hide

Scientology

Article
Talk

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

SmallStandardLarge

Width

StandardWide

Color (beta)

AutomaticLightDark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scientology
Part of a series on

General
Scientology Dianetics Timeline History L. Ron Hubbard Publications Glossary
Beliefs and practices
Thetan Auditing Bridge to Total Freedom OT Xenu Ethics and justice
Church of Scientology
Officials and staff Sea Org David Miscavige
Controversies
Litigation Status by country Suppressive person Disconnection Fair game RPF The Hole Office of Special Affairs Guardian’s Office War on psychiatry
More

Scientology is a set of beliefs and practices invented by the American author L. Ron Hubbard, and an associated movement. It is variously defined as a religion, a cult, a business, or a scam.^[11] Hubbard initially developed a set of pseudoscientific ideas that he represented as a form of therapy, which he called Dianetics. An organization that he established in 1950 to promote it went bankrupt, and his ideas were rejected as nonsense by the scientific community.^[12] He then recast his ideas as a religion, likely for tax purposes and to avoid prosecution, and renamed them Scientology.^[13] In 1953, he founded the Church of Scientology which, by one 2014 estimate, has around 30,000 members.

Key Scientology beliefs include reincarnation, and that traumatic events cause subconscious command-like recordings in the mind (termed “engrams“) that can be removed only through an activity called “auditing“. A fee is charged for each session of “auditing”. Once an “auditor” deems an individual free of “engrams”, they are given the status of “clear“. Scholarship differs on the interpretation of these beliefs: some academics regard them as religious in nature; other scholars regard them as merely a means of extracting money from Scientology recruits. After attaining “clear” status, adherents can take part in the Operating Thetan levels, which require further payments. The Operating Thetan texts are kept secret from most followers; they are revealed only after adherents have typically paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Scientology organization.^[14] Despite its efforts to maintain the secrecy of the texts, they are freely available on various websites, including at the media organization WikiLeaks.^[15]^[16] These texts say past lives took place in extraterrestrial cultures.^[17] They involve an alien called Xenu, described as a planetary ruler 75 million years ago who brought billions of aliens to Earth and killed them with thermonuclear weapons.^[18] Despite being kept secret from most followers, this forms the central mythological framework of Scientology’s ostensible soteriology.^[19] These aspects have become the subject of popular ridicule.^[20]^[21]

Since its formation, Scientology groups have generated considerable opposition and controversy. This includes deaths of practitioners while staying at Church of Scientology properties, several instances of extensive criminal activities, and allegations by former adherents of human trafficking, child labor, exploitation and forced abortions. In the 1970s, Hubbard’s followers engaged in a program of criminal infiltration of the U.S. government, resulting in several executives of the organization being convicted and imprisoned for multiple offenses by a U.S. federal court. Hubbard was convicted of fraud in absentia by a French court in 1978 and sentenced to four years in prison.^[22] The Church of Scientology was convicted of spying and criminal breach of trust in Toronto in 1992, and convicted of fraud in France in 2009.^[23]^[24]^[25]

The Church of Scientology has been described by government inquiries, international parliamentary bodies, scholars, in parliamentary debate, and in numerous superior court judgments as both a dangerous cult and a manipulative profit-making business.^[30] Numerous scholars and journalists observe that profit is the primary motivating goal of the Scientology organization.^[31] Following extensive litigation in numerous countries,^[32]^[33] the organization has managed to attain a legal recognition as a religious institution in some jurisdictions, including Australia,^[34]^[35] Italy,^[33] and the United States.^[36] Germany classifies Scientology groups as an anti-constitutional cult,^[37]^[38] while the French government classifies the group as a dangerous cult.^[39]^[40] A 2012 opinion poll in the US indicates that 70% of Americans do not think Scientology is a real religion; 13% think it is. Scientology is the subject of numerous books, documentaries, and depictions in film and television, including the Emmy Award-winning Going Clear and Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath, and is widely understood to be a key basis for The Master.

Definition and classification

In his history of the Church of Scientology, the scholar Hugh Urban describes Scientology as a “huge, complex, and multifaceted movement.”^[41] According to Urban, Scientology represents a “rich syncretistic blend” of sources, including elements from Hinduism and Buddhism, Thelema, new scientific ideas, science-fiction, and from psychology and popular self-help literature available by the mid-20th century.^[42] The sociologist Stephen A. Kent views the Church of Scientology as “a multifaceted transnational corporation, only one element of which is religious”.^[43]

Hubbard claimed that Scientology was “all-denominational”,^[44] and members of the Scientology organization are not prohibited from active involvement in religions.^[45] Scholar of religion Donald Westbrook encountered members who also practiced Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, and the Nation of Islam; one was a Baptist minister.^[44] In practice, however, Westbrook noted that most members consider Scientology to be their only commitment, and the deeper their involvement became, the less likely they were to continue practicing other traditions.^[44] The ceremonies, structure of the prayers, and minister attire suggested by Hubbard reflect his own Protestant traditions.^[46]

Scientology has experienced multiple schisms during its history.^[47] While the Church of Scientology was the original promoter of the movement, various factions have split off to form independent Scientology groups. Referring to the “different types of Scientology”, the scholar of religion Aled Thomas suggests it was appropriate to talk about “Scientologies”.^[48]

Debates over classification

Debate as to whether Scientology should be regarded as a cult, a business, a scam, or a religion has continued over many years.^[49]^[10]

Many Scientologists consider it to be their religion.^[50] Its founder, L. Ron Hubbard, presented it as a religion,^[51] but the early history of the Scientology organization, and Hubbard’s policy directives, letters, and instructions to subordinates, indicate that his motivation for doing so was as a legally pragmatic move to minimize his tax burden and escape the possibility of prosecution.^[5]^[52] In many countries, the Church of Scientology has engaged in extensive litigation to secure recognition as a tax-exempt religious organization,^[53] and it has managed to obtain such a status in a few jurisdictions, including the United States, Italy, and Australia.^[54]^[55] The organization has not received recognition as a religious institution in the majority of countries in which it operates.^[56]

Government inquiries, international parliamentary bodies, scholars, law lords, and numerous superior court judgments describe Scientology both as a dangerous cult and as a manipulative profit-making business. These institutions and scholars state that Scientology is not a religion.^[57] An article in Time magazine, “The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power“, describes Scientology as a ruthless global scam.^[1] The Church of Scientology’s attempts to sue the publishers for libel and to prevent republication abroad were dismissed.^[58]

Psychologists and skeptics support this view of Scientology as a confidence trick to obtain money from its targets.^[5]^[59] The academic Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi observes that “the majority of activities conducted by Scientology and its many fronts and subsidiaries involve the marketing of secular products.”^[5] Scholars and journalists note that profit is the primary motivating goal of Hubbard’s Scientology groups.^[31] Those making this observation have often referred to a governing financial policy issued by Hubbard that is to be obeyed by all Scientology organization staff members,^[60] which includes the following [uppercase in original]:^[61]

Make sure that lots of bodies move through the shop…A. MAKE MONEY. … J. MAKE MONEY. K. MAKE MORE MONEY. L. MAKE OTHER PEOPLE PRODUCE SO AS TO MAKE MONEY…However you get them in or why, just do it.

Some scholars of religion have referred to Scientology as a religion.^[62]^[63] The sociologist Bryan R. Wilson compares Scientology with 20 criteria that he associated with religion and concludes that the movement could be characterized as such.^[64] Wilson’s criteria include: a cosmology that describes a human reality beyond terrestrial existence; ethics and behavior teachings that are based on this cosmology; prescribed ways for followers to connect with spiritual beings; and a congregation that believes in and helps spread its teachings.^[65] Alan W. Black analyzed Scientology through the seven “dimensions of religion” set forward by the scholar Ninian Smart and also decided that Scientology met those criteria for being a religion.^[66] The sociologist David V. Barrett noted that there was a “strong body of evidence to suggest that it makes sense to regard Scientology as a religion”,^[67] while scholar of religion James R. Lewis comments that “it is obvious that Scientology is a religion”.^[68] The scholar Mikael Rothstein observes that the Scientology “is best understood as a devotional cult aimed at revering the mythologized founder of the organization”.^[69] Opinion polling in 2012 shows that in its home market, the US, 70% of Americans do not think Scientology is a real religion; 13% think it is.^[70]^[71] A 2015 poll in the UK shows 61% of British people do not think Scientology is a real religion; 8% think it is.^[72]

The characterisation as a religion by such religious studies academics is disputed by the psychology professor Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi. He writes that: “Scientology cannot be classified as a religion. Because Scientology is a profit-oriented organization, sometimes, not always, masquerading as a religion, it has faced serious legitimation problems…The extreme measures Scientology has taken to defend itself reflect the truly precarious position of an organization with clearly illegitimate goals and a fraudulent operational style.”^[73] Beit-Hallahmi notes that the degree of collaboration with Scientology in the new religious movement (NRM) research network is in a class by itself. He observes that “Scholars collaborating with Scientology have tried to provide an umbrella of legitimacy. Moreover, they have knowingly collaborated in some of its deceptive schemes and front organizations.”^[73]

Numerous religious studies scholars have described Scientology as a new religious movement.^[74] Various scholars have also considered it within the category of Western esotericism,^[75] while the scholar of religion Andreas Grünschloß noted that it was “closely linked” to UFO religions,^[76] as science-fiction themes are evident in its theology.^[77] Scholars have also varyingly described it as a “psychotherapeutically oriented religion”,^[78] a “secularized religion”,^[79] a “postmodern religion”,^[80] a “privatized religion”,^[81] and a “progressive-knowledge” religion.^[82] According to scholar of religion Mary Farrell Bednarowski, Scientology describes itself as drawing on science, religion, psychology and philosophy but “has been claimed by none of them and repudiated, for the most part, by all”.^[83]

Some government bodies and other institutions maintain that the Scientology is a secular, profit-making organization,^[5] and many commentators claim that is a form of therapy masquerading as religion.^[84] The French government characterizes the movement as a dangerous cult, and the German government monitors it as an anti-democratic cult.^[37]^[38]^[39]^[40]

The notion of Scientology as a religion is strongly opposed by the anti-cult movement.^[85] Its claims to a religious identity have been particularly rejected in continental Europe.^[55] Grünschloß writes that labeling Scientology a religion does not mean that it is “automatically promoted as harmless, nice, good, and humane”.^[86] The multi-faceted nature of the Church of Scientology that includes pedagogy, communication theories, management principles and methods for a healthy living discombobulated many observers when it first started. Dericquebourg comments that the same things can be found in established churches.^[87]

Etymology

The word Scientology, as coined by Hubbard, is a derivation from the Latin word scientia (“knowledge”, “skill”), which comes from the verb scīre (“to know”), with the suffix -ology, from the Greek λόγος lógos (“word” or “account [of]”).^[88]^[89] Hubbard claimed that the word “Scientology” meant “knowing about knowing or science of knowledge“.^[90] The name “Scientology” deliberately makes use of the word “science”,^[91] seeking to benefit from the “prestige and perceived legitimacy” of natural science in the public imagination.^[92] In doing so, Scientology has been compared to religious groups like Christian Science and the Science of Mind, which employed similar tactics.^[93]

The term “Scientology” had been used in published works at least twice before Hubbard.^[90] In The New Word (1901), poet and lawyer Allen Upward first used scientology to mean blind, unthinking acceptance of scientific doctrine (compare scientism).^[94]^[95] In 1934, philosopher Anastasius Nordenholz published Scientology: Science of the Constitution and Usefulness of Knowledge, which used the term to mean the science of science.^[96]^: 116–9^[97] It is unknown whether Hubbard was aware of either prior usage of the word.^[96]^: 116–9^[98]^: 111

History

Main article: History of Dianetics and Scientology

For a chronological guide, see Timeline of Scientology.

Hubbard established an organization to promote his pseudoscientific ideas about the mind, which he called Dianetics,^[99] in 1950. The organization went bankrupt, and Hubbard lost the rights to his book Dianetics in 1952. His ideas were rejected as nonsense by the scientific community.^[100]^[101] As the 1950s developed, Hubbard saw the advantages of having his Scientology movement legally recognized as a religion.^[102] In an April 1953 letter to Helen O’Brien, his US business manager, he proposed that Scientology should be transformed into a religion: “We don’t want a clinic. We want one in operation but not in name…It is a problem of practical business. I await your reaction on the religion angle”.^[103] In reaction to a series of arrests of his followers, and the prosecution of Hubbard’s Dianetics foundation for teaching medicine without a license, in December 1953 Hubbard incorporated three organizations – Church of American Science, Church of Scientology, and Church of Spiritual Engineering.^[52]^[104] By 1954, Hubbard had regained the rights to Dianetics.^{[citation needed]} In 1959, Hubbard purchased Saint Hill Manor in East Grinstead, Sussex, United Kingdom, which became the worldwide headquarters of the Church of Scientology and his personal residence. With the organization often under heavy criticism, it adopted strong measures of attack in dealing with its critics.^[105]

In 1962, amid FDA concerns, Hubbard announced Scientology’s future was “being planned on a religious organization basis”, but advising followers the change was “entirely a matter for accountants and solicitors”. ^[106]^[107]

In 1966, the organization established the Guardian’s Office (GO), a department devoted to undermining those hostile towards Scientology.^[108] The GO launched an extensive program of countering negative publicity, gathering intelligence, and infiltrating organizations.^[109] In “Operation Snow White“, the GO infiltrated the IRS and numerous other government departments and stole tens of thousands of documents pertaining to the Scientology organization, politicians, and celebrities.^[110] In July 1977, the FBI raided Church of Scientology premises in Washington, DC, and Los Angeles, revealing the extent of the GO’s infiltration into government departments and other groups.^[111] Eleven officials and agents of the Church^[a] were indicted. In December 1979, they were sentenced to between 4 and 5 years each and individually fined $10,000 (equivalent to $43,000 in 2024).^[112]^[113] Among those found guilty was Hubbard’s then-wife, Mary Sue Hubbard.^[110] Public revelation of the GO’s activities brought widespread condemnation of the Scientology organization.^[112]

In 1967, Hubbard established a new group, the Sea Organization or “Sea Org”, the membership of which was drawn from the most committed members of the Scientology organization.^[114] By 1981, the 21-year-old David Miscavige, who had been one of Hubbard’s closest aides in the Sea Org, rose to prominence.^[53] Hubbard died at his ranch in Creston, California, on January 24, 1986, and David Miscavige succeeded Hubbard as head of the organization.^[115]^[116] In 1993, the Internal Revenue Service dropped all litigation against the Scientology organization and recognized it as a religious institution.^[117]

Beliefs and practices

Main article: Scientology beliefs and practices

Hubbard lies at the core of Scientology and his writings remain the source of its ideas and practices.^[118] Sociologist of religion David G. Bromley describes Scientology as Hubbard’s “personal synthesis of philosophy, physics, and psychology”.^[119] Hubbard claimed that he developed his ideas through research and experimentation, rather than through revelation from a supernatural source.^[120] He published hundreds of articles and books over the course of his life.^[121] Scientologists regard his writings on Scientology as scripture.^[122] Some information about the Scientology belief system is kept hidden from most Scientologists, with layers of secrecy and obfuscation.^[123]

In Scientology Hubbard’s work is regarded as perfect, and no elaboration or alteration is permitted.^[124] Hubbard described Scientology as an “applied religious philosophy”, because, according to him, it consists of a metaphysical doctrine, a theory of psychology, and teachings in morality.^[125] Hubbard incorporated a variety of hypnotic techniques in Scientology auditing and courses.^[126] These are used as a means to create dependency and obedience in followers.^[127]

Hubbard developed thousands of neologisms during his lifetime.^[124] The nomenclature used by the movement is termed “Scientologese” by members.^[128] Scientologists are expected to learn this specialist terminology, the use of which separates followers from non-Scientologists.^[124] The Scientology organization refers to its practices as “technology”, a term often shortened to “Tech”.^[129] Scientologists stress the “standardness” of this “tech”, by which they express belief in its infallibility.^[130] The Scientology organization’s system of pedagogy is called “Study Tech” and is presented as the best method for learning.^[131] Scientology teaches that when reading, it is very important not to go past a word one does not understand. A person should instead consult a dictionary as to the meaning of the word before progressing, something Scientology calls “word clearing”.^[132]

According to Scientology texts, its beliefs and practices are based on rigorous research, and its doctrines are accorded a significance equivalent to scientific laws.^[133] Blind belief is held to be of lesser significance than the practical application of Scientologist methods.^[133] Adherents are encouraged to validate the practices through their personal experience.^[133] Hubbard put it this way: “For a Scientologist, the final test of any knowledge he has gained is, ‘did the data and the use of it in life actually improve conditions or didn’t it?'”^[133] Many Scientologists avoid using the words “belief” or “faith” to describe how Hubbard’s teachings impacts their lives, preferring to say that they “know” it to be true.^[134] Hubbard said the aim of Scientology is “A civilization without insanity, without criminals and without war; where the world can prosper and honest beings can have rights, and where man is free to rise to greater heights”.^[135]^[136]^[137]

Auditing

Main article: Auditing (Scientology)

The central practice of Scientology is an activity known as “auditing“. It takes place with two Scientologists: one is the “auditor” who asks questions, and the subject is termed the “preclear”. The stated purpose is to help the subject to remove their mental traumas (ostensible recordings in the mind which Hubbard termed “engrams”).^[138] Scholarship in clinical psychology demonstrates that the purpose of auditing is to induce a light hypnotic state and to create dependency and obedience in the subject.^[126] When deemed free of engrams they are given the status of “clear”, and then continue doing further auditing until they are deemed to have reached the level Operating Thetan. Hubbard assigns vitality, good health and increased intelligence to those who are given the status of “clear“, having removed the source of their “psychosomatic illnesses”.^[138] The further status of Operating Thetan (OT) is posited as complete spiritual freedom in which one is able to do anything one chooses, create anything, go anywhere — an idea which has appealed to many.^[139]

The scholar Hugh Urban describes the supernatural powers promoted as being gained by an Operating Thetan as:^[140]

The liberated thetan could even freely create a personal paradise, populating it with heavenly beings and infinite pleasures at will. … As such, the thetan who truly realized his power to create and destroy universes would in effect be “beyond God”. … The thetan has been deceived into worshipping such a God by mainstream religion and so forgotten its own godlike power to create and destroy universes.

