[114] Ann’s theme (“Stolen Love”) is a Viennese waltz and begins with notes similar to those in Kong’s theme.[115] Steiner eventually combined both themes in one melody just before Kong dies.[116] Musician biographer Steven C. Smith identifies what he calls the “danger theme”. It is written with four notes and is meant to sound “questioning”. It first appears in “The Forgotten Island”.[115] Later, it is reworked into a major key when Driscoll confesses his love for Ann. Smith suggests that this points to what he calls “the perils of romance”.[115] Later in life Cooper expressed that “much of the reason for [King Kong‘s success] is because Maxie Steiner was able to create what no other man that I knew of in Hollywood at that time could”.[117] Steiner himself remarked that the film “was made for music”.[93]

Upon the film’s release its score received little critical review, being overshadowed by the film’s innovations in special effects.[118] However, it received more attention as the movie became more famous in the years that followed.[117] Christopher Palmer wrote that the score “marked the real beginnings of Hollywood music”.[119] Mervyn Cooke adds that it “almost single-handedly marked the coming-of-age of nondiegetic film music”.[119] In his book After the Silents: Hollywood Film Music in the Early Sound Era, 1926–1934, Slowik argues that King Kong‘s score did not influence Hollywood film scores that many music scholars think it did. He suggests that, because the movie was unusual, the score was unable to introduce an alternate way to write film scores.[120] He also suggests that Steiner drew upon already-established patterns of Hollywood music.[121] He writes that rather than single-handedly shaping the Golden Age of Hollywood music, King Kong is just one film among others that helped shape it.[122] Slowik explains that the score features both “original and symphonic music”, something that was not common in film scores of the time.[123] Portions of the score were reused in Double Harness, The Last Days of Pompeii, and The Last of the Mohicans, among others.[124] The island music appears as an orchestra scene in Jackson’s 2005 remake.[125] Over the years, Steiner’s score was recorded by multiple record labels and the original motion picture soundtrack has been issued on a compact disc.[126]

Release and censorship

Initial release and box office

Grauman’s Chinese Theatre, where King Kong held its Hollywood premiere.

King Kong’s campaign included newspaper ads, radio ads, and posters.[127] It premiered in the Radio City Music Hall and RKO Roxy in New York City on March 2, 1933.[74][128] U. S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared the four-day nationwide bank holiday three days after the film’s premiere in New York City.[129][130] The film was a box-office success and during the opening weekend earned an estimated $90,000.[1] Receipts fell by up to 50% during the second week of the film’s release because of the national bank holiday.[131] Attendance of the film dropped within the second and third weeks of its New York release.[132] During the film’s first run it made a profit of $650,000.[133] Before the 1952 re-release, the film is reported to have worldwide rentals of $2,847,000 including $1,070,000 from the United States and Canada and profits of $1,310,000.[2] The Hollywood premiere was held on March 24, 1933, in Grauman’s Chinese Theatre.[134] The screening was preceded by a performance featuring dances of Indigenous people and trapeze performances[135] and RKO had decorated the theater’s lobby so that it looked like a jungle.[136] It was not officially released until April 7, 1933.[3] It was re-released in 1952 following the promising re-release of Snow White.[137] After the 1952 re-release, Variety estimated the film had earned an additional $1.6 million in the United States and Canada, bringing its total to $3.9 million in cumulative rentals in the United States.[138] Profits from the re-release were estimated by the studio to be at about $2.5 million,[3] which was about double of what the film earned in 1933.[139]

Theatrical advertisement from 1933

Censorship and restorations

The Production Code‘s stricter rules were put into effect in Hollywood after the film’s 1933 premiere and it was progressively censored further, with several scenes being either trimmed or excised altogether for the 1938–1956 rereleases.[140][141] Censors removed the scene of the Brontosaurus mauling crewmen in the water, chasing one up a tree and killing him.[142] They also removed the scenes where Kong undresses Ann Darrow,[1][142] bites and steps on people.[1] The scene where Kong mistakes a sleeping woman for Ann and drops her to her death after realizing his mistake was also removed.[1][142] An additional scene portraying giant insects, spiders, a reptile-like predator and a tentacled creature devouring the crew members shaken off the log by Kong onto the floor of the canyon below was deemed too gruesome by RKO even by pre-Code standards. Cooper thought it “stopped the story”, and thus the scene was censored by the studio before the original release.[74] Members of the preview audience also left the film early because they were concerned about the scene.[143] The footage is considered lost, except for only a few stills and pre-production drawings.[90][144] There are also claims that it was never filmed and was only in the script and novelization.[145]

The film was initially banned in Nazi Germany, with the censors describing it as an “attack against the nerves of the German people” and a “violation of German race feeling”.[146] Shortly following its release the film was also banned in Finland for violence; the ban was released in 1939.[147]Duration: 1 minute and 32 seconds.1:32Trailer for the 1938 re-release of King Kong (1:32).

