↓

JAVASCRIPT IS DISABLED. Please enable JavaScript on your browser to best view this site.

Home→New Essays→TOMBOY

Main menu

Search

Donate

Personal tools

Contents

hide

(Top)
Origins
HistoryToggle History subsection
- In the United States
Psychobehavioral aspectsToggle Psychobehavioral aspects subsection
Representations in media
See also
References
External links

Tomboy

48 languages

Article
Talk

Tools

Appearancehide

Text

SmallStandardLarge

Width

StandardWide

Color (beta)

AutomaticLightDark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the type of girl. For other uses, see Tomboy (disambiguation).

hideThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. The specific problem is: casual tone, awkward discussion of gender stereotypes, partial speech, militancy. (November 2022)This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor’s personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (March 2023)The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (March 2023)

A tomboy

Tomboy is a term referring to girls or young women with masculine traits. It may include wearing androgynous or unfeminine clothing and engaging in physical sports or other activities and behaviors usually associated with boys or men.^[1]

Origins

The Tomboy, 1873 painting by John George Brown

The word “tomboy” is a compound word which combines “tom” with “boy”. Though this word is now used to refer to “boy-like girls”, the etymology suggests the meaning of tomboy has changed drastically over time.^[2]

In 1533, according to the Oxford Dictionary of English, “tomboy” was used to mean a “rude, boisterous or forward boy”. By the 1570s, however, “tomboy” had taken on the meaning of a “bold or immodest woman”, finally, in the late 1590s and early 1600s, the term morphed into its current meaning: “a girl who behaves like a spirited or boisterous boy; a wild romping girl.”^[3]

History

In the United States

19th century

Before the mid-19th century, femininity was equated with emotional fragility, physical vulnerability, hesitation, and domestic submissiveness, commonly known as the “Cult of True Womanhood“. Under the influence of this ideal of femininity, women did not engage in strenuous sports or any physical activity. This paradigm remained stagnant until the mid-nineteenth century. During the Long Depression of the late 1800s, the US’s increasing economic instability made fragile femininity no longer desirable. Young women joined the workforce to support their families and learn practical job skills, and thus a more robust physique was needed to support the physical demands of job practices. This led to the paradigm shift in people’s expectations of young women from languishing, decorative beauty to vigorously healthy, thus laying the groundwork for tomboyism.^[4]

In Charlotte Perkin Gilman’s 1898 book, Women and Economics, the author lauds the health benefits of being a tomboy, that girls should be “not feminine till it is time to be”.^[5] Joseph Lee, a playground advocate, wrote in 1915 that a “tomboy phase” was crucial to physical development of young girls between the ages of 8 and 13.^[6] Coupled with the birth of first wave feminism and the US’s depressed economy, tomboyism amongst young girls emerged because the young girls’ parents permitted or even promoted the tomboy upbringing due to the decaying economy and the American turbulent political climate.^[4]

Late 19th century and Civil War

Sunday morning mass in camp of 69th N.Y.S.M. Photograph shows Father Thomas H. Mooney, Chaplain of the 69th Infantry Regiment of the New York State Militia and Irish American soldiers at a Catholic Mass at Fort Cocoran, Arlington Heights, Virginia on June 1, 1861. (Source: The Irish American, June 22, 1861) — Army recruited men for the American Civil War, leaving the women behind to take care of the “left duties of men.”

During the American Civil War, American society fully realized the importance of healthy women. When hostilities of the North and South broke out and thousands of men fled to the battlefield, many adolescent girls and young women were pushed to be responsible for tasks that would be traditionally considered in the men’s realm. Women who had not been allowed to have independent bank accounts were now expected to take care of the finances. American wives, mothers, and young girls who used to rely on the men in the household for security now had the duty of protecting their homes from the army. As a result, mothers focused on improving the physical constitution of their daughters while taking care of their own. Many women who had subscribed to the Cult of True Womanhood before the Civil War found themselves engaging in an array of masculine actions during it. Women being given the duties of men during the period of Civil War encouraged tomboyism.^[7]

20th century: Second wave feminism

Feminist Suffrage Parade in New York City, 1912

While first wave feminism mainly focused on women’s suffrage, second wave feminism expanded the discussion of gender inequality in areas such as sexuality, family dynamics, workspace, and laws in relation with patriarchy and culture.^[8] With the main purpose of critiquing the patriarchal system, this movement opened avenues for women in education, employment, and legal protection against domestic violence.

Late 20th century

In the late 20th century, the term tomboy describes girls who wear unfeminine clothing, actively engage in physical sports, and embrace what are often known as “boy toys” such as cars, or other activities usually associated with boys.^[1] The term is used less frequently than before in the West mainly because it is now a societal norm for adolescent girls to engage in physical activities, play with peers of the same and opposite gender, and wear comfortable clothing.^[9]

Beginning 21st century

Sebastian Zulch of Bustle argued that since the term tomboy implicitly associates a behavior to masculine gender and reminds the societal expectation for girls, its use could be considered condescending and sexist.^[10]

Psychobehavioral aspects

Child development

Tomboy is often a phase of gender presentation in childhood. It is not a true indicator of sexual orientation or future gender display.