— Hugh Urban in The Church of Scientology: A History of a New Religion

The prices to undertake a full course of auditing with the Church of Scientology are not often advertised publicly.^[141] As of 2011 it can easily cost $400,000 to do the entirety of Scientology’s “Bridge to Total Freedom” (equivalent to $559,000 in 2024).^[142]^[113] In a 1964 letter, Hubbard stated that a 25-hour block of auditing should cost the equivalent of “three months’ pay for the average middle class working individual.”^[141] In 2007, the fee for a 12 and a half hour block of auditing at the Tampa Org was $4000 (equivalent to $6,070 in 2024).^[143]^[113] The Scientology organization is often criticized for the prices it charges for auditing,^[143] and examinations of the group have indicated that profit is the group’s primary purpose.^[144] Hubbard stated that charging for auditing was necessary because the practice required an exchange, and should the auditor not receive something for their services it could harm both parties.^[143]

During auditing, a device called an electropsychometer (E-meter) is used.^[145] Scientology’s primary road map for guiding a person through the sequential steps to attain Scientology’s concepts of “clear” and OT is The Bridge to Total Freedom, a large chart enumerating every step in sequence.^[146] The steps past “clear” are kept secret from most Scientologists and include the founding myth that seeks to explain Scientology doctrine.^[147]^[148]

Soul

Space opera and the Wall of Fire

The mythological framework which forms the basis for what Scientologists view as the system’s path to salvation is the story of Xenu.^[158] Reflecting a strong science-fiction theme within its theology,^[77] Scientology’s teachings make reference to “space opera“, a term denoting events in the distant past in which “spaceships, spacemen, [and] intergalactic travel” all feature.^[159]

Hubbard wrote about a great catastrophe that took place 75 million years ago.^[82] According to this story, 75 million years ago there was a Galactic Confederacy of 76 planets ruled over by a leader called Xenu. The Confederacy was overpopulated and Xenu transported millions of aliens to earth and killed them with hydrogen bombs.^[160] The thetans of those killed were then clustered together and implants were inserted into them, designed to kill any body that these thetans would subsequently inhabit should they recall the event of their destruction.^[161] After the massacre, several of the officers in Xenu’s service rebelled against him, ultimately capturing and imprisoning him.^[162] Hubbard claimed to have discovered the Xenu myth in December 1967, having taken the “plunge” deep into his “time track”.^[163] Scientology teaches that attempting to recover this information from the “time track” typically results in an individual’s death, caused by the presence of Xenu’s implants, but that because of Hubbard’s “technology” this death can be avoided.^[164]

A man dressed as Xenu carrying an E-meter; Scientology’s critics often use Xenu to mock the movement.^[165]

The Scientology organization says that learning the Xenu myth can be harmful for those unprepared for it,^[166] and the documents discussing Xenu are kept secret from most members.^[167] The teachings about Xenu were later leaked by ex-members,^[168] becoming a matter of public record after being submitted as evidence in court cases.^[169]^[170] They are now widely available online.^[171] Members who have been given the teachings routinely deny these teachings exist.^[172] Hubbard however talked about Xenu on several occasions,^[173] the Xenu story bears similarities with some of the science-fiction stories Hubbard published,^[174] and substantial themes from the Xenu story are in Hubbard’s book Scientology – A History of Man.^[175]

The Operating Thetan levels

The degrees above the level of Clear are called “Operating Thetan” or OT.^[176] Hubbard described there being 15 OT levels, although he had only completed eight of these during his lifetime.^[177] OT levels nine to 15 have not been reached by any Scientologist.^[178] In 1988 the Scientology organization stated that OT levels nine and ten would only be released when certain benchmarks in its expansion had been achieved.^[179] The Church of Scientology has gone to considerable length to try to maintain the secrecy of the texts, but they remain widely available on the internet. This is partly due to litigation involving Scientology, whereby the Fishman Affidavit was leaked to the public.^[180] Materials have also been passed on to other sources and made available by publishers such as the media organization WikiLeaks.^[16]

To gain the OT levels of training, a member must go to one of the Advanced Organisations or Orgs, which are based in Los Angeles, Clearwater, East Grinstead, Copenhagen, Sydney, and Johannesburg.^[181] Conservative estimates indicate that getting to OT VIII would require a minimum of payments to the Scientology organization of $350,000 to $400,000 (equivalent to $559,000 in 2024).^[182]^[113] OT levels six and seven are only available at Clearwater.^[183] The highest level, OT eight, is disclosed only at sea on the Scientology ship Freewinds, operated by the Flag Ship Service Org.^[184]^[185] Scholar of religion Aled Thomas suggested that the status of a person’s level creates an internal class system within the Scientology organization.^[186]

The Scientology organization claims that the material taught in the OT levels can only be comprehended once its previous material has been mastered and is therefore kept confidential until a person reaches the requisite level.^[187] Higher-level members typically refuse to talk about the contents of these OT levels.^[188] Those progressing through the OT levels are taught additional, more advanced auditing techniques;^[189] one of the techniques taught is a method of auditing oneself,^[190] which is the necessary procedure for reaching OT level seven.^[183]

Ethics

Scientology has its own unique definitions for ethics and procedures for justice. According to scholar Stephen Kent, “The purpose of Scientology ethics is to eliminate opponents, then eliminate people’s interests in things other than Scientology. In this ‘ethical’ environment, Scientology would be able to impose its courses, philosophy, and ‘justice system’ – its so-called technology — onto society.”^[191]

Symbology

Hubbard created many symbolism concepts, including the eight dynamics, the ARC and KRC triangles, the “S and double triangle” symbol, the Scientology cross, and many others. Scientology celebrates seven calendar events including L. Ron Hubbard’s birthday, Auditor’s Day, and New Year’s. There is a Sunday service which is primarily of interest for non-members and beginners. Weddings and funerals are also held.^[69]

Psychiatry, psychology, psychosis

Main article: Scientology beliefs and practices § Rejection of psychology and psychiatry

Scientology is vehemently opposed to psychiatry and psychology, and wants to replace them with its own methods.^[192] The clinical and academic psychiatry community rejected Hubbard’s theories in the early 1950s.^[193] Hubbard and his early Dianetics organization were prosecuted for practicing medicine without a license in the early 1950s.^[194]

Hubbard taught that psychiatrists were responsible for a great many wrongs in the world, saying that psychiatry has at various times offered itself as a tool of political suppression and that psychiatry was responsible for the ideology of Hitler, for turning the Nazis into mass murderers, and the Holocaust.^[195] The Scientology organization operates the anti-psychiatry group Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), which operates Psychiatry: An Industry of Death, an anti-psychiatry museum.^[195] Though Hubbard had stated psychosis was not something Scientology dealt with, after noticing many Scientologists were suffering breakdowns after using his techniques he created the Introspection Rundown, a brutal and inhumane method to allegedly solve psychotic episodes.^[196]^: 208–9 The rundown came under public scrutiny when in 1995 Scientologist Lisa McPherson suffered a mental breakdown and was removed from the hospital and held in isolation at a Church of Scientology for 17 days before she died.^[197]^{: Part 2}

Views on Hubbard

Scientologists view Hubbard as an extraordinary man, but do not worship him as a deity.^[198] They regard him as the preeminent Operating Thetan who remained on Earth in order to show others the way to spiritual liberation,^[124] the man who discovered the source of human misery and a technology allowing everyone to achieve their true potential.^[199] Church of Scientology management frames Hubbard’s physical death as “dropping his body” to pursue higher levels of research not possible with an Earth-bound body.^[155]

Scientologists often refer to Hubbard affectionately as “Ron”,^[200] and many refer to him as their “friend”.^[201] The Scientology organization operates a calendar in which 1950, the year in which Hubbard’s book Dianetics was published, is considered year zero, the beginning of an era. Years after that date are referred to as “AD” for “After Dianetics“.^[202] They have also buried copies of his writings preserved on stainless steel disks in a secure underground vault in the hope of preserving them against major catastrophes.^[199] The Church of Scientology’s view of Hubbard is presented in their hagiographical biography of him,^[203] seeking to present him as “a person of exceptional character, morals and intelligence”.^[204] Critics of Hubbard and his organization claim that many of the details of his life as he presented it were false.^[205] Every Scientology Org maintains an office set aside for Hubbard in perpetuity, set out to imitate those he used in life,^[206] and will typically have a bust or large framed photograph of him on display.^[207]

The Church of Scientology

Main articles: Church of Scientology and List of Scientology organizations

The Church of Scientology is headquartered at “Gold Base” in Riverside County, California, where the highest Sea Org officials work,^[208] and at “Flag Land Base” in Clearwater, Florida.^[209] The organization operates on a hierarchical and top-down basis,^[210] being largely bureaucratic in structure.^[211] It claims to be the only true voice of Scientology.^[212] The internal structure of Scientology organizations is strongly bureaucratic with a focus on statistics-based management.^[213] Organizational operating budgets are performance-related and subject to frequent reviews.^[213]

By 2011, the organization was claiming over 700 centers in 65 countries.^[214] Smaller centres are called “missions”.^[215] The largest number of these are in the U.S., with the second largest number being in Europe.^[216] Missions are established by missionaries, who are referred to as “mission holders”.^[217] Members can establish a mission wherever they wish but must fund it themselves; the missions are not financially supported by the central organization.^[218] Mission holders must purchase all of the necessary material from the central Church of Scientology; as of 2001, the Mission Starter Pack cost $35,000 (equivalent to $62,200 in 2024).^[219]^[113]

Each mission or Org is a corporate entity, established as a licensed franchise, and operating as a commercial company.^[222] Each franchise sends part of its earnings, which have been generated through beginner-level auditing, to the International Management.^[223] Bromley observed that an entrepreneurial incentive system pervades the organization, with individual members and organizations receiving payment for bringing in new people or for signing them up for more advanced services.^[224] The individual and collective performances of different members and missions are gathered, being called “stats”.^[225] Performances that are an improvement on the previous week are termed “up stats”; those that show a decline are “down stats”.^[226] According to leaked tax documents, the Church of Scientology International and Church of Spiritual Technology in the US had a combined $1.7 billion in assets in 2012, in addition to annual revenues estimated at $200 million a year.^[227]

Internal organization

Main articles: Office of Special Affairs and Guardian’s Office

The Sea Org is the organization’s primary management unit,^[224] containing the highest ranks in its hierarchy.^[213] Its members are often recruited from the children of existing Scientologists,^[228] and sign up to a “billion-year contract” to serve the organization.^[229] Kent described that for adult Sea Org members with minor children, their work obligations took priority, damaged parent-child relations, and has led to cases of severe child neglect and endangerment.^[230]

The Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF) is the Church of Scientology’s disciplinary program,^[231] where Sea Org members deemed to have seriously deviated from its teachings are placed.^[232]^[233] They will often face a hearing, the “Committee of Evidence”, which determines if they will be sent to the RPF.^[234] The RPF operates out of several locations.^[235] It involves a daily regimen of five hours of auditing or studying, eight hours of work, often physical labor, such as building renovation, and at least seven hours of sleep.^[233] Journalists have condemned RPF practices for violating human rights;^[231] and criticized the Scientology organization for placing children as young as twelve into the RPF, engaging them in forced labor and denying access to their parents, violating Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.^[191] The RPF has contributed to characterizations of the organization as a cult.^[236]

The Office of Special Affairs or OSA (formerly the Guardian’s Office) is a department of the Church of Scientology which has been characterized as a non-state intelligence agency.^[237]^[238]^[239] It has targeted critics of the organization for “dead agent” operations, which is mounting character assassination operations against perceived enemies.^[240] A 1990 article in the Los Angeles Times reported that in the 1980s the Scientology organization more commonly used private investigators, including former and current Los Angeles police officers, to give themselves a layer of protection in case embarrassing tactics were used and became public.^[241] The International Association of Scientologists operates to advance the cause of the Scientology organization and its members across the world.^[242]

Promotional material

The Church of Scientology’s Celebrity Centre in Hollywood, Los Angeles

The Scientology organization employs a range of media to promote itself and attract converts.^[243] Hubbard promoted Scientology through a vast range of books, articles, and lectures.^[124] It publishes several magazines, including Source, Advance, The Auditor, and Freedom.^[121] It has established a publishing press, New Era,^[244] and the audiovisual publisher Golden Era.^[245] It has also used the Internet for promotional purposes,^[246] and employed advertising to attract potential converts, including in high-profile locations such as television ads during the 2014 and 2020 Super Bowls.^[247]

The organization has long used celebrities as a means of promoting itself, starting with Hubbard’s “Project Celebrity” in 1955 and followed by its first Scientology Celebrity Centre in 1969.^[248] The Celebrity Centre headquarters is in Hollywood; other branches are in Dallas, Nashville, Las Vegas, New York City, and Paris.^[249] In 1955, Hubbard created a list of 63 celebrities targeted for conversion to Scientology.^[250] Prominent celebrities who have joined the organization include John Travolta, Tom Cruise, Kirstie Alley, Nancy Cartwright, and Juliette Lewis.^[251] It uses celebrity involvement to make itself appear more desirable.^[252] Other new religious movements have similarly pursued celebrity involvement such as the Church of Satan, Transcendental Meditation, ISKCON, and the Kabbalah Centre.^[253]

Social outreach

Several Scientology organizations promote the use of Scientology practices as a means to solve social problems. Scientology began to focus on these issues in the early 1970s. The Church of Scientology developed outreach programs that say they aim to fight drug addiction, illiteracy, learning disabilities and criminal behavior. They have been presented to schools, businesses and communities as secular techniques based on Hubbard’s writings.^[254] They have been described as part of the Scientology organization’s “war” against the discipline of psychiatry.^[255] Some critics regard this outreach as merely a public relations exercise.^[129]

In 1966, the Church of Scientology repackaged Hubbard’s theories about drugs into a drug rehabilitation program it calls Narconon, which purports to treat addicts through sweating in a sauna and using other Scientology techniques and processes.^[256] It has been described as a front group for recruiting into Scientology.^[257]^[258]^[259] Criminon is the organization’s criminal rehabilitation program.^[119]^[260] Its Applied Scholastics program, established in 1972, employs Hubbard’s pedagogical methods to help students.^[261]^[262] The Way to Happiness Foundation promotes a moral code written by Hubbard, to date translated into more than 40 languages.^[262] Narconon, Criminon, Applied Scholastics, and The Way to Happiness operate under the management banner of Association for Better Living and Education.^[263]^[264] The World Institute of Scientology Enterprises (WISE) applies Scientology practices to business management.^[43]^[262] The most prominent training supplier to make use of Hubbard’s technology is Sterling Management Systems.^[262]

Hubbard devised the Volunteer Minister Program in 1973.^[265] They offer help and counseling to those in distress; this includes the Scientological technique of providing “assists“.^[265] After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in New York City, Volunteer Ministers were on the site of Ground Zero within hours of the attack;^[266] they subsequently went to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.^[41] Accounts of the Volunteer Ministers’ effectiveness have been mixed, and touch assists are not supported by scientific evidence.^[267]^[268]^[269]

In 2010, hundreds of members of the Nation of Islam attended a Dianetics seminar near the group’s Chicago headquarters, where they were introduced to Scientology auditing practices. Louis Farrakhan subsequently encouraged his followers to study Scientology, telling them that its techniques could help address the struggles of African Americans, and stated that “nobody can lead in our Nation until and unless they become clear.” By 2012, according to the Nation of Islam newspaper The Final Call, more than 1,000 members had been certified as auditors and several thousand others were studying Scientology materials. The Church of Scientology opened new facilities in Harlem and Inglewood, California, and former officials reported that course costs for Nation members were sometimes reduced, though the Church denied giving special treatment. Farrakhan described the relationship as a “long and beautiful” alliance.^[270]

Responses to opponents

Main articles: Scientology ethics and justice, Suppressive person, Disconnection (Scientology), and Fair game (Scientology)

The Scientology organization regards itself as the victim of media and governmental persecution,^[271] and the scholar of religion Douglas Cowan observed that “claims to systematic persecution and harassment” are part of the internal culture.^[272] In turn, Urban noted the organization has “tended to respond very aggressively to its critics, mounting numerous lawsuits and at times using extralegal means to respond to those who threaten it.”^[271] The organization has often responded to criticism by ad hominem attacks.^[273] Its approach to targeting critics has often generated more negative attention for their organization,^[274] with Lewis commenting that it “has proven to be its own worst enemy” in this regard.^[275]

It has a reputation for litigiousness stemming from its involvement in a large number of legal conflicts.^[276] Barrett characterized the organization as “one of the most litigious religions in the world”.^[277] It has conducted lawsuits against governments, organizations, and individuals, both to counter criticisms made against it and to gain legal recognition as a religion.^[278] J.P. Kumar, who studied the litigation, argued that victory was not always important to the organization; what was important was depleting the resources and energies of its critics.^[279]

Suppressive persons and fair game

Those deemed hostile to the Church of Scientology, including ex-members, are labeled “suppressive persons” or SPs.^[280] Hubbard maintained that 20 percent of the population would be classed as “suppressive persons” because they were truly malevolent or dangerous: “the Adolf Hitlers and the Genghis Khans, the unrepentant murderers and the drug lords”.^[281]^[282] If the organization declares that one of its members is an SP, all other members are forbidden from further contact with them, an act it calls “disconnection“.^[274] Any member breaking this rule is labeled a “potential trouble source” (PTS) and unless they swiftly cease all contact they can be labeled an SP themselves.^[283]^[284]^[83]