RKO did not preserve copies of the film’s negative or release prints with the excised footage, and the cut scenes were considered lost for many years. In 1969, a 16mm print, including the censored footage, was found in Philadelphia. The cut scenes were added to the film, restoring it to its original theatrical running time of 100 minutes. This version was re-released to art houses by Janus Films in 1970.[90] Over the next two decades, Universal Studios undertook further photochemical restoration of King Kong. This was based on a 1942 release print with missing censor cuts taken from a 1937 print, which “contained heavy vertical scratches from projection.”[148] An original release print located in the UK in the 1980s was found to contain the cut scenes in better quality.[140] After a 6-year worldwide search for the best surviving materials, a further, fully digital restoration utilizing 4K resolution scanning was completed by Warner Bros. in 2005. This restoration also had a 4-minute overture added, bringing the overall running time to 104 minutes.[149] The project was funded by The Film Foundation and the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.[141] Somewhat controversially, King Kong was colorized for a 1989 Turner Home Entertainment video release.[150][3]

Television and home media

After the 1956 re-release, the film was sold to television and was first broadcast on March 5, 1956.[151] King Kong had numerous VHS and LaserDisc releases of varying quality before receiving an official studio release on DVD. In 1984, King Kong was one of the first films to be released on LaserDisc as part of the Criterion Collection, and was the first movie to have an audio commentary track included.[152] Criterion’s audio commentary was by film historian Ron Haver.[153] The Haver commentary was available on the FilmStruck streaming service.[154] Image Entertainment released another LaserDisc around 1993.[155] The VHS release from Turner was a 60th-anniversary edition in 1992 featuring a front cover that had the sound effect of Kong roaring when his chest was pressed. It had orders for over 140,000 copies, with the colorized version being preferred. It also included a 25-minute documentary, It Was Beauty Killed the Beast (1992).[156]

In 2005, Warner Bros. released its digital restoration of King Kong in a US 2-disc Special Edition DVD, coinciding with the theatrical release of Peter Jackson‘s remake.[3] The restoration was funded partially by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.[157] The DVD release had numerous extra features, including a new, third audio commentary by visual effects artists Ray Harryhausen and Ken Ralston, with archival excerpts from actress Fay Wray and producer/director Merian C. Cooper. At American Cinematographer, Kenneth Sweeney found the extras on disc 1 lackluster for such an important release. Disc 2 included more in-depth features, with a short biographical film on Cooper, and “RKO Production 601: The Making of King Kong“, produced by Peter Jackson. Disc 2 included additional interviews with many relevant people. The DVD was also sold in a limited edition with Son of Kong and Mighty Joe Young[158] Warners issued a US digibook-packaged Blu-ray in 2010, presented in a aspect ratio of 1.37:1, and with a 1080p master upgrade over the 2005 two-disc DVD release. Rudy Behlmer wrote the accompanying 32-page booklet.[159]

Reception

Contemporary

Front cover of King Kong’s Los Angeles premiere program included in the 1933 edition of Hollywood Reporter.

King Kong received generally positive reviews upon its release. Meehan of Motion Picture Herald predicted it would be “one of the sensational pictures of the year”, opining that “no more thrilling climax ever was filmed”.[160] A reviewer for The Hollywood Reporter claimed the film “bears all the earmarks of a winner”, predicting it would make “plenty of money”.[161] Another review in the same periodical declared it was “superbly produced-acted”, a “great piece of imagination, hatched in the brain of a showman for showmen”.[162] A Motion Picture Herald review by McCarthy called King Kong “imagination-stunning” and praised the “buildup of suspense”, dubbing it “a showman’s picture”.[163] The Chicago Tribune called it “one of the most original, thrilling and mammoth novelties to emerge from a movie studio.”[164] The New York Times gave readers an enthusiastic account of the plot and thought the film a fascinating adventure.[165] The New York World-Telegram said it was “one of the very best of all the screen thrillers, done with all the cinema’s slickest camera tricks.”[166]

The Film Daily wrote, “The picture has plenty of shocker stuff, and the terror is heightened by [Fay Wray’s screaming], while the film’s musical score adds its blare to keep the audience in a state of turmoil.” The reviewer cautioned that “some women and children” might dislike the film’s intensity.[167] John Mosher of The New Yorker called it “ridiculous,” but wrote that there were “many scenes in this picture that are certainly diverting.”[168] Joe Bigelow of Variety thought the film held “power” once a viewer got used to the “phoney atmosphere”. He remarked that “a few details were too strong to swallow the picture” and the technical innovations overshadowed the plot and acting. The film’s “many flaws”, he added, were “overcome by the general results”.[169] Newsweek wrote that Cooper and Schoedsack were no longer “scientists” because the film was “exaggerated in its faked views of wild life”.[170]

The Hollywood Reporter included a multi-page booklet in its March issue, featuring production stills and concept sketches alongside critical praise for the film.[171] The booklet was the program for the film’s Los Angeles premiere.[51]

Recent

Ed Symkus of USA Today claims the film “stands tall as a groundbreaking piece of jaw-dropping, eye-widening entertainment”.[172] The Washington City Paper called it “a movie upon whose foundation we’ve built a sizable section of contemporary pop culture”.[173] Film historian Michael Price calls the film “the product of a remarkable group of daredevils, artists, and craftsmen.”[85] Brian Eggert claims that “King Kong’s greatness remains in part because it demonstrates a compendium of Classic Hollywood production strategies.” He additionally praises the music as “guid[ing] every emotion”.[174] Almar Haflidason of BBC praises the “fantastic atmosphere” of the score and the “richness of Kong’s character.” Haflidason adds that the animation is “technically brilliant [and] highly imaginative in terms of cinematic action”.[175] Roger Ebert included King Kong in his “Great Movies” list, writing that “in the very artificiality of some of the special effects, there is a creepiness that isn’t there in today’s slick, flawless, computer-aided images… Even allowing for its slow start, wooden acting, and wall-to-wall screaming, there is something ageless and primeval about King Kong that still somehow works.”[176]

James Berardinelli writes that “advances in technology and acting have dated aspects of the production”. He also adds that the acting is weak and that he feels “some sense of awe” in consideration of the special effects.[177] The Guardian pointed out Kong’s perceptible size changes, and remarked that compared to today’s filmmaking techniques, King Kong “has ceased to be the thriller…and has become of the best comedies seen for years”.[178] In its review Time wrote that Kong “sometimes doubled in size”.[179] TIFF wrote that it is “reductive in its portrayal of humans, especially the Indigenous people”.[180]