Tomboy can be seen as a phase of gender presentation in adolescence.^[11] Some parents might be concerned by the lack of femininity in their child but the tomboy phase is, in fact, crucial to physical development between the ages of 8 and 13, according to Joseph Lee, the playground movement advocate in 1915.^[6] Some girls start to embrace femininity as age increases while some persist to be tomboys in adulthood.^[11]

Psychologists speculate that childhood tomboy behavior results from a young child’s innate curiosity combined with family dynamics and imposed societal gender roles and behavioral customs.^[12] The preference of athletics and masculine clothing can be explained by adolescent tomboys’ curiosity about outdoors and physical games, by which comfortable clothing such as pants and jersey helps to facilitate their physical engagement.^[13] A 2002 study suggests that some girls are “born tomboys” because of the higher testosterone levels of the mother during pregnancy.^[14]^[15] Being a childhood tomboy does not determine one’s sexual orientation or life-long gender presentation. ^[16]

Gender roles

Girl riding a skateboard

The idea that there are girl activities and clothing, and that there are boy activities and clothing, is often reinforced by the tomboy concept. Tomboyism can be seen as both refusing gender roles and traditional gender conventions, but also conforming to gender stereotypes.^[17] The concept may be considered outdated or looked at from a positive viewpoint.^[18] Feminine traits are often devalued and unwanted, and tomboys often respond to this viewpoint. This can be due in part to an environment that desires and only values masculinity, depending on the decade and geographical region. Idealized masculinity is atop the hegemony and sets the traditional standard, and is often upheld and spread by young children playing with one another. Tomboys may view femininity as having been pushed on them, which results in negative feelings toward femininity and those who embrace it.^[19] In this case, masculinity may be seen as a defense mechanism against the harsh push toward femininity, and a reclaiming of agency that is often lost due to sexist ideas of what girls are and are not able to do.^[20]

In western culture, tomboys are expected to one day cease their masculine behavior, usually during or right before puberty, return to feminine behavior, and are expected to embrace heteronormativity. Tomboys who do not do such are occasionally stigmatized, usually due to homophobia. Barbara Creed argues that the tomboy’s “image undermines patriarchal gender boundaries that separate the sexes”, and thus is a “threatening figure”.^[21] This “threat” affects and challenges the idea of what a family must look like, generally nuclear independent heterosexual couplings with two children.^[22]

Gender scholar Jack Halberstam argues that while the defying of gender roles is often tolerated in young girls, adolescent girls who show masculine traits are often repressed or punished.^[17] However, the ubiquity of traditionally female clothing such as skirts and dresses has declined in the Western world since the 1960s, where it is generally no longer considered a male trait for girls and women not to wear such clothing. An increase in the popularity of women’s sporting events (see Title IX) and other activities that were traditionally male-dominated has broadened tolerance and lessened the impact of “tomboy” as a pejorative term.^[1] Sociologist Barrie Thorne suggested that some adult women take pride in describing their childhood selves as tomboys, “as if to suggest: I was (and am) independent and active; I held (and hold) my own with boys and men and have earned their respect and friendship; I resisted (and continue to resist) gender stereotypes”.^[23]

In the Philippines, tomboys are masculine-presenting women who have relations with other women, with the other women tending to be more feminine, although not exclusively, or transmasculine people who have relationships with women; the former appears more common than the latter.^[24] Women who engage in romantic relationships with other women, but who are not masculine, are often still deemed heterosexual. This leads to more invisibility for those that are lesbian and feminine.^[25] Scholar Kale Bantigue Fajardo argues for the similarity between “tomboy” in the Philippines and “tombois in Indonesia“, and “toms in Thailand” all as various forms of female masculinity.^[24] In China, tomboys are called “假小子” (jiá xiao zi), which literally translates as “pseudo-boy”. This term is largely used as a derogatory term to describe those girls with masculine characteristics.^[26] Most of the times calling someone a “假小子” is a humiliation which implies that the individual could not find a boyfriend.^[26] This largely reduces the value of women to only romance and diminishes girls’ confidence in working in what is traditionally defined as the “boy’s realm.^[26]“