In an October 1968 letter to members, Hubbard wrote about a policy called “fair game” which was directed at SPs and other perceived threats to the organization.^[105]^[285] Here he stated that these individuals “may be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologists. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed”.^[280] Following strong criticism, the organization said that it formally ended Fair Game a month later, with Hubbard stating that he had never intended “to authorize illegal or harassment type acts against anyone.”^[286] Critics and some scholarly observers argue that its practices reflect that the policy remains in place.^[287] It is “widely asserted” by former members that Fair Game is still employed;^[288] Stacy Brooks, a former member of the internal Office of Special Affairs, stated in court that “practices which were formerly called ‘Fair Game’ continue to be employed, although the term ‘Fair Game’ is no longer used.”^[286]

Hubbard and his followers targeted many individuals as well as government officials and agencies, including a program of illegal infiltration of the IRS and other U.S. government agencies during the 1970s.^[289]^[285] They also conducted private investigations, character assassination and legal action against the organization’s critics in the media.^[289]

The Scientology ethics and justice system regulates member behavior,^[213] and Ethics officers are present in every Scientology organization. Ethics officers ensure “correct application of Scientology technology” and deal with “behavior adversely affecting a Scientology organization’s performance”, ranging from “errors” and “misdemeanors” to “crimes” and “suppressive acts”, as those terms defined by Scientology.^[233]

Free Zone and independent Scientology

Main article: Free Zone (Scientology)

The terms “Free Zone”, “Freezone” and “Independent Scientology” are used by those who practice Scientology outside of the purview of the Church of Scientology. Free Zoners believe that Church of Scientology leadership has deviated from Hubbard’s teachings, while asserting their own loyalty to Hubbard. The Church of Scientology is hostile to the Free Zone, and refers to such independent Scientologists as “squirrels”. In 1983, the Advanced Ability Center was founded by David Mayo in California, but was successfully shut down by the Church of Scientology. Conversely, still operating in 2023 is Ron’s Org in Europe, founded in 1984 by Bill Robertson as a loose grouping of independent centers rather than a centralized organization. Robertson coined the term “free zone” from Hubbard’s space opera teachings. Since Robertson had said that he was channeling messages from the late Hubbard and had obtained OT levels above the eight offered by the Church of Scientology, many of the newer “indies” prefer to call themselves “independent scientologists” to distance themselves from Robertson.^[290]

Controversies

Main article: Scientology controversies

Urban described the Church of Scientology as “the world’s most controversial new religion”,^[41] while Lewis termed it “arguably the most persistently controversial” of contemporary new religious movements.^[293] According to Urban, the organization had “a documented history of extremely problematic behavior ranging from espionage against government agencies to shocking attacks on critics of the organization and abuse of its own members.”^[294]

A first point of controversy was its response to its rejection by the scientific establishment. Another was a 1991 Time magazine article about the organization, which responded with a major lawsuit that was rejected by the court as baseless early in 1992. A third is its religious tax status in the United States, as the IRS granted the organization tax-exempt status in 1993.^[295]

It has been in conflict with the governments and police forces of many countries (including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada,^[22] France^[296] and Germany).^[297]^[1]^[298]^[299] It has been one of the most litigious religious movements in history, filing countless lawsuits against governments, organizations and individuals.^[300]

Hubbard himself was convicted of fraud in absentia by a French court in 1978 and sentenced to four years in prison.^[22] In 1992, a court in Canada convicted the Scientology organization in Toronto of spying on law enforcement and government agencies and criminal breach of trust, later upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal.^[23]^[24] The Church of Scientology was convicted of fraud by a French court in 2009, a judgment upheld by the supreme Court of Cassation in 2013.^[25]

Reports and allegations have been made, by journalists, courts, and governmental bodies of several countries, that the Church of Scientology is an unscrupulous commercial enterprise that harasses its critics and brutally exploits its members.^[298]^[301] A considerable amount of investigation has been aimed at the organization, by groups ranging from the media to governmental agencies.^[298]^[301]

The controversies involving the Church of Scientology, some of them ongoing, include:

Criminal behavior by members of the organization, including the infiltration of the US Government.^[1]
Organized harassment of people perceived as enemies of the Church of Scientology.^[1]
Scientology’s disconnection policy, in which some members are required to shun friends or family members who are “antagonistic” to the organization.^[302]^[303]
The death of Scientologist Lisa McPherson while in the care of the organization. Robert Minton sponsored the multimillion-dollar lawsuit against Scientology for the death of McPherson. In May 2004, McPherson’s estate and the Church of Scientology reached a confidential settlement.^[304]
Attempts to legally force search engines to censor information critical of the Scientology organization.^[305]
Allegations the organization’s leader David Miscavige beats and demoralizes staff, and that physical violence by superiors towards staff working for them is a common occurrence in the organization.^[197]^[306] Scientology spokesman Tommy Davis denied these claims and provided witnesses to rebut them.^[197]

Stephen A. Kent, a professor of sociology, has said that “Scientologists see themselves as possessors of doctrines and skills that can save the world, if not the galaxy.”^[307] As stated in Scientology doctrine: “The whole agonized future of this planet, every man, woman and child on it, and your own destiny for the next endless trillions of years depend on what you do here and now with and in Scientology.”^[308] Kent has described the Scientology ethics and justice system as “a peculiar brand of morality that uniquely benefited [the Church of Scientology] … In plain English, the purpose of Scientology ethics is to eliminate opponents, then eliminate people’s interests in things other than Scientology.”^[191]

Many former members have come forward to speak out about the organization and the negative effects its teachings have had on them, including celebrities such as Leah Remini. Remini spoke about her split from the Church of Scientology, saying that she still has friends within the organization whom she is no longer able to speak with.^[309]

Throughout the early 1950s, adherents of Hubbard were arrested for practicing medicine without a license. In January 1951, the New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners brought proceedings against the Dianetic Research Foundation on the charge of teaching medicine without a license. In January 1963 U.S. Marshals raided the Founding Church of Scientology in Washington.^[194] Scientology social programs such as drug and criminal rehabilitation have also drawn both support and criticism.^[310]^[311]^[312]

Hubbard’s motives

Common criticisms directed at Hubbard was that he drew upon pre-existing sources and the allegation that he was motivated by financial reasons.^[313] A number of Hubbard’s letters and directives to his subordinates support the notion that he used religion as a façade for Scientology to maintain tax-exempt status^[5] and avoid further prosecutions (a number of Dianetics or Scientology practitioners had already been arrested) for medical claims.^[314] The IRS cited a statement frequently attributed to Hubbard that the way to get rich was to found a religion.^[104] Many of Hubbard’s science fiction colleagues, including Sam Merwin, Lloyd Arthur Eshbach and Sam Moscowitz, recall Hubbard raising the topic in conversation.^[315]^[316]^[317] In 2006, Rolling Stone‘s Janet Reitman also attributed the statement to Hubbard, as a remark to science fiction writer Lloyd Eshbach and recorded in Eshbach’s autobiography.^[307]

Criminal behavior

In 1978, a number of Scientologists, including L. Ron Hubbard’s wife Mary Sue Hubbard (who was second in command in the organization at the time), were convicted of perpetrating what was at the time the largest incident of domestic espionage in the history of the United States, called “Operation Snow White“. This involved infiltrating, wiretapping, and stealing documents from the offices of Federal attorneys and the Internal Revenue Service.^[318] L. Ron Hubbard was convicted in absentia by French authorities of engaging in fraud and sentenced to four years in prison.^[22] The head of the French Church of Scientology was convicted at the same trial and given a suspended one-year prison sentence.^[319]

An FBI raid on the Church of Scientology’s headquarters revealed documentation that detailed Scientology’s criminal actions against various critics of the organization. In “Operation Freakout“, agents of the organization attempted to destroy Paulette Cooper, author of The Scandal of Scientology, an early book that had been critical of the movement.^[320] Among these documents was a plan to frame Gabe Cazares, the mayor of Clearwater, Florida, with a staged hit-and-run accident. Nine individuals related to the case were prosecuted on charges of theft, burglary, conspiracy, and other crimes.

In 1988, Scientology president Heber Jentzsch and ten other members of the organization were arrested in Spain on various charges including illicit association, coercion, fraud, and labor law violations.^[321] In October 2009, the Church of Scientology was found guilty of organized fraud in France.^[322] The sentence was confirmed by the court of appeal in February 2012, and by the supreme Court of Cassation in October 2013.^[323]^[25] In 2012, Belgian prosecutors indicted Scientology as a criminal organization engaged in fraud and extortion.^[324]^[325]^[326] In March 2016, the Church of Scientology was acquitted of all charges, and demands to close its Belgian branch and European headquarters were dismissed.^[327]

Organized harassment

Main article: Fair game (Scientology)

Scientology has historically engaged in hostile action toward its critics; executives within the organization have proclaimed that Scientology is “not a turn-the-other-cheek religion”.^[328] Since the 1960s, Journalists, politicians, former Scientologists and various anti-cult groups have said that Scientology followers have engaged in organized hostility, harassment and threats, and Scientology has targeted these critics–almost without exception–for retaliation, in the form of lawsuits and public counter-accusations of personal wrongdoing. Many of Scientology’s critics have also reported they were subject to threats and harassment in their private lives.^[329]^[330]

According to a 1990 Los Angeles Times article, the Scientology organization had largely switched from using members to using private investigators, including former and current Los Angeles police officers, as this gives the organization a layer of protection in case investigators use tactics which might cause the organization embarrassment. In one case, the organization described their tactics as “LAPD sanctioned”, which was energetically disputed by Police Chief Daryl Gates. The officer involved in this particular case of surveillance and harassment was suspended for six months.^[241]

Journalist John Sweeney reported that “While making our BBC Panorama film Scientology and Me I have been shouted at, spied on, had my hotel invaded at midnight, denounced as a ‘bigot’ by star Scientologists, brain-washed – that is how it felt to me – in a mock up of a Nazi-style torture chamber and chased round the streets of Los Angeles by sinister strangers”.^[331]

Mistreatment of members

A prominent ex-member who has spoken out about the Scientology organization’s mistreatment of members and ex-members is Leah Remini. Remini is an American actress that has been involved with the Church of Scientology since childhood. She left in 2013. In 2015 she published a book entitled Troublemaker: Surviving Hollywood and Scientology where she recounts her experiences and events leading up to her leaving the organization.^[332]

She also has produced a documentary television series on A&E entitled Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath released in 2017 which aired for three seasons. In this series, she and her co-host Mike Rinder, who is also an ex-member, tell their experiences and interview numerous ex-members with similar. Leah Remini has been outspoken about her views on the Church of Scientology and has raised much awareness about some of the major issues within the organization regarding treatment of children, exploitive money practices and mistreatments she has experienced.

As of August 2023, Remini has filed a lawsuit against the Church of Scientology. She alleges verbal, physical and sexual abuse was known and tolerated by the organization, and exploitive practices such as signing billion-year contracts with the organization. The main claims of the lawsuit are for psychological torture, defamation, surveillance, harassment, and intimidation experienced by her for years while a member, and as tactics used after she publicly left.^[333]

Violation of auditing confidentiality

During the auditing process, the auditor collects and records personal information from the client.^[334] While the Church of Scientology claims to protect the confidentiality of auditing records, the organization has a history of attacking and psychologically abusing former members using information culled from the records.^[334] For example, a December 16, 1969, a Guardian’s Office order (G. O. 121669) by Mary Sue Hubbard explicitly authorized the use of auditing records for purposes of “internal security”.^[335] Former members report having participated in combing through information obtained in auditing sessions to see if it could be used for smear campaigns against critics.^[336]^[337]

Allegations of coerced abortions

Further information: Scientology and abortion § Sea Org

The Sea Org originally operated on vessels at sea where it was understood that it was not permitted to raise children on board the ships because “children hinder adults from performing their vital assignments”. Women who became pregnant have stated that they had been “coercively persuaded” to undergo abortions in order to remain in the Sea Org.^[338]

In 2003, The Times of India reported “Forced abortions, beatings, starvation are considered tools of discipline in this church”.^[339] A former high-ranking source reports that “some 1,500 abortions” have been “carried out by women in the Sea Organization since the implementation of a rule in the late 80s that members could not remain in the organization if they decided to have children”. The source noted that “And if members who have been in the Sea Organization for, say, 10 years do decide to have kids, they are dismissed with no more than $1,000” as a severance package.^[340]

Longtime member Astra Woodcraft left Scientology for good when the organization tried to pressure her to have an abortion.^[341]^[342] Former Sea Org member Karen Pressley recounted that she was often asked by fellow Scientologists for loans so that they could get an abortion and remain in the Sea Org.^[343]^[344]^[345] Scientology employee Claire Headley has said she “was forced to have (two) abortions to keep her job and was subjected to violations of personal rights and liberties for the purpose of obtaining forced labor”.^[346] Laura DeCrescenzo reported she was “coerced to have an abortion” as a minor, and sued in 2009.^[347]

In March 2009 a former Scientologist reported that women who worked at Scientology’s headquarters were forced to have abortions, or faced being declared a “suppressive person” by the organization’s management.^[348] In March 2010, former Scientologist Janette Lang stated that at age 20 she became pregnant by her boyfriend while in the organization,^[349] and her boyfriend’s Scientology supervisors “coerced them into terminating the pregnancy”.^[350] “We fought for a week, I was devastated, I felt abused, I was lost and eventually I gave in. It was my baby, my body and my choice, and all of that was taken away from me by Scientology”, said Lang.^[350]^[351]

Australian Senator Nick Xenophon gave a speech to the Australian Parliament in November 2009, about statements he had received from former Scientologists.^[352] He said that he had been told members of the organization had coerced pregnant female employees to have abortions.^[352] “I am deeply concerned about this organisation and the devastating impact it can have on its followers,” said Senator Xenophon, and he requested that the Australian Senate begin an investigation into Scientology.^[352] According to the letters presented by Senator Xenophon, the organization was involved in “ordering” its members to have abortions.^[353]

Former Scientologist Aaron Saxton sent a letter to Senator Xenophon stating he had participated in coercing pregnant women within the organization to have abortions.^[354] “Aaron says women who fell pregnant were taken to offices and bullied to have an abortion. If they refused, they faced demotion and hard labour. Aaron says one staff member used a coat hanger and self-aborted her child for fear of punishment,” said Senator Xenophon.^[355] Carmel Underwood, another former Scientologist, said she had been put under “extreme pressure” to have an abortion,^[356] and that she was placed into a “disappearing programme”, after refusing.^[357] Underwood was the executive director of Scientology’s branch in Sydney.^[355]

Scientology spokesman Tommy Davis said these statements are “utterly meritless”.^[346] Mike Ferriss, the head of Scientology in New Zealand, told media that “There are no forced abortions in Scientology”.^[358] Scientology spokesperson Virginia Stewart likewise denied the statements and asserted “The Church of Scientology considers the family unit and children to be of the utmost importance and does not condone nor force anyone to undertake any medical procedure whatsoever.”^[359]

Allegation of human trafficking and other crimes against women

A number of women have sued the Church of Scientology, alleging a variety of complaints including human trafficking, rape, forced labor, and child abuse.^[360] In 2009, two former Sea Org employees, Marc and Claire Headley, sued the Church of Scientology alleging human trafficking.^[361]

Scientology, litigation, and the Internet

In the 1990s, Miscavige’s organization took action against increased criticism of Scientology on the Internet and online distribution of Scientology-related documents.^[362] Starting in 1991, Scientology filed fifty lawsuits against Scientology-critic Cult Awareness Network (CAN).^[363] Many of the suits were dismissed, but one resulted in $2 million in losses, bankrupting the network.^[363] At bankruptcy, CAN’s name and logo were obtained by a Scientologist.^[363]^[364] A New Cult Awareness Network was set up with Scientology backing, which says it operates as an information and networking center for non-traditional religions, referring callers to academics and other experts.^[365]^[366]

In a 1993 U.S. lawsuit brought by the Church of Scientology against former member Steven Fishman, Fishman made a court declaration which included several dozen pages of formerly secret esoterica detailing aspects of Scientologist cosmogony.^[367] As a result of the litigation, this material, normally strictly safeguarded and used only in Scientology’s more advanced “OT levels”, found its way onto the Internet.^[367] This resulted in a battle between the Scientology organization and its online critics over the right to disclose this material, or safeguard its confidentiality.^[367] The organization was forced to issue a press release acknowledging the existence of this cosmogony, rather than allow its critics “to distort and misuse this information for their own purposes”.^[367]

In January 1995, Church of Scientology lawyer Helena Kobrin attempted to shut down the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology by sending a control message instructing Usenet servers to delete the group.^[368] In practice, this rmgroup message had little effect, since most Usenet servers are configured to disregard such messages when sent to groups that receive substantial traffic, and newgroup messages were quickly issued to recreate the group on those servers that did not do so. However, the issuance of the message led to a great deal of public criticism by free-speech advocates.^[369]^[370] Among the criticisms raised, one suggestion is that Scientology’s true motive is to suppress the free speech of its critics.^[371]^[372]

The Church of Scientology also began filing lawsuits against those who posted copyrighted texts on the newsgroup and the World Wide Web, lobbied for tighter restrictions on copyrights in general, and supported the controversial Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act as well as the even more controversial Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Beginning in the middle of 1996 and ensuing for several years, the newsgroup was attacked by anonymous parties using a tactic dubbed sporgery by some, in the form of hundreds of thousands of forged spam messages posted on the group. Some investigators said that some spam had been traced to members of the Church of Scientology.^[374]^[375] Former Scientologist Tory Christman later asserted that the Office of Special Affairs had undertaken a concerted effort to destroy alt.religion.scientology through these means; the effort failed.^[376]

On January 14, 2008, a video produced by the Scientology organization featuring an interview with Tom Cruise was leaked to the Internet and uploaded to YouTube.^[377]^[378]^[379] The Church of Scientology issued a copyright violation claim against YouTube requesting the removal of the video.^[380] Calling the action by the Church of Scientology a form of Internet censorship, participants of Anonymous coordinated Project Chanology, consisting of a series of denial-of-service attacks against Scientology websites, prank calls, and black faxes to Scientology centers.^[381]^[382]^[383]^[384]