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 97% based on 116 reviews, with an average rating of 9/10. The site’s critical consensus reads, “King Kong explores the soul of a monster – making audiences scream and cry throughout the film – in large part due to Kong’s breakthrough special effects.”[181] On Metacritic the film currently has a rare weighted average score of 92 out of 100, based on 12 critics, indicating “universal acclaim”.[182]

Analysis

Racial stereotypes

King Kong has undergone extensive analysis of its portrayal of race. NPR producer Robert Malesky remarks that, “To many, the eroticism and racism of the original film are just side themes and part of the fabric of 1930s America.”[183] Author Ryan Britt feels that critics were willing to overlook the film’s problematic aspects as “just unattractive byproducts of the era in which the film was made”. He adds, “the meta-fictional aspects almost excuse some of the cultural insensitivity”.[184] In the 19th and early 20th century, people of African descent were commonly represented visually as ape-like, a metaphor that fit racist stereotypes further bolstered by the emergence of scientific racism.[185] Early films frequently mirrored racial tensions. While King Kong is often compared to the story of Beauty and the Beast, many film scholars have argued that the film was a cautionary tale about interracial romance, in which the film’s “carrier of blackness is not a human being, but an ape.”[186][187] Jordan Zakarin of Inverse quotes author John Michlig, who explains that even though many modern viewers see the film as racist, it exhibits 1930s perceptions of obscure locations and peoples.[188]

The film has been criticized for racial stereotyping of the native people and Charlie the cook, the latter of whom exclaims, “Crazy black man been here!” when he discovers Ann has been kidnapped.[189] Filmmaker Fatimah Rony argues that Charlie is feminized in his occupation and gesticulations.[190] She also views the native people’s “savagery” as being associated with their dark skin.[191] In 2013 Atlanta Black Star described the people native to the island “as subhuman, or primate…[without] a distinct way of communicating”.[192] Rony points out that African Americans and a Yaqui man were cast to portray Indonesian people.[191] In her view, racial undertones are present when Ann is preferred for the sacrifice rather than the girl who is native to Skull Island.[191] Wayne State University film professor Cynthia Erb remarks that “Ann’s prized whiteness” is “the most disturbing racial” component, rather than “Kong’s blackness”.[193] Erb explains that in jungle films “the depiction of natives was often patronizing, stereotypical, racist.” She adds, “I think it does happen with the Skull Islanders.”[194]

Critics have also seen Kong himself as a perpetuation of racial tensions. Atlanta Black Star perceived a racial allegory between Kong and black men, remarking that Kong “meets his demise due to his insatiable desire for a white woman”.[192] Erb argues that the portrayal of Kong is one of a “noble savage” and a fighter rather than a “sexual aggressor”.[195] In her analysis Rony relates Kong to the “noble savage” because he fights off the dinosaurs due to his affection for Ann.[196] She remarks that Kong is “not exclusively black”, as he is connected to Asia due to his Eastern-inspired name as well as the Indonesian location of Skull Island.[197] She calls it “one of the most outrageous ‘racial films’ ever made”,[198] opining that it is one among several films of the time that portrays a person with African, Asian, or Pacific Islander ancestry “as an ape-monster”.[199] According to Rony, Cooper decided to make Ann blonde to emphasize the difference between her and Kong,[200] and as a white woman she was established as “a kind of lure for the monster-like beast”.[201] Her fair complexion contrasts with his dark complexion, which film analyst Rhona Berenstein argues is implicitly associated with his “monstrosity”.[202]

Concerns surrounding biracial interactions in the film have also arisen. Rony claims the film “ultimately celebrates cinema’s tendency to create monsters which mirror the anxieties of any given age”.[203] According to Rony, Kong symbolizes biracial sexual relationships, which were looked down upon at the time of the film’s release.[204] Berenstein sees Kong and Ann’s relationship as “a vehicle for racial crossing”, arguing that the film both “confirms” and “destablizes” the idea of “white supremacy“.[205] She explains that Ann serves as a warning against and as a summons for “the monstrous possibility of miscegenation“.[202] Writer James A. Snead and German Studies professor Dagmar Lorenz compare Denham to a colonialist and link Kong’s capture to the slave trade.[206][207] Erb takes the idea of Denham as colonialist to argue that, following the prologue, the film appears to “challenge” colonialism.[208] Zakarin claims that elements that may be seen as disturbing stemmed from what Cooper believed would make the film adventurous.[188]

Ann’s relationships

Kong puts Ann (Fay Wray) in a tree for safety (and to prevent her escape) before he battles a Tyrannosaurus

The film has been called sexist in its portrayal of women. J. P. Telotte claims that the film “sets up a pattern of repression” in the largely male ship crew as well as with Denham’s and Jack’s “antiromantic remarks”.[209] According to author Joseph Andriano, the film attempts to reduce the idea of sexism by creating a relationship between King Kong and Ann. He adds that this attempt does not work because Ann is portrayed as helpless. Because Kong’s eventual downfall results from “feminine charm”, Andriano suggests that the film implies a “helpless female” is more powerful than an able male.[210] According to Rhona Berenstein, screaming women are “central to [the] jungle-horror” genre.[211] Denham coaches Ann’s screaming when there is nothing to scream at. Berenstein remarks that this coached screaming may bleed into her reaction to Kong, rendering it a performance.[212] She furthers the argument by stating that the practiced screaming indicates that Ann’s and Kong’s relationship “is not simply that between a victim and a monster”,[212] adding that Ann’s victimization via Kong comes only after she seeks independence.[213]