Sexual orientation

Association of tomboyism with lesbianism

During the 20th century, Freudian psychology and backlash against LGBT social movements resulted in societal fears about the sexualities of tomboys, and this caused some to question whether tomboyism leads to lesbianism.^[27] Throughout history, there has been a perceived correlation between tomboyishness and lesbianism.^[28]^[17] For instance, Hollywood films would stereotype the adult tomboy as a “predatory butch dyke“.^[17] Lynne Yamaguchi and Karen Barber, editors of Tomboys! Tales of Dyke Derring-Do, argue that “tomboyhood is much more than a phase for many lesbians”; it “seems to remain a part of the foundation of who we are as adults”.^[28]^[29] Many contributors to Tomboys! linked their self-identification as tomboys and lesbians to both labels positioning them outside “cultural and gender boundaries”.^[28] Psychoanalyst Dianne Elise’s essay in 1995 reported that more lesbians noted being a tomboy than straight women.^[2]

Misconception

While some tomboys later reveal a lesbian identity in their adolescent or adult years, behavior typical of boys but displayed by girls is not a true indicator of one’s sexual orientation.^[30] With raising female liberation and gender-neutral playgrounds (at least in the US) in the 21st century, an increasing number of girls could technically be considered “tomboys” without being referred to as “tomboys” because it is considered normal for girls to engage in physical activities, play equally with boys, and wear pants, masculine or gender-neutral clothing. The association between lesbianism and tomboyism is not only outdated but can also be disrespectful to both women and lesbians.^[31]

Representations in media

Main article: List of tomboys in fiction

Tomboys in fictional stories are often used to contrast a more girly and traditionally feminine character. These characters are also often the ones that undergo a makeover scene in which they learn to be feminine, often under the goal of getting a male partner. Usually with the help of the more girly character, they transform from an ugly duckling into a beautiful swan, ignoring past objectives and often framed in a way that they have become their best self.^[21] Doris Day‘s character in the 1953 film Calamity Jane is one example of this.^[22] Tomboy figures who do not eventually go on to conform to feminine and heterosexual expectations often simply remain in their childhood tomboy state, eternally ambiguous. The stage of life where tomboyism is acceptable is very short and rarely are tomboys allowed to peacefully and happily age out of it without changing and without giving up their tomboyness.^[22]

Tomboyism in fiction often symbolizes new types of family dynamics, often following a death or another form of disruption to the nuclear family unit, leading families of choice rather than a descent. This provides a further challenge to the family unit, including often critiques of socially who is allowed to be a family – including critiques of class and often a women’s role in a family. Tomboyism can be argued to even begin to normalize and encourage the inclusion of other marginalized groups and types of families in fiction including, LGBT families or racialized groups. This is all due to the challenging of gender roles, and assumptions of maternity and motherhood that tomboys inhabit.^[22]

Tomboys are also used in patriotic stories, in which the female character wishes to serve in a war, for a multitude of reasons. One reason is patriotism and wanting to be on the front lines. This often ignores the many other ways women were able to participate in war efforts and instead retells only one way of serving by using one’s body. This type of story often follows the trope of the tomboy being discovered after being injured, and plays with the particular ways bodies get revealed, policed and categorized. This type of story is also often nationalistic, and the tomboy is usually presented as the hero that more female characters should look up to, although they still often shed some of their more extreme ways after the war.^[22]