On January 21, 2008, Anonymous announced its intentions via a video posted to YouTube entitled “Message to Scientology”, and a press release declaring a “war” against the Church of Scientology and the Religious Technology Center.^[385] In the press release, the group stated that the attacks against the organization would continue in order to protect the freedom of speech, and end what they saw as the financial exploitation of members of the organization.^[386]

On January 28, 2008, an Anonymous video appeared on YouTube calling for protests outside Church of Scientology buildings on February 10, 2008.^[387]^[388] The date was chosen because it was the birthday of Lisa McPherson.^[389] According to a letter Anonymous e-mailed to the press, about 7,000 people protested in more than 90 cities worldwide.^[390] Many protesters wore masks based on the character V from V for Vendetta (who was influenced by Guy Fawkes) or otherwise disguised their identities, in part to protect themselves from reprisals from the Church of Scientology.^[391]^[392] Many further protests have followed since then in cities around the world.^[393]

The Arbitration Committee of the Wikipedia internet encyclopedia decided in May 2009 to restrict access to its site from Church of Scientology IP addresses, to prevent self-serving edits by Scientologists.^[394]^[395] A “host of anti-Scientologist editors” were topic-banned as well.^[394]^[395] The committee concluded that both sides had “gamed policy” and resorted to “battlefield tactics”, with articles on living persons being the “worst casualties”.^[394]

Disputes over legal status

The legal status of Scientology or Scientology-related organizations differs between jurisdictions.^[32]^[33]^[396] Scientology was legally recognized as a tax-exempt religion in Australia,^[34] Portugal,^[397] and Spain.^[398] Scientology was granted tax-exempt status in the United States in 1993.^[399]^[400]^[401]^[402] The organization is considered a cult in Chile and an “anticonstitutional sect” in Germany,^[37] and is considered a cult (French secte) by some French public authorities.^[38]

The Church of Scientology argues that Scientology is a genuine religious movement that has been misrepresented, maligned, and persecuted.^[271]^[403] The organization has pursued an extensive public relations campaign for the recognition of Scientology as a tax-exempt religion in the various countries in which it exists.^[404]^[405]^[406]

The Church of Scientology has often generated opposition due to its strong-arm tactics directed against critics and members wishing to leave the organization.^[407] A minority of governments regard it as a religious organization entitled to tax-exempt status, while other governments variously classify it as a business, cult, pseudoreligion, or criminal organization.^[408]^[409]

In 1957, the Church of Scientology of California was granted tax-exempt status by the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and so, for a time, were other local branches of the organization.^[36] In 1958 however, the IRS started a review of the appropriateness of this status.^[196] In 1959, Hubbard moved to England, remaining there until the mid-1960s.^[410] In 1967, the IRS removed Scientology’s tax-exempt status, asserting that its activities were commercial and operated for the benefit of Hubbard, rather than for charitable or religious purposes.^[36]^[411]

In the mid-1960s, the Church of Scientology was banned in several Australian states, starting with Victoria in 1965.^[196] The ban was based on the Anderson Report, which found that the auditing process involved “command” hypnosis, in which the hypnotist assumes “positive authoritative control” over the patient. On this point the report stated:^[3]^: 115

It is the firm conclusion of this Board that most scientology and dianetic techniques are those of authoritative hypnosis and as such are dangerous … the scientific evidence which the Board heard from several expert witnesses of the highest repute … leads to the inescapable conclusion that it is only in name that there is any difference between authoritative hypnosis and most of the techniques of scientology. Many scientology techniques are in fact hypnotic techniques, and Hubbard has not changed their nature by changing their names.^[3]^: 115

The Australian branch of the Scientology organization was forced to operate under the name of the “Church of the New Faith” as a result, the name and practice of Scientology having become illegal in the relevant states. Several years of court proceedings aimed at overturning the ban followed.^[34] In 1973, state laws banning Scientology were overturned in Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia. In 1983 the High Court of Australia ruled in a unanimous decision that the Church of Scientology was “undoubtedly a religion and deserving of tax exemption”.^[35]

Scientology in religious studies

Hugh B. Urban writes that “Scientology’s efforts to get itself defined as a religion make it an ideal case study for thinking about how we understand and define religion.”^[412] Frank K. Flinn, adjunct professor of religious studies at Washington University in St. Louis wrote, “it is abundantly clear that Scientology has both the typical forms of ceremonial and celebratory worship and its own unique form of spiritual life.”^[413]

Flinn further states that religion requires “beliefs in something transcendental or ultimate, practices (rites and codes of behavior) that re-inforce those beliefs and, a community that is sustained by both the beliefs and practices”, all of which are present within Scientology.^[408] Similarly, World Religions in America states that “Scientology contains the same elements of most other religions, including myths, scriptures, doctrines, worship, sacred practices and rituals, moral and ethical expectations, a community of believers, clergy, and ecclesiastic organizations.”^[414] According to Mikhael Rothstein, Scientology’s rituals can be classified into 1) those with the purpose of changing the person, such as auditing; 2) collective, which are calendar events where Scientology, its community and L. Ron Hubbard are celebrated; 3) rites of passage 4) weekly services that are similar to Christian services.^[415]

While acknowledging that a number of his colleagues accept Scientology as a religion, sociologist Stephen A. Kent writes: “Rather than struggling over whether or not to label Scientology as a religion, I find it far more helpful to view it as a multifaceted transnational corporation, only one element of which is religious” [emphasis in the original].^[5]^[43] Donna Batten in the Gale Encyclopedia of American Law writes, “A belief does not need to be stated in traditional terms to fall within First Amendment protection. For example, Scientology – a system of beliefs that a human being is essentially a free and immortal spirit who merely inhabits a body – does not propound the existence of a supreme being, but it qualifies as a religion under the broad definition propounded by the Supreme Court.”^[416]

A great number of research archives on Scientology have emerged in recent years for the academic study of Scientology. These include collections in San Diego State University, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, Los Angeles, Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, Ohio State University and Claremont College Library. There is also a big collection of alternative beliefs and religions at the University of Alberta Library in Canada, where scholar Stephen A. Kent “makes material available on a restricted bases to undergraduate and graduate students.”^[417]

The material contained in the OT levels has been characterized as bad science fiction by critics, while others claim it bears structural similarities to gnostic thought and ancient Hindu beliefs of creation and cosmic struggle.^[418] Donald A. Westbrook suggests that there are three areas of research scholars should consider researching and writing about: the biographical life and legacy of L. Ron Hubbard, the Church of Scientology’s social betterment programs, and derivative scientology.^[419]

Influences

The general orientation of Hubbard’s philosophy owes much to Will Durant, author of the popular 1926 classic The Story of Philosophy; Dianetics is dedicated to Durant.^[420] Hubbard’s view of a mechanically functioning mind in particular finds close parallels in Durant’s work on Spinoza.^[420] According to Hubbard himself, Scientology is “the Western anglicized continuance of many early forms of wisdom”.^[421] Ankerberg and Weldon mention the sources of Scientology to include “the Vedas, Buddhism, Judaism, Gnosticism, Taoism, early Greek civilization and the teachings of Jesus, Nietzsche and Freud”.^[422] Hubbard had an inaccurate and superficial understanding of the major Eastern religious traditions, despite his claims of similarities to Scientology. His self-proclaimed association with Buddhism’s Maitreya was an attempt on his part to enhance his image and add respectability to his organisation’s beliefs. Aside from superficial similarities between Scientology and Hinayana Buddhism that might have motivated him to draw spurious associations between the two belief systems, Hubbard may have written about Eastern faiths because his Western members were unlikely to have sufficient knowledge of them to assess the validity of his claims.^[423]

Hubbard asserted that Freudian thought was a “major precursor” to Scientology. W. Vaughn Mccall, Professor and Chairman of the Georgia Regents University writes, “Both Freudian theory and Hubbard assume that there are unconscious mental processes that may be shaped by early life experiences, and that these influence later behavior and thought.” Both schools of thought propose a “tripartite structure of the mind”.^[424] Sigmund Freud‘s psychology, popularized in the 1930s and 1940s, was a key contributor to the Dianetics therapy model, and was acknowledged unreservedly as such by Hubbard in his early works.^[425] Hubbard never forgot, when he was 12 years old, meeting Cmdr. Joseph Cheesman Thompson, a U.S. Navy officer who had studied with Freud^[426] and when writing to the American Psychological Association in 1949, he stated that he was conducting research based on the “early work of Freud”.^[427]

In Dianetics, Hubbard cites Hegel as a negative influence – an object lesson in “confusing” writing.^[428] According to Mary A. Mann, Scientology is considered nondenominational, accepting all people regardless of their religions background, ethnicity, or educational attainment.^[429] Another influence was Alfred Korzybski‘s General Semantics.^[425] Hubbard was friends with fellow science fiction writers A. E. van Vogt and Robert Heinlein, who both wrote science-fiction inspired by Korzybski’s writings, such as Vogt’s The World of Null-A. Hubbard’s view of the reactive mind has acknowledged parallels with Korzybski’s thought; in fact, Korzybski’s “anthropometer” may have been what inspired Hubbard’s invention of the E-meter.^[425]

Beyond that, Hubbard himself named a great many other influences in his own writing – in Scientology 8-8008, for example, these include philosophers from Anaxagoras and Aristotle to Herbert Spencer and Voltaire, physicists and mathematicians like Euclid and Isaac Newton, as well as founders of religions such as Buddha, Confucius, Jesus and Mohammed—but there is little evidence in Hubbard’s writings that he studied these figures to any great depth.^[425]

As noted, elements of the Eastern religions are evident in Scientology,^[427] in particular the concept of karma found in Hinduism and Jainism.^[430]^[431] According to the Encyclopedia of Community, Scientology “shows affinities with Buddhism and a remarkable similarity to first-century Gnosticism”.^[432]^[433]

Demographics

One 2014 estimate indicates there were about 30,000 Scientologists;^[434] an estimate given by former high-level Church of Scientology employee Jefferson Hawkins in 2011 was of 40,000.^[435] They are found mostly in the U.S., Europe, South Africa and Australia.^[307]

By the start of the 21st century, the organization was claiming it had 8 million members.^[66] Several commentators observe that this number is cumulative rather than collective: that is, it represents the total number of people who had any interaction with the Scientology organization since its founding, some of whom only had one or two auditing sessions.^[436] The organization also maintained that it was the world’s fastest growing religion,^[437] a title also claimed by several religious groups, including Mormons, modern Pagans, and Baháʼí,^[438] but which is demonstrably incorrect.^[439]^[440]^[408]^[441]^[442] Due to its internationally dispersed nature, it is difficult to determine the number of Free Zone Scientologists.^[443] In 2021, Thomas suggested that the Free Zone was growing,^[443] with Lewis commenting that Free Zoners may one day outnumber members of the Church of Scientology.^[444]

The American Religious Identification Survey of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York found 45,000 Scientologists in the United States in 1990,^[439] 55,000 in 2001,^[445] and 25,000 in 2008.^[446]^[447] Lewis commented that the “pattern of solid growth” he observed in the 2000s seemed “suddenly to have ground to a halt” by the early 2010s.^[448] Within the U.S., higher rates of Scientology have been observed in the western states, especially those bordering the Pacific Ocean, than further east.^[449] The Canadian census revealed 1,215 Scientologists in 1991 and 1,525 in 2001,^[226] and 1,745 in 2011^[450] before declining to 1,380 in 2021.^[451]^[452]

The Australian census reported 1,488 Scientologists in 1996 and 2,032 in 2001,^[453] before dropping to under 1,700 in 2016.^[454]^[455]^[456] The New Zealand census found 207 Scientologists in 1991 and 282 in 2001.^[226] Andersen and Wellendorf estimated that there were between 2000 and 4000 Scientologists in Denmark in 2009,^[457] with contemporary estimates suggesting between 500 and 1000 active Scientologists in Sweden.^[458] Germany’s government counted 3600 German members in 2021,^[459] while observers have suggested between 2000 and 4000 in France.^[216] The 2021 census in England and Wales recorded 1,800 Scientologists.^[460]

Internationally, the Scientology organization’s members are largely middle-class.^[461] In Australia, Scientologists have been observed as being wealthier and more likely to work in managerial and professional roles than the average citizen.^[462] Scientology is oriented towards individualistic and liberal economic values;^[463] the scholar of religion Susan J. Palmer observed that Scientologists display “a capitalist ideology that promotes individualistic values”.^[464] A survey of Danish Scientologists revealed that nearly all voted for liberal or conservative parties on the right of Denmark’s political spectrum and took a negative view of socialism.^[465] Placing great emphasis on the freedom of the individual, those surveyed believed that the state and its regulations held people down, and felt that the Danish welfare system was excessive.^[466] Interviewing members of the Church of Scientology in the United States, Westbrook found that most regarded themselves as apolitical, Republicans, or libertarians; fewer than 10 percent supported the Democratic Party.^[467]

Recruitment

Most people who join the organization are introduced to it via friends and family.^[468] It also offers free “personality tests” or “stress tests”, typically involving an E-Meter, to attract potential recruits.^[469] It hopes that if non-Scientologists purchase one service from the organization and feel a benefit from it – a “win” in Scientology terminology – they are more likely to purchase additional services from it.^[470] Other recruitment methods include lectures and classes introducing non-Scientologists to the subject.^[215]

The Church of Scientology’s own statistics, published in 1998, reveal that 52.6% of those who joined did so through their family and friendship networks with existing members.^[471] 18% were drawn in through personality tests, 4.8% through publicity, and 3.1% through lectures.^[472] Westbrook’s interviews with members determined that most people who joined the organization were initially attracted by “the practical benefits advertised”.^[473] Westbrook found that various members deepened their involvement after having what they considered to be a spiritual experience, such as exteriorization or a past life memory, in their first few weeks of involvement.^[474]

Reception and influence

Scientology has influenced various therapy and spiritual groups formed since the 1960s.^[475] Much past-life therapy was influenced by Dianetics,^[475] while Werner Erhard‘s Erhard Seminars Training therapy system also drew on Scientology.^[475] Paul Twitchell, who founded Eckankar, had also been a staff member at the Church of Scientology and plagiarised some of Hubbard’s writings.^[475] In the 1960s, the Process Church of the Final Judgment was established by former Scientologists.^[476] In 1986 Harry Palmer – who had previously run a Scientology franchise mission in Elmira, New York, for around a decade – established his own group, the Avatar Course.^[475]

Barrett noted that “vast amounts” have been written about Scientology, both in support and opposition to it.^[273] Much of this literature has been heavily polarised.^[477] Scientology has attracted negative publicity since its founding,^[478] with criticism of the Scientology organization coming from government agencies, the media, and anti-cult groups.^[214] Much material critical of the organization was written by ex-members such as Cyril Vosper, Bent Corydon, and Jon Atack.^[273] Many of the organizations’s critics have utilized the internet, for instance to disseminate leaked OT documents.^[479] The Church of Scientology has sought to sue various websites, including the Usenet group alt.religion.scientologist, for disseminating Hubbard’s writings.^[480] Urban noted that Scientologists have long maintained that theirs is “a legitimate religious movement that has been misrepresented, maligned, and persecuted by media witch-hunters and McCarthy-style government attacks.”^[271]

Relations between the Scientology organization and German government are largely hostile.^[481] The German government banned members from working in the public sector, pointing out that the organization is a threat to democracy.^[277] In France, conspiracy theories have spread alleging that the Church of Scientology controls the US government or that it is a front for American imperialism, perhaps run by the Central Intelligence Agency.^[482] French Scientologists have reported being fired or refused jobs because of their beliefs,^[483] and bombs have been thrown at French Scientology centers; in 2002 one Scientologist sustained permanent injuries as a result.^[484] A 2022 YouGov poll on Americans’ attitudes toward religious groups ranked Scientology as the country’s least-favored group, with around 50% of respondents indicating a negative view of the practise, alongside Satanism.^[485]

Media, popular culture, and academia

Main article: Scientology in popular culture

Scientology has received an “extraordinary amount” of media interest.^[486] In his writings, Hubbard often described journalists in negative terms, for instance calling them “merchants of chaos”.^[487] He discouraged Scientologists from interacting with journalists, a tendency that, Westbrook argued, has contributed to negative press portrayals of the movement.^[488] Many journalists examining the organization have been concerned about potential human rights violations.^[489]

Academic research into Scientology was for several decades comparatively limited compared to the media and public interest in it.^[486] This has been attributed to the organization’s secrecy,^[490] its reputation for litigiousness,^[491] and a lack of academic access to documentary material about the organization.^[272] Early studies included Roy Wallis‘ The Road to Total Freedom (1976) and Harriet Whitehead’s Renunciation and Reformulation (1987).^[492] Research intensified in the early 21st century,^[493] and in 2014, the first academic conference on the topic was held, in Antwerp, Belgium.^[494] Several academics who have studied the movement have described the organization paying close attention to their work by telephoning them and sending representatives to attend their talks on the subject.^[486] Some observers of Scientology have also been critical of scholars studying it, noting that they frequently act as apologists for it.^[495]

Documentaries about Scientology have typically focused on allegations about the Scientology organization’s intimidating behavior, greed and brainwashing.^[496] Popular examples include Louis Theroux‘s 2015 documentary My Scientology Movie,^[497] and Leah Remini‘s documentary series Scientology and the Aftermath and her book Troublemaker: Surviving Hollywood and Scientology, drawing on her experience as a member of the Church of Scientology.^[246]^[498] Paul Thomas Anderson‘s 2012 film The Master features a religious organization called “The Cause” that has similarities to Scientology and a protagonist who has similarities to Hubbard.^[499]^[500]^[501] Comedy series have also critiqued Scientology.^[502] The most notable was the 2005 South Park episode “Trapped in the Closet“, which satirized the Scientology founding myth of Xenu, accompanied by an onscreen caption reading “This is what Scientologists actually believe”.^[503] After explaining these beliefs, the character representing the Church of Scientology’s president ultimately reveals to Stan Marsh that the organization is in reality a money-making scam.^[504]^[505] There have also been theatre shows about Scientology, such as Cathy Schekelberg’s 2017 one-person show Squeeze My Cans about her former life in the organization.^[506]

Notes

Use of “Church” or “the Church” is a common shortened form of “Church of Scientology”; see The Church (Scientology).