Berenstein parallels Ann’s sacrifice to Kong with Denham’s Kong exhibit in New York City, suggesting that this makes Ann and Kong “both doubles and adversaries”.[214] She views the film as creating a relatability between “people of color, a white woman, and a simian monster”.[215] Mark Rubinstein parallels Kong’s New York rampage to his efforts to protect Ann on Skull Island, remarking that Kong both protects Ann and acts as if she belongs to him.[216] Rubinstein argues that the proverb appearing at the film’s beginning warns about love, specifically that if a man is romantically attracted to a woman he will experience a “downfall”.[217] He argues that Ann does not return Kong’s affection.[217] Wray herself claimed that Ann had no romantic feelings for Kong but instead feared him.[218]

It has also been suggested that Ann is under Denham’s control. Erb remarks that while Kong seeks a romantic relationship with Ann, Denham seeks to earn money because of her.[193] She explains that Denham appears “control-oriented” to modern viewers, whereas to 1930s viewers he would have appeared “more as the enterprising showman”.[219] According to Rony and Berenstein, Ann is controlled by Denham,[220] who uses her “as an object of trade and of spectacle”, subjecting her to the male gaze while practicing her screams under Denham’s direction.[221] Snead remarks that in the film women become “a sort of visual capital” rather than “people or potential partners”.[222]

Nature and civilization

While Cooper and Schoedsack insisted in contemporary interviews that there was no hidden meaning to King Kong, a posthumously published interview with Cooper revealed that his inspiration for the film was rooted in the image of a giant ape falling from the tallest building, which would represent how primitive people are doomed by modern civilization.[223][224] This idea has been taken up in scholarly analysis of the film. In her analysis Erb focuses on the struggle between primitivism and civilization.[225] In her view, Kong invokes a sense of primitivism and symbolizes nature, while Denham symbolizes modern society.[226] The film, she argues, demonstrates “nature’s revenge on culture” and nature’s eventual defeat.[227] While Erb explains that she does not disagree with views of the film involving sexism and racism, she argues that Kong’s interactions with Ann reach beyond race and sex.[228] She argues that when Kong partially undresses Ann, it “initiate[s] her into the realm of the wild”.[229] Touching her and smelling her clothes are primitivist actions, Erb suggests, because it focuses on senses other than sight. Heavy reliance on sight is associated with modern society.[229] Erb explains that Kong’s alternation of aggressiveness and gentleness “arguably embodies both the demonic and Edenic impulses of the jungle tradition” common in 1930s film.[225] According to Erb, through contrast Skull Island is set up as a counterpart to New York City.[230]

Telotte takes a similar approach, pointing out that many of the island scenes reflect the events of the city scenes.[231] According to Telotte, Kong is taken from an “Edenic world” to be exploited in the modern world.[232] Kong’s New York City rampage is an “effort to tear down the base of modern culture itself”.[233] Dagmar Lorenz argues that the film establishes “Western civilization as the source of Kong’s destruction”[207] and explains that portraying Skull Island’s “wildness” seems to convey an idea of “barbarity”.[234] Tom Shales of The Washington Post takes a different approach, suggesting that the film is “an allegory about modern man, sort of, facing his own nature”, rather than about beauty killing the beast.[194]

Social impact during the Great Depression

The weekend after Kong‘s release, newly-elected President Franklin Roosevelt ordered a bank holiday to halt the panic in the financial sector. Innovation historian Jason Voiovich calls the film “The First Popcorn Movie,” making the case that King Kong helped nervous people process the extreme economic stress. The movie served its purpose as an escape on one level, but on another, the monster represented the fear of the Great Depression and that people could conquer it in the end.[235]

Legacy and franchise

Legacy

See also: Wasei Kingu Kongu and The King Kong That Appeared in Edo

Since its release the film has received some significant honors. In 1975, Kong was named one of the 50 best American films by the American Film Institute.[236] Around this time it also gained academic attention.[237] In 1981 a video game titled Donkey Kong, starring a character with similarities to Kong, was released. In 1991, the film was deemed “culturally, historically and aesthetically significant” by the Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry.[238][239] In 1998, the AFI ranked the film #43 on its list of the 100 greatest movies of all time.[90][240]

The film’s stop motion effects by Willis H. O’Brien left a lasting impact on the film industry worldwide and inspired other genre films such as Mighty Joe Young,[241] The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms,[242] Creature from the Black Lagoon,[243] Mothra,[244] and Jurassic Park.[245][246] The film was also one of the biggest inspirations for Godzilla, with Tomoyuki Tanaka stating, “I felt like doing something big. That was my motivation. I thought of different ideas. I like monster movies, and I was influenced by King Kong.”[247]

Daiei Film, the company which later produced Gamera, Daimajin and other tokusatsu films, distributed the 1952 re-release of King Kong in Japan, making it the first post-war release of monster movies in the country. The company also distributed The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms in Japan in 1954, and these distributions presumably influenced productions of both Godzilla and Gamera franchises.[248]

Author Daniel Loxton suggested that King Kong inspired the modern day legend of the Loch Ness Monster.[249][250]

In 2025, The Hollywood Reporter listed King Kong as having the best stunts of 1932 to 1933.[251]

American Film Institute Lists

Sequel and franchise

Main article: King Kong (franchise)

Delos W. Lovelace was hired by Cooper to compose a novel version of King Kong. Lovelace appeared as the author alongside the credit “conceived by Edgar Wallace and Merian C. Cooper”.[58] Walter Ripperger wrote a two-part serial version for Mystery, which was credited as “the last creation of Edgar Wallace”.[58]