See also

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Bailey, J. Michael; Bechtold, Kathleen T.; Berenbaum, Sheri A. (2002). “Who Are Tomboys and Why Should We Study Them?”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 31 (4). SpringerLink: 333–341. doi:10.1023/A:1016272209463. PMID 12187546.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b King, Elizabeth (5 January 2017). “A Short History of the Tomboy”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 8 January 2017. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
^ Abate, Michelle Ann (4 June 2015). “Tomboy”. Keywords. Retrieved 13 December 2022.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Abate, Michelle Ann (28 June 2008). Tomboys: A Literary and Cultural History. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 4–6. ISBN 978-1-59213-724-4.
^ Gilman, Charlotte Perkins (1898). Women and Economics. Boston: Small, Maynard & Company. p. 56.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Lee, Joseph (1915). Play in Education. pp. 392–393.
^ Abate, Michelle Ann (28 June 2008). Tomboys: A Literary and Cultural History. Philadelphia, USA: Temple University Press. pp. 24–16. ISBN 978-1-59213-724-4.
^ Pike, Kirsten (1 June 2011). “Lessons in Liberation: Schooling Girls in Feminism and Femininity in 1970s ABC Afterschool Specials”. Girlhood Studies. 4 (1): 95–113. doi:10.3167/ghs.2011.040107. ISSN 1938-8322.
^ Hemmer, Joan D.; Kleiber, Douglas A. (1 December 1981). “Tomboys and sissies: Androgynous children?”. Sex Roles. 7 (12): 1205–1212. doi:10.1007/BF00287972. ISSN 1573-2762. S2CID 143826710.
^ Zulch, Sebastian (4 May 2015). “Why Calling Someone A “Tomboy” Is Problematic”. Bustle. Retrieved 26 August 2023.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Plumb, Pat; Cowan, Gloria (May 1984). “A developmental study of destereotyping and androgynous activity preferences of tomboys, nontomboys, and males”. Sex Roles. 10 (9–10): 703–712. doi:10.1007/BF00287381. ISSN 0360-0025. S2CID 143885856.
^ Adegbenro, Adeyinka (19 November 2019). “Why girls become tomboys”. Medium. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
^ JONES, OWAIN (1 June 1999). “Tomboy Tales: The rural, nature and the gender of childhood”. Gender, Place & Culture. 6 (2): 117–136. doi:10.1080/09663699925060. ISSN 0966-369X.
^ “Study Suggests That Tomboys May Be Born, Not Made”. ScienceDaily. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
^ Hines, M.; Golombok, S.; Rust, J.; Johnston, K. J.; Golding, J.; Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Study Team (2002). “Testosterone during pregnancy and gender role behavior of preschool children: A longitudinal, population study” (PDF). Child Development. 73 (6): 1678–1687. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00498. PMID 12487486.
^ Ahlqvist, Sheana; Halim, May Ling; Greulich, Faith K.; Lurye, Leah E.; Ruble, Diane (1 September 2013). “The Potential Benefits and Risks of Identifying as a Tomboy: A Social Identity Perspective”. Self and Identity. 12 (5): 563–581. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.717709. ISSN 1529-8868. S2CID 143966649.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d Halberstam, Judith (1998). Female Masculinity. Duke University Press. pp. 193–196. ISBN 0822322439. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 18 December 2019. Hollywood film offers us a vision of the adult tomboy as the predatory butch dyke: in this particular category, we find some of the best and worst of Hollywood stereotyping.
^ Halberstam, Judith (1988). Female Masculinity. doi:10.1215/9780822378112. ISBN 978-0-8223-2226-9. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 18 December 2019.
^ Jennings, Nancy (2016). “One Choice, Many Petals: Reading the Female Voice of Tris in the Divergent Series”. Gender(ed) Identities (1st ed.). doi:10.4324/9781315691633-11. ISBN 9781315691633. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
^ Harris, Adrienne (15 July 2000). “Gender as a Sort Assembly Tomboys’ Stories”. Studies in Gender and Sexuality. 1 (3): 223–250. doi:10.1080/15240650109349157. ISSN 1524-0657. S2CID 144985570.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Creed, Barbara (25 September 2017), “Lesbian Bodies: Tribades, Tomboys and Tarst”, Feminist Theory and the Body, Routledge, pp. 111–124, doi:10.4324/9781315094106-13, ISBN 978-1-315-09410-6
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Proehl, Kristen Beth (2011). Battling girlhood: sympathy, race and the tomboy narrative in American literature (Thesis). doi:10.21220/s2-3741-jk05. OCLC 724578046.
^ Thorne, Barrie (1993). Gender play: boys and girls in school. Rutgers University Press. p. 114. ISBN 0-8135-1923-3.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Fajardo, K. B. (1 January 2008). “TRANSPORTATION: Translating Filipino and Filipino American Tomboy Masculinities through Global Migration and Seafaring”. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 14 (2–3): 403–424. doi:10.1215/10642684-2007-039. ISSN 1064-2684. S2CID 142268960.
^ Nadal, Kevin L.; Corpus, Melissa J. H. (September 2013). “”Tomboys” and “baklas”: Experiences of lesbian and gay Filipino Americans”. Asian American Journal of Psychology. 4 (3): 166–175. doi:10.1037/a0030168. ISSN 1948-1993.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c “”女汉子”与”假小子”-商务印书馆英语世界”. www.yingyushijie.com. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
^ Abate, Michelle Ann (2008). Tomboys: A Literary and Cultural History. Temple University Press. ISBN 978-1-59213-722-0.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Brown, Jayne Relaford (1999). “Tomboy”. In B. Zimmerman (ed.). Encyclopedia of Lesbian Histories and Cultures. Routledge. pp. 771–772. ISBN 0815319207. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 21 August 2012. The word [tomboy] also has a history of sexual, even lesbian, connotations. [ … ] The connection between tomboyism and lesbianism continued, in a more positive way, as a frequent theme in twentieth-century lesbian literature and nonfiction coming out stories.
^ Yamaguchi, Lynne and Karen Barber, ed. (1995). Tomboys! Tales of Dyke Derring-Do. Los Angeles: Alyson Publications. ISBN 9781555832858.
^ Gabriel Phillips & Ray Over (1995). “Differences between heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian women in recalled childhood experiences”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 24 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1007/BF01541985. PMID 7733801. S2CID 23296942.
^ Craig, Traci (October 2011). “Tomboy as Protective Identity”. Journal of Lesbian Studies. 15 (4): 450–465. doi:10.1080/10894160.2011.532030. PMID 21973066. S2CID 35791467.

External links

Look up tomboy in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tomboy.

showAuthority control databases

Comments are closed.

↑