References

Behar 1991.
Kent, Stephen A. (2001). “Brainwashing Programs in The Family/Children of God and Scientology”. In Zablocki, Benjamin; Robbins, Thomas (eds.). Misunderstanding Cults: Searching for Objectivity in a Controversial Field. University of Toronto Pressbusiness. pp. 349–358. ISBN 978-0-8020-8188-9.
Anderson, Kevin Victor (1965). “Report of the Board of Inquiry into Scientology”. Government Printer, Melbourne. (alternative link)
Edge, Peter W. (2006). Religion and law: an introduction. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-3048-7. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
Beit-Hallahmi 2003.
Urban 2011, pp. 6, 46.
Halupka 2014.
Westbrook, Donald A. (August 10, 2018). “The Art of PR War: Scientology, the Media, and Legitimation Strategies for the 21st Century”. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses. 47 (3). SAGE Publishing: 373–395. doi:10.1177/0008429818769404. ISSN 0008-4298. S2CID 149581057.
Urban, Hugh B. (2015). New Age, Neopagan, and New Religious Movements: Alternative Spirituality in Contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 144. ISBN 978-0-520-28117-2. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
Lewis, James (March 16, 2015). “Scientology: Sect, Science, or Scam?”. Numen. 62 (2–3): 226–242. doi:10.1163/15685276-12341364.
^[1]^[2]^[3]^: 179^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]^[9]^[10]
Lewis & Hellesøy 2017, pp. 257, 325; Kent & Manca 2014; Kent 1999b.
Kent 1996, pp. 30–32; Urban 2011, pp. 57–66; Aviv 2012; Hellesøy 2014, p. 265; Miller 2016, p. 220.
Cowan & Bromley 2015, p. 27; Tobin 2016; Shermer 2020.
Urban 2011, pp. 186–188.
Urban 2021, p. 174.
Christensen 2016.
Bromley 2009, p. 91.
Bogdan 2014; Hammer & Rothstein 2012, pp. 122–123; Grünschloß 2009, pp. 231–232; Shermer 2020; Rothstein 2009, pp. 365–367.
Urban 2011, p. 102, Urban cites the television show South Park’s Trapped in the Closet episode as a particularly damaging example.
Taete, Jamie Lee (March 15, 2018). “I Watched Scientology TV for 24 Confusing Hours Straight”. VICE. Retrieved October 30, 2025.
Morgan, Lucy (March 29, 1999). “Abroad: Critics public and private keep pressure on Scientology”. St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2007. Retrieved November 4, 2007.
Brown, Barry; Cooper, David Y. (August 19, 1992). “Toronto Church Faces Heavy Fine: Scientology Branch is Convicted of Spying on Police, Others”. The Buffalo News. Buffalo, NY. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
Regina v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, 33 O.R. (3d) 65 (Court of Appeal for Ontario April 18, 1997).
“Scientology’s fraud conviction upheld in France”. The Daily Telegraph. London. AFP. October 17, 2013. Archived from the original on May 30, 2014. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
“Church of Scientology”. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Lords. December 17, 1996. col. 1392–1394.
Espersen 1992.
Hubbard and another v. Vosper and another, 1 All ER 1023 (Court of Appeal (England and Wales) November 19, 1971).
RE B & G (Minors: Custody), F.L.R. 493 (Court of Appeal (England and Wales) September 19, 1984).
^[1]^[3]^: 179^[4]^[26]^[27]^[28]^[29]
Beit-Hallahmi 2003; Passas & Castillo 1992; Sappell & Welkos 1990a; Tobin 2016.
Richardson 2009
Carobene, Germana (June 16, 2014). “Problems on the legal status of the Church of Scientology”. Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale. 2014 (21). Milan: University of Milan. doi:10.13130/1971-8543/4109. Retrieved March 10, 2020. In this sense the long process of Milan is of great importance, which, after six pronunciations was concluded in 2000 and legally recognized Scientology as a religion in Italy. The case was based on the complaint of a series of criminal offenses against some members of the church: conspiracy, fraud, extortion. After some contradictory rulings, the Milan judges became aware of the need to define the religiosity of the movement, i.e. it is to be considered a religion if all the alleged activities can qualify as normal religious practices
Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax (Vict) [1983] HCA 40, (1983) 154 CLR 120, High Court (Australia) “the evidence, in our view, establishes that Scientology must, for relevant purposes, be accepted as “a religion” in Victoria”
Melton 2009, p. 24.
Frantz, Douglas (March 9, 1997). “Scientology’s Puzzling Journey From Tax Rebel to Tax Exempt”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 10, 2023. Retrieved October 26, 2008.
“Hubbard’s Church ‘Unconstitutional’: Germany Prepares to Ban Scientology”. Spiegel Online. December 7, 2007. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
“National Assembly of France report No. 2468”. assemblee-nationale.fr. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
A 1995 parliamentary report lists Scientology groups as cults, and in its 2006 report MIVILUDES similarly classified Scientology organizations as a dangerous cult. Rapport au Premier ministre 2006 by MIVILUDES (in French) Archived September 24, 2023, at the Wayback Machine
“Le point sur l’Eglise de Scientologie”. L’Obs (in French). May 26, 2009. Retrieved January 28, 2023.
Urban 2011, p. 9.
Urban 2012, p. 359.
Kent 1999a, p. 4.
Westbrook 2019, p. 40.
Cusack 2009, p. 397; Flinn 2009, p. 210; Lewis 2009a, p. 6; Westbrook 2019, p. 40.
Willms 2009, p. 253.
Lewis 2012, p. 141.
Thomas 2021, pp. ix, 113, 130, 161.
Barrett 2001, p. 447; Grünschloß 2009, p. 225; Beit-Hallahmi 2003; Cowan & Bromley 2015; Shermer 2020.
Bainbridge 2009, p. 42; Cowan 2009, p. 57; Dericquebourg 2009, p. 165; Willms 2009, p. 245; Westbrook 2019, p. 2.
Bigliardi 2016, p. 663.
Kent 1996, pp. 30–32.
Barrett 2001, p. 468.
Melton 2009, p. 17.
Willms 2009, p. 245.
Bigliardi 2016, p. 666.
^[1]^[3]^: 179^[4]^[26]^[28]^[29]
Lewis & Hellesøy 2017, p. xvii.
Shermer 2020.
Helton & Münker 1999.
Senn 1990; Passas & Castillo 1992; Beit-Hallahmi 2003; Behar 1991; Harman 2012; Gartner 1985.
Bainbridge & Stark 1980, p. 128; Rothstein 2004, p. 110; Lewis 2009c, pp. 35, 103, 196.
Willms 2009, pp. 245, 257.
Kent 1999a, p. 3; Barrett 2001, p. 447.
Dericquebourg, Régis (May 1, 2017). “Scientology”. Nova Religio. 20 (4): 5–12. doi:10.1525/nr.2017.20.4.5. ISSN 1092-6690.
Barrett 2001, p. 447.
Barrett 2001, p. 474.
Lewis 2012, p. 146.
Rothstein 2016.
Jeanie, Groh (October 2, 2012). “Poll: Most Americans Don’t Think Scientology is a Religion”. The Washington Post. Washington, DC: WP Company.
“Most Americans doubt Scientology is true religion: poll”. Reuters. London: Thomson Reuters. October 1, 2012.
Dahlgreen, Will (April 8, 2015). “Scientology Not a Real Religion – Public”. YouGov. London.
Beit-Hallahmi 2025.
Barrett 2001, p. 471; Lewis 2009c, pp. 53, 84, 184, et passim; Urban 2012, p. 335.
Westbrook 2019, p. 18.
Grünschloß 2009, p. 238.
Westbrook 2022, p. 15.
Lewis 2012, p. 133.
Grünschloß 2009, p. 237.
Grünschloß 2009, p. 238; Rothstein 2009, p. 365.
Andersen & Wellendorf 2009, p. 143.
Barrett 2001, p. 452.
Bednarowski, Mary Farrell (1995). “The Church of Scientology: Lightning Rod for Cultural Boundary Conflicts”. In Timothy Miller (ed.). America’s Alternative Religions. SUNY Press. p. 388. ISBN 978-0-7914-2397-4. OL 1092279M.
Flinn 2009.
Westbrook 2019, p. 3.
Grünschloß 2009, p. 228.
Dericquebourg, Régis (2017). “Scientology: From the Edges to the Core”. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions. 20 (4): 5–12. doi:10.1525/nr.2017.20.4.5. ISSN 1092-6690. JSTOR 26417718.
Cusack 2009, p. 394
Benjamin J. Hubbard/John T. Hatfield/James A. Santucci An Educator’s Classroom Guide to America’s Religious Beliefs and Practices, p. 89, Libraries Unlimited, 2007 ISBN 978-1-59158-409-4
Urban 2011, p. 64.
Rothstein 2004, p. 110; Bigliardi 2016, p. 666.
Lewis 2012, p. 136.
Lewis 2009a, p. 8; Lewis 2012, p. 136.
Atack 1990, p. 128.
Upward, Allen (1914) [1907]. The New Word : An open letter addressed to the Swedish academy in Stockholm on the meaning of the word idealist. Kennerley. pp. 139, 149. OL 14030703M.
Malko, George (1970). Scientology: The Now Religion. Delacorte Press. OL 5444962M.
Nordenholz, Anastasius (1934). Scientologie, Wissenschaft von der Beschaffenheit und der Tauglichkeit des Wissens [Scientology: Science of the Constitution and Usefulness of Knowledge] (in German). OCLC 249980578.
Wallis, Roy (1977). The Road to Total Freedom: A Sociological Analysis of Scientology. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231042000. OL 4596322M.
Spellman, Frank R.; Price-Bayer, Joan (2010). In Defense of Science: Why Scientific Literacy Matters. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-60590-735-2. Archived from the original on May 15, 2025. Retrieved May 15, 2025.
Manca, Terra (March 2012). “L. Ron Hubbard’s Alternative to the Bomb Shelter: Scientology’s Emergence as a Pseudo-science During the 1950s”. Journal of Religion and Popular Culture. 24 (1). Berkeley: University of California Press: 80–96. doi:10.3138/jrpc.24.1.80.
Kent & Manca 2014.
Urban 2011, p. 58.
Beit-Hallahmi 2003; Urban 2011, p. 65.
Miller 1987, pp. 140–142
Barrett 2001, p. 463.
https://skent.ualberta.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Scientology-and-Eastern-Religions.pdf ^{[bare URL PDF]}
Quote: Hubbard returned once again to religious claims in late October, 1962, apparently after he learned that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had become ‘interested’ in his organisation’s e-meters. Fearing the worst, Hubbard issued a policy letter entitled ‘Religion’, in which he specifically justified the devices by insisting that Scientologists used them ‘to disclose truth to the individual who is being processed and thus freehim spiritually’. Regarding the future direction of his organisation, Hubbard announced that “Scientology 1970 is being planned on a religious organization basis throughout the world”. He reassured his members, however, by adding that “[t]his will not upset in any way the usual activities of any organization. It is entirely a matter for accountants and solicitors” (Hubbard, 1962: 282).
Barrett 2001, p. 466; Melton 2009, p. 25.
Melton 2009, p. 25.
Barrett 2001, p. 467.
Melton 2009, pp. 27–28.
Melton 2009, p. 28.
1634–1699: McCusker, J. J. (1997). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. “Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–”. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
Barrett 2001, pp. 464–465; Lewis 2009a, p. 5; Melton 2009, p. 26.
Miller 1987, pp. 374–5.
Rigley, Colin. “L. Ron Hubbard’s last refuge”. New Times San Luis Obispo. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013.
Urban 2011, p. 3; Lewis 2009a, p. 7.
Melton 2009, p. 25; Lewis 2012, p. 133.
Bromley 2009, p. 97.
Grünschloß 2009, p. 231.
Lewis 2009a, p. 6.
Melton 2009, p. 25; Rothstein 2009, p. 378.
Hammer & Rothstein 2012, p. 123; Urban 2021, p. 166.
Bigliardi 2016, p. 665.
Dericquebourg, Regis (2014). “Acta Comparanda”. Affinities between Scientology and Theosophy. International Conference – Scientology in a scholarly perspective 24–25th January 2014 (in English and French). Antwerp, Belgium: University of Antwerp, Faculty for Comparative Study of Religions and Humanism. Archived from the original on February 16, 2017.
Hassan & Scheflin 2024, pp. 759–761.
Hassan & Scheflin 2024, p. 760.
Thomas 2021, pp. 17, 110.
Lewis 2009a, p. 9.
Flinn 2009, p. 217.
Thomas 2021, p. 42.
Thomas 2021, pp. 42–43; Westbrook 2022, p. 7.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, pp. 170–171
Westbrook 2019, p. 17.
Westbrook 2019, p. 56.
Kent, Stephen A. (2001). From Slogans to Mantras: Social Protest and Religious Conversion in the Late Vietnam War Era. Syracuse University Press. p. 99. ISBN 0815629486. OL 15521204M.
Chryssides, George D.; Wilkins, Margaret (2006). A Reader in New Religious Movements. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 18. ISBN 0826461689. OL 8168615M.
Urban 2011, p. 46ff.
Urban 2011, p. 81ff.
Urban 2011, p. 81.
, Harley & Kieffer 2009, p. 191.
Urban 2011, pp. 135–6.
Harley & Kieffer 2009, p. 191; Thomas 2021, p. 48.
Behar 1991; Beit-Hallahmi 2003; Passas & Castillo 1992; Sappell & Welkos 1990a; Tobin 2016.
Urban 2011, p. 49ff.
Urban 2011, pp. 101, 134–135.
Urban 2011, pp. 74, 102–5.
Rothstein 2009, pp. 365–367.
Westbrook 2019, p. 21; Thomas 2021, p. 51.
Barrett 2001, pp. 451–452; Lewis 2009a, p. 5; Thomas 2021, p. 52.
Bainbridge & Stark 1980, p. 133; Barrett 2001, p. 451; Melton 2009, p. 22.
Thomas 2021, p. 52.
Urban 2011, p. 77.
Urban 2011, pp. 68–71.
Bromley 2009, p. 89.
Lewis 2009a, p. 6; Lewis 2012, p. 137.
Dericquebourg 2009, p. 176.
Rothstein 2009, p. 365–366.
Rothstein 2009, p. 377.
Bromley 2009, p. 91; Rothstein 2009, pp. 372–373.
Rothstein 2009, pp. 372–373.
Rothstein 2009, p. 372.
Rothstein 2009, pp. 372–373, 375.
Rothstein 2009, pp. 375–376; Thomas 2021, p. 84.
Thomas 2021, pp. 14, 86.
Rothstein 2009, pp. 368–369.
Shermer 2020; Barrett 2001, p. 452; Bromley 2009, p. 94; Thomas 2021, p. 14.
Rothstein 2009, p. 367.
Ortega, Tony (December 23, 1999). “Double Crossed”. Phoenix New Times. Archived from the original on March 12, 2007. Retrieved September 16, 2007.
Hines, Matt (September 8, 2003). “Scientology loss keeps hyperlinks legal”. CNET. Archived from the original on November 16, 2006. Retrieved September 16, 2007.
Thomas 2021, p. 83.
Lewis 2012, p. 137.
Rothstein 2009, p. 381.
Barrett 2001, p. 453.
Rothstein 2009, p. 375.
Bainbridge & Stark 1980, p. 133; Barrett 2001, p. 452; Bainbridge 2009, p. 43; Harley & Kieffer 2009, p. 190.
Urban 2012, p. 356.
Thomas 2021, pp. 81–82.
Westbrook 2019, p. 31.
Urban 2011, pp. 103, 183.
Bainbridge & Stark 1980, p. 133; Westbrook 2019, p. 30; Westbrook 2022, p. 32.
Urban 2021.
Westbrook 2022, p. 32.
Westbrook 2019, pp. 30, 33.
Derek Davis New Religious Movements and Religious Liberty in America, pp. 45–47, Baylor University Press, 2004 ISBN 978-0-918954-92-3
Thomas 2021, p. 82.
Thomas 2021, pp. 47, 81.
Barrett 2001, p. 454.
Thomas 2021, p. 46.
Thomas 2021, p. 47.
Kent, Stephen (September 2003). “Scientology and the European Human Rights Debate: A Reply to Leisa Goodman, J. Gordon Melton, and the European Rehabilitation Project Force Study”. Marburg Journal of Religion. 8 (1). University of Marburg. doi:10.17192/mjr.2003.8.3725. Archived from the original on June 29, 2006. Retrieved May 21, 2006.
Kent 1999a, p. 6.
Miller 1987, p. 184.
Urban 2011, pp. 62–68; Westbrook 2019, pp. 81–83; Kent 1996.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 184
Reitman, Janet (2011). Inside Scientology: The Story of America’s Most Secretive Religion. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 9780618883028. OL 24881847M.
- The Truth Rundown, a three-part series by Thomas C. Tobin and Joe Childs, St Petersburg Times
- “Part 1 — Scientology: The Truth Rundown”. June 21, 2009. Archived from the original on February 9, 2013.
- “The Truth Rundown, Part 2 — Death in slow motion”. June 22, 2009. Archived from the original on October 24, 2019.
- “The Truth Rundown, Part 3 — Ecclesiastical justice”. June 23, 2009. Archived from the original on August 9, 2009.
Bigliardi 2016, p. 665; Westbrook 2019, p. 27; Westbrook 2022, p. 14.
Bromley 2009, p. 88.
Bromley 2009, p. 89; Bigliardi 2016, p. 662; Westbrook 2019, p. 24; Thomas 2021, p. 96.
Bromley 2009, p. 89; Westbrook 2019, p. 24.
Bromley 2009, p. 89; Grünschloß 2009, p. 229; Thomas 2021, p. 99.
Bromley 2009, p. 88–89, 99; Lewis 2009b, p. 133.
Thomas 2021, p. 22.
Bromley 2009, p. 89; Urban 2012, p. 338.
Cowan 2009, p. 63; Palmer 2009, p. 295; Westbrook 2019, p. 22; Thomas 2021, p. 100.
Westbrook 2019, p. 22.
Urban 2011, p. 10; Lewis & Hellesøy 2017, p. 216.
Thomas 2021, pp. 7–8.
Cusack 2009, pp. 394, 397; Thomas 2021, p. 5.
Dericquebourg 2009, p. 177.
Thomas 2021, p. 39.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 180
Urban 2011, p. 1; Urban 2012, p. 335.
Lewis 2009b, p. 134.
Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 326.
Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 325.
Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 327.
Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 328.
Wright, Lawrence (2013). Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief. Alfred A. Knopf. p. 227. ISBN 978-0-307-70066-7. OL 25424776M. There was a deliberate campaign to provide religious cloaking for the church’s activities. A Scientology cross was created. Scientology ministers now appeared wearing Roman collars.
Urban 2012, p. 352.
Bromley 2009, p. 98; Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 327.
Bromley 2009, p. 98.
Bromley 2009, p. 99.
Bromley 2009, pp. 98–99.
Lewis 2009b, p. 120.
“Church Of Scientology Worth More Than $1.2 Billion, According To New Tax Docs”. Business Insider.
Westbrook 2019, p. 42.
Kent 1999a, p. 7; Bromley 2009, p. 99; Urban 2011, p. 36; Halupka 2014, p. 618.
Kent 1999a, pp. 7–11.
Urban 2011, p. 10.
Kent 1999a, p. 11; Halupka 2014, p. 618.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 181
Kent 1999a, pp. 11–12.
Kent 1999a, p. 11.
Halupka 2014, p. 618.
Wakefield, Margery (1991). “12: OSA (Office of Special Affairs) – The Secret CIA of Scientology”. Understanding Scientology. Retrieved January 28, 2023 – via David S. Touretzky.
Cisar, Joe (translator) The Guardian Office (GO)
Hamburg Regional Office of the German Constitutional Security Agency. “Der Geheimdienst der Scientology-Organisation – Grundlagen, Aufgaben, Strukturen, Methoden und Ziele – Zweite Auflage, Stand 06.05.1998” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 14, 2006.
Dyer, Clare (June 9, 1999). “Scientologists pay for libel”. The Guardian. Retrieved January 28, 2023.
Sappell, Joel; Welkos, Robert W. (June 29, 1990). “On the Offensive Against an Array of Suspected Foes”. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 28, 2023. Retrieved January 28, 2023.
Kent 1999a, p. 5.
Thomas 2021, p. 32.