The film and characters inspired imitations and installments. The same year of King Kong‘s release, Son of Kong, a sequel, was fast-tracked and released.[74] In the 1960s, RKO licensed the King Kong character to Japanese studio Toho, which made two films, King Kong vs. Godzilla,[252] the third film in Toho’s long-running Godzilla series, and King Kong Escapes.[253] Both were directed by Ishirō Honda. These films are mostly unrelated to the original and follow a very different style.[254] In 1976 producer Dino De Laurentiis released a modern remake of King Kong.[253] It follows the same basic plot, but the setting is moved to the present day and several other details are different.[254] This remake was followed by a 1986 sequel King Kong Lives.[252] In 1998, a loosely-adapted direct-to-video animated version, The Mighty Kong, was distributed by Warner Bros.[255] In 2005, Universal Pictures released another remake of King Kong, co-written and directed by Peter Jackson,[252] which is set in the 1930s, as in the original film.[254] Legendary Pictures and Warner Bros. made Kong: Skull Island (2017),[252] which serves as part of a cinematic universe, MonsterVerse,[254] followed by the sequels Godzilla vs. Kong (2021) and Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire (2024).[254]

The search for censored scenes inspired a play called “Censored Scenes from King Kong,” performed in 1980. A reviewer in The Hollywood Reporter called it the “worst offering” in a bad season.[256]

