Privacy

Skip to main content

Search this journalEnter search terms…SearchAdvanced search

• Access/Profile
• Cart

• Browse by discipline
• Information for

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Impact Factor: 2.1 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 4.1

Journal Homepage

Submit Paper

Restricted access

Research article

First published April 1999

Validity Issues in the Likert and Thurstone Approaches to Attitude Measurement

James S. Roberts, James E. Laughlin, and Douglas H. WedellView all authors and affiliations

Volume 59, Issue 2

https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921969811

• Contents
  • Abstract
  • References
• Get access
• • Cite article
  • Share options
  • Information, rights and permissions
  • Metrics and citations

Abstract

This article highlights the theoretical differences between the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement and demonstrates how such differences can lead to discrepant attitude estimates for individuals with the most extreme opinions. Both simulated data and real data on attitude toward abortion are used to demonstrate this discrepancy. The results suggest that attitude researchers should, at the very least, devote more attention to the empirical response characteristics of items on a Likert attitude questionnaire. At most, these results suggest that other methods, such as the Thurstone technique or one of its recently developed item response theory counterparts, should be used to derive attitude estimates from disagree-agree responses.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

Andrich, D. (1988). The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type to the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 33-51.

Google Scholar

Andrich, D. (1996). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 347-365.

Google Scholar

Andrich, D., & Luo, G. (1993). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 253-276.

Google Scholar

Barclay, J. E., & Weaver, H. B. (1962). Comparative reliabilities and the ease of construction of Thurstone and Likert attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 109-120.

Google Scholar

Cliff, N., Collins, L. M., Zatkin, J., Gallipeau, D., & McCormick, D. J. (1988). An ordinal scaling method for questionnaire and other ordinal data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 83-97.

Google Scholar

Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.

Google Scholar

DeSarbo, W. S., & Hoffman, D. L. (1986). Simple and weighted unfolding threshold models for the spatial representation of binary choice data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 247-264.

Google Scholar

DeSarbo, W. S., & Hoffman, D. L. (1987). Constructing MDS joint spaces from binary choice data: A multidimensional unfolding threshold model for marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 40-54.

Google Scholar

Edwards, A. L., & Kenney, K. C. (1946). A comparison of the Thurstone and Likert techniques of attitude scale construction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 72-83.

Google Scholar

Ferguson, L. W. (1941). A study of the Likert technique of attitude scale construction. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 51-57.

Google Scholar

Flamer, S. (1983). Assessment of the multitrait-multimethod matrix validity of Likert scales via confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 275-308.

Google Scholar

Green, B. F. (1954). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 335-369). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Google Scholar

Hoijtink, H. (1990). A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data. Psychometrika, 55, 641-656.

Google Scholar

Hoijtink, H. (1991). The measurement of latent traits by proximity items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 153-169.

Google Scholar

Jaccard, J., Weber, J., & Lundmark, J. (1975). A multitrait-multimethod analysis of four attitude assessment procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 149-154.

Google Scholar

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-53.

Google Scholar

Likert, R., Roslow, S., & Murphy, G. (1934). A simple and reliable method of scoring the Thurstone attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 228-238.

Google Scholar

Mueller, D. J. (1986). Measuring social attitudes: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. New York: Teachers College Press.

Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

Google Scholar

Reinsch, C. H. (1967). Smoothing by spline functions. Numerishe Mathematik, 10, 177-183.

Google Scholar

Rhoads, R. F., & Landy, F. J. (1973). Measurement of attitudes of industrial work groups toward psychology and testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 197-201.

Google Scholar

Roberts, J. S. (1995). Item response theory approaches to attitude measurement (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 7089B-7089B.

Google Scholar

Roberts, J. S., Donoghue, J. R., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996, June 28). A generalized item response model for unfolding responses from a graded scale. Paper presented at the 61st annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Banff, Alberta, Canada.

Google Scholar

Roberts, J. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996a). A unidimensional item response model for unfolding responses from a graded disagree-agree response scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 231-255.

Google Scholar

Roberts, J. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996b). The graded unfolding model: A unidimensional item response model for unfolding graded responses (RR-96-16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Google Scholar

Safir, M. A. (1937). A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 2, 179-198.

Google Scholar

Seiler, L. H., & Hough, R. L. (1970). Empirical comparisons of the Thurstone and Likert techniques. In G. Summers (Ed.), Attitude measurement (pp. 159-173). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1927a). Psychophysical analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 38, 368-389.

Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1927b). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.

Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1927c). The method of paired comparisons for social values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 249-269.

Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology, 26, 249-269.

Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L., & Chave, E. J. (1929). The measurement of attitude: A psychophysical method and some experiments with a scale for measuring attitude toward the church. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar

van Schuur, W. H. (1984). Structure in political beliefs: A new model for stochastic unfolding with application to European party activists. Amsterdam: CT Press.

Google Scholar

van Schuur, W. H. (1993). Nonparametric unidimensional unfolding for multicategory data. Political Analysis, 4, 41-74.

Google Scholar

van Schuur, W. H., & Kiers, H.A.L. (1994). Why factor analysis is often the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model can be used instead. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 97-110.

Google Scholar

Similar articles:

• Restricted accessA General Item Response Theory Model for Unfolding Unidimensional Polytomous ResponsesShow details
• Restricted accessA Unidimensional Item Response Model for Unfolding Responses From a Graded Disagree-Agree Response ScaleShow details
• Restricted accessComputerized Adaptive Testing with the Generalized Graded Unfolding ModelShow details

View more

Sage recommends:

• SAGE Research MethodsEntryThurstone ScalesShow details
• SAGE Research MethodsEntry“Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A”Show details
• SAGE Research MethodsEntryLikert ScalingShow details

View more

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.

Download PDF

Also from Sage

• CQ LibraryElevating debateopens in new tab
• Sage DataUncovering insightopens in new tab
• Sage Business CasesShaping futuresopens in new tab
• Sage CampusUnleashing potentialopens in new tab
• Sage KnowledgeMultimedia learning resourcesopens in new tab
• Sage Research MethodsSupercharging researchopens in new tab
• Sage VideoStreaming knowledgeopens in new tab
• Technology from SageLibrary digital servicesopens in new tab

About

• About Sage Journals
• Accessibility guide
• Historical content
• Advertising disclaimer
• Permissions
• Terms of use
• Sage discipline hubs
• Sage microsites

Information for

• Authors
• Editors
• Librarians
• Promoters / Advertisers
• Researchers
• Reviewers
• Societies
• Frequently asked questions

Educational and Psychological Measurement

• ISSN: 0013-1644
• Online ISSN: 1552-3888

• About Sage
• Contact us
• CCPA – Do not sell my personal information
• CCPA
• Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2024 by SAGE Publications

https://www.medtargetsystem.com/beacon/portal/?_url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fdoi%2F10.1177%2F00131649921969811&_sid=f82581c2-4a27-443e-bc32-83496bff47f0&_vid=9291e3f4-e960-49e5-a370-8038843725bf&_ak=126-610-A5ECBB04&_flash=false&_th=1726777551|1726777551|1