Grünschloß 2009, p. 229; Thomas 2021, p. 51.
Grünschloß 2009, p. 229.
Thomas 2021, p. 34.
Bigliardi 2016, p. 675; Thomas 2021, p. 33.
Thomas 2021, p. 33.
Westbrook 2019, p. 51.
Shaw, William (February 14, 2008). “What do Tom Cruise and John Travolta know about Scientology that we don’t?”. The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on February 23, 2012. Retrieved June 25, 2009.
Cusack 2009, p. 389; Urban 2011, p. 1; Urban 2012, p. 335; Westbrook 2019, p. 51; Thomas 2021, p. 33.
Cusack 2009, p. 396.
Cusack 2009, p. 396–397.
Neusner, Jacob (2009). World Religions in America (4th ed.). Westminster John Knox Press.
Lewis & Hellesøy 2017, pp. 565–569.
Andersen & Wellendorf 2009, p. 155; Bromley 2009, p. 97; Lewis 2009a, p. 9.
“Drugs charity is front for ‘dangerous’ organisation; Insight; Focus”. Sunday Times. January 7, 2007. Retrieved March 20, 2014. Narconon’s international website claims: “The ministry of health in England [sic] has also directly funded Narconon residential rehabilitation.” But the Department of Health denies any knowledge of this. … Professor Stephen Kent, a Canadian academic who is an authority on Scientology, said: “The connection between Narconon and Scientology is solid. Of course, Scientology tries to get non-Scientologists involved in the programme, but the engine behind the programme is Scientology.” … The British government expressed concern about Narconon as long as eight years ago. A 1998 memo from the Home Office’s drug strategy unit warned that the charity had its “roots in the Church of Scientology and (is) not in the mainstream of drug rehabilitation”. Tower Hamlets council in east London advises its schools against using Narconon. DrugScope, one of the UK’s main drug charities, said: “We feel that the quality of Narconon’s information is not objective and non-judgmental. It does not have any credibility.” Stephen Shaw, the prisons ombudsman, advised that inmates in British jails should not receive drug education from Narconon because it is so “closely associated with the Church of Scientology”.
Behar 1991: “Hubbard’s purification treatments are the mainstay of Narconon, a Scientology-run chain of 33 alcohol and drug rehabilitation centers—some in prisons under the name “Criminon”—in 12 countries. Narconon, a classic vehicle for drawing addicts into the cult, now plans to open what it calls the world’s largest treatment center, a 1,400-bed facility on an Indian reservation near Newkirk, Okla. (pop. 2,400). At a 1989 ceremony in Newkirk, the Association for Better Living and Education presented Narconon a check for $200,000 and a study praising its work. The association turned out to be part of Scientology itself. Today the town is battling to keep out the cult, which has fought back through such tactics as sending private detectives to snoop on the mayor and the local newspaper publisher.”
“What Germans think about their Narconon”. Der Spiegel. October 21, 1991. Archived from the original on November 4, 2012. Retrieved March 20, 2014. The enterprising Scientology sect increases its profits thanks to the misery of addicts. The cover organization, Narconon, offers drug rehabilitation therapy that, in the opinion of experts and doctors in the field, is not only useless but also dangerous. … Narconon closely follows the motto of the Scientology sect’s founder, Lafayette Ron Hubbard, who died in 1986 at the age of 74. The discoverer of this pseudo-scientific hocus pocus, gave this advice: Make money, make more money, make other people make money. The disciples at Narconon follow this order. It is officially an independent subsidiary of Scientology. The Scientologists have developed countless supposedly humanitarian initiatives around their church. One example is the commission for the violations of psychiatry against human rights. Another is the organization for the furthering of religious tolerance and interhuman relations. In fact all these activities, like the drug rehabilitation program, are only to further the fame and increase the paying followers of the sect.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 182
Andersen & Wellendorf 2009, p. 155; Bromley 2009, p. 98.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 183
Mantesso, Sean (May 4, 2019). “Scientology’s controversial push to enter schools with learning material — including in Australia”. ABC Online.
Asimov, Nanette (May 25, 2014). “Narconon: Misleading antidrug program back in public schools”. SFGate.com.
Cusack & Digance 2009, p. 436.
Cusack & Digance 2009, pp. 435–436.
Winn, Patrick (May 15, 2015). “Scientologists are in Nepal trying to ‘heal’ trauma victims”. Global Post. Retrieved December 16, 2015.
Winn, Patrick (April 11, 2011). “Scientology’s global disaster squad”. MinnPost. Retrieved December 16, 2015.
Goodman, Peter S. (January 28, 2005). “For Tsunami Survivors, A Touch of Scientology (washingtonpost.com)”. The Washington Post. Retrieved February 22, 2022.
Gray, Eliza (October 5, 2012). “Thetans and Bowties”. The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Retrieved September 8, 2025.
Urban 2011, p. 2.
Cowan 2009, p. 68.
Barrett 2001, p. 446.
Thomas 2021, p. 30.
Lewis 2012, p. 140.
Lewis 2012, p. 134.
Barrett 2001, p. 471.
Richardson 2009, p. 283.
Halupka 2014, p. 620.
Barrett 2001, p. 463; Thomas 2021, p. 30.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 177
Zellner & Petrowsky 1998, pp. 146–147
Thomas 2021, pp. 30–31.
Bednarowski, Mary Farrell (1995). New Religions and the Theological Imagination in America (Religion in North America). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. p. 114. ISBN 978-0-253-20952-8.
Urban, Hugh B. (2008). “Secrecy and New Religious Movements: Concealment, Surveillance, and Privacy in a New Age of Information”. Religion Compass. 2 (1): 66–83. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00052.x. ISSN 1749-8171.
Barrett 2001, p. 464.
Barrett 2001, p. 464; Thomas 2021, p. 31.
Doherty 2014, p. 46.
Urban, Hugh B. Magia sexualis: sex, magic, and liberation in modern Western esotericism, p. 137. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0-520-24776-5
Lewis 2013, pp. 262–70.
“Publications listing on the website of the Bavarian Office for the Protection of the Constitution”. Lfv.bayern.de. Archived from the original on February 19, 2012. Retrieved September 4, 2010.
Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs. “Germany”. 2001-2009.state.gov.
Lewis 2009a, p. 4; Lewis 2012, p. 133.
Urban 2011, p. 7.
Lewis, James R. (March 11, 2009). Scientology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-988711-8. Retrieved November 5, 2015.
Souchard, Pierre-Antoine (February 2, 2012). “Scientology Fraud Conviction Upheld”. Huffington Post. Archived from the original on November 3, 2013. Retrieved February 3, 2012. A French appeals court on Thursday upheld the Church of Scientology’s 2009 fraud conviction on charges it pressured members into paying large sums for questionable remedies.
“Remember Venus?”. Time. December 22, 1952. Archived from the original on July 21, 2013. Retrieved July 20, 2007.
Leiby, Richard (December 25, 1994). “Scientology Fiction: The Church’s War Against Its Critics – and Truth”. The Washington Post. Retrieved June 21, 2006.
Schön, Brigitte (May 22, 2009). “Marburg Journal of Religion: Framing Effects in the Coverage of Scientology versus Germany: Some Thoughts on the Role of Press and Scholars” (PDF). Web.uni-marburg.de. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 9, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2010.
Richardson 2009, p. 283
Goodin, Dan (June 3, 1999). “Scientology subpoenas Worldnet”. CNET News.com. Archived from the original on January 28, 2007. Retrieved May 4, 2006.
Cooper, Robert (August 19, 2014). “Scientology Gateshead building still empty after seven years”. BBC News.
Farley, Robert (June 24, 2006). “The unperson”. St. Petersburg Times. pp. 1A, 14A. Archived from the original on July 3, 2007. Retrieved June 24, 2007.
Farley, Robert (May 29, 2004). “Scientologists settle death suit”. St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved November 3, 2008.
Matt Loney; Evan Hansen (March 21, 2002). “Google pulls anti-Scientology links”. CNET. Archived from the original on October 15, 2008. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
Joe Childs, Thomas C. Tobin (June 23, 2009). “Scientology: Ecclesiastical justice”. St Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on January 17, 2013. Retrieved June 23, 2009.
Reitman, Janet (February 8, 2011) [February 23, 2006]. “Inside Scientology”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on May 2, 2018.
Hubbard, L. Ron (February 7, 1965). “Keeping Scientology Working Series 1” (PDF). Chaplain Mini Hat (This document was included in the attached documents submitted to the IRS in 1993.). Page with Bates# 240513. Archived from the original on September 7, 2012.
Eggenberger, Nicole (September 10, 2013). “Leah Remini “Lost Friends” After Leaving Scientology”. Us Weekly. Archived from the original on December 11, 2013. Retrieved January 28, 2023.
Gianni, Luke (February 22, 2007). “Scientology does detox – David E. Root, M.D”. local stories > 15 minutes. Sacramento News & Review. Archived from the original on January 30, 2011. Retrieved May 6, 2007.
“Monserrate Defends Detox Program”. The Politicker. New York Observer. April 20, 2007. Archived from the original on February 5, 2012. Retrieved November 27, 2007.
Etter, Lauren (January 19, 2007). “Program for prisoners draws fire over Scientology”. Wall Street Journal. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Archived from the original on January 18, 2012. Retrieved November 27, 2007.
Westbrook 2019, p. 27.
Kent 1996.
Eshbach, Lloyd Arthur (1983). Over my shoulder : reflections on a science fiction era. Philadelphia: O. Train. ISBN 978-1-880418-11-6. OCLC 939141508.
Miller 1987, pp. 117, 133, 148.
Atack 1990, pp. 137–152
Ficsher, Erika. National Reporting, 1941–1986. Walter de Gruyter. p. 302.
Catholic Sentinel, March 17, 1978
Stafford, Charles (1979). “Scientology: An in-depth profile of a new force in Clearwater” (PDF). St Petersburg Times. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 9, 2007. “The 1980 Pulitzer Prize Winner in National Reporting”. The Pulitzer Prizes.
Koff, Stephen (December 22, 1988). “Scientology church faces new claims of harassment”. St. Petersburg Times. pp. 1, 6 – via Newspapers.com. (alternative courtesy copy)
“Scientology convicted for fraud in France, escapes ban”. Reuters. October 27, 2009. Archived from the original on January 14, 2010., Reuters, October 27, 2009
“French court upholds Scientology fraud conviction”. CBS News. February 2, 2012., AFP, February 2, 2012
“Could Belgium Bring Down Scientology? – The Atlantic”. The Wire. thewire.com. December 28, 2012. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
“Belgium will try two Scientology organizations and 10 Scientologists for fraud ‘ The Underground Bunker”. tonyortega.org. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
“Our man in Europe reports on Belgium’s criminal prosecution of Scientology ‘ The Underground Bunker”. tonyortega.org. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
Lewins, Dean (March 11, 2016). “Scientology: Belgium court acquits church of organised crime charges (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)”. ABC News. abc.net.au. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
“A Sci-Fi Faith”. Time. April 5, 1976. Archived from the original on October 14, 2007. Retrieved July 24, 2009.
Behar, Richard (May 6, 1991a). “The Scientologists and Me”. Time. Archived from the original on November 10, 2007.
Strupp, Joe (June 30, 2005). “The press vs. Scientology”. Salon. Archived from the original on January 7, 2007. Retrieved September 19, 2007.
Sweeney, John (May 14, 2007). “Row over Scientology video”. BBC News. Retrieved November 3, 2008.
Remini, Leah (2015). Troublemaker: Surviving Hollywood and Scientology. Ballantine Books.
Hauser, Christine; Tumin, Remy (August 4, 2023). “Leah Remini, Vocal Scientology Critic, Files Suit Against Church”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 8, 2023. Retrieved October 22, 2023.
Donaghy, James (June 9, 2007). “My name is L Ron Hubbard”. The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on March 7, 2013. Retrieved January 14, 2009.
Breckenridge, Memorandum of Intended Decision in Church of Scientology of California vs. Gerald Armstrong, Superior Court, Los Angeles County, case no. C420153. quoted in Atack 1990, p. 332
Koff, Stephen (December 22, 1988). “Scientology church faces new claims of harassment”. St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2009. Retrieved October 26, 2008.
Steven Girardi (May 9, 1982). “Witnesses Tell of Break-ins, Conspiracy”. Clearwater Sun: 1A.
Kent 1999a, p. 10.
The Times of India staff (July 17, 2003). “Tom Cruise and the Church of Scientology”. The Times of India.
New York Post staff (June 29, 2005). “Abort-Happy Folks”. New York Post. News Corporation. p. 011.
Los Angeles Times staff (February 29, 2008). “Kids against Scientology”. Web Scout. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 2, 2008. Retrieved November 7, 2009.
Lattin, Don (February 12, 2001). “Leaving the Fold – Third-generation Scientologist grows disillusioned with faith”. San Francisco Chronicle. The Chronicle Publishing Co. p. A1.
MSNBC staff (January 15, 2008). “Exclusive: ‘Tom Cruise: An Unauthorized Biography’ – Read an excerpt from Andrew Morton’s controversial new book”. Today.com. NBC. Retrieved November 7, 2009.
Morton, Andrew (2008). Tom Cruise: An Unauthorized Biography. St. Martin’s Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-312-35986-7.
Pressley, Karen Schless (2017). Escaping Scientology: An Insider’s True Story. Bayshore Publications. p. 222. ISBN 978-0-9990881-0-4.
Perrault, Michael (March 26, 2009). “Suit alleges wing of Church of Scientology violated labor laws”. The Press-Enterprise. The Press-Enterprise Co. p. C01.
Courthouse News Service staff (April 3, 2009). “Scientology Accused of Human Trafficking”. Courthouse News Service. www.courthousenews.com. Archived from the original on April 13, 2009. Retrieved November 7, 2009.
Baca, Nathan (March 31, 2009). “Former Scientologist Recounts ‘Torturous’ Past Inside the Church”. KESQ-TV.
“Scientologists forced me to have two abortions”. Herald Sun. www.heraldsun.com.au. March 17, 2010. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
Australian Associated Press (March 17, 2010). “Scientologists forced me to have two abortions, ex-disciple says”. News.com.au. News Limited. Archived from the original on March 22, 2010. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
“Scientologists pressured me to have abortions”. ABC News (Australia). Australian Broadcasting Corporation. March 27, 2010. Archived from the original on March 22, 2010. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
Tedmanson, Sophie (November 19, 2009). “Church of Scientology accused of torture and forced abortions”. The Times. Times Newspapers Ltd. Archived from the original on January 7, 2010. Retrieved November 19, 2009.
Agence France-Presse (November 18, 2009). “Australian PM voices ‘concerns’ over Scientology”. Canada.com. Canwest News Service. Archived from the original on November 21, 2009. Retrieved November 19, 2009.
Collins, Pádraig (November 19, 2009). “Scientology faces allegations of abuse and covering up deaths in Australia”. Irish Times. www.irishtimes.com. Retrieved November 19, 2009.
O’Loughlin, Toni (November 18, 2009). “Scientology faces allegations of torture in Australia: Australian prime minister considers inquiry after senator tables allegations including forced abortions, assault and blackmail”. The Guardian. Guardian News and Media Limited. Retrieved November 19, 2009.
Saulwick, Jacob (November 18, 2009). “Pressure mounts for Scientology inquiry”. Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax Digital. Retrieved November 19, 2009.
Ansley, Greg (November 19, 2009). “Church attacked for ‘criminal’ activities”. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved November 19, 2009.
“Kiwi blows the whistle on Scientology”. 3 News. www.3news.co.nz. November 26, 2009. Archived from the original on April 6, 2012. Retrieved November 26, 2009.
Australian Associated Press (March 18, 2010). “Scientologists reject claims they forced abortions”. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
Mark, Michelle (September 21, 2019). “Lawsuits against the Church of Scientology are piling up, alleging a vast network of human trafficking, child abuse, and forced labor”. Insider Inc. Retrieved June 25, 2020.
“Marc And Claire Headley Lose Forced Labor Lawsuit Against Church Of Scientology”. HuffPost. July 24, 2012. Archived from the original on July 28, 2012.
Grossman, Wendy (October 1997). “Copyright Terrorists”. Net.Wars. New York: New York University Press. pp. 77–78. ISBN 978-0-8147-3103-1. Archived from the original on July 22, 2018. Retrieved June 11, 2006.
Knapp, Dan (December 19, 1996). “Group that once criticized Scientologists now owned by one”. CNN. Archived from the original on April 8, 2014. Retrieved October 29, 2007.
Russell, Ron (September 9, 1999). “Scientology’s Revenge – For years, the Cult Awareness Network was the Church of Scientology’s biggest enemy. But the late L. Ron Hubbard’s L.A.-based religion cured that–by taking it over”. New Times LA.
Lewis, James R (May 3, 2005). Book: Cults: A Reference Handbook By James R. Lewis, Published by ABC-CLIO, 2005, ISBN 1-85109-618-3, ISBN 978-1-85109-618-3. Abc-Clio. ISBN 978-1-85109-618-3. Retrieved September 4, 2010.
Goodman, Leisa (2001). “A Letter from the Church of Scientology”. Marburg Journal of Religion: Responses From Religions. pp. Volume 6, No. 2, 4 pages. Archived from the original on February 13, 2007. Retrieved October 28, 2007.