See also

References

  1. “AFI|Catalog – King Kong (1933)”. catalog.afi.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  2. Jewell 1994, p. 39.
  3. “King Kong (1933) – Notes – TCM.com”. December 16, 2019. Archived from the original on January 22, 2025. Retrieved January 20, 2025.
  4. “King Kong Franchise Box Office History”. The Numbers. Retrieved February 27, 2025.
  5. Sprague, Mike (April 7, 2021). “Horror History: King Kong (1933) Is Now 88 Years Old”. Dread Central. Archived from the original on September 9, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
  6. Daniel Eagan, (2010). America’s Film Legacy: The Authoritative Guide to the Landmark Movies in the National Film Registry. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, New York, NY p. 22
  7. Kehr, Dave (September 26, 1991). “U.S. Film Registry Adds 25 Significant Movies”. Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  8. “Best Horror Movies – King Kong (1933)”. Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on April 1, 2010. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
  9. “Top 100 Movies of All Time – Rotten Tomatoes”. Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved October 14, 2016.
  10. “King Kong’s Complicated Rights Issues Explained”. August 17, 2023.
  11. Orville Goldner, George E Turner (1975). Making of King Kong: The Story Behind a Film Classic. ISBN 0498015106. See also Spawn of Skull Island (2002). ISBN 1887664459
  12. Gerald Peary, ‘Missing Links: The Jungle Origins of King Kong’ (1976)[link removed] Gerald Peary: Film Reviews, Interviews, Essays, and Sundry Miscellany, 2004.
  13. Erish, Andrew (January 8, 2006). “Illegitimate Dad of King Kong”. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2017.
  14. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 186.
  15. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 189–190, 193.
  16. Andriano 1999, p. 48; Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 194; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 69; Von Gunden 1989, p. 108
  17. Andriano 1999, p. 48.
  18. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 202; Rovin 1977, p. 33
  19. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 202; Von Gunden 1989, p. 111
  20. Rovin 1977, p. 27.
  21. Smith 2020, p. 99.
  22. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 207; Dyson 1997, p. 30; Von Gunden 1989, p. 109
  23. Rovin 1977, p. 31.
  24. Erb 2009, p. 29.
  25. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 217.
  26. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 214.
  27. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 208.
  28. Erb 2009, p. 31.
  29. Erb 2009, p. 30.
  30. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 71.
  31. Rovin 1977, p. 33; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73
  32. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 71; Dyson 1997, p. 30; Von Gunden 1989, p. 109
  33. Dyson 1997, p. 31; Erb 2009, p. 24
  34. Archer 1993, p. 14; Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 217
  35. Erb 2009, p. 28.
  36. Erb 2009, pp. 35–36.
  37. Erb 2009, p. 40.
  38. Erb 2009, p. 47.
  39. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 218.
  40. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 220; Archer 1993, p. 14
  41. Archer 1993, p. 14.
  42. Erb 2009, p. 35.
  43. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222.
  44. Erb 2009, p. 42.
  45. Erb 2009, p. 43.
  46. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222; Rovin 1977, p. 33
  47. Erb 2009, pp. 29, 31.
  48. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 222; Andriano 1999, p. 52
  49. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 223.
  50. Erb 2009, pp. 31, 36.
  51. Erb 2009, p. 32.
  52. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 220; Erb 2009, pp. 38–39
  53. Erb 2009, p. 34.
  54. Erb 2009, pp. 36–37.
  55. Erb 2009, p. 37.
  56. “Vaz, Mark Cotta”. Fresh Air Archive: Interviews with Terry Gross. September 14, 2005. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
  57. Erb 2009, p. 38.
  58. Erb 2009, p. 39.
  59. Wasko, Janet. (2003). How Hollywood Works. California: Sage Publications Ltd. p. 53.
  60. Bordwell, David, Thompson, Kristin, Smith, Jeff. (2017). Film Art: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 388.
  61. Archer 1993, pp. 176, 197.
  62. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, pp. 74–75.
  63. Rovin 1977, pp. 31, 41.
  64. Harryhausen 1985, p. 173.
  65. Harryhausen 1985, p. 172.
  66. Corrigan, Timothy, White, Patricia. (2015). The Film Experience. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s. pp. 120–121.
  67. Von Gunden 1989, p. 115.
  68. Dyson 1997, p. 30.
  69. Rovin 1977, p. 33.
  70. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 216.
  71. “King Kong | Giant Ape, Stop-Motion Animation, Adventure | Britannica”. www.britannica.com. November 22, 2024. Retrieved December 27, 2024.
  72. Rovin 1977, p. 41.
  73. Harryhausen 1985, p. 171.
  74. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 84.
  75. “Charlie Gemora, 58, had King Kong role”. The New York Times. August 20, 1961. Archived from the original on March 18, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2017.(subscription required)
  76. Greene, Bob (November 27, 1990). “Saying so long to Mr. Kong”. Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on December 21, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
  77. Glut, Donald F. (2001). Jurassic Classics: A Collection of Saurian Essays and Mesozoic Musings. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. p. 192. ISBN 9780786462469. Over the years, various actors have claimed to have played Kong in this [Empire State Building] scene, including a virtually unknown performer named Carmen Nigro (AKA Ken Roady), and also noted gorilla impersonator Charles Gemora… In Nigro’s case, the claim seems to have been simply fraudulent, in Gemora’s, the inaccurate claim was apparently based on the actor’s memory of playing a giant ape in a never-completed King Kong spoof entitled The Lost Island.
  78. Glut, Donald F. (2005). “His Majesty, King Kong – IV”. In Woods, Paul A. (ed.). King Kong Cometh!. London: Plexus. p. 64. ISBN 9780859653626. Cooper denied any performance by an actor in a gorilla costume in King Kong… Perhaps a human actor was used in a bit of forgotten test footage before the film went into production, but thus far the matter remains a mystery.
  79. Brierton, Tom (2004). Stop-Motion Puppet Sculpting: A Manual of foam Injection, Build-Up, and Finishing Techniques. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. p. 22. ISBN 0-7864-1873-7.
  80. Von Gunden 1989, p. 114.
  81. Rovin 1977, p. 31; Von Gunden 1989, p. 114; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73
  82. Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 73.
  83. Rovin 1977, p. 43.
  84. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 227.
  85. Price, Michael. “King Kong” (PDF). Library of Congress.
  86. Dyson 1997, pp. 36–37; Von Gunden 1989, p. 117
  87. Dyson 1997, p. 37.
  88. Dyson 1997, p. 37; Von Gunden 1989, p. 117
  89. Von Gunden 1989, p. 117.
  90. Morton 2005, pp. 75–76.
  91. Von Gunden, Kenneth (2001). Flights of Fancy: The Great Fantasy Films. McFarland. p. 117. ISBN 9780786412143.
  92. Smith 2020, p. 100; Slowik 2014, p. 235; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 135
  93. Smith 2020, p. 100.
  94. Smith 2020, pp. 101, 110.
  95. Smith 2020, p. 110.
  96. Slowik 2014, p. 237.
  97. Smith 2020, p. 100; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 135; Tatna 2020
  98. Smith 2020, pp. Smith 100–101.
  99. Smith 2020, p. 101.
  100. Smith 2020, pp. 100–101, 110.
  101. Slowik 2014, p. 244.
  102. Smith 2020, p. 101; Slowik 2014, pp. 231, 233
  103. Slowik 2014, p. 233.
  104. Slowik 2014, p. 234.
  105. Smith 2020, p. 105.
  106. Slowik 2014, p. 235.
  107. Slowik 2014, pp. 232–233.
  108. Slowik 2014, p. 239.
  109. Slowik 2014, p. 264.
  110. Slowik 2014, p. 240.
  111. Slowik 2014, p. 238.
  112. Smith 2020, pp. 100–101.
  113. Smith 2020, p. 102.
  114. Smith 2020, p. 106.
  115. Smith 2020, p. 103.
  116. Smith 2020, p. 109.
  117. Smith 2020, p. 114.
  118. Smith 2020, p. 113; Wierzbicki 2009, p. 133
  119. Slowik 2014, p. 230.
  120. Slowik 2014, p. 249.
  121. Slowik 2014, pp. 2, 231.
  122. Slowik 2014, p. 263.
  123. Slowik 2014, p. 236.
  124. Slowik 2014, pp. 113–114.
  125. Wierzbicki 2009, p. 223.
  126. “King Kong – 75th anniversary of the film and Max Steiner’s great film score”. Archived from the original on March 6, 2019. Retrieved March 2, 2019.
  127. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 233, 236.
  128. Lasky 1984, p. 94.
  129. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 236.
  130. Lasky 1984, pp. 94–95.
  131. Ahamed, Liaquat (2009). Lords of Finance. Penguin Books. p. 452. ISBN 9780143116806.
  132. Erb 2009, p. 45.
  133. Jewell 1994, p. 43.
  134. Cotta Vaz 2005, p. 236; Harryhausen & Dalton 2008, p. 84
  135. Cotta Vaz 2005, pp. 236–237.
  136. Holliss, Richard. Harryhausen: The Movie Posters. London: Titan Books, 2018. p. 9,
  137. Erb 2009, p. 125.
  138. “‘Gone,’ With $26,000,000, Still Tops All-Timers, Greatest Show Heads 1952”. Variety. January 21, 1953. p. 4.
  139. Erb 2009, p. 126.
  140. Miller, Frank (March 2, 2007). “Pop Culture 101: King Kong”. Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on February 17, 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  141. Tatna, Meher (November 9, 2020). “Out of the Vaults: ‘King Kong’, 1933”. Golden Globes. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  142. Morton 2005, p. 84.
  143. Von Gunden 1989, p. 119.
  144. Wednesday, WTM • (December 12, 2018). “The Lost Scene from 1933’s King Kong – the Spider Pit”. Neatorama. Archived from the original on January 28, 2020. Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  145. “King Kong (non-existent cut content of Pre-code monster adventure film; 1933) – The Lost Media Wiki”. April 2, 2024. Archived from the original on April 2, 2024. Retrieved April 28, 2024.
  146. “Hitlers Kino: “Führer”-Faible für Garbo oder Dick und Doof”. Der Spiegel Online. Hamburg, Germany. December 2, 2015. Archived from the original on April 4, 2019. Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  147. Flavorwire Staff (February 3, 2012). “Movies Banned in Foreign Countries for Weird Reasons”. Flavorwire. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  148. Millimeter Magazine article, 1 January 2006. Retrieved: March 15, 2012. Archived May 21, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  149. “Robert A. Harris On King Kong”. Retrieved: March 15, 2012. Archived August 13, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.
  150. Wickstrom, Andy (February 17, 1989). “Colorized King Kong May Bug Fans”. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
  151. Rainho, Manny (March 2015). “This Month in Movie History”. Classic Images (477): 26.
  152. “If DVD killed the film star, Criterion honors the ghost”. The Denver Post. August 24, 2005. Archived from the original on November 11, 2019. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
  153. Schneider, Wolf (January 21, 1985). “Criterion for laserdisc sales”. The Hollywood Reporter. 285 (21): 1–2.
  154. “Watch a Clip of Criterion’s Long-Lost ‘King Kong’ Audio Commentary”. Nerdist.
  155. King Kong. WorldCat. OCLC 28363532.
  156. Toumarkine, Doris (September 11, 1992). “Retailers going ape over ‘Kong'”. The Hollywood Reporter. 323 (40): 1, 50.; Parisi, Paula (December 14, 1992). “Vid dealers have sets to suit”. The Hollywood Reporter. 325 (3): 9, 13.
  157. “Restored King Kong At LACMA”. Golden Globes. December 9, 2013.
  158. Sweeney, Kenneth (February 2006). “DVD Playback”. American Cinematographer. 87 (2): 14.
  159. Tribbey, Chris (May 31, 2010). “Warner brings original ‘Kong’ to Blu-ray Sept. 28”. Home Media Magazine. 32 (22).
  160. Meehan (February 18, 1933). “King Kong”. Motion Picture Herald. 110 (8): 27 – via Internet Archive.
  161. “‘King Kong’ a Winner: Radio Production Should Be Answer to Exhibitor Prayers – Exploitation Value Limitless”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (23): 1, 6. February 15, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  162. “‘King Kong’ Excellent Pix Superbly Produced-Acted: Fay Wray Shines; Rest of Cast Good”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (23): 3. February 15, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  163. McCarthy (February 25, 1933). “King Kong”. Motion Picture Herald. 110 (9): 37, 40 – via Internet Archive.
  164. “Monster Ape Packs Thrills in New Talkie”. Chicago Tribune. Chicago. April 23, 1933. p. Part 7, p. 8.
  165. Hall
  166. “New York Reviews”. The Hollywood Reporter. Los Angeles. March 7, 1933. p. 2.
  167. “King Kong”. The Film Daily. LXI (46): 4. February 25, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  168. Mosher, John (March 11, 1933). “The Current Cinema”. The New Yorker. New York: F-R Publishing Corporation. p. 56.
  169. Bigelow, Joe (March 6, 1933). “King Kong”. Variety. Retrieved February 20, 2010.
  170. Erb 2009, p. 48.
  171. “King Kong”. The Hollywood Reporter. XIII (39). March 6, 1933 – via Internet Archive.
  172. Symkus, Ed. “Here’s why the original ‘King Kong’ is still one of the greatest films of all time”. USA Today. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  173. Lennon, Will. “King Kong (1933)”. Washington City Paper. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  174. Eggert, Brian (April 27, 2020). “King Kong”. Deep Focus Review. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  175. Haflidason, Almar. “BBC – Films – review – King Kong”. www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  176. Ebert, Roger (February 3, 2002). “King Kong movie review & film summary (1933)”. RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on April 17, 2013. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  177. Berardinelli, James. “King Kong”. Reelviews Movie Reviews. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  178. RH (April 12, 2023). “King Kong: ‘the film caters for all tastes’ – archive, 1933”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  179. Latson, Jennifer (March 2, 2015). “How ‘King Kong’ Gripped Audiences, Despite Ham-Handed Effects”. Time. Retrieved February 5, 2025.