Dawson, Lorne L.; Cowan, Douglas E. (2004). Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York, NY/London, UK: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 262, 264–265. ISBN 978-0-415-97022-8.
Wendy Grossman Net.wars, p. 77, NYU Press, 1997 ISBN 978-0-8147-3103-1
Steven Vedro Digital Dharma, p. 190, Quest Books, 2007 ISBN 978-0-8356-0859-6
Mike Godwin Cyber Rights, p. 219, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2003 ISBN 978-0-262-57168-5
Catharine Cookson Encyclopedia of Religious Freedom, p. 432, Taylor & Francis, 2003 ISBN 978-0-415-94181-5
Wendy Grossman Net.wars, p. 90, New York University Press, 1997 ISBN 978-0-8147-3103-1
Sarno, David (February 11, 2008). “Global Scientology protests include L.A.” Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on November 7, 2012., Los Angeles Times, February 11, 2008.
Christopher Lueg From Usenet to CoWebs, p. 37, Springer, 2003 ISBN 978-1-85233-532-8
Wendy Grossman Net.wars, pp. 74–76, NYU Press, 1997 ISBN 978-0-8147-3103-1
Nordhausen, Frank (2008). Scientology: Wie der Sektenkonzern die Welt erobern will (in German). Links Christoph Verlag. p. 518. ISBN 978-3-86153-470-9.
John Cook (March 17, 2008). “Scientology – Cult Friction”. Radar. Archived from the original on March 23, 2008. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
Vamosi, Robert (January 24, 2008). “Anonymous threatens to “dismantle” Church of Scientology via internet”. cnet.com. CNET. Retrieved May 30, 2015.
KNBC Staff (January 24, 2008). “Hacker Group Declares War On Scientology: Group Upset Over Church’s Handling Of Tom Cruise Video”. KNBC. Archived from the original on August 21, 2008. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
Vamosi, Robert (January 24, 2008). “Anonymous hackers take on the Church of Scientology”. CNET News. CNET Networks, Inc. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
George-Cosh, David (January 25, 2008). “Online group declares war on Scientology”. National Post. Canwest Publishing Inc. Archived from the original on January 28, 2008. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
Singel, Ryan (January 23, 2008). “War Breaks Out Between Hackers and Scientology – There Can Be Only One”. Wired. CondéNet, Inc. Archived from the original on April 4, 2009. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
Feran, Tom (January 24, 2008). “Where to find the Tom Cruise Scientology videos online, if they’re still posted”. The Plain Dealer. Newhouse Newspapers. Archived from the original on December 11, 2013. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
Matthew A. Schroettnig; Stefanie Herrington; Lauren E. Trent (February 6, 2008). “Anonymous Versus Scientology: Cyber Criminals or Vigilante Justice?”. Archived from the original on June 3, 2013. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
Chan Enterprises (January 21, 2008). “Internet Group Declares “War on Scientology”: Anonymous are fighting the Church of Scientology and the Religious Technology Center”. Press Release. PRLog.Org. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 8, 2011. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
Brandon, Mikhail (January 28, 2008). “Scientology in the Crosshairs”. The Emory Wheel. Emory University. Archived from the original on May 15, 2012. Retrieved January 31, 2008.
Feran, Tom (January 31, 2008). “The group Anonymous calls for protests outside Scientology centers – New on the Net”. The Plain Dealer. Newhouse Newspapers. Archived from the original on March 4, 2014. Retrieved February 4, 2008.
Vamosi, Robert (January 28, 2008). “Anonymous names 10 February as its day of action against Scientology”. CNET News. CNET Networks, Inc. Archived from the original on October 15, 2008. Retrieved January 28, 2008.
Greenwald, Will (February 11, 2008). “Anonymous Attacks!”. CNET. Archived from the original on August 29, 2012.
Carlos Moncada (February 12, 2008). “Organizers Tout Scientology Protest, Plan Another”. TBO.com. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved February 13, 2008.
Harrison, James (The State News) (February 12, 2008). “Scientology protestors take action around world”. Archived from the original on October 21, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2008.
Forrester, John (February 11, 2008). “Dozens of masked protesters blast Scientology church”. The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on October 27, 2013. Retrieved February 15, 2008.
Andrew Ramadge (March 17, 2008). “Second round of Anonymous v Scientology”. News.com.au. Archived from the original on October 6, 2009. Retrieved March 17, 2008.
Shea, Danny (May 29, 2009). “Wikipedia Bans Scientology From Site”. The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on September 5, 2012. Retrieved May 29, 2009.
Metz, Cade (May 29, 2009). “Wikipedia bans Church of Scientology”. The Register. Archived from the original on April 3, 2011. Retrieved May 29, 2009.
Alan Aldridge Religion in the Contemporary World, p. 20, Polity, 2007 ISBN 978-0-7456-3405-0
“2007 U.S. Department of State – 2007 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Portugal”. State.gov. March 11, 2008. Retrieved September 20, 2012.
“La Audiencia Nacional reconoce a la Cienciología como iglesia”. El País. El Pais. November 1, 2007. Archived from the original on May 13, 2011. (in Spanish)
Finkelman, Paul (2006). Encyclopedia of American Civil Liberties. CRC Press. p. 287. ISBN 978-0-415-94342-0. “Scientology has achieved full legal recognition as a religious denomination in the United States.”
Davis, Derek H. (2004). “The Church of Scientology: In Pursuit of Legal Recognition” (PDF). Zeitdiagnosen: Religion and Conformity. Münster, Germany: Lit Verlag. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 12, 2009. Retrieved May 10, 2008. Many countries, including the United States, now give official recognition to Scientology as a religion […]
Lucy Morgan (March 29, 1999). “Abroad: Critics public and private keep pressure on Scientology”. St. Petersburg Times. In the United States, Scientology gained status as a tax-exempt religion in 1993 when the Internal Revenue Service agreed to end a long legal battle over the group’s right to the exemption.
Toomey, Shamus (June 29, 2005). “‘TomKat’ casts spotlight back on Scientology”. Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on June 29, 2005. Retrieved January 28, 2023.
Willms 2009, p. 245. “Being a religion is one of the most important issues of Scientology’s current self-representation.”
Kennedy, Dominic (June 23, 2007). “‘Church’ that yearns for respectability”. The Times. London. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved January 4, 2009. Scientology is probably unique in that it keeps its sacred texts secret until, typically, devotees have paid enough money to learn what they say.
Cowan & Bromley 2007, p. 17
Garcia, Wayne (March 31, 1994). “Scientology suit on PR firm heads for trial”. St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved January 4, 2009. For 2½ years, Hill & Knowlton worked closely with the controversial religion, coming up with ways to turn around Scientology’s maligned image and teaching Scientologists how to handle reporters’ questions.^{[dead link]}
Flowers 1984, p. 101
Flinn, Frank K. (July 5, 2005). “Scientology”. Live discussion. The Washington Post. Retrieved October 12, 2024.
Hexham, Irving (1997) [1978]. “The Religious Status of Scientology: Is Scientology a Religion?”. University of Calgary. Archived from the original on November 19, 2009. Retrieved June 13, 2006.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 172
“Church of Scientology & IRS Confidentiality” (Press release). December 31, 1997. Archived from the original on May 18, 2012. Recognition was based upon voluminous information provided by the Church regarding its financial and other operations to the Internal Revenue Service
Urban, Hugh B.: The Church of Scientology: A History of a New Religion Chapman, Mark. Review of Religious Research. 2013. vol. 55. Issue: 1, pp. 203–204
Flinn, Frank K. (September 22, 1994). “Scientology: The Marks of Religion”. Church of Scientology. Archived from the original on September 14, 2012.
DeChant, Dell; Jorgensen, Danny L. (October 7, 2009). Neusner, Jacob (ed.). World Religions in America, Fourth Edition: An Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 297. ISBN 978-1-61164-047-2.
Lewis, James R. (2016). “Scientology: Religious Studies Approaches”. Numen. 63 (1): 6–11. doi:10.1163/15685276-12341405.
Jeffrey Lehman; Shirelle Phelps, eds. (2005). “Religion”. West’s Encyclopedia of American Law. Vol. 8 (2nd ed.). Detroit: Thomson/Gale. p. 283. ISBN 978-0-7876-6375-9.
Westbrook 2022.
Herrick, James A. (2004). The Making of the New Spirituality. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. p. 199. ISBN 978-0-8308-3279-8.
Westbrook, Donald A. (2020). “Scientology Studies 2.0: Lessons Learned and Paths Forward”. Religion Compass. 14 (2). doi:10.1111/rec3.12345.
Willms 2009, pp. 248–249
Ankerberg, John; Weldon, John (1996). Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs. Harvest House Publishers.
Pretorius, S.P. (2006). “The concept “salvation” in the Church of Scientology”. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies. 62 (1): 313–327. doi:10.4102/hts.v62i1.353. hdl:2263/14050.
Kent 1996, pp. 29–30, “Hubbard had only a rudimentary, and largely inaccurate, understanding of major Eastern religious traditions – traditions about which he claimed similarities to the faith that he had constructed. His self-proclaimed association, for example, with Buddhism’s Maitreya seems to have been an effort on his part to enhance his image with his followers, as well as add respectability to his organisation’s beliefs by associating them with a major religious tradition. Aside from superficial similarities between scientology and Hinayana Buddhism that might have motivated him to draw spurious associations between the two belief systems, Hubbard may have written about Eastern faiths because his Western members were unlikely to have sufficient background in them to make informed assessments about his claims”.
Mccall, W. Vaughn (2007). “Psychiatry and Psychology in the Writings of L. Ron Hubbard”. Journal of Religion and Health. 46 (3): 437–47. doi:10.1007/s10943-006-9079-9. S2CID 10629230.
Willms 2005, pp. 54–60
Christensen, Dorthe Refslund (2004). “Inventing L. Ron Hubbard: On the Construction and Maintenance of the Hagiographic Mythology of Scientology’s Founder”. In Lewis, James R.; Petersen, Jesper Aagaard (eds.). Controversial New Religions (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 238. ISBN 978-0-19-515682-9.
Cowan & Bromley 2006, p. 171
Hubbard, L Ron. ‘Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health’. Los Angeles, California: Bridge Publications, 2007: 3. ISBN 978-1-4031-4484-3
Mann, Mary A. (2004). Science and Spirituality. Mary A. Mann. ISBN 978-1-4184-9294-6. Retrieved December 14, 2015.
Wilson, Bryan (1995). Religious Toleration & Religious Diversity. The Institute for the Study of American Religion. Archived from the original on October 31, 2013.
James R. Lewis The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements, p. 429, Oxford University Press US, 2004 ISBN 978-0-19-514986-9
Karen Christensen, David Levinson (2003): Encyclopedia of Community, SAGE, p. 1210: “Scientology shows affinities with Buddhism and a remarkable similarity to first-century Gnosticism.”
John A. Saliba (1996): Signs of the Times, Médiaspaul, p. 51
Ortega 2014; Bigliardi 2016, p. 666.
Ortega, Tony (July 4, 2011). “Scientologists: How Many Of Them Are There, Anyway?”. The Village Voice. Archived from the original on July 30, 2017.
Barrett 2001, p. 447; Richardson 2009, p. 292.
Bromley 2009, p. 92; Lewis 2009b, p. 120.
Lewis 2009b, pp. 117–118.
Lewis 2009b, p. 121.
Bromley, David; Cowan, Douglas (2007). Cults and new religions: a brief history. Wiley. p. 24. ISBN 9781405161282. Retrieved July 29, 2013.
Jarvik, Elaine (September 18, 2004). “Scientology: Church now claims more than 8 million members”. Deseret News. Archived from the original on June 16, 2008. Retrieved August 1, 2007. Melton, who has been criticized by some for being too easy on Scientology, and has been criticized by the church for being too harsh, says that the church’s estimates of its membership numbers – 4 million in the United States, 8 to 9 million worldwide – are exaggerated. “You’re talking about anyone who ever bought a Scientology book or took a basic course. Ninety-nine percent of them don’t ever darken the door of the church again.” If the church indeed had four million members in the United States, he says, “they would be like the Lutherans and would show up on a national survey” such as the Harris poll.
Tu, Janet I (July 31, 2010). “Scientology church finds new home in Queen Anne neighborhood”. The Seattle Times. Sociologist Barry Kosmin of Trinity College, one of study’s principal researchers, said the sample size of Scientologists used was too small to give a reliable count of members. Still, he said, the data “strongly suggests that there has been no recent vast increase and that the number of Scientologists (in the U.S.) is in the tens of thousands”. [Bob] Adams, the Church of Scientology International spokesman, estimates there are millions of Scientologists worldwide, though he couldn’t be more specific on the number, and about a million in the U.S.
Thomas 2021, p. 11.
Lewis 2012, p. 142.
Lewis 2009b, p. 121; Lewis 2012, p. 148.
Lewis 2012, p. 148.
Bernstein, Fred (November 9, 2010). “In Pasadena, a Model for Scientology’s Growth Plan”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 14, 2013. Retrieved July 13, 2011.
Lewis 2012, p. 145.
Bainbridge 2009, p. 46.
2011 National Household Survey: Data tables: Religion (Report). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 2012.
2021 Census: Religion by visible minority and generation status (Report). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 2021.
“More Canadians than ever have no religious affiliation, census shows”. Okotoks Online. Canadian Press. October 26, 2022. Retrieved October 5, 2025.
Lewis 2009b, pp. 120–121; Possamai & Possamai-Inesedy 2009, p. 346.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (July 4, 2022). “Census of Population and Housing: Census article – Religious affiliation in Australia, 2021”. Archived from the original on December 26, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2022.
Census 2016, Religious Affiliation by Sex (SA2+) (Report). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2017.
Schneiders, Ben (April 4, 2021). “Push for investigation into Scientology’s charity status”. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved April 12, 2021.
Andersen & Wellendorf 2009, p. 149.
Bogdan 2009, p. 343.
“Verfassungsschutzbericht 2022” [Constitutional Protection Report 2022]. Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (in German). p. 327. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
Census 2021 Dataset: Regions, England and Wales (Report). Fareham: Office for National Statistics. November 29, 2022. TS031.
Andersen & Wellendorf 2009, p. 159; Westbrook 2019, p. 47.
Possamai & Possamai-Inesedy 2009, p. 348.
Willms 2009, p. 255.
Palmer 2009, p. 315.
Andersen & Wellendorf 2009, p. 157.
Andersen & Wellendorf 2009, pp. 157–159.
Westbrook 2019, p. 54.
Westbrook 2019, p. 49.
Lewis 2009b, p. 134; Bigliardi 2016, p. 671; Thomas 2021, p. 48.
Harley & Kieffer 2009, p. 190.
Lewis 2009b, p. 138; Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 330; Westbrook 2019, p. 49.
Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 330; Westbrook 2019, p. 49.
Westbrook 2019, p. 47.
Westbrook 2019, pp. 48–49.
Lewis 2013, p. 264.
Bainbridge 2009, p. 42.
Urban 2011, p. 6.
Cusack 2009, p. 395.
Urban 2011, p. 23; Thomas 2021, p. 34.
Barrett 2001, pp. 471–472; Urban 2012, p. 360.
Richardson 2009, p. 289.
Palmer 2009, pp. 311, 315–16; Rigal-Cellard 2009, p. 325.
Palmer 2009, p. 314.
Palmer 2009, pp. 296, 302.
YouGov (December 23, 2022). Americans’ views on 35 religious groups, organizations, and belief systems (Report). YouGov. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
Graham 2014.
Westbrook 2022, p. 6.
Westbrook 2019, p. 11.
Bigliardi 2016, p. 671.
Urban 2011, p. ix; Graham 2014.
Lewis 2009a, p. 4; Cowan 2009, p. 53; Richardson 2009, p. 284; Urban 2011, p. ix; Graham 2014.
Cowan 2009, p. 56; Thomas 2021, p. 3; Westbrook 2022, p. 3.
Thomas 2021, p. 161; Westbrook 2022, p. 1.
Graham 2014; Thomas 2021, p. viii; Westbrook 2022, p. 5.
Westbrook 2022, p. 8.
Thomas 2021, pp. 36–37.
Thomas 2021, p. 31.
Oriana Schwindt (November 30, 2016). “Leah Remini Scientology Doc Premiere Draws 2.1 Million Viewers for A&E | Variety”. Variety. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
Brown, Lane (December 3, 2010). “So This New Paul Thomas Anderson Movie Is Definitely About Scientology, Right?”. New York Magazine. Retrieved June 5, 2011.
Brown, Lane (March 17, 2010). “Universal Passes on Paul Thomas Anderson’s Scientology Movie”. New York Magazine. Retrieved June 5, 2011.
Pilkington, Ed (April 26, 2011). “Church of Scientology snaps up Hollywood film studio”. Guardian.co.uk. Retrieved June 12, 2011.
Thomas 2021, p. 37.
Arp, Robert, ed. (December 11, 2006). South Park and Philosophy: You Know, I Learned Something Today. William Irwin (Series Editor). Blackwell Publishing (The Blackwell Philosophy & Pop Culture Series). pp. 27, 59, 60, 118, 120, 132, 137, 138, 140, 224. ISBN 978-1-4051-6160-2.
Thomas 2021, pp. vii, 37–38.
Smith, John (November 16, 2005). “Trapped in the Closet”. South Park. Season 9. Episode 912. 17:00 minutes in. Comedy Central. Retrieved August 25, 2020. This is a scam on a global scale. Do you fucking get me now?
Thomas 2021, p. 38.