  180. “King Kong – 90th Anniversary”. TIFF. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
  181. “King Kong”. Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on December 30, 2009. Retrieved November 19, 2022.
  182. “King Kong (1933) Reviews –Metacritic”. Metacritic.com. Metacritic. Archived from the original on July 29, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
  183. “‘King Kong’: The Eighth Wonder of the World”. NPR. June 29, 2008. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  184. “Think He’s Crazy? Nah, Just Enthusiastic. Rewatching King Kong (1933)”. October 24, 2011.
  185. Grant, Elizabeth. (1996). ‘Here Comes the Bride.’ In: Grant, Barry Keith (ed.). The Dread of Difference: Gender and the Horror Film. Austin: University of Texas Press. p. 373
  186. Goff, Phillip Atiba; Eberhardt, Jennifer L.; Williams, Melissa J.; Jackson, Matthew Christian (2008). “Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94 (2): 293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292. ISSN 1939-1315. PMID 18211178.
  187. Kuhn, Annette. (2007). King Kong. In: Cook, Pam. (ed.) The Cinema Book. London: British Film Institute. p. 41. and Robinson, D. (1983). King Kong. In: Lloyd, A. (ed.) Movies of the Thirties. Orbis Publishing Ltd. p. 58.
  188. Zakarin, Jordan (March 9, 2017). “King Kong’s Long Journey from Racist Monster to Woke Hero”. Inverse. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  189. “King Kong: Special Edition”. www.starburstmagazine.com/. June 29, 2021. Retrieved June 4, 2024.
  190. Rony 1996, p. 175.
  191. Rony 1996, p. 177.
  192. “11 of The Most Racist Movies Ever Made”. Atlanta Black Star. November 22, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2024.
  193. Erb 2009, p. 105.
  194. Malesky, Robert (June 29, 2008). “‘King Kong’: The Eighth Wonder of the World”. NCPR. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  195. Erb 2009, pp. 89, 117.
  196. Rony 1996, p. 180.
  197. Erb 2009, p. 102.
  198. Rony 1996, p. 154.
  199. Rony 1996, p. 15.
  200. Rony 1996, p. 172.
  201. Rony 1996, pp. 165, 181.
  202. Berenstein 1996, pp. 163–164.
  203. Rony 1996, p. 189.
  204. Rony 1996, pp. 165, 176.
  205. Berenstein 1996, pp. 195–196.
  206. Rony 1996, p. 176.
  207. Lorenz 2007, p. 159.
  208. Erb 2009, p. 106.
  209. Telotte 1988, pp. 389–390.
  210. Andriano 1999, p. 50.
  211. Berenstein 1996, pp. 186–187.
  212. Berenstein 1996, p. 188.
  213. Berenstein 1996, pp. 193–194.
  214. Berenstein 1996, p. 189.
  215. Berenstein 1996, p. 192.
  216. Rubinstein 1977, pp. 5–6.
  217. Rubinstein 1977, p. 8.
  218. Lloyd & Robinson 1985, p. 57.
  219. Erb 2009, p. 104.
  220. Berenstein 1996, p. 187.
  221. Rony 1996, pp. 172, 176.
  222. Berenstein 1996, p. 191.
  223. Smith 2020, pp. 99–100.
  224. Haver, Ron (December 1976). “Merian C. Cooper: The First King of Kong”. American Film Magazine. New York: American Film Institute. p. 18. Archived from the original on August 2, 2020. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
  225. Erb 2009, p. 89.
  226. Erb 2009, pp. 89, 102.
  227. Erb 2009, pp. 102–103.
  228. Erb 2009, p. 88.
  229. Erb 2009, p. 112.
  230. Erb 2009, p. 103.
  231. Telotte 1988, p. 396.
  232. Telotte 1988, p. 390.
  233. Erb 2009, p. 117.
  234. Lorenz 2007, p. 167.
  235. Voiovich, Jason (May 13, 2025). Bullfrogs, Bingo, and the Little House on the Prairie: How Innovators of the Great Depression Made the Best of the Worst of Times. Jaywalker Publishing. pp. 145–158. ISBN 978-1737001379.
  236. Morton 2005, p. 85.
  237. Erb 2009, p. 161.
  238. Eagan 22
  239. “Complete National Film Registry Listing”. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on November 10, 2020. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
  240. “AFI’s 100 YEARS…100 MOVIES”. American Film Institute. Archived from the original on December 13, 2020. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  241. Erb 2009, p. 129.
  242. Rovin, Jeff (1989). The Encyclopedia of Monsters. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-1824-3.
  243. Weaver, Tom (2014). The Creature Chronicles: Exploring the Black Lagoon Trilogy. McFarland & Company. p. 30. ISBN 978-0786494187.
  244. Memories of Ishiro Honda. Twenty Years After The Passing Of Godzilla’s Famed Director by Hajime Ishida. Famous Monsters of Filmland #269. Movieland Classics LLC, 2013. Pg. 20
  245. Mottram, James (2021). Jurassic Park: The Ultimate Visual History. Insight Editions. p. 17. ISBN 978-1683835455.
  246. Jones, James Earl (Host) (1995). The Making of Jurassic Park (VHS). Universal.
  247. Wudunn, Sheryl (April 4, 1997). “Tomoyuki Tanaka, the Creator of Godzilla, Is Dead at 86”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 26, 2017. Retrieved August 3, 2021.
  248. Hisayuki Ui, January 1, 1994, From Gamera to Daimajin: all of Daiei tokusatsu films, p.63, Kindaieigasha
  249. “Did King Kong inspire Nessie?”. The New Zealand Herald. August 17, 2014. Retrieved January 9, 2015.
  250. “Nessie’s starring role”. The Week. January 9, 2015. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
  251. Doherty, Thomas (June 7, 2025). “The Best Stunts of All Time, Over Nearly 100 Years of the Oscars”. The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 20, 2025.
  252. Eggert, Brian (April 27, 2020). “King Kong”. Deep Focus Review. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
  253. Newman, Kim (January 1, 2000). “EMPIRE ESSAY: King Kong“. Empire. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
  254. Bruce, Amanda; Summers, Megan; McCormick, Colin (November 27, 2020). “Every King Kong Movie (In Chronological Order)”. ScreenRant. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
  255. “The Mighty Kong | Rotten Tomatoes”. www.rottentomatoes.com. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
  256. “Censored Scenes from Hong Kong”. The Hollywood Reporter. 260 (44): 26. March 13, 1980.

Bibliography

External links

Wikimedia Commons logo

Wikimedia Commons has media related to King Kong (1933 film).

vteKing Kong
vteFilms directed by Ernest B. Schoedsack
vteEdgar Wallace
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata

Categories:

Posted in New Essays permalink

About joelsnell99

Who's Who in all U.S and U.K. Honoraries (Marquis) Numerous publications in over 80 venues DANA SPIRIT AWARD/2009 Oxford Roundtable, Editor of FOCUS, a student Social Science Journal Author Snell Life Cycle Lonliness Curve Professor Emeritus - Kirkwood College Omicron Delta Kappa Grants Online Editor for Psychology and Education.com Research Fellow - Arlington Institute Outstanding Teacher at Kirkwood College Membership in numerous editorial boards or a reviewer of manuscripts Associate Editor - Psychology and Education Co-Author of Snell-Green Professor Index Author of Snell Educator Effectiveness Index Contributer to FutureEdition.com Co-Author of Snell-Allen Medical Rank Index Fellow in Kennedy Foundation Co-Author of Snell-Allen Subjective Assessment Sex Role Index Honors >>> Positions and Courses Taught >>> joelsnell@hotmail.com http://www.socialvibes.net Research Council, Advisory Board

Comments are closed.

↑