Sources

Andersen, Peter B.; Wellendorf, Rie (2009). “Community in Scientology and among Scientologists”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 143–163. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Atack, Jon (1990). A Piece of Blue Sky: Scientology, Dianetics and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed. Carol Publishing Group. ISBN 081840499X. OL 9429654M.
Aviv, Rachel (January 26, 2012). “Religion, grrrr”. London Review of Books. 34 (2). Archived from the original on May 6, 2015. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
Bainbridge, William Sims (2009). “The Cultural Context of Scientology”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 35–51. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Bainbridge, William Sims; Stark, Rodney (1980). “Scientology: To Be Perfectly Clear”. Sociological Analysis. 41 (2): 128–136. doi:10.2307/3709904. JSTOR 3709904.
Barrett, David V. (2001). The New Believers: A Survey of Sects, Cults and Alternative Religions. London: Cassell and Co. ISBN 978-0304355921. OL 3999281M.
Behar, Richard (May 6, 1991). “Scientology: The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power”. Time. Archived from the original on May 25, 2014.
Beit-Hallahmi, Benjamin (September 2003). “Scientology: Religion or Racket?”. Marburg Journal of Religion. 8 (1). University of Marburg: 1–56. doi:10.17192/mjr.2003.8.3724.
Beit-Hallahmi, Benjamin (2025). “Collaborating with Scientology”. Academic Advocacy for New Religious Movements: Of Apocalypse and Justice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 167–213. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83169-0_9. ISBN 978-3-031-83168-3.
Bigliardi, Stefano (2016). “New Religious Movements, Technology, and Science: The Conceptualization of the E-Meter in Scientology Teachings”. Zygon. 51 (3): 661–683. doi:10.1111/zygo.12281.
Bogdan, Henrik (2009). “The Church of Scientology in Sweden”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 335–344. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Bogdan, Henrik (2014). “It’s Not about Religion, but about Manipulation”. In Demker, Marie; Leffler, Yvonne; Sigurdson, Ola (eds.). Culture, Health, and Religion at the Millennium. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 77–98. ISBN 978-1-137-47222-9.
Bromley, David G. (2009). “Making Sense of Scientology: Prophetic, Contractual Religion”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 83–102. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.003.0005. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3. OL 16943235M.
Christensen, Dorthe Refslund (June 24, 2016). “Rethinking Scientology: A Thorough Analysis of L. Ron Hubbard’s Formulation of Therapy and Religion in Dianetics and Scientology, 1950–1986”. Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review. 7 (1): 155–227. doi:10.5840/asrr201662323.
Cowan, Douglas E. (2009). “Researching Scientology: Perceptions, Premises, Promises, and Problematics”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 53–79. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Cowan, Douglas E.; Bromley, David G. “The Church of Scientology”. In Gallagher & Ashcraft (2006), pp. 169–196.
Cowan, Douglas E.; Bromley, David G. (2007). Cults and New Religions: A Brief History. Malden, MA / Oxford, UK / Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-6127-5.
Cowan, Douglas E.; Bromley, David G. (2015). “The Church of Scientology: The Question of Religion”. Cults and New Religions: A Brief History (2nd ed.). Malden/Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 18–37. ISBN 978-1-118-72210-7.
Cusack, Carole M. (2009). “Celebrity, the Popular Media, and Scientology: Making Familiar the Unfamiliar”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 389–409. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Cusack, Carole M.; Digance, Justine (2009). “Pastoral Care and September 11: Scientology’s Nontraditional Religious Contribution”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 435–437. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Dericquebourg, Régis (2009). “How Should We Regard the Religious Ceremonies of the Church of Scientology?”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 165–182. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Doherty, Bernard (2014). “Sensational Scientology! The Church of Scientology and Australian Tabloid Television”. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions. 17 (3): 38–63. doi:10.1525/nr.2014.17.3.38. JSTOR 10.1525/nr.2014.17.3.38.
Espersen, Ole (February 5, 1992). European Council, Debate on Recommendation 1178: Sects and New Religious Movements (Report). Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
Flowers, Ronald B. (1984). Religion in Strange Times: The 1960s and 1970s. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press. ISBN 978-0-86554-127-6.
Flinn, Frank K. (2009). “Scientology as Technological Buddhism”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 209–223. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Gallagher, Eugene V.; Ashcraft, W. Michael, eds. (2006). Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America. Volume 5: African diaspora traditions and other American innovations. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-275-98712-1. Retrieved November 5, 2015.
Gartner, Hana (1985). Getting Clear (Television production). The Fifth Estate. Ottawa: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
Graham, Ruth (November 5, 2014). “Are Academics Afraid to Study Scientology?”. JSTOR Daily.
Grünschloß, Andreas (2009). “Scientology, a ‘New Age’ Religion?”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 225–243. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Halupka, Max (2014). “The Church of Scientology: Legitimacy through Perception Management”. Politics and Religion. 7 (3): 613–630. doi:10.1017/S1755048314000066. S2CID 143524953.
Hammer, Olav; Rothstein, Mikael (2012). “Canonical and Extracanonical Texts in New Religions”. The Cambridge Companion to New Religious Movements. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 113–132. ISBN 978-0-521-19650-5. OL 25323554M.
Harley, Gail M.; Kieffer, John (2009). “The Development and Reality of Auditing”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 183–205. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Harman, Danna (September 30, 2012). “Breaking Out of Scientology’s Iron Grip”. Haaretz. Tel Aviv: The Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. Archived from the original on June 2, 2022.
Hassan, Steven A.; Scheflin, Alan W. (2024). “Understanding the Dark Side of Hypnosis as a Form of Undue Influence Exerted in Authoritarian Cults: Implications for Practice, Policy, and Education”. In Linden, Julie H.; De Benedittis, Giuseppe; Sugarman, Laurence I.; Varga, Katalin (eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. pp. 755–772. ISBN 978-1-032-31140-1.
Hellesøy, Kjersti (2014). “Scientology”. In Lewis, James R.; Petersen, Jesper (eds.). Controversial New Religions (Second ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 257–269. ISBN 978-0-19-931531-4.
Helton, Arthur; Münker, Jochen (April 1, 1999). “Religion and persecution: Should the United States provide refuge to German Scientologists?”. International Journal of Refugee Law. 11 (2): 310–328. doi:10.1093/ijrl/11.2.310.
Kent, Stephen A. (1996). “Scientology’s Relationship With Eastern Religious Traditions”. Journal of Contemporary Religion. 11 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1080/13537909608580753. Archived from the original on September 2, 2012. Retrieved January 13, 2009.
Kent, Stephen A. (1999a). “Scientology — Is this a Religion?”. Marburg Journal of Religion. 4 (1). University of Marburg: 1–56. doi:10.17192/mjr.1999.4.3754.
Kent, Stephen (1999b). “The Creation of ‘Religious’ Scientology”. Religious Studies and Theology. 18 (2). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing: 97–126. doi:10.1558/rsth.v18i2.97.
Kent, Stephen A.; Manca, Terra A. (2014). “A War over Mental Health Professionalism: Scientology versus Psychiatry”. Mental Health, Religion & Culture. 17 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/13674676.2012.737552.
Lewis, James R., ed. (2009c). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Lewis, James R. (2009a). “Introduction”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–14. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Lewis, James R. (2009b). “The Growth of Scientology and the Stark Model of Religious ‘Success'”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 117–140. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Lewis, James R. (2012). “Scientology: Up Stat, Down Stat”. In Olav Hammer; Mikael Rothstein (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to New Religious Movements. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 133–149. ISBN 978-0-521-19650-5. OL 25323554M.
Lewis, James R. (2013). “Free Zone Scientology and Other Movement Milieus: A Preliminary Characterization”. Temenos: Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion. 49 (2): 255–276. doi:10.33356/temenos.8203. hdl:10037/25718.
Lewis, James R.; Hellesøy, Kjersti, eds. (2017). Handbook of Scientology. Leiden: Brill Publishers. ISBN 9789004328716.
Melton, Gordon (March 19, 2009). “Birth of a Religion”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 17–29. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.003.0002. ISBN 978-0-1953-3149-3. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
Miller, Russell (1987). Bare-faced Messiah: The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard (1st American ed.). New York: H. Holt. ISBN 978-0-8050-0654-4.
Miller, Russell (2016). Bare-Faced Messiah: The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard. Silvertail Books. ISBN 978-1-909269-36-1. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
Ortega, Tony (August 31, 2014). “Oops, Scientology Reveals a Key Fact About the Size of its Membership”. The Underground Bunker.
Palmer, Susan J. (2009). “The Church of Scientology in France: Legal and Activist Counterattacks in the ‘War on Sectes’“. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 295–322. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Passas, Nikos; Castillo, Manuel Escamilla (1992). “Scientology and its ‘Clear’ Business”. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 10 (1). Wiley: 103–116. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370100110.
Possamai, Adam; Possamai-Inesedy, Alphia (2009). “Scientology Down Under”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 345–361. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Richardson, James T. (2009). “Scientology in Court: A Look at Some Major Cases from Various Nations”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 283–294. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Rigal-Cellard, Bernadette (2009). “Scientology Missions International (SMI): An Immutable Model of Technological Missionary Activity”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 325–334. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Rothstein, Mikael (2004). “Science and Religion in the New Religions”. In James R. Lewis (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 99–118. ISBN 978-0195369649.
Rothstein, Mikael (2009). “‘His Name was Xenu. He used Renegades…’: Aspects of Scientology’s Founding Myth”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 365–387. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.003.0020. ISBN 9780199852321. OL 16943235M.
Rothstein, Mikael (January 13, 2016). “The Significance of Rituals in Scientology: A Brief Overview and a Few Examples”. Numen. 63 (1). Leiden: Brill Publishers: 54–70. doi:10.1163/15685276-12341408.
Sappell, Joel; Welkos, Robert (June 25, 1990a). “LRH: The Story of L. Ron Hubbard and the Church of Scientology – Goal of church: to make money”. Tampa Bay Times. Times Publishing Company.
Senn, Stephen (1990). “The Prosecution of Religious Fraud”. Florida State University Law Review. 17 (2). Tallahassee: Florida State University College of Law: 325–252.
Shermer, Michael (2020). “The Curious Case of Scientology”. Giving the Devil his Due. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–103. ISBN 9781108489782.
Thomas, Aled (2021). Free Zone Scientology: Contesting the Boundaries of a New Religion. London: Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-350-18254-7.
Tobin, Thomas C. (December 27, 2016). “Former Scientology insiders describe a world of closers, prospects, crushing quotas and coercion”. Tampa Bay Times. St Petersburg. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021.
Urban, Hugh B. (2011). The Church of Scientology: A History of a New Religion. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-14608-9.
Urban, Hugh B. (2012). “The Occult Roots of Scientology? L. Ron Hubbard, Aleister Crowley, and the Origins of a Controversial New Religion”. In Bogdan, Henrik; Starr, Martin P. (eds.). Aleister Crowley and Western Esotericism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 335–68. ISBN 978-0-19-986309-9. OCLC 820009842.
Urban, Hugh (2021). “The Third Wall of Fire”. Secrecy: Silence, Power, and Religion. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. pp. 165–186. ISBN 978-0-226-74650-0.
Westbrook, Donald A. (2019). Among the Scientologists: History, Theology, and Praxis. Oxford Studies in Western Esotericism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0190664978.
Westbrook, Donald A. (2022). L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology Studies. Cambridge Elements: New Religious Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-009-01455-7.
Willms, Gerald (2005). Scientology: Kulturbeobachtungen jenseits der Devianz (in German). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag. ISBN 978-3-89942-330-3.
Willms, Gerald (2009). “Scientology: ‘Modern Religion’ or ‘Religion of Modernity’?”. In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Scientology. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 245–265. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-5331-49-3.
Zellner, William W.; Petrowsky, Marc (1998). Sects, Cults, and Spiritual Communities: a Sociological Analysis. Westport CT: Praeger Publishers. ISBN 978-0-275-96335-4.

External links

Scientologyat Wikipedia’s sister projects

Definitions from Wiktionary
Media from Commons
News from Wikinews
Quotations from Wikiquote
Texts from Wikisource
Resources from Wikiversity
Data from Wikidata

Scientology – Is This a Religion? by Stephen A. Kent
An Annotated Bibliographical Survey of Primary and Secondary Literature on L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology
Lord, Phil (2019). “Scientology’s Legal System”. Marburg Journal of Religion. 21 (1). Marburg Journal of Religion. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3232113. SSRN 3232113.

v t e Scientology
Beliefs and practices	Abortion Auditing Books Bridge Clear Dianetics Dianetics (book)Disconnection E-meter Engram Ethics and justice Glossary and Terminology Hypnosis Implant Incident Keeping Scientology Working Marcab Confederacy Marriage MEST Operating Thetan OT VIII Reactive mind Scientology and religious groups Reincarnation Sec Check Sex Gender Homosexuality Silent birth Space opera Study Technology Thetan Training routines Xenu
History and controversies	Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act Books critical of Scientology Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia Clearwater Hearings Death of Elli Perkins Death of Kaja Ballo Death of Lisa McPherson Fair game Fishman Affidavit Guardian’s Office operations Keith Henson The Internet Operation Clambake Operation Freakout Operation Snow WhiteA Piece of Blue SkyProject Chanology Project Normandy R2-45 PsychiatryScientology and MeScientology as a businessThe Secrets of ScientologySuppressive person Tax status in the US The HoleThe Thriving Cult of Greed and PowerTimeline
Government reports	Anderson Report (AUS)Dumbleton–Powles Report (NZ)Foster Report (UK)Lee Report (CAN)
Litigation	R v Registrar General, ex p SegerdalHubbard v VosperUnited States v. HubbardX. and Church of Scientology v. SwedenChurch of Scientology v. SwedenWollersheim v. Church of ScientologyHernandez v. CommissionerNew Era Publications International ApS v. Carol Publishing Group and Jonathan Caven-AtackChurch of Scientology of California v. ArmstrongR. v. Church of Scientology of TorontoChurch of Scientology Intl. v. Fishman and GeertzHill v. Church of Scientology of TorontoReligious Technology Center v LermaReligious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.Church of Scientology Intl. v. Time Warner, Inc., et al.Arenz, Röder and Dagmar v. GermanyChurch of Scientology Moscow v. RussiaHeadley v. Church of Scientology International
Organizations (and properties)	Cadet Org Celebrity Centre Château Élysée Church of Scientology Church of Scientology International Guaranty Building Church of Spiritual Technology Trementina Base Flag Service Organization Flag Building/Super Power Building Flag Ship Service Org Freewinds Founding Church of Scientology Galaxy Press Author Services building Golden Era Productions (Gold Base)Hubbard Association of Scientologists International International Association of Scientologists Office of Special Affairs Religious Technology Center Rehabilitation Project Force Saint Hill Manor Scientology Missions International Sea Org
Countries	Status by country Australia Belgium Canada Egypt France Germany Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Russia United Kingdom United States
Officials	L. Ron Hubbard Mary Sue Hubbard David Miscavige Shelly Miscavige Bob Adams John Carmichael Tommy Davis Jessica Feshbach David Gaiman Leisa Goodman Heber Jentzsch Kendrick Moxon Karin Pouw Mark Rathbun Mike Rinder Michelle Stith Kurt Weiland
Affiliated organizations and recruitment	Association for Better Living and Education Applied Scholastics Celebrities Citizens Commission on Human Rights Concerned Businessmen’s Association of America Criminon Cult Awareness Network Delphian School Free Zone Front groups Moxon & Kobrin Narconon New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Project Oxford Capacity Analysis Safe Environment Fund Scientology Network KSCN-TV WFTT-TV Second Chance Program Trademarks Volunteer Ministers The Way to Happiness Foundation World Institute of Scientology Enterprises Youth for Human Rights International
Popular culture	Ali’s Smile: Naked ScientologyBeing Tom CruiseBowfingerThe BridgeGoing Clear filmLeah Remini: Scientology and the AftermathThe MasterMy Scientology MovieThe ProfitSouth Park“A Token of My Extreme“A Very Merry Unauthorized Children’s Scientology PageantWe Stand Tall
Wikibooks Wikimedia Commons Wikinews Wikiquote Wikisource Wikiversity Wiktionary

v t e L. Ron Hubbard

v t e New religious movements

v t e New religious movements in the United States

Authority control databases

Categories:

Contents